Sunday, June 14, 2026

IMPORTANT NEW BOOKS:

Are White Men Smarter Than Everybody Else?: Playing Offense in the Fight for Racial Justice in America
by Steve Phillips
The New Press, 2026


[Publication date: April 21, 2026]

*USA TODAY BESTSELLER* From the bestselling author of Brown Is the New White, an explosive new argument for draining the swamp of white male privilege

“Steve Phillips situates our present crisis exactly where it belongs—within the long, unfinished struggle to make real the promise that all are created equal. . . . He reminds us that backlash is not new, but neither is resistance.” —Anna Malaika Tubbs, New York Times bestselling author of Erased and The Three Mothers

In a time when equal rights are facing an unparalleled assault, what if we’ve been framing the conversation about racial justice all wrong? Instead of focusing on the underrepresentation of people of color, what if we examined the overrepresentation of white men?

Building on the urgency and clarity of his New York Times and Washington Post bestseller Brown Is the New White and his “spirited and persuasive” (Publishers Weekly) How We Win the Civil War, these questions drive the explosive premise of author Steve Phillips’s latest book, Are White Men Smarter Than Everybody Else?

Just six years after the racial reckoning that followed the murder of George Floyd, we are witnessing a full-scale assault on equality in America unparalleled since the overthrow of Reconstruction. With the critical 2026 midterms approaching and DEI initiatives under attack nationwide, Phillips’s work is more relevant than ever. He moves beyond defensive measures to offer a powerful offensive strategy. The book introduces the concept of “Straight White American Male Preference” (S.W.A.M.P.) and systematically dismantles the myth of reverse racism.

Through twelve sharp, deeply researched chapters, Phillips reveals how this preference has shaped everything from corporate America and philanthropy to arts and government, creating systemic advantages for white men, who make up a minority (29 percent) of the U.S. population.

This isn’t just another book about inequality; it’s a playbook for a counterattack. Fearless and timely, this much-needed corrective offers equality-loving readers the arguments, data, and inspiration they need to challenge the status quo effectively.

REVIEWS:

Praise for Are White Men Smarter Than Everybody Else?

“Steve Phillips situates our present crisis exactly where it belongs—within the long, unfinished struggle to make real the promise that all are created equal. By tracing a line from the Gettysburg Address to the nationwide, and global, racial reckoning sparked by the murder of George Floyd, he reminds us that backlash is not new, but neither is resistance.”—Anna Malaika Tubbs, New York Times bestselling author of Erased and The Three Mothers

“Steve Phillips says the quiet part out loud. He names, with precision and urgency, the uncomfortable truth many of us, especially those of us who are white, have been taught to skirt around: racial inequality in America is the result of sustained conditioning that leads so many of us to believe that straight white men are far more competent than the rest of us. This book exposes who holds power—and why. This book doesn’t allow white readers to remain spectators. It calls us in and calls us out.”—Erin Heaney, executive director of Showing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ)

“For more than a decade Steve Phillips has been an indispensable analyst of America’s political failures—and political possibilities. Now, with this provocative and powerful book, he offers the modest suggestion that white men may not be smarter and more talented than the other 71 percent of the population—and that the way to find out is to end straight white American male preference—or, as he puts it so eloquently, the SWAMP—and create a truly multiracial democracy.”—Jon Wiener, historian, journalist, contributing editor of The Nation and host of The Nation’s weekly podcast, Start Making Sense


ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Steve Phillips is a New York Times bestselling author, columnist, and national political thought leader. He is a regular columnist for The Guardian and The Nation, and has published opinion articles in The New York Times and Washington Post. He is the author of The New York Times and Washington Post bestselling Brown Is the New White as well as How We Win the Civil War and Are White Men Smarter Than Everybody Else? (all from The New Press); He is also the founder of Democracy in Color, a political media organization dedicated to race, politics, and the multicultural New American Majority. Phillips is the host of Democracy in Color with Steve Phillips, a color-conscious podcast on politics.  

 
The Church Committee Report: Revelations from the Bombshell 1970s Investigation into the National Security State
Edited and introduced by Matthew Guariglia and Brian Hochman 
W.W. Norton and Company, 2026


[Publication date: January 13, 2026]
 
After fifty years, this shocking report―released in a single, readable volume for the first time―is still the most accurate account of US government spying on its own citizens.

Fifty years ago, a government investigation led by US senator Frank Church uncovered some of the darkest state secrets of the twentieth century. The Church Committee confirmed the nation’s worst fears about the unchecked power of its intelligence agencies: at the FBI, surveillance campaigns against civil rights leaders and clandestine attempts to disrupt antiwar protests; at the CIA, assassination plots against foreign heads of state, experiments with toxic substances and illegal drugs, and covert partnerships with the Mafia. The Church Committee’s findings were so explosive that key members found themselves on the watch lists of the very government agencies they were investigating. Three witnesses who cooperated with the inquiry were murdered.

Amid the creep of digital surveillance and the upheavals of social protest, this accessible volume, containing the most harrowing revelations of the Church Committee investigation, sheds valuable light on some of today’s most urgent concerns.

REVIEWS:

"Every American who believes a government must be accountable to its citizens should read this report."
― Senator Ron Wyden

"Even now, half a century after its creation, the Church Committee remains the most influential investigation ever undertaken into the work of the country’s secretive intelligence bureaucracies."
― From the foreword by Beverly Gage, Pulitzer Prize–winning historian and author of G-Man

"A worthwhile overview of a seminal takedown of the deep state."― Publishers Weekly

ABOUT THE EDITORS AND RESEARCHERS:

Matthew Guariglia is a historian and senior policy analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. He is the author of Police and the Empire City: Race and the Origins of Modern Policing in New York. He lives in Atlanta, Georgia.

Brian Hochman is the Hubert J. Cloke Director of American Studies at Georgetown University and author of The Listeners: A History of Wiretapping in the United States. He lives in Washington, DC.
 

The Secret War Against Hate: American Resistance to Antisemitism and White Supremacy
by Steven J. Ross
Bloomsbury Publishing, 2026


[Publication date: April 28, 2026]

 
A USA Today Bestseller

From the author of Pulitzer Prize finalist Hitler in Los Angeles, the definitive story of the intrepid activists and spies who fought against a resurgent movement of hate in America-a book that "should be read by every American who wants to know how courageous men and women can resist hatred." (Kirkus Reviews, starred review)

Americans today like to believe that the end of World War II brought a new era of tolerance in the United States. But antisemitism and racism went up-not down-after the war's end. Violence broke out in cities across the country, and the number of organized hate groups more than doubled from 1940 to 1946. In this shocking account of a resurgence of White Supremacy in America, celebrated historian Steven J. Ross reveals how four key leaders-Emory Burke, J. B. Stoner, James Madole, and George Lincoln Rockwell-worked together to “finish the job Hitler had begun,” launching deadly attacks on Jews and African Americans and building a network of terrorists across the U.S. In response to this “war of hate,” three men-Arnold Forster of the Anti-­Defamation League, George Mintzer of the American Jewish Committee, and James Sheldon of the Non-­Sectarian Anti­-Nazi League-along with dozens of men and women, launched a multipronged effort: They infiltrated, monitored, and undermined these hate groups, putting their own safety on the line and scoring important victories that, today, have been all but forgotten.

Tracing the extraordinary work of these unsung heroes, The Secret War Against Hate provides a groundbreaking reconsideration of the legacy of the “Good War,” and essential reading on how America today can beat hate once again and build a just and united nation.

REVIEWS:

“Richly researched, impressively annotated, burningly bright . . . this book takes readers through familiar times and places with fresh research and a vivid narrative style . . . Personality and media strode hand in hand then, much as now, and Ross alerts us to the deep and ugly history behind today's trolls and truants . . . This book should be read by every American who wants to know how courageous men and women can resist hatred.” ―Kirkus Reviews, starred review

“Well-researched and at times shocking . . . Ross weaves the timelines of these figures together in an easy-to-follow way, showing how they gained power but also highlighting the people and organizations who actively fought against them in public and in spy rings, who each had their own motivations for resisting fascism. Readers will get sucked into the story and want to know what happens next . . . An excellent 'hidden history' book that gives additional context to modern political movements.” ―Library Journal, starred review

“Ross's work is utterly immersive in its sweeping, decades-long tracing of how some Americans have resisted the contagion of hate . . . [The Secret War Against Hate is] vital for any citizen concerned with polarized politics and civic abuses . . . an indispensable manual for safeguarding the future by understanding threats from the past.” ―Shelf Awareness, starred review

“At a time of renewed interest in America's previous fights with fascism, no one has done more than Steven J. Ross to unearth the epic conflicts and characters at the heart of that history. In The Secret War Against Hate, Ross has found a startling new chapter of our history, surfacing villains worthy of any Hollywood horror franchise, and intrepid heroes whose exploits could be written into a national anthem. This book will be taught and read for decades; the more we learn from it, the stronger we will be for the fights ahead, and for the fights already at hand. A brilliant history, a brilliant story. Bravo” ―Rachel Maddow, New York Times bestselling author of PREQUEL

“Ross has written an engrossing, informative, and timely history of the hate groups that energized the far right in the early postwar decades, the anti-hate organizations that infiltrated them, and the spies who gathered information from (and fomented dissent among) those who hate.” ―Washington Independent Review of Books

“Fascinating . . . Ross observes that movements and leaders come and go, but ideas persist. Even ideas as thoroughly debunked as white supremacy, or that America was always intended to be a country for whites alone, remain as emotionally and politically charged today as they were immediately after World War II.” ―California Review of Books

“[An] absorbing study of the brave Americans who fought homegrown Nazism . . . A captivating read.” ―The Irish Independent

“With power and deep insight, Steven Ross has given us the harrowing story of postwar domestic fascism-dripping with racism and antisemitism-and the determined organizations and people who sought to expose its ambitions and defeat it. Eye-opening in content, The Secret War Against Hate is a must-read for anyone interested in the roots of today's radical right and the prospects for resistance to it.” ―Steven Hahn, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of A NATION UNDER OUR FEET and ILLIBERAL AMERICA

“Steven Ross's timely and impressively researched book draws a through line of the anti-Semitism that emerged in America in the wake of the Holocaust, continued in various iterations, and has reemerged in our day. He paints vivid portraits of the fanatics, dupes, scoundrels and blood-thirsty loonies who peopled the American fascist movements and of those who worked courageously to defeat them. This history of hate and heroic resistance to hate is chilling, inspiring, and vital reading.” ―Lillian Faderman, author of NAKED IN THE PROMISED LAND and THE GAY REVOLUTION

“Steven Ross's narrative about the Americans who fought to expose and defeat the neo-fascist right in the decades after World War II is highly original, full of insight, and an utterly compelling read. Anyone who wants to understand the roots of the hatemongers who befoul our politics today should read this book.” ―Michael Kazin, author of WHAT IT TOOK TO WIN: A HISTORY OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

“In his gripping new book, Steven J. Ross unflinchingly examines American Hitlerism and efforts to expose it. Recent events bring home tragically the pertinence of Ross's instructive narrative.” ―Randall Kennedy, Michael R. Klein Professor of Law, Harvard Law School

“In this revelatory study, Steven Ross brings out of the shadows a series of far right agitators who have remained largely unknown to both professional scholars and the general public. He convincingly reveals that a fascist tradition has always existed in the United States, while compellingly showing how ordinary Americans have worked to counteract it. Combining original research and sober analysis, the book could not be more timely.” ―Gavriel D. Rosenfeld, author of THE FOURTH REICH: THE SPECTER OF NAZISM FROM WORLD WAR II TO THE PRESENT

“Set against the backdrop of postwar America, Steven Ross's meticulously researched and engaging narrative illuminates the increasingly pernicious development of White Supremacy and rightwing extremism, and those few organizations and individuals who worked to limit the impact of illiberal forces. He outlines, like few before him, the precedents that frame many of the present-day debates on whether the US should remain an inclusive democracy or revert to atavistic society that limits opportunities for those outside the majority. Despite heroic efforts by civil society to keep these forces at bay after 1945, Ross notes rightly that extremist leaders might pass, “but ideas persist forever.” Understanding the origins of today's extremisms, the approaches that proved successful in resisting them, and how this past shapes our future make The Secret War Against Hate an indispensable and important contribution to the field” ―Robert J. Williams, CEO and Finci-Viterbi Chair of the USC Shoah Foundation and UNESCO Chair on Antisemitism and Holocaust Research


ABOUT THE AUTHOR:


Steven J. Ross is a Distinguished Professor of History at the University of Southern California and Director of the Casden Institute for the Study of the Jewish Role in American Life. He is the author of Hitler in Los Angeles, a Los Angeles Times bestseller and Pulitzer Prize finalist, Hollywood Left and Right, which received the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences' Film Scholars Award, and Working-Class Hollywood, named a Best Book of the Year by the Los Angeles Times. He lives in Southern California.
 

 
There Is No Place For Us: Working and Homeless in America
by Brian Goldstone
Crown, 2026

 

[Publication date:  March 3, 2026]


WINNER OF THE PULITZER PRIZE • ONE OF THE NEW YORK TIMES AND THE ATLANTIC’S TEN BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR • ONE OF BARACK OBAMA’S FAVORITE BOOKS OF THE YEAR • Through the “revelatory and gut-wrenching” (Associated Press) stories of five Atlanta families, this landmark work of journalism exposes a new and troubling trend—the dramatic rise of the working homeless in cities across America.

“An exceptional feat of reporting, full of an immediacy that calls to mind Adrian Nicole LeBlanc’s Random Family and Matthew Desmond’s Evicted.”—The New York Times Book Review (Editors’ Choice)

WINNER OF THE LOS ANGELES TIMES BOOK PRIZE • FINALIST FOR THE ANDREW CARNEGIE MEDAL AND THE BERNSTEIN AWARD • A BEST BOOK OF THE YEAR: NPR, The Washington Post, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Elle, New America, BookPage, Shelf Awareness

The working homeless. In a country where hard work and determination are supposed to lead to success, there is something scandalous about this phrase. But skyrocketing rents, low wages, and a lack of tenant rights have produced a startling phenomenon: People with full-time jobs cannot keep a roof over their head, especially in America’s booming cities, where rapid growth is leading to catastrophic displacement. These families are being forced into homelessness not by a failing economy but a thriving one.

In this gripping and deeply reported book, Brian Goldstone plunges readers into the lives of five Atlanta families struggling to remain housed in a gentrifying, increasingly unequal city. Maurice and Natalia make a fresh start in the country’s “Black Mecca” after being priced out of DC. Kara dreams of starting her own cleaning business while mopping floors at a public hospital. Britt scores a coveted housing voucher. Michelle is in school to become a social worker. Celeste toils at her warehouse job while undergoing treatment for ovarian cancer. Each of them aspires to provide a decent life for their children—and each of them, one by one, joins the ranks of the nation’s working homeless.

Through intimate, novelistic portraits, Goldstone reveals the human cost of this crisis, following parents and their kids as they go to sleep in cars, or in squalid extended-stay hotel rooms, and head out to their jobs and schools the next morning. These are the nation’s hidden homeless—omitted from official statistics, and proof that overflowing shelters and street encampments are only the most visible manifestation of a far more pervasive problem.

By turns heartbreaking and urgent, There Is No Place for Us illuminates the true magnitude, causes, and consequences of the new American homelessness—and shows that it won’t be solved until housing is treated as a fundamental human right.


REVIEWS:

“[Goldstone] writes about a ruthless housing system that profits from people’s desperation and penalizes them for being poor. I was moved by this book. I also felt enraged.”
—Jennifer Szalai, The New York Times Book Review

“Goldstone stitches together a textured and extraordinarily detailed narrative of [five families’] multiyear struggle to keep a roof over their heads. The effect is reminiscent of Random Family. . . . There Is No Place for Us shifts the paradigm on homelessness.”
—The Washington Post

“An incredible feat . . . Stunning . . . A book like this ought to be a rallying cry, the 21st-century equivalent of Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle.”
—The Nation

“Beautifully crafted . . . Revelatory and often heartbreaking . . . [Goldstone] has the clear eye and deft touch of a master storyteller. There Is No Place for Us reveals an America few of us know.”
—The New York Review of Books

“Poignant . . . Through in-depth and often heart-rending accounts, Mr. Goldstone shows why [families] lack stable housing and face difficulties in acquiring it.”
—The Wall Street Journal

“Brian Goldstone’s stunning nonfiction debut, There Is No Place for Us, traces the downfall of the American worker to the fallout of the American Dream. . . . Magnificently stylistic. . . . [Reads like] a gripping novel.”
— Rolling Stone

“[An] extraordinary work of journalism . . . There Is No Place for Us tells the stories of [five] families with precision and depth.”
— Jezebel

“Devastating . . . [Goldstone] writes with unusual depth and humanity about people whose stories political and media elites largely prefer to ignore.”
—Baffler

“Monumental. . . . For confronting us with an America where there’s still only room at the inn for the wealthy, we are indebted to Goldstone’s essential work exposing the truth. This book isn’t just worthy of our attention; it’s worthy of our outrage.”
— Christian Century

“Read this extraordinary book. If you’re lucky, you’ll be changed.”
—Adrian Nicole LeBlanc, author of Random Family

“In this brilliant book, Brian Goldstone lays bare the hidden disaster of housing precarity among America’s low-wage workers.”
—Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, author of Race for Profit

“If you read one book this year—or this decade—it should be There Is No Place for Us.”
—Adelle Waldman, author of Help Wanted

“Spellbinding and unflinching . . . this book will devastate you and then set your spirit ablaze.”
—Antonia Hylton, author of Madness

“Deeply reported and written with an empathy that brims from every page . . . [Goldstone] has pulled off a rare and stunning narrative feat.”
—Jonathan Blitzer, author of Everyone Who Is Gone Is Here

“A crucial, masterful book that will change the national conversation about homelessness.”
—Rachel Aviv, author of Strangers to Ourselves

“A blistering investigation into the true scope of America’s ballooning homelessness crisis.”
—Roxanna Asgarian, author of We Were Once a Family

“A tremendous achievement in reporting, in narration, in emotional and intellectual understanding.”
—James Fallows, author of Our Towns


“A model of ethical journalism . . . Make a place for this book alongside Jane Jacobs’ classic Death and Life of Great American Cities.”
—Kirkus Reviews


“A gripping, high-stakes account of America’s housing emergency.”
—Publishers Weekly

“There Is No Place for Us belongs on the shelf next to Matthew Desmond’s Pulitzer Prize–winning Evicted.”
—BookPage, starred review

“A revelatory and gut-wrenching exploration of an often-ignored homeless population.”
—Associated Press

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Brian Goldstone is a journalist whose longform reporting and essays have appeared in The New York Times, Harper’s Magazine, The New Republic, The California Sunday Magazine, and Jacobin, among other publications. He has a PhD in anthropology from Duke University and was a Mellon Research Fellow at Columbia University. In 2021, he was a National Fellow at New America. He lives in Atlanta with his family.
 
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

1

Britt scrutinized her face in the bathroom mirror, hoping she looked less tired than she felt. Sleep had been hard to come by since she began working the closing shift at Low Country, a “new Southern cuisine” restaurant at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport. Some nights, after a grinding hour-plus commute from the airport back to her great-grandmother’s apartment in Atlanta’s East Lake neighborhood, she managed to crawl into bed beside her two-year-old son, Kyrie, and four-year-old daughter, Desiree, without waking them. Last night she was not so lucky: Kyrie stirred and Britt was up with him until well past midnight. No sooner had they finally drifted off than Britt’s phone alarm sounded, and it was all she could do to get the kids dressed and fed by six o’clock, when their daycare van arrived. Now, seven hours later, she massaged cocoa butter moisturizer onto her cheeks and forehead. Good enough, she thought with a sigh.

“Britt!” her great-grandmother bellowed over a television commercial. “Don’t forget to tidy up my living room before you leave!” Britt examined herself one last time. She hadn’t been able to wash her line-cook uniform between the previous night’s shift and the one she would be starting shortly, but the stains weren’t too noticeable.

For five months, Britt and her kids had been living out of several oversized tote bags in a corner of the apartment’s compact living room, next to the pullout sofa bed they shared. An ironclad rule at Granny’s apartment was that you pick up after yourself, and as Britt rushed to fold their clothes and blankets, she tried to arrange everything as neatly as possible. She had never asked Granny for a closet or dresser drawer in which to keep these items, in part because it seemed like there wasn’t any room to spare—the older woman had a propensity to squirrel away whatever toy or child’s sweater or pajama set she thought could be handed down to the family’s newest members—but mostly because she needed to believe that their stay at her apartment was only temporary. For her part, Granny made it clear in her own loving but not particularly subtle way that she was in no need of roommates. Britt described it to a friend as a “don’t get too comfortable” situation.

After reassembling the sofa bed and arranging its cushions, Britt hurried into the kitchen to finish preparing the kids’ dinner for later: chicken tenders, rice, green peas, and Pillsbury Crescent Rolls. She glanced at Granny, perched in her rocking chair a few feet away from the TV. Britt often marveled at the disconnect between this kindly arthritic woman, who passed the hours glued to Judge Mathis or Tyler Perry’s Madea movies while clutching her large-print Bible, and the stories she’d grown up hearing about her. Britt’s favorite photo of Granny from her younger years showed a scowling, self-professed hustler outside Butler’s Shoes in downtown Atlanta, sporting an all-white Levi’s denim suit with a smart red bow tie. These days the sole vestige of Granny’s former self was her fierce independence, which a recent diagnosis of Alzheimer’s had done little to diminish.

“Girl, it’s almost one-thirty. Shouldn’t you be on your way?” Britt hadn’t noticed her mom, Cass—short for Cassandra—enter the apartment. As always, the forty-three-year-old had a brusque, tightly coiled energy. She greeted Granny with a quick kiss on the top of her head.

“I’m making food for Des and Kyrie,” Britt replied. “If you could just throw it in the microwave when they get back—”

Cass cut her off. “What? You think I can’t put together some nuggets for my grandchildren?” She said this playfully, if a bit defensively. For a brief moment Britt stared at her, as if there was a lot she could say in response. “You get going and let me handle this,” Cass said.


At the front door, beside Granny’s “wall of fame,” where dozens of pictures taken at graduations and proms and athletic events had been assembled, Britt put on a thin, stylish camouflage-print jacket. “Where’s your coat at?” Cass yelled from the kitchen. “You know how cold it is? Why don’t you step out on that patio and find out.”

“Oh, she thinks she too cute for a puffy jacket,” Granny teased.

“Well, her ass is gonna freeze,” Cass said. The two women laughed. Britt, grinning, said, “Yeah, yeah,” and shut the door behind her.

Outside, Britt headed toward the bus stop on Glenwood Avenue. She had been walking this route since she was a toddler. Granny’s apartment building was a stone’s throw from the public housing project where Britt had spent the first few years of her life. Five generations of the family had lived together at East Lake Meadows. That had not been the plan. When Granny’s mother—“Big Mama,” as everyone called her—landed a job at an Atlanta printing factory in 1961, her hope was to eventually purchase her own house. But this was before the Fair Housing Act was signed into law. A century of housing discrimination ensured that the path to homeownership remained closed to the majority of Black Americans. Unlike some of her white co-workers, who were approved for low-interest mortgages and able to move to the nearby suburbs, Big Mama and her progeny were confined to Atlanta’s renter class—spending ten years at an apartment at 949 Washington Street, located in the predominantly Black Peoplestown neighborhood, before relocating to East Lake Meadows in the early seventies.

In the public imagination, the 650-unit complex known as “Little Vietnam” was rampant with crime and violence, but Britt’s family spoke about it differently, as a place where people managed to forge a community despite living in terrible conditions. And the conditions were abysmal. Government neglect had plagued the project from the very beginning. Then, in the early nineties, Atlanta real estate titan Tom Cousins purchased the historic but derelict East Lake Golf Club, which bordered the housing project. Instead of advocating for the city to renovate the complex, he began calling for its demolition: his goal was to “rehabilitate” the neighborhood surrounding the golf course. Soon the complex was razed.

By 2001, when Britt was eight, the area had its first grocery store, a charter school, and The Villages of East Lake, a privately owned apartment complex built on the former site of East Lake Meadows. Cousins’s revived golf club became the annual host of the prestigious PGA TOUR Championship. The neighborhood’s rapid change was celebrated in media reports across the country, but not everyone benefited from it: because of strict eligibility requirements and the limited number of apartments set aside for low-income households, a mere 15 percent of the families residing at East Lake Meadows before its demolition were able to move into the new development. Granny and Big Mama, who died shortly after settling into her unit at the Villages, were among this select group. Cass and her kids were forced to go elsewhere.

A cold February wind cut through Britt’s outfit as she raced to catch the bus on Glenwood that would take her to MARTA’s Edgewood-Candler Park station and, from there, after transferring at Five Points, to the domestic terminal at Hartsfield-Jackson. As Britt rounded the corner, she saw that her bus was already approaching. She had to sprint to catch it.

It was only when she boarded the Gold line train at Five Points that Britt allowed herself to relax. She put in her earbuds and closed her eyes. The gentle opening notes of “Be Blessed” by Yolanda Adams—first an unadorned piano, then the deep, resonant tones of a gospel organ—began to settle her nerves. Prone to minor panic attacks, Britt had come up with strategies to stave off such episodes. Although she didn’t consider herself religious, listening to this song had a way of grounding her. It was as if Adams were an older, wiser friend, perfectly aware of Britt’s traumas and regrets but steadfast in the conviction that she need not be defined by them.

I want you to be blessed, don’t live life in distress

Just let go, let God, He’ll work it out for you

I pray that your soul will be blessed

Forever in His hands, for you deserve His best, no less.

Britt played the song twice and, when it ended, realized there was only one stop left before she arrived at the airport. As she had already done a number of times that day, she checked her email. She wasn’t expecting to see the message she’d been waiting for, but she still felt a pang of disappointment when it wasn’t there.

Flyboy in the Buttermilk: 
Essays on Contemporary America
by Greg Tate
AUWA, 2026


[Publication date:  June 9, 2026]
[New 2026 reissue edition of 1992 classic]
 
[2015 Reprint edition of 1992 classic]
 
"Greg Tate was my first, and in some ways truest, North Star . . . Greg was the first person who validated the art that I loved and made it intellectually viable." ―Questlove, from the foreword

"The velocity and volume of his exuberance, his demands, his curiosities, and, yes, his vibrant dissatisfactions pulled me to the edge of my chair." ―Hanif Absurraqib, from the introduction

A reissue of Pulitzer Prize winner Greg Tate's classic, out-of-print collection of essays, with a new introduction by Hanif Abdurraqib and a new foreword by Questlove.

From one of the most original, creative, and provocative culture critics comes an eye-opening collection of essays and tales about American music and culture.

Under the guise of writing about a single subject, Greg Tate’s essays in Flyboy in the Buttermilk branch out from his usual and explore social, pop cultural, political, and economic subjects. Taking on a wide diversity of topics―from the rise of hip-hop; the art of Jean-Michel Basquiat; the music of Miles Davis, James Brown, Jimi Hendrix, Bad Brains, and many others; to the crisis of the Black intellectual and the irony of the GOP recruiting Black Americans― Tate writes in a brave and distinctive voice that is angry, joyous, anxious, and funny.

In every piece of this collection, Tate offers informed insight into where America is going and why.

REVIEWS:

"[Tate's] language – cribbed from literature, academia, popular culture and hip-hop – was as influential as the content of his ideas. His aesthetic, innovations and intellectual originality, particularly in his pioneering hip-hop criticism, continue to influence subsequent generations, especially writers and critics of color."
―Pulitzer Prize citation

“I stole [my roommate’s copy] for a while till I got my own, which across the decades has become one of a handful of books I regularly pull off the shelf just to soak in a few paragraphs and juice the brain up into writing mode . . . With its re-humanizing sprezzatura that always unveils the power grid beneath the everyday as well as the personal stakes in the systemic, [Flyboy in the Buttermilk] is a handbook for preserving your own wild sanity under the terrordome. You should pilfer it from your best friend’s bookshelf posthaste.”
–Carl Wilson, Bookforum

“A new reissue of Greg Tate’s 1992 essay collection hits hard with the truth, again and again . . . Tate hit as hard as the music he wrote about, and his columns were often more important than his topics . . . the beauty of Tate, especially this bag of uncut gems, is that he was not a theorist of a unified field or a strict logician―or even an underdog . . .

Maybe the most distinct pleasure available here is the palpable truth that Tate was not auditioning for another job . . . [he] didn’t engage with culture with that sort of rueful magazine approach, the clucks-over-the-sad-brutality-of-America-but-hey-what-an-album pellet so much writing is cubed into. Tate knew the brutality is there every time the one comes back around. He just wanted everyone to get up.”
–Sasha Frere-Jones, 4Columns

“This new edition of Tate’s essay collection . . . reminds readers how wonderful it is to have this long-out-of-print book available again, as it is one of the first and most influential books that helped to define a modern Black aesthetic . . . More than just a time capsule, the book acts as a primer for being a critic. Jean-Michel Basquiat, Miles Davis, Samuel R. Delany, Public Enemy, De La Soul, Spike Lee, and Amiri Baraka are all discussed here, seen through Tate’s clear, critical eye . . . [T]his reissue restores a blueprint for criticism in the 21st century. VERDICT: The cultural gravity of this book makes it an essential part of any library on Black aesthetics, music criticism, and art criticism.”
–John Rodzvilla, Library Journal

"A singular voice, a fount of bravura essays on the fantastical creativity, determined resilience and wry paradoxes of Black creativity and life . . . His writing froze and shattered time, supercharged neurons, unraveled familiar knots and tied up beautiful new ones . . . he affected every writer I cared about and learned from ― we’re all Tate’s children."
―Jon Caramanica, The New York Times

"[It's] hard to explain the impact that Flyboy in the Buttermilk had on a whole generation of young writers and critics who read every page of it like scripture. It’s still a clinic on literary brilliance"
―Jelani Cobb, staff writer at The New Yorker and author of Three Or More Is a Riot: Notes on How We Got Here: 2012-2025

"[Tate's] best paragraphs throbbed like a party and chattered like a salon; they were stylishly jam-packed with names and reference points that shouldn’t have got along but did . . . What made Tate’s criticism special was his ability to theorize outward from his encounters with genius and his brushes with banality―to telescope between moments of artistic inspiration and the giant structures within which those moments were produced."
―Hua Hsu, The New Yorker

"A writer who'd not only mastered the mode of writing to which I aspired, but had reinvented it, right down to the vocabulary, so that music criticism became music itself."
―Ann Powers, NPR

"To call Greg Tate one of the most important critics and essayists of the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries, in any language, would not be an exaggeration. In fact, it would not be enough."
―Robin D.G. Kelley, Boston Review

"He looked knowingly to our tears and offered us a salve in the massive wonder of epic sentences that captured the full scale of both our sorrow and the undying enchantment that lives on in the music."
―Daphne A. Brooks, Bookforum

"Tate taught many of us how to write and even to think―musically, improvisationally, poetically . . . Tate’s cultural criticism has long served as a North Star for those championing artistic freedom, cultural complexity and Black excellence."
―Kevin Young, Director of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture
 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Greg Tate (1957–2021) was a music and popular-culture critic and journalist whose work appeared in many publications, including The Village Voice, Vibe, Spin, The Wire, and Downbeat. He was the author of Flyboy in the Buttermilk: Essays on Contemporary America and Midnight Lightning: Jimi Hendrix and the Black Experience and the editor of Everything but the Burden: What White People Are Taking from Black Culture. He won a posthumous Pulitzer Prize in 2024 in recognition of his pioneering work. Tate, via guitar and baton, also led the conducted improvisation ensemble Burnt Sugar the Arkestra Chamber, which toured internationally.

2026 IS THE CENTENNIAL YEAR OF MILES DAVIS (b. May 26, 1926, d. September 28, 1991)--PART 5: Poetry, Music, Historical Essays, Theoretical Analyses and Critical Commentary: 1956- 2026

2026 IS THE CENTENNIAL YEAR OF SIX MAJOR WORLD HISTORICAL FIGURES ALL BORN IN 1926: Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Fidel Castro, Chuck Berry, Oscar Brown, Jr. and Michel Foucault

NOTE: The following prose poem was written on October 15, 1991 in honor of Miles Davis (1926-1991) who died September 28, 1991. It initially appeared in 'The World' literary magazine (issue #44, St. Mark’s Poetry Project, NYC) in March 1992.
 
 
AN OPEN LETTER TO MILES (& THE REST OF US)  
by Kofi Natambu

"It’s always Night or we wouldn’t need Light.”
—Thelonious Monk

"Write what you know or write what you don’t know like everybody else.”
—Miles Davis

"Hell, if you understood everything I did you’d be me.”
—Miles Davis 

So when did it begin Miles? Was it the spring of ’63 when a rather precocious 12 year black boy first saw that famous pose of yours on the cover of ‘Round About Midnight your royal chin held in a pensive yet nonchalant manner cupped in yr right hand, yr left hand, wrist and arm gently cradling a trumpet, yr magnificent tiger eyes hidden behind vintage "Charlie Greene" shades. You are bathed in smoky red light, a neon shroud enveloping yr entire head face and shoulders. You are staring straight into the lens masked forever behind those shades wearing what appears to be the most ambiguous smile or is it smirk or is it melancholy that I’ve ever seen in my life.

I recognize it immediately as yr "SO WHAT" demeanor. You look so goddamn cool and elegant and sexy and DANGEROUS and shy and sinister and sad and content and sweet and evil that my 12 year old eyes can’t believe it. After all then I hardly had a clue what many of those adjectives could have possibly meant.

But I did KNOW in some secret part of my very young and hungry soul what it was I saw and wanted so badly. It was that incredibly regal and majestic stance that you projected, so fucking HIP which is to say KNOWING which is to say painful which is to say exhilarating which is to say REAL, a realness that most of us never even got to feel, let alone experience. You reminded me (always) of my father & my Uncles and my father’s best friends wiry relaxed and intense black men who looked sounded and acted like lions tigers and bears (O MY!) everyday of their slick sly and wicked lives, so clean and HIP and stoic and magnanimous, so pleased and funny and angry & mean and clever and happy and miserable that it made you dizzy even to look at them. We couldn’t wait to see them laugh or cry or shout or whisper or flirt or dance or drink or smoke or talk or stare off into space. Miles was ALL of these men all at once and the only option you had if you loved endless style and rhythm and beauty and intelligence and Joy and women women women was to follow not him (after all he was US); so not to follow but to somehow Act upon and play wild imaginative variations on his glorious ever evolving melody which was his life and our lives simultaneously.

So there you are Miles staring directly into the lens. As always you are both visible and invisible. You are both there in HUDSON’S department store record bin and a billion light years away. You are in all my pre-adolescent dreams and future adult memories. I am humbled and plagued and transformed by that soaring and searing sound of yours, so luminous and lucid and hidden and lonely and loving that my 12 year old ears can only wonder why they sound like that. I mean I wanted to cry and I still didn’t know (yet) why. I wanted to laugh and I suspect or at least I have an inkling why I couldn’t stop myself from doing so. It is again that not-so-cosmic yet otherworldly connection to all the men in my life and in my dreams, in my head and in the streets, both above and below who I think I might be. As Gil Evans said you were a "sensational singer of Songs" and yr dedication to singing them so brilliantly made we aggressive and hungry ’60s kids only intensify our need to fight and change and grow and create an entirely New Life. But it was yr horn Miles that taught us that that life could only come seeping and sprouting out of the nurtured ground of the Old. It was yr sound that contained and improvised upon the clarion calls of all our mighty ancestors, the Armstrongs the Ellingtons the Holidays the Birds the Bechets the Kings the Smiths the Joplins the Sarahs the Gillespies the Youngs the Websters & the Boldens. Because that’s who you were and you knew it and that’s who we were and are and you taught us so clearly that it was our life and the lives of all those who had come before. So where was I Miles or rather where could I have been to talk to you so openly across the years?

I seem to remember now. It was in the aisle of LaGreen’s amazing Jazz record store in downtown Detroit that I first got up the $2.50 for the ‘Round About Midnight recording which I had saved for two months from the 25 cents weekly allowance that my father gave me and my brother in those dreamy days of Spring 1963 when my biggest concerns were baseball music and learning what it really meant to be a man, that is a human being, that is a singer of my own songs. As always you remain the unending soundtrack to the film I’m still shooting. As a great Auteur you would know all about that, wouldn’t you Miles? Now some 100 records later I am thumbing once again thru the precious canon of yr works as each magical recording reminds me of the most significant & banal parts of my quotidian existence, everything I’ve ever done or wanted to do, the Good Bad Ugly & Indifferent aspects of my entire life racing thru my (re)awakened consciousness allowing me to reflect & meditate & grin & grimace my way thru all the years holding the rapidly moving cadences & phrasings in my soul’s ear, pushing out with the dancing tempos in a thousand different shades of Blue the whole story of who & what we are & could have been. There in my listening room my whole life comes spilling out in yr aching cries & haunting whispers in yr sardonic asides & fierce exclamations, in yr reptilian slurs & soothing sighs, in yr jaunty playfulness & screaming complaints.

All the Love all the Hate all the Desire all the Joy all the Pain. Everything that both dreams & nightmares are made of. Because yr Music tells us this eternal story, the one yr good friend Jimmy Baldwin called "the only story to tell in all this madness" because you told it so well & with so much grace & so much insight & so much truth & so much beauty I will always love you & it for the purely selfish & selfless reason that it is my story and the story of all Others who Dare to listen.

Love,
 
Kofi 
10/15/91 


MILES DAVIS QUINTET:
 
Miles Davis--Trumpet
Wayne Shorter--Tenor Saxophone
Ron Carter--Bass
Herbie Hancock--Piano
Tony Williams--Drums
 
THE COMPLETE LIVE AT THE PLUGGED NICKEL
Columbia Records, 1965
 
VIDEO:

The Miles Method – A Theory of Transformative Artistry

Introduction

Of all the musical geniuses of the 20th century, there were perhaps none as creatively prolific as Miles Davis. A musical seeker and truth-teller, Miles was unapologetically disruptive to the global music scene, and his influence is still being heard in the music of today. Now, almost thirty years after his passing, those who worked with Miles, as well as those who heard his music, still speak in glowing terms of his legendary status as a musician, artist, and creative guide.

In his autobiography Miles tells the story of a time when he attended a gala dinner commemorating Ray Charles at the Kennedy Centre. In an uncomfortable and indignant conversation with a lady sitting next to him, Davis was asked, “What have you done that’s so important in your life? Why are you here?” He answered, “Well, I’ve changed music five or six times…” (1). And Miles was true to his word, for multiple times throughout his career his influence changed not only the musical style we call “jazz”, but also the entire direction of music.

For those who appreciate transformational artists in history, one question arises; how does an artist become so creatively transformative? This is where I hope to lead us because when discussing such people it’s often helpful to explore not only their creations but the philosophy behind their creations. The artistic outpourings are the fruits, however, the processes of thought and action which lead to such fruits are to be considered as the roots – essential and fundamental. For artists today who wish to develop greater creativity and artistry, there is perhaps no greater teacher than the wise Miles Davis, and throughout this essay, I hope to pull apart some of the interviews and resources that we have from Miles in order to offer a speculative theory of transformative artistry, otherwise known as “The Miles Method”. For the convenience of the reader/artist, I have compressed this method into ten essential parts, all of which play into a cohesive philosophy that I hope will be of value to other artistic seekers. Of course, in the interpretation of the wisdom of Miles Davis, there lies a great danger of misconstruing his words or placing his thoughts into boxes where they don’t belong. For this reason, I will point out that this essay is not intended to be a historical account of Davis’s literal process of creativity, but instead, it is an interpretation of some of the common ideas which flow throughout his career.

Finally, I’d like to express the importance of reading this essay not merely as an academic exploration, but as a practical guide for the modern artist who wishes to base his or her creative efforts on a foundation offered by one of the most incredible artists in history. Consider the ideas presented as well as how they can apply to your art form, creative process, or even your life. And most importantly, put them to practice. 

Past, Present and Future: Follow the Stream

Miles Davis made his professional debut on the music scene during one of the most important moments in the history and development of the music we call “jazz”. It was the mid-forties, and as DeVeaux put it, “The birth of the new style (bebop) coincided with the peak of the revival of New Orleans jazz, prompting a frequently acrimonious, occasionally hysterical war of words that did much to polarise the jazz community into opposing sides: the Progressives and the ‘mouldy figs’” (2). Of the former, there were musicians like Charlie Parker; the founding father of bebop; a revolutionary style of jazz that broke many of the rules previously set by the swing-era musicians. Of the latter was Louis Armstrong; a quintessential performer who had won the respect and admiration of both the audiences and the musicians, and yet who still regarded the new sounds which Parker had brought onto the scene as highly inferior. Of this new music called “bebop” Armstrong said, “All they want to do is show you up, and any old way will do as long as it’s different from the way you played it before.” (3)

From the passage above we can clearly see that, despite his genius, Louis Armstrong had picked a lane, and he was staying in it. Parker, however, had moved on to create his own style called “bebop”, and this is where Miles Davis really came onto the scene. Miles, who had played in commercial swing bands and now in Charlie Parker’s bebop band, clearly felt that being an artist was not about finding a sound and staying with it, but rather that it was about listening for the next sound or the next style. Over the course of their careers, Charlie Parker would go on to stay mainly in the lane of Bebop, whereas Miles would go on to create music that continued to push the boundaries, thus putting him on a stream of creativity that would carry him to the heights of artistic mastery.

Skipping ahead to the top end of his life and career, in a rare 1988 interview, the interviewer asks Davis, “What kind of repertoire are you going to be doing tonight? Is it going to be a mixture of the last albums you did in other tours like Decoy, You’re Under Arrest, Tutu, or are you going to do something different?” Miles shakes his head throughout the question and replies, “No, no, it’s an entirely different thing… It’s gotten a little bit funkier, and it goes in another direction… We play Tutu; we play one song that Prince wrote, and we play something I wrote. But I reconstructed them, and they sound up to date on Prince’s side and James Brown’s side and my theory of music.” This response shows the struggle that Miles often came across — that nobody truly understood what he was doing. He wasn’t interested in playing what he’d already played, and if he was, then he was going to “reconstruct it” — a common theme found throughout Miles’ creative processes. There were always new sounds, new bands, and new styles to explore, and Miles was there on the frontline.

In the same interview, Miles is seen slouched over, drawing a picture as he listens to the interviewer. The interviewer says to Miles, “I have one picture of yours right now over here that was done a couple of years ago, and the first time I saw it….” Miles interrupts and places the drawing he has just finished on the lap of the interviewer. He says, “Here’s one that was done just then. Now.” (4) Miles wasn’t fond of, nor was he polite to those who were only focused on what he had already done. He wanted to talk about what he was doing, and that was rarely the same as what he had already done.

In an earlier 1986 interview, the interviewer asks a question comparing classical music to jazz, suggesting that the music is being doctored and that they’re not keeping it in its purest form “like they do with classical.” Davis responds by saying, “When you say ‘in its purest form…’ you mean when they had bell-bottomed pants? You can’t wear that today. You know what I mean? You can’t wear that today. This is 1986, and it’s almost 87. You can’t continue to play like that or wear the same clothes…” (7)

While some, like Louis Armstrong, identified themselves with the music that they had been playing, and others, like Charlie Parker, identified themselves with the music they had created, Miles was a true visionary who identified not with what was or what is, but with what could be. He had elevated himself to a different sphere of artistic intuition, and he was only interested in following the stream of creativity that would lead him to the next sound or the next style.

During the 80s, while synthesizers were fresh on the scene, Miles was quoted as saying, “If you don’t match those social sounds that are in the air, they don’t want to hear it. I wouldn’t if I was my fan. If I was a fan of myself, which I am, I wouldn’t want to hear anything that looked like what I did in 1960. You know, you can’t do both of them. I mean, it’s over, the 60s and the 70s. It’s 1984, and soon it will be 1985. They’re doing all sorts of things. Anything is possible.” (11) This passage shows an artist who is clearly riding the stream of creativity, all the while listening for the new sounds and the new whispers of what is coming, which he called the “social sounds.”

All this focus on the next sound, however, was not mere disdain for the traditions of the past. Commenting on his time in Davis’s legendary quintet, Herbie Hancock says that the band was engaged in “controlled freedom” (18, P6) where each band member was able to contribute something unique and new to the sound, while at the same time, everyone was being linked together by Miles who represented the “history of jazz” (18, P6) that led up to that particular moment. This, in a way, was the true genius of Miles. He was a constant innovator, but the flavour of all the styles he’d played previously was at least still present in the musical concoction of the moment, which was always fresh.

For the modern artist who wishes to follow in the footsteps of such a visionary, there is one very important lesson we can learn from these bites of wisdom. With which process do you identify as an artist? The process of creating the traditional art of the past? The process of creating a new art of the future? Or the process of transforming what has been into that which could be? Miles was an artist who seemed to identify with the latter, and In this way, he was able to follow the stream of creativity that pushed him beyond his own limits and into new territories of artistic genius. 

Knowledge is Freedom

Perhaps an important next step for a transformative artist, and key to the revolutionary nature of Davis’s work, is his philosophy of happiness. In a 1988 television interview, he said, “For me, knowledge is happiness. If I learn something, I’m happy… I learned something last night. I can’t wait to apply it.” (6)

Often artists can attach their life satisfaction to the end product rather than the process which gets them there – that of learning and growing in creative intelligence. In his self-titled autobiography, Miles says that “Knowledge is freedom and ignorance is slavery.” (1, p61) This wisdom is especially true for artists and musicians. One reason why so many brilliant artists can freely create works that express the heights of their internal creative imagery is that they have the necessary tools of knowledge and skill at their disposal, and that means that knowledge and skill must be precursors to truly free and honest art. This is exactly why one wouldn’t expect a new pianist to be able to express their artistic ideas as beautifully as a pianist who has spent their entire life mastering their craft — the creativity may be there, but the tools of creation are not.

Miles was a master of his craft, and this is what gave him the freedom to explore ideas and concepts without feeling restricted. Ignorance and lack of skill truly do put shackles on artistry, and thus for the transformative artist, it is imperative that much time is spent learning new ideas, concepts, and tools for further freedom in creativity. 

Be Fearless in Your Creation

In a recent interview between myself and the music historian Benjamin Cawthra, I asked about Davis’s relentless creativity. Benjamin gave the following insight; “I think of Miles Davis as artistically fearless… The only way to account for somebody who went through so many phases without worrying too much about whether the audience would come with him is that he’s artistically fearless. He’ll jump off that cliff with the confidence that it will be ok… He has that kind of belief in his aesthetic power and confidence that he will reach people wherever the road leads him next and that he’s going to land on his feet. And he did that over and over again.” (16)

For any artist, it can often be uncomfortable to push beyond the boundaries and into new territories of artistry. For Miles, it seemed that this was second nature, and he decided to fearlessly plough forward, despite what the audiences may have thought. But as it turns out, this was exactly what both his audience and his band members loved about his style. Being interviewed about his time playing alongside Miles, the guitarist Carlos Santana was asked if he was surprised that Miles started playing pop and rock. Santana replied, “No, I was not surprised because I knew he had that kind of heart. I think only ignorant people are like cows that regurgitate and eat the same thing. I always knew that Miles was a person who had a big heart, and his finger wanted to be at what was happening now — on the pulse. We love him for that because he was always pushing forward.” (8)

For the modern transformative artist, following the stream of creativity wherever it goes must be the ultimate priority. The applause of the audience and praise of the critics must not get in the way of achieving something completely revolutionary. The artist holds their breath and jumps because they know that nothing spectacular was ever achieved without criticism or pushback. 

Don’t Look Back, and Don’t Get Comfortable

In the same 1987 interview discussed earlier, the interviewer suggests that Bitches Brew was being touted as a revolution in music. Miles, in his usual abrupt style, replied by asking, “How long is it going to be a revolution?” (4) Bitches Brew was released 17 years before this interview, and Miles was obviously tired of the callbacks. He wasn’t interested in looking back at what he had done, but rather he wanted people to focus on what was happening now and on what was going to happen.

Miles also didn’t have much to say about those musicians who had gotten too comfortable within their styles. In a 1987 interview, Miles was asked what he thought about Wynton Marsalis. He said, “I can’t say anything about Wynton… He’s a good trumpet player, but he doesn’t have anything extra, you know, he’s precise. And maybe later he’ll develop… another style, but as it is now, he’s just, you know, he’s a good trumpet player, you know, he’s straight though.” (7) This idea is later developed in another interview where he is asked why he is constantly moving and changing. He said, “I can’t be around a person [who’s] comfortable. You know what I mean? They get on my nerves because they don’t wanna do anything.”(12) Just a brief look over Miles’ extensive discography shows a musician who lived up to his word — he was never comfortable. Moving from bebop to straight ahead, from cool jazz and fusion, Miles was constantly changing musicians and sounds in order to push his own creative limits.

Miles’s priorities also clearly found their way into the sound of the recordings we know and love. In his biography of Miles Davis, So What, John Szwed remarked that Davis’s “love of first takes at recording sessions were a part of the aesthetic of discovery that was given priority over a finished, perfected performance.” (19, P264) Miles wasn’t interested in perfection, but like an eccentric chemist mixing new compounds and substances in search of the newest high, Miles was constantly creating new concoctions which pushed the boundaries and stunned listeners around the globe.

For the transformative artist, these principles are fundamental. Safety is often the enemy of creativity, but what Miles shows us in his art and through his wisdom is that an artist should never get stuck in the habit of playing or creating what has already been. They should equally never be satisfied with being comfortable or safe if they’re serious about creating something new and worthy of attention. Discomfort often pushes the mind to find new ways of doing and being. Thus, the transformative artist will find ways to go beyond comfort and necessity to retrieve new and valuable artistic intuition. 

Transform Your “Mistakes” Into Masterpieces

One of the great challenges to any true artist is the perceptions they harbour around mistakes and what it means to make them. Miles Davis offered true wisdom in these matters. In his 1987 interview, he sits drawing with vivid colours, and the interviewer questions what he does when he makes a wrong line in his drawing and if that’s like music. In his usual raspy voice, Miles responds, “The line isn’t wrong until you have to put the next one down. Music is the same way… You don’t make bad notes. The note next to the one that you think is bad corrects the one in front. The only way you can do that is by experience. The only way you can [fix] a line that you don’t mean to draw is to draw every day.” (4)

Here we find two golden nuggets of wisdom. First, that the artist finds no mistakes when they view each line or note concerning those that come next, and second, that the only way for an artist to become a seasoned reformer of these perceived mistakes is for them to immerse themselves in the art form. Experience is the true way to perfection, and Miles didn’t just speak this, but he lived it. In his Harvard lecture on the wisdom of Miles Davis, the legendary pianist Herbie Hancock talks of a moment on stage with Miles where things could have gone completely awry. “Right in the middle of Miles’ solo,” Herbie recalls, “I played the wrong chord – a chord that just sounded completely wrong, and Miles paused for a second, and then he played some notes that made my chord right, which astounded me. I couldn’t believe what I had heard. Miles was able to make something wrong into something right with the choice of notes that he played and the feeling that he had… What I realize now is that Miles didn’t hear it as a mistake. He heard it as something that happened – just an event. And so that was part of the reality of what was happening at that moment, and he dealt with it… Since he didn’t hear it as a mistake, he felt that it was his responsibility to find something that he felt fit, and he could do that. That taught me a huge lesson about not only music but about life, you know? We can look for the world as we would like it to be as individuals, you know, ‘make it easier for me’- that idea. But I think that the important idea is that we grow, and the only way we can grow is if we have a mind that is open enough to accept and to be able to experience situations as they are and turn them into medicine, to turn poison into medicine. Take whatever situation you have and make something constructive with it.” (10)

The above passage shows the fruits of a way of life that values openness to new experiences as well as a sense of personal responsibility for the varied situations of life. For the artist, this change of perception is an absolute key to creative mastery. Such an artist identifies with a transformation not only in the stream of creativity that leads to the next sound or style but also in the potential that lies between each note or each stroke. Within these pockets of space and time lie opportunities for metamorphosis, where what is can be transformed into what could be. This requires a complete restructuring of what we ordinarily consider as “wrong” or “right”, and it also requires a great amount of experience in the art of calling upon one’s skills in each and every infinitesimal, moment but once achieved, this skill is undoubtedly valuable to the artist. 

You Don’t Have to Label It

In a TV advertisement for Honda scooters in 1984, Miles is seen leaning up against a scooter that looks like a prop straight from a 2020 scene in “Back to the Future.” In a reserved and somewhat awkward way, he says, “I’ll play it first, and I’ll tell you about it later… Maybe.” (5) This quote was quintessentially Miles, and if the advertisers came up with it, then they got him just right. For Miles, labels only served to distract from what the music or art really was. He took this so seriously that he even detested the use of the term “jazz”(12), often calling back to his early days in St. Louis where they didn’t call it anything (4). It seems that, for Miles, if people knew what it was called, it had already been done.

Earlier in the decade, in a 1982 interview, Miles was asked what “we should tell people about Miles.” He said, “Don’t tell them nothin’. Let them guess. What’s he gonna do next?” (9) Again, what we see from this example is a man who was far more interested in pushing forward into new lanes of creativity that hadn’t been discovered rather than placing himself within a set of walls, definitions, or descriptions. Putting a label on art, or even talking about it too much, can often distract from what it is and what it could be. For the modern artist, it is imperative that labels and categories don’t put unnecessary boundaries on the creative process. Transformational art is, by definition, something completely different from what had come before. Although such art is built upon the ashes of that which came before, placing it within boundaries and walls runs the risk of having it be associated with something dead or dying. The rule is simply this: an artist’s art does not need to be placed within a certain lane or label, and refusing to do so opens up new paths of creative outlet that can supervene that which already exists. 

Listen With Your Heart

In a highly commercialised world where the bottom dollar is king, Miles Davis seemed to surpass everyone’s expectations simply by listening to what he wanted to do and create before listening to the logistical team behind him. Carlos Santana recalled this as being one of the key lessons he learned from Miles. He said, “He taught all of us how to do what we want to, not what our accountants or lawyers or CBS or Warner Brothers want. Do what your soul tells you to do. Damn the rules, it’s the feeling that counts. That’s a supreme lesson to teach anybody; execute your heart’s convictions.” (8) He then also went on to say that “If people don’t understand Miles it’s because they rationalise Miles with their mind and not with their heart. If you see Miles with your heart, he’s right on.” (8)

What Miles can teach us all is that as an artist, your own thoughtful creativity and earnest convictions must come first. They must come before the audience, the other musicians, the lawyers, the record company executives, and the accountants. True art is created for the sake of beauty and artistic brilliance – not for the sake of company profits. Miles understood this, which is exactly why he was able to break so many barriers and transform the music of the world so many times. And so it must be for the transformative artist, that they must listen to their own heart’s convictions. To do anything else would be to put the cart before the horse.
 
Pass It On

In my previously mentioned interview with the musical historian Benjamin Cawthra, he said that “You could look at the history of jazz, post-war, just by looking at the Miles Davis family tree of musicians and get a pretty fair sense of what happened over those 40-50 years in the music. And I think that’s part of his genius, actually – to be able to see the talent in others and to situate them in such a way that, through performing his music, their own talent comes out.” (16) Miles was not only a bandleader, but his bands were essentially mini-universities for up-and-coming musicians. Miles constantly fast-tracked the careers of younger musicians who he deemed to be promising by giving them opportunities to further develop their own style and sound.

This mentor-like approach, however, must not be taken to be any form of charity. Miles picked the best, and as a result, he created music that brought together the best of both the newer conceptions of jazz as well as the traditions which Miles had played through. Discussing Miles’ “second great quintet” with Wayne Shorter, Herbie Hancock, Ron Carter, and Tony Williams, Keith Waters recalls that “The group provided a formative workshop for the creative young innovators to develop individually and collectively. The players developed paths for extended improvisation and group interaction on an astonishingly high level.” (18, P5)

In a Rolling Stones article, R. Palmer correctly points out that “In a music that has known more great players than great bandleaders, Davis set standards for ensemble style and interaction again and again. The list of musicians who broke into the front ranks through tenures in Davis’s bands reads like a who’s who: saxophonists John Coltrane, Cannonball Adderly and Wayne Shorter; pianists Bill Evans, Herbie Hancock and Chick Corea; drummers Philly Joe Jones, Tony Williams, and Jack DeJohnette; guitarists John McLaughlin and John Scofield.” (17) So many musicians are indebted not only to the path that Miles paved for music but for his caring influence in the lives of those who played with and learned from him. He never stopped creating, and he never stopped passing that wisdom on to the musicians who deserved a shot.

Today’s artists share this same sacred responsibility — to learn and create and then pass it all on to those up-and-coming artists who are clearly deserving of a guiding hand. Art is about bringing people together in the spirit of creativity and celebration of life, and as soon as artists start living with scarcity mindsets, the art dies. Miles saw the value of incorporating new talent into the stream of creativity, and as a result, incredible musicians graduated from his bands throughout his entire career. 

For Inspiration, Come Back to the Water

When asked how he would describe Miles’ music, Carlos Santana said, “Essential. As important as Picasso or Stravinsky, or da Vinci. To me, it’s always nourishment for the soul, like water. You know, you can have champagne or Coca-Cola or beer, but sooner or later you’re gonna drink water.” (8)

There are some artists whose work was undoubtedly genius and pure. Miles was such an artist, and as such, his music has been a source of soul-nourishing water for countless artists. This wisdom, spoken by Santana, a transformative artist in his own right, gives a valuable lesson to those seeking to change the direction of their preferred art form: always come back to the water. Come back to those artists who paved the way, listen for the underlying stream of creativity they represent, and let their revolutionary art rejuvenate the soul and inspire the way forward.
 
Don’t Speak Your Legacy — Give It

Standing out the back of a stage after doing a stellar performance in 1985, Gwen Sommers asks Miles about the legacy that he would leave to younger jazz artists of the day. He said “I don’t know… it’s already there. It’s in the tapes. I left it already. It’s there! In the records, in the tapes… They’ll do the same thing that I did – hear my stuff and take it somewhere else.” (13) This is, perhaps, the greatest and most important legacy that we can learn from Miles — the legacy that is in the tapes. He really was a man of few words, because he was far more interested in showing what he had created rather than talking about it.

This offers yet another profound lesson for the transformative artist of today, which is to say that the legacy an artist leaves should be in the art they produce and not in the words that they or the critics use to describe it. Nobody remembers the voices of Davis’s critics, but they know the legacy he left with his groundbreaking albums like Birth of the Cool (1957), Kind of Blue (1959), Sketches of Spain (1959), Bitches Brew (1969), or Tutu (1986). These are the albums that changed history and changed the music we now know, and they’re the best legacy Miles could have left behind. 

Bringing it All Together

Miles Davis was unquestionably one of the most profound musical geniuses in recent history, and his legacy lives on in many of the “social sounds” that we hear today. His transformative artistry stands as a guiding light to all who wish to create honest and meaningful art. Throughout this essay, I have compiled some of the most common themes throughout Davis’s interviews and other resources which can help us to understand the true genius behind the music, and as such, I have offered what I believe to be a coherent theory of transformative artistry that suggests the following ten steps for any budding transformative artist to consider: Past, present and future: 
 
Follow the stream
Understand that knowledge is freedom
Be fearless in creation
Don’t look back and don’t get too comfortable
Transform “mistakes” into masterpieces
Don’t feel the need to label the art
Listen with the heart
Pass it on
For inspiration, come back to water
Don’t speak a legacy — leave it


Considering all of these steps together and in relation to each other, it is my hope that any budding artist who wishes to truly transform the world with their art will find this theory helpful and practical. Perhaps if more artists could engage with these concepts and practices, we would see even more art that pushes the boundaries of creativity far beyond what we now see as possible. 
 

Miles Davis -"Call It Anything"--The Isle Of Wight Festival --August 29, 1970

VIDEO: 
MILES DAVIS SEPTET:
 
Miles Davis - trumpet 
Gary Bartz - alto and sopranosaxophones 
Chick Corea - electric piano 
Keith Jarrett - electric piano 
Dave Holland - bass 
Jack DeJohnette - drums 
Airto Moreira - percussion