Wednesday, April 8, 2026

FASCIST AMERICA 2026: The Foreign Policy of A Fascist Regime is An Exact Reflection and Heinous Extension of Its Domestic Policy And As Always in the United States the Primary Propaganda Targets Are All Directed At Trying To Rationalize And Justify Massive Corruption, Militaristic Assault, And Institutional Warfare, Deeply Rooted in Pathological Lies in the Name of So-Called ‘American Exceptionalism’; Translation: Endless Greed Plus Endless Hatred Plus Endless Theft On A Global Scale=Imperialism--PART 5

Thus The First, Last, and Always Most Important Truth We All Must Remember And Demand Of Not Only Others But Ourselves As Well is That Absolutely No One Anywhere Or At Any Time Is Even Remotely “Safe” Or “Innocent” From the Eternal Existential and Empirical Threats of Genocide, Hatred, and Pathological Mass/Self Destruction. 

Fascism As Advocated, Practiced, Tolerated, and Justified by Anyone in the World Is Inherently A Monumental Crime against Humanity And the Very Conflicted and Often Delusional Idea of “Civilization” On This Planet. Always Was. Always Will Be. 

 

Finally It Will Clearly Remain So Unless and Until We Face the “Truth and Consequences” Of Our Own Corrupted and Deeply Complicit Actions and Positions In Response To the Present Ongoing Crisis.  Full Stop. Period.

 

DEFEAT FASCISM BEFORE FASCISM DEFEATS YOU
   
"Fascism is a system of political authority and social order intended to reinforce the unity, energy, and purity of communities in which liberal democracy stands accused of producing division and decline...a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.”
—Robert Paxton, The Anatomy of Fascism  (2004)
The Anatomy of Fascism. by Robert Paxton.  
Vintage Books.  2004

“If Trump wins, it’s going to be awful. If he loses, it’s going to be awful too.” Paxton scoured his brain for an apt historical analogy but struggled to find one. Hitler was not elected, he noted, but legally appointed by the conservative president, Paul von Hindenburg...In Italy, Mussolini was also legitimately appointed. “The king chose him,” Paxton said, “Mussolini didn’t really have to march on Rome.” Trump’s power, Paxton suggested, appears to be different. “The Trump phenomenon looks like it has a much more solid social base,” Paxton said. “Which neither Hitler nor Mussolini would have had.”
—Robert Paxton, from interview with Elisabeth Zerofsky "Is It Fascism? A Leading Historian Changes His Mind”, New York Times magazine, October 23, 2024

The relentlessly courageous journalist and pioneering independent media producer Mehdi Hasan breaks down the LONG imperialist history of U.S. intervention in Iran...PASS THE WORD...

 

VIDEO:

https://youtube.com/shorts/ohA_cqqJbyg?si=GX0egO0-FWCAwvU2

How Jared Kushner, Trump’s vile and thoroughly arrogant son-in-law has become a despicable foreign agent on behalf of Israel and Saudi Arabia and under the aegis of his deranged and murderous father-in-law has also become one of the most CRIMINALLY CORRUPT people in the world today...PASS THE WORD...

 

VIDEO: 

https://youtube.com/shorts/9aqvESSiIvk?si=_wY-AjWkSJYmla3Z 

 

 
VIDEO:   
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TV9dkU2E8j0
 


https://zeteo.com/p/did-iran-just-win-this-war

🇮🇷 🇺🇸 Did Iran Just Win This War?


Instead of trying to wipe out Iran’s ‘civilization,’ Trump will negotiate an end to the war using Iran’s 10-point framework in a pretty huge humiliation for both the US and its ally Israel.

On this day in 2018, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán won the general election by a landslide, securing his third consecutive term in office. The far-right authoritarian is up for reelection once again, and despite receiving support from Donald Trump and JD Vance, who traveled to Budapest this week, Orbán’s chances aren’t looking as promising this time around.

Good morning! Andrew, Swin, and Prem here, with some decent news. Donald Trump opted not to try to slaughter Iran’s “whole civilization” Tuesday evening, as he had threatened. In Trump’s disturbing second term, we must take wins where we can. Who knows how long the “ceasefire” will last, but we, of course, welcome it: No more civilians should have to die just because our president is a raging idiot, sociopath, and pawn of Benjamin Netanyahu.

In today’s ‘First Draft,’ the ceasefire framework appears to be “a strategic win” for Iran, and a major loss for Trump and Netanyahu; liberals expand their majority on Wisconsin’s Supreme Court; and Janet Mills goes dark on the air with two months left in Maine’s Senate primary.



Don Backs Down


Trump speaks in Miami Beach, Florida, on March 27, 2026. Photo by Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images.

Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened to destroy Iran’s “whole civilization”unless its leaders agreed to a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

By Tuesday evening – instead of trying to kill the 90 million people living in Iran, or bombing Iran’s power plants and bridges as he had promised – Trump announced “a double sided CEASEFIRE!” for two weeks. In doing so, Trump all but admitted the reality that his illegal war is going terribly – and Iran is winning.

“We received a 10-point proposal from Iran, and believe it is a workable basis on which to negotiate,” the president announced on Truth Social – apparently referring to the 10-point plan that Iran had presented to the US before he threatened to murder its entire population.

Using this 10-point plan as a framework for a deal, rather than the previous American 15-point plan, is obviously a major win for Iran – which is, indeed, declaring victory. Experts and commentators see it that way, too.

“If Iran did in fact secure guarantees based on the ‘10 principles’ Trump referenced, that is not a marginal outcome, it is a strategic win for Tehran, reinforcing its narrative and positioning,” wrote Danny Citrinowicz, a former top Israeli intelligence officer who focused on Iran. As former US State Department official and veteran Middle East negotiator Aaron David Miller put it, “Iran has won another round.”

Political scientist Robert A. Pape writes: “Huge strategic defeat for the US, biggest loss since Vietnam.”

The 10-point plan would allow Iran to continue its control over the Strait of Hormuz, the crucial waterway that Iran has closed since the start of the war, stopping the flow of oil and throttling the global economy.

Just a day earlier, Trump was fantasizing about the US “charging tolls” for ships to transit the strait. Now, it looks much more likely that Iran will keep doing this instead, and that it will get to charge “a $2M fee per ship.” In another win for Iran, the plan would involve lifting “all US sanctions on Iran.”

Some liberals will invariably revel in “TACO Trump” memes about how Trump always chickens out. But, as we reported at Zeteo on Tuesday, none of this is over. The ceasefire, as of now, is only temporary. As Trump advisers and others in the upper tiers of Trumplandia warned us, there’s still a decent chance that he escalates the war again soon. 


The 1953 Iran Coup: How the U.S. Helped Overthrow a Democracy — and Why It Still Matters Today

by David Flash
February 28, 2026
Big Bend Times 
In August 1953, a covert operation orchestrated by the United States and the United Kingdom helped overthrow Iran’s democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh. The event — known as Operation Ajax — reshaped the Middle East, strengthened authoritarian rule in Iran for decades and continues to influence tensions between Tehran and Washington today.

Understanding what happened requires stepping back into the geopolitics of the early Cold War — and the global fight over oil.
 
A Popular Leader Challenges Western Oil Power

Mossadegh came to power in 1951 with strong nationalist support after Iran’s parliament voted to nationalize the country’s oil industry. For decades, Britain — through the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now BP) — had controlled Iranian oil, paying Iran only a small share of the profits.

Nationalization was wildly popular inside Iran but unacceptable to Britain, which responded with sanctions, a global boycott of Iranian oil and covert efforts to undermine Mossadegh’s government.

Britain soon sought help from the United States.
 
Cold War Fears and Operation Ajax

At first, the Truman administration hesitated to intervene. But by 1953, U.S. officials under President Dwight Eisenhower feared instability in Iran might open the door to Soviet influence — a major concern during the Cold War.

The CIA approved a covert plan with British intelligence (MI6) to remove Mossadegh from power. The operation included propaganda campaigns, funding protests, bribing officials and coordinating with military officers loyal to Iran’s monarch, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

On Aug. 19, 1953, after several chaotic days of demonstrations and violence in Tehran, Mossadegh’s government collapsed. The shah — who had briefly fled the country — returned to power, and General Fazlollah Zahedi became prime minister.

About 200 to 300 people were killed during the unrest.
From Constitutional Monarchy to Authoritarian Rule

Before the coup, Iran functioned as a constitutional monarchy with an elected government. Afterward, the shah consolidated power, ruling with increasing authoritarian control supported by U.S. military and intelligence assistance.

His regime lasted until 1979, when the Iranian Revolution overthrew the monarchy and established the Islamic Republic that still governs Iran today.

Many historians consider the coup a turning point that fueled anti-American sentiment in Iran. Iranian nationalists saw it as proof that Western powers would undermine democracy to protect strategic and economic interests.
U.S. Acknowledgment — Decades Later

For years, the CIA’s role was denied or downplayed. But declassified documents and official statements eventually confirmed U.S. involvement.

In 2013, internal CIA records acknowledged that the coup was carried out “under CIA direction” as U.S. foreign policy.

More recently, the agency has described the intervention itself as undemocratic.
 
Why the Coup Still Matters

The 1953 coup remains central to how Iranians — across political factions — view the United States.

It shapes debates over:

Nuclear negotiations
Sanctions and diplomacy
Regional conflicts
Iranian distrust of Western intentions

Many experts argue that ignoring this history makes it harder to understand current tensions.
 
A Complicated Legacy

The coup was not solely driven by oil or imperial ambition; Cold War fears of communism were also real factors for U.S. policymakers at the time. But the outcome — removing an elected leader and empowering an autocratic monarchy — has led many scholars to rank the intervention among the most consequential and controversial decisions in American foreign policy.

More than 70 years later, the consequences are still unfolding.