Wednesday, January 14, 2026

FASCIST AMERICA 2026: Brilliant and As Always National Treasure Journalists, Public Intellectuals, Truth Tellers, and Progressive Media Producers Wajahat Ali and Danielle Moodie On What a FASCIST Infrastructure Looks Like

This Is What a FASCIST Infrastructure Looks Like!!


Wajahat Ali

January 13, 2026


VIDEO: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P28Dbwvr6I8

#BreakingNews #AmericanCrisis #Authoritarianism


America’s darkest forces aren’t lurking in the shadows anymore they’re operating in plain sight. Wajahat Ali and Danielle Moodie break down how white supremacy, misogyny, and authoritarian power have fused into a federal machine from ICE’s militarization to the normalization of extremist language and state violence. This isn’t about ideology anymore. It’s about infrastructure and who it’s being built to crush. 

 
http://Thelefthook.substack.com#BreakingNews #AmericaInCrisis #Authoritarianism #ICE #Trump #Accountability #CivilRights #democracy#wajahatali #daniellemoodie #news #maga #white #news






FASCIST AMERICA 2026: The Vicious Federal Government's War On The Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights Of the U.S. Citizens in Minneapolis Minnesota. who and What Is Going To Stop This Carnage?

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/13/us/ice-videos-minnesota-trump-immigration.html


Skirmishes between residents and heavily armed federal agents have been nerve-racking for residents in Minneapolis. Credit: by David Guttenfelder/the New York Times

Listen to this article · 8:44 minutes

Learn more

‘Like a Military Occupation’: Clashes Rise With Federal Agents in Minneapolis

Arrests and aggressive tactics by ICE and the Border Patrol, many seen on viral videos, have intensified the frustration and fear among residents  

by Thomas Fuller and Jazmine Ulloa

Jazmine Ulloa reported from Minneapolis.

Updated January 14, 2026, 7:17 a.m. ET

The video shows a young employee in a reflective vest being hauled away by federal agents from the entrance of a Target store in a Minneapolis suburb.

“I’m a U.S. citizen!” the worker shouted as the armed agents shoved him into an S.U.V. after he had directed expletives at one. “U.S. citizen! U.S. citizen!”

In and around Minneapolis in recent days — in quiet residential neighborhoods and busy shopping districts, at gas station and big box store parking lots — similar chaotic scenes are unfolding, an escalation of tensions between residents and federal agents as the Trump administration intensifies its immigration crackdown in Minnesota after the killing of Renee Good by an immigration officer last week.

“It feels like our community is under siege by our own federal government,” said State Representative Michael Howard, a Democrat whose district includes Richfield, where the Target employee and another colleague were seized.

Video

“Look at that.

Videos showing a Target employee shouting expletives at a federal agent before being tackled in Richfield, Minn., have been widely circulated online and shared by a member of Congress. In another video the employee yells, “I’m a U.S. citizen.”CreditCredit...@chris_123_56, via Instagram, Rep. Jimmy Gomez, via Facebook

Mr. Howard said both workers were U.S. citizens and were later released. The Department of Homeland Security said the Target worker seen in the video was arrested in connection with “assaulting, resisting or impeding federal officers.” It was unclear on Tuesday if the employee had been charged.

Federal officers are descending on streets in what they say is an effort to find undocumented immigrants with criminal and dangerous backgrounds. They are displaying a show of force they argue is necessary in cities and states where local governments and law enforcement agencies have refused to help them. But many residents, business owners and immigrant workers have denounced the tactics, saying the agents are indiscriminately sweeping up hard-working friends and neighbors based on racial and ethnic profiling, and are increasingly organizing to push back.

The skirmishes between residents and the heavily armed federal agents have been especially nerve-racking for residents of Minneapolis, where the memories of the 2020 murder of George Floyd — and the protests and rioting that followed — are still raw. This time, residents and elected officials say, the fear is not abuses by law enforcement but an encroaching federal government.


Federal agents outside a home in Minneapolis on Tuesday. Credit:  Todd Heisler/The New York Times


Protesters gathered around a home where agents arrested two people on Tuesday. Credit: Todd Heisler/The New York Times


Federal agents deployed tear gas as some protesters shouted and threw snowballs in their direction. Credit:  David Guttenfelder/The New York Times

Local concerns over the federal government grew on Tuesday when six federal prosecutors in Minnesota resigned over the Justice Department’s push to investigate the widow of Ms. Good and questions over whether the shooter would be investigated.

Homeland security officials have made roughly 2,400 immigration-related arrests in Minnesota since Nov. 29, said Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the department. Some of those immigrants have been convicted of sex crimes, armed robbery, drug crimes and other offenses, federal officials said. But it was not clear how many of the people immigration agents had arrested had criminal records. The number of arrests does not include protesters.

As the surge has intensified, so have the efforts among activists, community volunteers and live streamers to document federal agents’ aggressive tactics. Federal officials and local residents both say the presence of the other on the street is making the situation worse.

Images circulating on social media over the past two days and verified by The New York Times show agents approaching a car at a gas station, seeking out the immigration status of the driver and demanding that he open the door. When he doesn’t, they break the window of the car and remove him. Gregory Bovino, a Border Patrol official, yells at bystanders to back up.

Video

At a gas station in St. Paul, Minn., federal agents smashed the side window of a Jeep, and pulled a man out and tackled him.Credit Credit: Status Coup News/Jon Farina, via Storyful

In another video, Elliott Payne, president of the Minneapolis City Council, is seen being shoved by an agent.

Mr. Payne said in an interview on Tuesday that federal agents with assault rifles and combat gear were patrolling the streets in convoys. At night, they shine lights from the vehicles onto pedestrians, he said.

“This is a military occupation, and it feels like a military occupation,” Mr. Payne said.

Mr. Payne said federal agents scream obscenities at residents and repeatedly holster and unholster their weapons. “It’s like living in a war zone,” he said. The federal presence was not ubiquitous. Residents said the federal agents were concentrated in areas with large immigrant populations and were absent in others.


Christian Molina stood by his damaged car after federal immigration officers crashed into the vehicle and questioned his immigration status on Monday. He was released after proving he was a U.S. citizen. Credit: Jamie Kelter Davis for The New York Times


Residents and activists recorded federal agents after they rammed Christian Molina’s car, according to Mr. Molina and a witness. Credit: Jamie Kelter Davis for The New York Times


Federal agents have been deploying pepper spray and tear gas to scatter residents and activists. Credit: Jamie Kelter Davis for The New York Times

President Trump said Tuesday that federal agents were in Minnesota to remove “convicted murderers, drug dealers and addicts, rapists, violent released and escaped prisoners, dangerous people from foreign mental institutions and insane asylums, and other deadly criminals.”

Mr. Trump wrote on social media that “THE DAY OF RECKONING AND RETRIBUTION” is coming for Minnesota, without elaborating.

On Monday, the Department of Homeland Security said Minnesota was not cooperating with the federal government and said 1,360 illegal immigrants were in Minnesota prisons. The department demanded that they be handed over to the federal authorities when released.

Mr. Howard, the state representative, said federal agents for the most part did not have warrants and were staging in the parking lots of stores and apartment complexes and targeting people of color, asking for proof of citizenship.

“Nothing about that is making our communities more safe,” he said. “We have many people in our community that are undocumented, but they are valued members of our community.”

For many in Minneapolis, where 70 percent of people voted Democratic in the 2024 presidential election, the resistance from neighborhood groups and community volunteers has felt empowering in what has felt like a hopeless time, residents said in interviews.

But even some of those in favor of the community defense efforts were on edge that protesters could go too far. Residents said they were worried that with the number of agents patrolling the area and heightened tensions, weapons would be fired, deliberately or by accident.

“It’s just a matter of time before something else occurs. Another person shot. ICE agents injured,” said Maurice Ward, 54, who runs a social justice organization.

Video

“I am U.S. citizen.

Nimco Omar filmed an encounter with masked Border Patrol agents, who repeatedly asked her for identification to prove her citizenship and where she was born.CreditCredit...Nimco Omar, via Storyful

On Monday afternoon, a few blocks away from where Ms. Good was killed, witnesses recounted how a group of federal agents had crashed their vehicle into a car that they had been trying to stop. As officers spoke to the driver, a crowd began to swell. Neighbors rushed out and groups of activists who had been following and filming the agents arrived, many whistling and shouting.

“Get out of our city!” they yelled.

Some threw snowballs at the officers and pelted their vehicles with water bottles. The agents deployed pepper spray and tear gas, sending residents scattering.

In an interview later, Christian Morales, 40, said he had been driving to his mechanic shop when he noticed what could be federal agents sitting in a vehicle in an alley. They began to follow him, he believed, solely for looking Hispanic.

He said he was grateful for the community volunteers and neighbors who came out, some in sweats and pajamas, to document the scene, and he believed their presence was why agents ultimately left him alone. But he also worried whether some of the volunteers shouting obscenities at agents emboldened them.

“It makes them act different, like they have more power,” he said.

Mr. Payne, the City Council president, said he was encouraging residents to take video of federal agents, which he said could be used as evidence in legal action that state and local officials are pursuing against the federal government over the deployments.

A lawsuit filed on Monday by the state of Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul asked a judge to block the federal government from “implementing the unprecedented surge in Minnesota.”

The lawsuit said “thousands of armed and masked D.H.S. agents have stormed the Twin Cities to conduct militarized raids and carry out dangerous, illegal and unconstitutional stops and arrests.”

On Monday night near a fast-food restaurant in South Minneapolis, whistling began to fill the air, a warning by volunteers that federal agents were in the area. Two immigrant workers locked the doors of the restaurant. Muna Ahmed, 37, who had walked in to order a sandwich, was grateful for the signal. A former hospital interpreter of Somali heritage, Ms. Ahmed was in disbelief over the hostility of federal officers on the streets.


“This is not the America I know,” she said.

Ernesto LondoƱo, Mitch Smith, Madeleine Ngo, Sonia A. Rao and Arijeta Lajka contributed reporting. Sheelagh McNeill contributed research.

 

ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

Thomas Fuller, a Page One Correspondent for The Times, writes and rewrites stories for the front page.

Jazmine Ulloa is a national reporter covering immigration for The Times.

A version of this article appears in print on Jan. 14, 2026, Section A, Page 15 of the New York edition with the headline: Clashes With Federal Agents Rise in Minneapolis. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper 


See more on: U.S. Politics, Homeland Security Department, Donald Trump


More on the Minnesota ICE Shooting

FASCIST AMERICA 2026: Prominent Journalist, Political Analyst, Historian, and Critic Jamelle Bouie On the Meaning Of the Openly Dictatorial Rule Of The Delusional Avatar of MAGA and the GOP Within the Oppressive National and International Confines Of the Fascist Trump Regime


Credit: Eric Lee for The New York Times


Listen to this article · 6:30 minutes

Learn more
 
This Is Not How a Normal President Speaks
by Jamelle Bouie
January 14, 2026
New York Times

Not long after his second inauguration — and still-riding high on his return to power, President Trump issued a stark proclamation on social media. “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law,” he wrote on both X and his Truth Social platform, paraphrasing Sergei Bondarchuk’s 1970 film “Waterloo.” Since Trump saw himself as saving the country, the message was simple: He was beyond the law, if not above it outright. This wasn’t a feint; in the weeks and months to follow, his administration would break, skirt and ignore the law in pursuit of the president’s agenda.

As he nears the end of the first year of his second term, Trump has turned his attention to the world abroad. Days after the start of the new year, he launched an attack on Venezuela that killed dozens of people and ended with the “kidnapping” — a word the president said was “not a bad term” for what happened — of NicolĆ”s Maduro, the nation’s authoritarian ruler. Flush with the glow of a successful operation, Trump then threatened military action against Cuba — demanding that the nation’s regime negotiate “BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE” — and raised the possibility of strikes on Mexico. He has also begun to talk threateningly again about Greenland, in what appears to be a naked land grab fueled by dreams of 19th century-style territorial expansion. (And why Greenland? Well, it is the nearest large landmass on the Mercator projection and Trump is nothing if not a simple man.)

Defending all of this in a recent interview with four of my Times colleagues, Trump declared that he was not subject to international law, or really any law, in his conduct of foreign affairs. “I don’t need international law,” he said, “I’m not looking to hurt people.” Asked if there were any limits on his power, Trump named his own conscience. “Yeah, there is one thing,” he said. “My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”

In his 2024 campaign for the White House, Trump told cheering audiences that he would be a “dictator,” but only for one day. This interview, to say nothing of his actions over the past year, makes clear that Trump sees himself as something like a dictator, and he wants to be one for a bit longer than 24 hours. Trump is, in his mind, an elected monarch — although not an enlightened one — whose whims are law and whose power extends to every inch of the United States and every corner of the Western Hemisphere.

It should go without saying that this is not how a normal president speaks. Virtually all previous presidents have understood themselves as they are: agents of the federal Constitution. Even Andrew Jackson, condemned as “King Andrew the First” by his Whig opponents for his unapologetic expansion of presidential authority, described himself as an “instrument” of the Constitution and promised, in his first inaugural address, to “keep steadily in view the limitations as well as the extent of the Executive power trusting thereby to discharge the functions of my office without transcending its authority.”

Trump’s assertion of unlimited authority — subject only to his moral judgment and his mind (whatever that means) — is a total rejection of popular sovereignty and the logic of the Constitution. And for as much as the Trump administration speaks of defending “Western civilization,” the president’s MAGA absolutism is also a challenge to the foundations of the Anglo-American political tradition — to the settlement of the Glorious Revolution and the defeat of Stuart claims of divine right and parliamentary subordination.

Another way to understand this is that Trump does not see himself as a constitutional officer. His power, as he sees it, flows from his own person — not the office and certainly not the people, whose only role, in his view, is to legitimize his desires. Trump is an anti-constitutional figure — whose very presence on the American political scene is nothing less than a full-spectrum assault on republican government and democracy. And it is a testament to the rot in our political system that in a little less than a year, he has — with the help of Republicans in Congress — put the American republic on life support, where it struggles with the creeping sickness of despotism.

In fairness to Trump, however, he is not solely to blame for the present state of affairs. His claim to unlimited president power rests significantly on the work of the chief justice of the United States, John Roberts. In Trump v. United States, Roberts and his Republican colleagues anointed the office of the presidency with immunity from criminal prosecution for “official acts,” defined — somewhat vaguely — as anything extending from the president’s “core constitutional powers.”

Never mind that this language had no basis in the constitutional text or its drafting and ratification. Never mind that the framers, in fact, seemed to accept the possibility that a president might be criminally prosecuted for actions in office following impeachment and removal. For Roberts, judicial accountability for wrongdoing was secondary to separation of powers and the “energy” of the executive. The president, in his view, has to be able to act, and the aim of Trump v. U.S. was to allow the president to perform the full breadth of his duties without ever needing to look behind his back.

I think Roberts saw this as a modest effort to make government work better and preclude the prospect of tit-for-tat prosecutions after each presidential election. But to Trump, Roberts’s ruling was a license to unleash himself on the constitutional order. Perhaps this is why, after delivering his first speech to Congress last year, Trump thanked Roberts: gratitude for a Supreme Court that gave him license to act as sovereign.

The American public, then, is left not with a president but with a man who imagines himself master and behaves like a tyrant. A man whose agents brutalize ordinary citizens and then defames them in the wake of their deaths; who has turned the nation’s law enforcement apparatus against his political enemies and who threatens the nation’s allies with military force. A man who takes no interest in the work of government but welcomes corruption and who treats half the country as conquered territory — vassals to abuse as he sees fit.

If the only thing Trump thinks can stop him is his own morality and his own mind, our task — at least for those of us who view the state of things with outrage and anger — is to show him the folly of his words.
 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:


Jamelle Bouie became a New York Times Opinion columnist in 2019. Before that he was the chief political correspondent for Slate magazine. He is based in Charlottesville, Va.


More on Trump and power:


Opinion | Thomas B. Edsall
Trump Unmasked
Jan. 13, 2026

Opinion | Michelle Goldberg
The Resistance Libs Were Right
Jan. 12, 2026

Opinion | David French
Trump Is Unleashing Forces Beyond His Control
Jan. 5, 2026

Opinion | Ezra Klein
The Trump Vibe Shift Is Dead
Dec. 21, 2025






Tuesday, January 13, 2026

FASCIST AMERICA 2026: Scumbag-in-Chief Donald J. Trump Is Also A Vicious Misogynist and Uber-Pimp Who Uses His Utter Contempt For Women and Endless LIES To Hide, Excuse, and Maniacally Justify and Rationalize Any and All Crimes He Attempts to Provide Despicable Cover for and/Or Cowardly Defend–Including Murder…

Trump Has Another Justification for the Shooting of Renee Good: Disrespect

President Trump suggested that Renee Good’s “highly disrespectful” attitude toward law enforcement played a role in her fatal shooting by an ICE agent.

Listen to this article · 5:45 minutes

Learn more


PHOTO: Mr. Trump’s shifting remarks have raised questions about whether the administration will put any limits on the tactics ICE agents may use. Credit: Doug Mills/The New York Times

by Luke Broadwater and Katie Rogers
January 12, 2026
New York Times


[Luke Broadwater and Katie Rogers are White House correspondents. They reported from Washington.]

President Trump has added another justification for the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent in Minnesota: She behaved badly.

“At a very minimum, that woman was very, very disrespectful to law enforcement,” Mr. Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday evening.

In the days since Ms. Good, 37, was shot and killed by Jonathan Ross, an ICE agent, Trump administration officials have used a variety of arguments as they have tried to justify the episode. They have called it an act of self-defense, and Mr. Trump has falsely claimed Ms. Good “ran over” the agent. JD Vance, the vice president, has argued that Mr. Ross has “absolute immunity.”

While Mr. Trump still says the ICE agent was acting in self-defense, his latest comments suggest that disrespecting law enforcement could help to justify the killing. The comments raise serious questions about the use of force by those carrying out Mr. Trump’s crackdown on immigration, and they underscore the extent to which Mr. Trump’s impulse is to condemn anything done by his critics and to defend the actions of his supporters.

Asked by a reporter if he believed deadly force was necessary in this case, Mr. Trump said: “It was highly disrespectful of law enforcement. The woman and her friend were highly disrespectful of law enforcement.”

The federal government has defended the shooting as lawful and necessary, while local officials have dismissed that narrative. Mr. Trump referred to a “crunch” he heard in footage of the shooting to buttress his claim that the ICE agent was in danger.

“It seems like the big picture is to control the narrative and suggest to the public that she was in the wrong, and they were in the right,” said Barbara L. McQuade, a former U.S. attorney and a law professor at the University of Michigan. “And also, I think, to send a message that the public needs to obey law enforcement on the streets, and to intimidate protesters.”

She added: “If people are afraid they’re going to be shot or arrested for observing or peacefully protesting, or even for mouthing off, I think the thought is that will cause people to self-censor or chill their behavior, cause them to stay home.”


PHOTO: People gathered to lay flowers at a makeshift memorial for Renee Good last week in Minneapolis. Credit: Jamie Kelter Davis for The New York Times

Mike Fox, a legal fellow at the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice, said that even if Mr. Trump’s allegation that Ms. Good was a “professional agitator” were true, that would not justify her killing.

“As far as I can tell, they’re not professional agitators,” Mr. Fox said. “She’s just a local woman who lived in the community. But it doesn’t really matter, right? You don’t get to kill someone because they engage in conduct that you disagree with or find distasteful or deplorable. If cops could just kill people any time they get annoyed or frustrated, my God, we would be in trouble.”

In the moments before the shooting Wednesday in Minneapolis, Ms. Good tells the agent that she isn’t mad at him, and Mr. Ross begins to circle her vehicle. She reverses as he crosses in front of her S.U.V., then she starts to move forward, and turns to the right. Mr. Ross is near her left headlight when he opens fire three times, killing her.

A Wall Street Journal investigation found that Ms. Good’s killing was one of 13 episodes in which federal immigration agents have used deadly force against civilians in vehicles since July.

Aboard Air Force One, Mr. Trump said ICE agents have faced their own hardships.

“These people have been harassed and threatened every day,” the president said. “They had bands out playing so they couldn’t sleep at the hotel. I see what they’re doing to them. They’re threatening them constantly.”

Like Mr. Trump, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, defended the actions of ICE on Monday, denigrating the protesters who oppose the agents’ actions.

“This administration will continue to stand wholeheartedly by the brave men and women of ICE, including that officer in Minneapolis who was absolutely justified in using self-defense against a lunatic who is part of a group, an organized group, to interject and to impede on law enforcement operations,” Ms. Leavitt said.

Vanita Gupta, a former associate attorney general who oversaw both the civil rights division that can prosecute federal agents and the civil division that can defend them, called the administration’s rush to disparage Ms. Good “unprecedented.”

“Being ‘disrespectful’ does not warrant the use of deadly force,” Ms. Gupta said. “The immediate public efforts by the White House to spin the facts, including denigrating the victim, does not change federal law.”

Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, contrasted Mr. Trump’s treatment of Ms. Good with his praise and support for the hundreds of pro-Trump rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and attacked the police.

On Jan. 6 this year, the Trump administration made a page on its website that accused the Capitol Police of instigating the riot, and said a pro-Trump rioter whom the police killed during the mayhem was “murdered.”

“Trump just pardoned nearly 1,600 insurrectionists,” Mr. Raskin said, “hundreds of whom violently attacked police officers and called them everything from traitors to pigs to racial epithets, and ruthlessly taunted them and maligned them for hours.” He added that “Donald Trump’s very dubious characterization of Renee Good as having been disrespectful is not only factually suspect, but it’s legally irrelevant.”

“The police do not have the right to shoot people in the head because they consider them having acted in a disrespectful way,” Mr. Raskin said. “That legal standard would have led to a slaughter on Jan. 6.”


ABOUT THE AUTHORS:


Luke Broadwater covers the White House for The Times.

Katie Rogers is a White House correspondent for The Times, reporting on President Trump.

See more on: U.S. Politics, Donald Trump\


More on the Minnesota ICE Shooting:


FASCIST AMERICA 2026: Scumbag-in-Chief Donald J. Trump Is Nothing But A Vile White Supremacist Demagogue, Notorious Criminal, Sexual Predator, Pathological Liar, And Raging Psychopath--Always Was, Always Will Be

“...“It’s very simple,” said Mr. Trump, who has carved out exceptions to his crackdown on refugee admissions for mostly white South Africans. “I want people that love our country,” he said.

Carrying out Mr. Trump’s agenda is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which was formed in 1965 under the Civil Rights Act. The commission’s chair, Andrea Lucas, issued a striking video message last month underlining the agency’s new posture.

“Are you a white male who has experienced discrimination at work based on your race or sex?” Ms. Lucas said in the video posted on X. “You may have a claim to recover money under federal civil rights laws. Contact the E.E.O.C. as soon as possible. Time limits are typically strict for filing a claim.”

“The E.E.O.C. is committed to identifying, attacking, and eliminating ALL forms of race and sex discrimination — including against white male applicants and employees,” she said.

In the video, Ms. Lucas pointed white men to the commission’s F.A.Q. on “D.E.I.-related discrimination,” which notes that D.E.I. “a broad term that is not defined” in the Civil Rights Act.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the nation’s primary litigator of workplace discrimination, and for decades has been a resource for minorities, women and other groups who have historically faced discrimination. But Ms. Lucas has endeavored to make it one of Mr. Trump’s most powerful tools against D.E.I., with a particular focus on remedying perceived harms against white men…”
—Erica Green, “Trump Says Civil Rights Led to White People Being ‘Very Badly Treated’, New York Times, January 11. 2026 
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/us/politics/trump-interview-white-people-discrimination.html

Trump Says Civil Rights Led to White People Being ‘Very Badly Treated’

President Trump’s comments were a blunt distillation of his administration’s racial politics, which rest on the belief that white people have become the real victims of discrimination in America.
 
Listen to this article · 5:41 minutes

Learn more


President Trump has equated diversity with incompetence and inferiority, and cast himself as the protector of white people both at home and abroad.Credit: Eric Lee for The New York Times

by Erica L. Green
January 11, 2026
New York Times 

[Erica L. Green is a White House correspondent. She reported from Washington.] 


President Trump said in an interview that he believed civil rights-era protections resulted in white people being “very badly treated,” his strongest indication that the concept of “reverse discrimination” is driving his aggressive crusade against diversity policies.

Speaking to The New York Times on Wednesday, Mr. Trump echoed grievances amplified by Vice President JD Vance and other top officials who in recent weeks have urged white men to file federal complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

When asked whether protections that began in the 1960s, spurred by the passage of the Civil Rights Act, had resulted in discrimination against white men, Mr. Trump said he believed “a lot of people were very badly treated.”

“White people were very badly treated, where they did extremely well and they were not invited to go into a university to college,” he said, an apparent reference to affirmative action in college admissions. “So I would say in that way, I think it was unfair in certain cases.”

He added: “I think it was also, at the same time, it accomplished some very wonderful things, but it also hurt a lot of people — people that deserve to go to a college or deserve to get a job were unable to get a job. So it was, it was a reverse discrimination.”

Mr. Trump’s comments were a blunt distillation of his administration’s racial politics, which rest on the belief that white people have become the real victims of discrimination in America. During his campaign for president, Mr. Trump harnessed a political backlash to the Black Lives Matter and other protests, saying there was “a definite anti-white feeling in this country,” and he joined his base in denouncing what he deemed to be “woke” policies.

The Trump administration has claimed that eradicating policies that promote diversity would shepherd in a “merit-based” society. But for civil rights leaders, Mr. Trump’s remarks showed that the perceived plight of white men was the true focus.

Derrick Johnson, the president of the N.A.A.C.P., the nation’s oldest civil rights organization, said there was “no evidence that white men were discriminated against as a result of the civil rights movement, the Civil Rights Act, and efforts to rectify the long history of this country denying access to people based on race in every measurable category.”

Within hours of taking office, Mr. Trump ordered the dismantling of diversity, equity and inclusion offices that were responsible for addressing systemic discrimination against minorities and women, and last year he ordered federal agencies to halt enforcement of core tenets of the bedrock Civil Rights Act.


He has gone on to equate diversity with incompetence and inferiority, and cast himself as the protector of white people both at home and abroad. Asked on Wednesday whether his immigration agenda was aimed at making the country whiter, Mr. Trump said he wanted people “that love our country.”

“It’s very simple,” said Mr. Trump, who has carved out exceptions to his crackdown on refugee admissions for mostly white South Africans. “I want people that love our country,” he said.

Carrying out Mr. Trump’s agenda is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which was formed in 1965 under the Civil Rights Act. The commission’s chair, Andrea Lucas, issued a striking video message last month underlining the agency’s new posture.

“Are you a white male who has experienced discrimination at work based on your race or sex?” Ms. Lucas said in the video posted on X. “You may have a claim to recover money under federal civil rights laws. Contact the E.E.O.C. as soon as possible. Time limits are typically strict for filing a claim.”

“The E.E.O.C. is committed to identifying, attacking, and eliminating ALL forms of race and sex discrimination — including against white male applicants and employees,” she said.

In the video, Ms. Lucas pointed white men to the commission’s F.A.Q. on “D.E.I.-related discrimination,” which notes that D.E.I. “a broad term that is not defined” in the Civil Rights Act.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the nation’s primary litigator of workplace discrimination, and for decades has been a resource for minorities, women and other groups who have historically faced discrimination. But Ms. Lucas has endeavored to make it one of Mr. Trump’s most powerful tools against D.E.I., with a particular focus on remedying perceived harms against white men.

PHOTO: Andrea Lucas, the chair of the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in her office in Washington last month. Credit: Kevin Mohatt/Reuters

Ms. Lucas’s tweet was boosted by Stephen Miller, Mr. Trump’s top domestic policy adviser, and Mr. Vance, who shared the video in a series of tweets railing against D.E.I. last month.

The vice president also shared an essay that blamed diversity initiatives for depriving white men of opportunities. “A lot of people think ‘DEI’ is lame diversity seminars or racial slogans at N.F.L. games,” Mr. Vance wrote last month on X. “In reality, it was a deliberate program of discrimination primarily against white men.”


Labor and civil rights lawyers said Ms. Lucas’s video was an escalation in the administration’s tactics to use civil rights laws to remedy what it sees as the disenfranchisement of white men, rather than to help groups that have historically faced discrimination.

“I’ve never seen, in the history of an agency, a blanket request to only one racial group and gender to contact the chair’s office directly to raise concerns about discrimination,” said Jenny R. Yang, a former chair of the commission. “That raises significant concerns.”

Zolan Kanno-Youngs contributed reporting.



ABOUT THE AUTHOR:


Erica L. Green is a White House correspondent for The Times, covering President Trump and his administration.

FASCIST AMERICA 2026: Elie Mystal On ICE and the Real Meaning Of the Deadly Ongoing Crisis of State Sanctioned Violence in Minnesota, Portland, and Throughout the United States

"...Every authoritarian regime throughout history has employed a roving band of armed thugs who operate outside the law to enforce its strongman’s will. Caesar had his Praetorian Guard, Francios Duvalier had his Tonton Macoutes, Hitler had his Gestapo.

Donald Trump has ICE. ICE is functionally a paramilitary organization, armed and empowered to harass citizens, brutalize opposition, and murder people who get in their way. Like any paramilitary apparatus, its chief aim is to strike fear in the population. It does this not only through feats of violence, false imprisonment, and kidnapping but also by repeatedly showing us it can’t be held accountable for its actions. ICE agents can seemingly do anything they want, and no one is allowed to stop them: They know it, and they want us to know it.

When we look at the historical record, the horrifying reality of these thug paramilitaries is that they do not naturally melt away when the strongman is finally deposed. They stay on. They align themselves with the next strongman, or the strongman who wants to overthrow the republican government that deposed the previous strongman. The next guy in office tends to want to keep them around anyway, because having a terrorist apparatus able to operate outside the law is something that leaders of nations consistently find useful.

These paramilitaries can be dismantled, but only when the people demand it, over and over again, and refuse to support any politicians or regimes who would keep them in place. ICE can be stopped, but we do not elect people to power who actually want to stop ICE; we tend instead to elect people who want to “fund” ICE, control it, and use it for their own purposes. And that is why we fail.

ICE must be abolished, root and stem, by the next Democratic administration. As a stopgap, it must be defunded by the current collection of Democrats, should the party take power in the upcoming election. ICE is the one true litmus test for an incoming post-Trump administration. The Democrats will likely not be inclined to do this. Again, paramilitary thugs have their uses to leaders the world over, and Democrats are traditionally afraid of looking “weak” on immigration or actually dismantling the tools of the enemy. Democrats, if they’re going to do this, must be forced to do this, by the people whose support they seek."
--Elie Mystal,  "Abolish ICE or GTFO", The Nation,  January 9, 2026
 
 
FBI takes over case of ICE agent killing US woman and cuts Minnesota’s access to evidence
 
Minneapolis remains on edge, with several protests planned after shooting of Renee Nicole Good


People protest against the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. Photograph: Tim Evans/Reuters
 
8 January 2026 
 
The FBI has taken full control of the investigation into the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) officer in Minneapolis, it emerged on Thursday.
 
In a statement, the Minnesota bureau of criminal apprehension (BCA) said it was initially called upon to help investigate the shooting before federal officials “reversed course” and said the case would be “solely led by the FBI”. With its access to the case materials, witnesses and evidence revoked, the BCA said it had to “reluctantly” withdraw from the investigation.
 
Speaking at a press conference on Thursday, homeland security secretary Kristi Noem denied that the BCA had been cut out of the investigation and said it was a matter of jurisdiction. “They have not been cut,” she said. “They don’t have any jurisdiction in this investigation.”
 
But Minnesota’s governor, Tim Walz, told a news conference that “Minnesota must be part of this investigation. It feels very, very difficult that we will get a fair outcome. And I say that only because people in positions of power have already passed judgment.”
 
Indeed, the reversal from federal law enforcement comes as the Trump administration continues to justify Wednesday’s deadly shooting by accusing Good of engaging in “an act of domestic terrorism” and claiming that the ICE agent who shot her was acting in “self-defense”, alleging she had tried to run him over.
 
That narrative is at odds with video footage of the incident, which has been widely shared online. It shows Good reversing her car and letting at least one ICE vehicle pass before an officer tells her to get out of the car; she then tries to turn and drive away. An agent shoots her multiple times, remains on his feet and walks away apparently uninjured as her car crashes into a lamp-post and parked vehicle.
 
The agent was identified independently by the Guardian as Jonathan E Ross, a Minnesota resident and 10-year veteran of federal law enforcement. Noem continued on Thursday to defend the federal agent – whom she described as “an experienced officer” that was “following his training” – and said he had been treated in hospital after the incident. Both she and the vice-president noted that Ross had been injured in an incident six months ago when an undocumented immigrant resisted arrest in a vehicle.
 
Vance also defended the shooting, repeatedly claiming, baselessly, that Good was part of a “leftwing network” of people who are trying to “incite violence against our law enforcement officers”.
 
He told the White House press briefing without evidence that the young mother was “a victim of leftwing ideology” and had been “brainwashed”, and doubled down on the administration’s claim that the officer had acted in self-defense. Good, 37, was “dead because she tried to ram somebody with her car”, Vance said.
 
The deadly incident, which occurred less than a mile from the spot where George Floyd was killed by police in 2020, escalated tensions that have been building for weeks in Minnesota amid ramped-up federal immigration enforcement operations and fraud investigations by the Trump administration.
 
Authorities in Minneapolis had canceled school classes across the city on Thursday amid safety concerns and rising political tension after the US citizen and mother of three was killed during a large-scale immigration enforcement operation the day before.
 

 
Dozens of clergy members from all faith backgrounds gathered with hundreds of people at the site of the shooting in south Minneapolis at noon to show that the city was unified in its response. “Renee Good stood for her neighbors. We now must stand for her,” said JaNaĆ© Bates, a co-executive director of the interfaith group Isaiah.
 
The crowd chanted “ICE out now” throughout the event, against visible signs of the tragedy: red paint in the snow read “ICE kills”, and writing on the street called for ICE to leave.
 
But emotions remained high in the city, and across the US, as the basic facts of the incident remain the subject of fierce debate.
 
Ilhan Omar posted on social media Thursday morning that thousands of people had gathered to honor Good last night, and that “ICE needs to get out of Minneapolis”.
 
“We will never accept that a single federal agent can be judge, jury and executioner in our streets,” the Minnesota representative said.
 
Minneapolis residents hold vigil for woman fatally shot by ICE agent – video
 
Jacob Frey, the Minneapolis mayor, also made several appearances on television networks on Wednesday night calling for peaceful protests and doubling down on his comments at a press conference earlier in the day in which he called for ICE “to get the fuck out of Minneapolis”.
 
“People are being hurt. Families are being ripped apart. Long-term Minneapolis residents that have contributed so greatly to our city, to our culture, to our economy are being terrorized, and now, somebody is dead,” Frey said.
He said the homeland security department was already “trying to spin this as an action of self-defense”, a claim he said was “bullshit”.
 
Some Republicans seized on Frey’s comments as incendiary, with Nancy Mace, a South Carolina representative, calling for the resignations of the mayor and Walz.
 
Despite local officials’ calls for federal law enforcement to leave the state, the New York Times reported on Thursday that the Trump administration will deploy more than 100 US Customs and Border Protection agents and officers to Minnesota following the fatal shooting of Good.
 
The agents will be redirected from operations in Chicago and New Orleans. The deployment is expected to last until Sunday, the newspaper reported, citing documents it obtained.
 
Noem also stated that ICE operations would continue in Minneapolis, which saw a surge of about 2,000 federal agents this week to target immigrant populations.
 
This story was amended on 8 January 2026 to correct the name of the ICE officer who shot Renee Nicole Good, which is Jonathan E Ross, not Jonathan David Ross. Also, an incorrect reference to Ross being a resident of Minneapolis was removed.
 
US border patrol agents shoot two people in Portland
Police say pair are in hospital but condition not known, 
as mayor urges ICE to pause operations
 
by Robert Mackey in Portland
9 January 2026
The Guardian  (UK) 
 
US border patrol agents shot two people outside a hospital in Portland, Oregon, a day after an ICE officer shot and killed a woman in Minneapolis.
 
The Portland police bureau (PPB) said in a statement on Thursday afternoon that two people were in hospital after a shooting involving federal agents, adding that the conditions of those shot were not known.
 
Police initially responded to reports of a shooting outside the Adventist hospital campus in east Portland, the department said, before learning “that a man who had been shot was calling and requesting help” about 3 miles (5km) away.
 
“Officers responded and found a male and female with apparent gunshot wounds. Officers applied a tourniquet and summoned emergency medical personnel. The patients were transported to the hospital,” the police said.
“Officers have determined the two people were injured in the shooting involving federal agents.”
 
Authorities have not confirmed the condition of the injured, but emergency dispatch audio obtained by FOX 12 Oregon indicated that the 911 call came from a man who said he was shot twice in the arm and his wife had been shot in the chest.
 
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, said in a statement that US border patrol agents had stopped a vehicle to search for a man they suspected of being an undocumented immigrant connected to a Venezuelan gang. According to the agents, they opened fire when the driver of the vehicle tried to run them over, the statement said. “Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired a defensive shot. The driver drove off with the passenger, fleeing the scene,” McLaughlin said.
 
Portland’s mayor, Keith Wilson, said at a news conference:
 
 “We know what the federal government says happened here. There was a time when we could take them at their word. That time is long past.”
 
Bob Day, the Portland police chief, said: “This is a federal investigation. It’s being led by the FBI.”
 
Taking place a day after a federal immigration officer fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis, the shooting sparked sharp condemnation and raised fears of increasing tensions in a city that had been galvanized by anti-immigration enforcement protests late last year.
 
Maxine Dexter, the Democratic representative for the district where the shooting took place, who is also a doctor, said both of the injured people “are alive, but we do not know the extent of their injuries.”
 
She also called on US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to leave the city.
 
“ICE has done nothing but inject terror, chaos, and cruelty into our communities,” Dexter said. “Trump’s immigration machine is using violence to control our communities – straight out of the authoritarian playbook. ICE must immediately end all active operations in Portland.”
 
Dexter also demanded a local police investigation. “We must allow our local law enforcement to do its work,” she said. “There must be a comprehensive investigation without Trump’s interference.”
 
Wilson, the mayor, echoed Dexter’s call for a pause on immigration enforcement in the city. He said: “We cannot sit by while constitutional protections erode and bloodshed mounts. Portland is not a ‘training ground’ for militarized agents, and the ‘full force’ threatened by the administration has deadly consequences. As mayor, I call on ICE to end all operations in Portland until a full investigation can be completed.”
 
Kayse Jama, an Oregon state senator who lives in the neighborhood where the shooting took place, said at an evening news conference that the “welcoming” city he arrived in as a refugee from Somalia decades ago did not need aggressive federal immigration enforcement. Addressing the federal agents, he said: “This is Oregon. We do not need you, you are not welcome and you need to get the hell out of our community.”
 
Zakir Khan, a Portland civil rights advocate, called on the hospital, which is part of Oregon Health and Science University, to release any security-camera footage of the incident it might have “as soon as possible”.
 
A man who was at the medical building told the Oregonian he saw federal officers follow a Toyota pickup truck into the parking lot of the office building and try to corner it. One officer pounded on the window, he said. The driver then backed up and moved forward at least a couple of times, striking a car behind them, before turning and speeding off.
 
There were months of protest in Portland last year centered on an ICE processing facility in the city’s south waterfront. Donald Trump tried to deploy national guard members to the city in response, but the deployment was blocked by a federal judge who said the president’s claim that the city was “war-ravaged” as a result of small-scale protests “was simply untethered to the facts”.
 
Jeff Merkley, one of Oregon’s two Democratic senators, urged protesters to remain calm in light of the shooting. “Trump wants to generate riots,” he said in a post on X. “Don’t take the bait.”
 
The Portland police chief echoed those pleas. Bob Day said: “We understand the heightened emotion and tension many are feeling in the wake of the shooting in Minneapolis, but I am asking the community to remain calm as we work to learn more.”
 
A banner at the top of the Portland city government website late Thursday advised residents: “Respond with calm and purpose.”
 
Early in the evening, about a hundred protesters gathered outside city hall in downtown Portland to chant: “Abolish ICE!” A smaller number of protesters also returned to the ICE facility in south Portland, many of them dressed in the animal costumes that have helped defuse tensions in recent months. Later, police used force to clear protesters from the street outside the facility, arresting six, including a young man who usually wears an inflatable frog costume to protests but was in street clothes when detained on Thursday night.
 
Tensions remain high across several major cities in the US following the shooting of Good in Minneapolis.
 
On Thursday, the FBI took control of the investigation into that shooting, and the Minnesota bureau of criminal apprehension (BCA) said its access to the case materials, witnesses and evidence had been revoked.
 
Speaking at a press conference on Thursday, the homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, denied that the BCA had been cut out of the investigation and said it was a matter of jurisdiction.
 
Minnesota’s governor, Tim Walz, told a news conference that the state “must be part of this investigation”.
 
Meanwhile, the Trump administration continued to justify the deadly shooting by accusing Good of engaging in “an act of domestic terrorism” and claiming that the ICE agent who shot her had been acting in “self-defense”. That narrative is at odds with witness video of the incident, which has been widely shared online, and shows the driver had turned the wheels of her vehicle away from the agent before he shot her three times as she attempted to drive away.
 
Explore more on these topics

Portland
ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement)
Trump administration
Oregon
West Coast
US politics
US immigration
news


https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/newsletter-abolish-ice-conway/

Politics

Abolish ICE or GTFO

In this week’s Elie v. US, The Nation’s justice correspondent makes the case to get rid of ICE, explores George Conway’s congressional campaign—and shares his New Year’s resolution.


by Elie Mystal
January 9, 2026
The Nation


PHOTO: Demonstrators in Minneapolis protest the murder of RenƩe Good. (Victor J. Blue / Bloomberg via Getty Images)


[This is a preview of Nation Justice Correspondent Elie Mystal’s new weekly newsletter. Click here to receive this newsletter in your inbox each Friday.]

Every authoritarian regime throughout history has employed a roving band of armed thugs who operate outside the law to enforce its strongman’s will. Caesar had his Praetorian Guard, Francios Duvalier had his Tonton Macoutes, Hitler had his Gestapo.

Donald Trump has ICE. ICE is functionally a paramilitary organization, armed and empowered to harass citizens, brutalize opposition, and murder people who get in their way. Like any paramilitary apparatus, its chief aim is to strike fear in the population. It does this not only through feats of violence, false imprisonment, and kidnapping but also by repeatedly showing us it can’t be held accountable for its actions. ICE agents can seemingly do anything they want, and no one is allowed to stop them: They know it, and they want us to know it.

When we look at the historical record, the horrifying reality of these thug paramilitaries is that they do not naturally melt away when the strongman is finally deposed. They stay on. They align themselves with the next strongman, or the strongman who wants to overthrow the republican government that deposed the previous strongman. The next guy in office tends to want to keep them around anyway, because having a terrorist apparatus able to operate outside the law is something that leaders of nations consistently find useful.

These paramilitaries can be dismantled, but only when the people demand it, over and over again, and refuse to support any politicians or regimes who would keep them in place. ICE can be stopped, but we do not elect people to power who actually want to stop ICE; we tend instead to elect people who want to “fund” ICE, control it, and use it for their own purposes. And that is why we fail.

ICE must be abolished, root and stem, by the next Democratic administration. As a stopgap, it must be defunded by the current collection of Democrats, should the party take power in the upcoming election. ICE is the one true litmus test for an incoming post-Trump administration. The Democrats will likely not be inclined to do this. Again, paramilitary thugs have their uses to leaders the world over, and Democrats are traditionally afraid of looking “weak” on immigration or actually dismantling the tools of the enemy. Democrats, if they’re going to do this, must be forced to do this, by the people whose support they seek.

Current issue

I’ve liked to think of myself as a single-issue voter, with that issue being Supreme Court expansion. But no longer. Abolish ICE, or GTFO of my primary.