Wednesday, September 9, 2009

David Sirota Calls Out President Obama for not Defending Van Jones

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/cnn-debate-on-van-jones-o_b_278714.html




David Sirota
Political journalist, best-selling author and syndicated newspaper columnist
Posted: September 7, 2009
Huffington Post



CNN Debate on Van Jones: Obama Sells Us Out to Political Terrorist Glenn Beck & His Lynch Mob

Per my post and announcement last night, here's the clip of my CNN debate with David Frum about the Van Jones affair this morning. Notice that Frum has no answer for the obvious double standards. Somehow, nobody gets fired for lying us into Iraq, Tim Geithner keeps his job after tax evasion and gift scandals, Republican Congresspeople remain credible while championing the "birther" lunacy -- but Van Jones must be fired for carelessly signing a petition years ago, which he later apologized for.

As I said on CNN, the hypocrisy uncovers the real truth of this whole affair: Van Jones was targeted by the political terrorist known as Glenn Beck -- the man who leads a 21st century lynch mob looking to hunt down anyone (and especially anyone black) who has ever been a part of progressive movement politics. I don't use that term "political terrorist" lightly. According to the dictionary, a terrorist is "a person who terrorizes or frightens others" -- and usually does so with an ideological objective. There are, of course, many different kinds of terrorists, and I'd say Beck -- with his fearmongering, paranoia and hate -- fits the letter and spirit of the dictionary definition of a political terrorist quite well. Indeed, just listen to this clip or look at this not-so-veiled threat and then try to claim with a straight face that Beck isn't explicitly using the mass media to scare and terrorize people.

In placating the demands of this terrorist and his lynch mob, the Obama administration has simultaneously empowered that terrorist and that lynch mob, while abandoning its own progressive base. (And yes, yes -- I know saying that makes the sycophants upset. I know it means I'll get a lot of irritating email saying, "I guess you wanted McCain!" or "You're going to get us President Romney in 2012!" - as if the progressive movement exists solely to worship at the feet of politicians with a "D" behind their name. That's fine -- that kind of cultism is everywhere in the American Idiocracy, and I've got my "delete" key fired up and ready to go).

I am at once loathe to help fuel this media-manufactured controversy and eager to use this as a kind of "teachable moment" that Obama talks about, but rarely delivers on. If we as a movement cannot stand up for a genuine progressive hero like Van Jones -- a guy with a towering record of real-world accomplishment on behalf of issues and grassroots communities -- then we will not be able to stand up for anything, much less major legislative initiatives.

The multi-million-dollar Washington-based "progressive" organizations that previously used Van Jones to stress their environmental and racial progressivism haven't strongly spoken out about Jones and about the White House's failure to back him. Indeed, most of those organizations have issued mealy-mouthed statements praising Jones but giving their friends in the White House a pass. This is par for the course, unfortunately. As I wrote in my newspaper column this week, and as Jane Hamsher has so effectively shown, these institutions are still too concerned with their White House access than in building a real movement.

So if I can do my own little part to take up the slack through the media, I will -- even if it means I will inevitably be targeted by that same right-wing lynch mob.

Of course, perhaps the Jones affair is the canary in the coal mine. Maybe the White House's refusal to stand by Jones and willingness to accept the demands of right-wing political terrorists is a symptom of the bigger disease whereby the Obama is already selling out progressives on every major priority. Perhaps, in short, Jones isn't the issue -- and what his firing represents is.

I fear that is the case -- certainly the Obama administration's behavior on everything from health care to climate change to war suggests that's what's going on. And if that's true, then we've got a huge problem on our hands


Van Jones' powerful (political) friends were silent when he needed them (VIDEO)


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=47137&tsp=1

by Joe Garofoli
San Francisco Chronicle
September 8, 2009



Notice the silence -- at least among current and even some former Democratic public officials -- in Van Jones' final hours? We reached out to former VP Al Gore and Sen. Barbara Boxer (leading climate change and energy battle in Senate) and San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris (major California fundraiser for Obama) over the past few days to get their reaction to the controversy. Silence.

Rep. Barbara Lee? Nothing offered for Van, even though she was "so very pleased" when her "friend" --- and constituent -- in March to the Administration gig.

We knew Van was green. And he was red for a bit. So what color is political uranium?

All of these people knew Van's history -- the left-wing politics, the provocative comments -- but few stood next to him at his bleakest hour. Sources close to Jones told us that this hurt him. Ultimately, he couldn't survive without somebody -- in office -- watching his political back.

Only SF Mayor Gavin Newsom backed Jones, as we told you the other day.

But Medea Benjamin told us that Jones may be more valuable outside the system than inside it. "Now he has all of those contacts on the inside, he can even be more effective working for the environment now." Arianna Huffington said much the same thing Tuesday, going so far to "thank" Fox News commentator Glenn Beck for helping force Jones back into the private sector. Same for Don Hazen at AlterNet. Center for American Progress head -- and Obama confidante -- John Podesta hinted at the same thing.

There's an "I stand with Van" Facebook page . But it all came too late to help. As Sierra Club president Carl Pope said: "Collectively we -- the environmental community, progressives, and the Obama administration -- blew this, and we let our cause, our president, and Van Jones down. This was a lynch mob and, when it started forming a month ago, we didn't take it seriously enough.

One politician continues to invoke Jones' name this week: GOP Guv candidate Steve Poizner. On Tuesday, The Commish turned his minor Van Jones video sensation from last week into a fundraising email pitch: "Take action to oppose this praise of Van Jones and become a "Huge Fan" of Steve Poizner instead. Show your support for Steve and send a message to Meg Whitman."

And while elected officials are backing away from Jones, liberal organizations aren't. Here's a video just released (it's long but probably more than you're heard from Jones directly before) by Brave New Films, the filmmakers who have taken on everything from Fox News to the Iraq War to the increased escalation in Afghanistan. In the video at the top of this page Van Jones speaks in conversation with Pope:



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-a-palermo/glenn-beck-vs-van-jones-m_b_279416.html


Glenn Beck vs. Van Jones: McCarthyism Enters the 21st Century


Joseph A. Palermo
Author/Associate Professor of History
Posted: September 8, 2009
Huffington Post


When Fox News' Glenn Beck called President Barack Obama a "racist" and claimed that he had "a deep-seated hatred for white people" an African-American netroots group, ColorOfChange.org, organized a successful boycott of Beck's corporate sponsors. It wasn't long until fifty seven of Beck's sponsors jumped ship lest they be associated with Beck's own "deep-seated" white supremacy. Burned, Beck and his right-wing Republican producers sought revenge by using his slice of the echo chamber to go after Van Jones, one of President Obama's most important advisers on green jobs, who could be linked to ColorOfChange. Beck and his buddies viewed Jones as the low hanging fruit of the Obama White House and launched a focused smear campaign against him. During one of his many conspiracy-laden tirades Beck asked: "Will progressive pigs fly right out of Van Jones' butt and pedal bicycles to" replace coal power? It didn't take much time under the glare of Beck's assault for Jones to make the politic move and resign his official post.

The Beck vs. Jones saga illustrates that even with the Republicans out of power their control over a propaganda ministry called Fox News, combined with their domination of the AM radio dial, still allows them to frame the debates within our wider political discourse.

What Glenn Beck, Roger Ailes, and their allies did in drumming Van Jones out of the government was an example of 21st century McCarthyism. They smeared Jones' past political remarks and associations the same way Joe McCarthy and Roy Cohn smeared a young Boston lawyer named Fred Fisher for being a member of the National Lawyers Guild, which they called "the legal mouthpiece of the Communist Party." There's no difference. I always said that if Joe McCarthy were alive today he'd have his own show on Fox News. Well, there you have it. Beck's tactics, which are identical to McCarthy's, have entered the bloodstream of our body politic. At some point someone has got to ask the well-timed question that Joseph Welch asked Joe McCarthy: "Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?" That "sense of decency" to which Mr. Welch referred left our political discourse long ago, somewhere between Lee Atwater and Karl Rove.

What I find interesting about the hyperventilating and shrill denunciations of Jones' mild past remarks coming from Beck and his legions of aggrieved white men is that President George W. Bush had surrounded himself for eight years with a stunning collection of political hacks and charlatans who had said things in the past that would make Minnesota Representative Michelle Bachmann sound cool and rational. To take just one of many possible examples, Bush chose a guy, not just to be one his advisers, but to sit on the federal bench in Little Rock, Arkansas named James Leon Holmes. Holmes was the former president of Arkansas Right to Life who wrote that "the wife is to subordinate herself to her husband" and "the woman is to place herself under the protection of Christ." An earlier example of what flowed from Holmes' pen said this: "[c]oncern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with approximately the same frequency as snowfall in Miami." (Miami saw snow once in a hundred years; there were 32,000 women who became pregnant by rape the year Holmes wrote this drivel.) I only bring up this example to show that no right-wing administration has to worry about purges of their people from a powerless but noisy Left, showing once again the bankruptcy of the faux balance the mainstream press insists on imposing on these types of political fights.

If you serve a right-wing Republican president you can write or say anything you want, even be connected to the white supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens (C of CC). But if you serve a liberal Democratic president, like the "pinks" who fell victim to McCarthyism, you can be taken down in a heartbeat.



Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Letter to and From My Sister regarding Van Jones debacle

Regina,

That's precisely my point. Obama is being nothing but a political coward in not defending and openly fighting for one of the most important and effective grassroots black political leaders/activists in this country---Van Jones. I guarantee you that Van would NEVER have pushed Barack "under the bus" the way Obama has him in this situation. I'm extremely disappointed in and deeply angry with Barack for not standing up for principle or for his brilliant black colleagues and advisors like Jones who have been nothing but loyal to Obama. I gotta be completely honest here and say that I'M NOT LIKING WHAT I'M SEEING FROM OBAMA THESE DAYS and I haven't been impressed for nearly three months now. It takes genuine courage, integrity, independence, and toughness to be a real leader and personal charm and intelligence ain't nearly enough to compensate in this equation. I'm really sick about Van being forced to resign in this situation and it all reflects VERY BADLY on Obama and his tottering administration. At this rate the racist rightwing maniacs will easily take Obama down and crush him like a bug if he doesn't wake up and grow a pair--and soon. Lately he's been turning into the gutless wonder (wunderkind?) right before our very eyes. I really feel for Van. He deserved much, much better from his "boss."

Kofi


On Sep 6, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Regina wrote:

Why didn't Obama fight for Van Jones!?! If I was talking to Obama...maybe he would say...it's easier SAID than done...because the bullets are all aimed at him NOT me???? I don't know what to think. On the one hand, Obama would be absolutely right...on the other hand...I still feel like I NEED a fighter now...more than ever!!!!!

Sunday, September 6, 2009

The Tragic Resignation of Van Jones and Why We (and the Obama Administration) Really Need Him

Van Jones resigned from his position as an environmental advisor Photo: GETTYIMAGES


Van Jones meets with San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom at The Green Collar Economy book signing, October 14, 2008.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6147267/Barack-Obama-aide-resigns-over-claim-that-911-was-a-pretext-for-war.html

All,

More very bad news for the Obama Administration (and most importantly the rest of us). The vicious racial and ideological McCarthyism of the national right wing cabal is going to drown this Presidency and everything it stands for if Obama doesn't fight back (and there are many indications and signals that he won't). His abject weakness in combatting his many virulent enemies is not only having a devastating effect on his ability to govern but also directly contributing to our collective inability as citizens to fully engage in meaningful and effective reform of the major problems facing the nation. What's making a very bad situation even worse is that the American Left has generally been as inept and clueless as the Obama administration has been in effectively fighting the pervasive rightwing/protofascist tide that continues to dominate, distort, and pervert the general direction of politics, economic policy, and cultural ideology in the United States. The massive failure of the left to thus far engage in a serious political effort to actively organize, educate, and mobilize millions of citizens to combat and defeat this rising tide of ideological and social insanity on the right is contributing to the weakneed half-measures of a braindead, opportunist, and highly compromised political party (i.e. the Democrats), and an administration that is constantly retreating and running scared in the face of the verbal and legislative onslaughts of a venal and utterly destructive political party (i.e. the Republicans)

On a personal note this development is also a individual tragedy for Van Jones a major black leftist organizer and thinker (and longtime Oakland, CA. resident!) who has throughout his brilliant career done some outstanding political and cultural work in the Bay Area and throughout the country and whose tireless community activism and critically acclaimed book from 2008 The Green Collar Economy: How One Solution Can Fix Our Two Biggest Problems (HarperOne Books) -- now available in paperback--has been very effective instruments of social change in this country. It's now clear from the vicious attacks and smears on his work and character by the Right that his thriving activist career and even his personal safety will be adversely affected by this libelous and slanderous campaign. In a fundamental sense we are all personally deeply responsible for and implicated in these heinous events precisely because we say we want, need, and desire fundamental social change. Needless to say President Obama, the Democratic Party, and the general Left are all at the forefront of this debacle as well.

Kofi


Barack Obama aide resigns over claim that 9/11 was a pretext for war

Van Jones, a senior adviser to President Barack Obama, has resigned after it emerged that he had signed a petition stating that the Bush administration may have allowed the September 11 attacks to happen as a pretext to go to war.

By Toby Harnden in Washington
Published: 06 Sep 2009
Telegraph (London)


The ousting of Van Jones, a Left-wing activist appointed by Mr Obama as his "special adviser for green jobs", is a victory for Republicans and a sign of growing weakness within the White House.

It was a major scalp for the Fox News host Glenn Beck, who brought Mr Jones's past to prominence and for weeks has been citing his presence in the Obama administration as evidence that the president is guided by a cadre of radical lieutenants.

In an angry statement issued on Sunday, Mr Jones spoke of a "vicious smear campaign against me" and blamed Republicans for "using lies and distortions to distract and divide".

He said: "I have been inundated with calls - from across the political spectrum - urging me to 'stay and fight'. But I came here to fight for others, not for myself. I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past.

"We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future."

David Axelrod, a senior Obama adviser, praised Mr Jones for the "great deal of commitment on his part" in "removing himself as an issue".

Mr Jones apologised twice last week, for signing the petition and for describing Republicans as "assholes" in February, before he joined the Obama administration.

When asked before the weekend whether Mr Jones enjoyed the confidence of Mr Obama, Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, would say only that he "continues to work in the administration".

The White House chose the very early hours of Sunday morning on the Labour Day holiday weekend to make the resignation announcement, a sign that it wanted to bury what had become a major distraction to the battle over health care reform.
Mr Jones's links to a group called Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (Storm) led to allegations from the Right that he was a communist.

After the September 11 attacks in 2001, he attended a vigil at which "US imperialism" was blamed for the al-Qaeda strikes on New York and Washington.

In a 2005 interview, Mr Jones said that after the acquittal of the assailants of Rodney King, the black victim of a vicious beating by white police officers in 1991, he was transformed from a being "rowdy nationalist" into "a communist".

The racial overtones of many of his past utterances were a particular liability for a president whose election campaign was nearly derailed by the rantings of his former pastor Jeremiah Wright and has since been anxious to distance himself from black extremism.

Mr Jones had accused whites of using pollution as a weapon against blacks, stating that "the white polluters and the white environmentalists are essentially steering poison into the people-of-color communities, because they don't have a racial justice frame".

The episode has drawn attention to the large number of czars appointed by Mr Obama - many more than in previous administration - and a haphazard system of vetting appointees that allowed such an obviously controversial figure to get through.

"Curious how he made it that far into the administration when a google search could have told you he believed that the Bush Administration had allowed 9/11 to happen," Dana Perino, President George W. Bush's press secretary, told the Politico website.

"It'd be like the Bush White House having a former clansman or Holocaust denier in the West Wing."

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Obama-Swiftboats-Van-Jones-by-Linda-Milazzo-090906-605.html


Obama Swiftboats Van Jones By Linda Milazzo For OpEdNews September 6, 2009

I was out last evening. I tried to escape, just for a while, back to the days of (Taking) Woodstock when we who worked to end the Vietnam war did so as a united, free-spirited force. I readily admit that in today's times of racism disguised as patriotism, religious perversion, rampant ignorance, unhinged media menaces, and growing hostility amongst Americans, I yearn for that long ago era of 'peace and love.'

Enroute home after my wistful evening, I glanced at my phone and saw a Washington Post alert saying Obama's Green Jobs appointee, Van Jones, had resigned. I was shocked. I knew Jones was being assaulted by the right, but I didn't think he'd resign, and I didn't think the Obama administration would so readily sacrifice this brilliant advocate for the environment and the poor. After all, Jones is a person in the Obama administration who personifies the term "public servant." For progressives, Van Jones' appointment was, and is, Obama's tour de force gift to America of a high level appointee free of corporate entanglements who cannot and will not be bought. Jones is a man for the people in an administration where for the corporation is the norm.

The news of Van Jones' resignation hit me hard. I was particularly bothered by this title by Ryan Grim on the Huffington Post, reporting on Jones' resignation: "Glenn Beck Gets First Scalp: Van Jones Resigns." While I understand how Beck's campaign against Jones might lead Ryan to this conclusion, Ryan and I view this differently.

For me, Jones' resignation isn't a testament to the frenetic dry-drunk tirades of a delusional Fox employee. For me, Jones' resignation was due to the Obama administration's failure to rightfully and necessarily defend a valuable member of its team. Much like it did with humanitarian and foreign policy advisor, Samantha Power in March of 2008, the Obama team sacrificed Van Jones, another humanitarian.

Van Jones was The People's best hope in this Obama administration. Unlike Obama's many remnants from the George(s) Bush and Bill Clinton years; unlike Obama's Democratic party and AIPAC insiders like Rahm Emanuel, and unlike Obama's corporate insiders like Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Van Jones was Obama's lifelong tireless advocate for the people - the member of the administration who was most immune to corporate enticement. Jones had dedicated his life to defend the poor and disenfranchised, and was NEVER a seeker of fortune or fame.

But fame found Jones, anyway, among the wide population of environmentalists, social justice advocates and general do-gooders, because Van did everything so much better. His brilliance, vibrance, and inescapable charisma captivated thousands of admirers at major events where he spoke jubilantly and worked tirelessly to inspire acts of compassion and dedication to public service. Van Jones is Kennedy-esque much more than Barack Obama.

Sadly, after Jones' resignation, I'm certain many will question his tenaciousness and fortitude. But that would be foolish. Even a cursory glance at Jones' vast accomplishments will tell you he's a man of action who won't be held back. In Jones' resignation statement he said:

"On the eve of historic fights for health care and clean energy, opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me. They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide. I have been inundated with calls - from across the political spectrum -- urging me to 'stay and fight.' But I came here to fight for others, not for myself. I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past. We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future."

The line that most captures my attention here is: "I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past." On this line, Van and I disagree. I see it as just the opposite. I believe Van's colleagues, knowing what an incredible talent he is, and what a GOOD man he is, SHOULD have fought for him. The entire Obama administration SHOULD have fought for him. But they didn't. Instead they cow-towed to a screeching, frequently weeping, mostly lying, dry-drunk who hallucinates false images on buildings and calls our first Black president a racist.

Witness for yourselves as Keith Olbermann brilliantly exposes how this deranged Fox News emissary sees hidden messages on buildings. What better proof could there be that this person is unfit to appear on the public airwaves:


More on Van Jones and his work:

http://www.vanjones.net/

Who is Van Jones?

Van Jones is a globally recognized, award-winning pioneer in human rights and the clean energy economy. He is a 1993 graduate of the Yale Law School and an attorney.

Van wrote the definitive book on "green jobs": The Green Collar Economy. In 2008 — thanks to a low-cost, viral marketing campaign — his book became an instant New York Times bestseller. It is today being translated into six languages.

As a tireless advocate for disadvantaged people and the environment, Van helped to pass America's first "green job training" legislation: the Green Jobs Act, which George W. Bush signed into law as a part of the 2007 Energy Bill. He is the co-founder of a number of successful non-profit organizations, including the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights and Green For All.

Van is the recipient of many awards and honors, including: the Reebok International Human Rights Award; the World Economic Forum's Young Global Leader designation; the prestigious, international Ashoka Fellowship; and many more. Van was included in the Ebony Magazine "Power 150" list of most influential African Americans for 2009. In 2008, Essence magazine named him one of the 25 most inspiring/influential African Americans. TIME Magazine named him an environmental hero in 2008. In 2009, TIME named him one of the 100 most influential people in the world.

In March 2009, Van went to work as the special advisor for green jobs at the White House Council for Environmental Quality.

Thank you for visiting VanJones.net. This is a site intended to provide some basic information to people interested in Van Jones, Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality.


On Jones's excellent book:

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Starred Review. As the "ecological crisis nears the boiling point," human rights activist and environmental leader Jones (president of the national organization Green For All) lays out a visionary, meticulous and practical explanation of the two major challenges the U.S. currently faces-massive socioeconomic inequality and imminent ecological catastrophe-and how the current third wave of environmentalism, the "investment" wave, can solve both. If industry players want to take advantage of growing consumer demand for green solutions, they'll have to follow principles of inclusiveness as well as conservation and inventiveness to create "broad opportunity and shared prosperity" for citizens at all levels of society. Rife with statistics, facts and history lessons, Jones introduces a "Green New Deal," a re-imagining of FDR's original New Deal that makes the government "a partner" (as opposed to a "nanny" or "bully") of the people, and sets about defining the principles of a "smart, supportive, reliable" partnership. Jones examines success stories from around the world (included close looks at Chicago and Milwaukee), defines government priorities at national and local levels and offers concrete solutions; one major positive step for any "significant U.S. metropolis" is to "invest massively in constructing buses, light rail cars, and mass-transit projects," creating good jobs while cutting greenhouse gases. With both caution and hope, Jones concludes that "tens of thousands of heroes at every level of human society" will be needed to carry off this third, and perhaps ultimate, green initiative.

Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
Reviews

"Brother Van Jones is a visionary who spells out real solutions in black and white - and, of course, green. Van’s vision of a thriving, green economy doesn’t have throw-away things or throw-away people. It’s the kind of environmentalism everyone can get behind." -- Mario Van Peebles, actor and producer, Mario's Green House

"It’s rare that someone with such a gift for speaking is able to convey the energy and excitement of his message equally well in writing. With The Green Collar Economy, Van Jones surpasses all expectations. The country seriously needs his take on the environment and the economy." -- Gavin Newsom, Mayor of San Francisco

"Jones accomplishes the super heroic feat of linking together the solutions for poverty, the energy crisis, and global warming. Van is a visionary of our times, and one of my personal heroes. Every relevant 21st century leader needs to read Van’s book." -- John Hope Bryant, Founder & CEO, Operation Hope

"The Green Collar Economy is a both a rallying call and a road map for how we can save the planet, reduce our dependency on budget-busting fossil fuels, and bring millions of new jobs to America." -- Fred Krupp, Environmental Defense Fund President and New York Times best-selling co-author of "Earth: The Sequel"

"The baton is passed to climate advocate Van Jones who clearly sees that our future must be green and must include everyone. His powerful new book ‘The Green Collar Economy’ shows us how to accomplish it." -- Laurie David

"This book illustrates the link between the struggle to restore the environment and the need to revive the US economy. Van Jones demonstrates conclusively that the best solutions for the survivability of our planet are also the best solutions for everyday Americans." -- Al Gore

"Van Jones has a unique ability to inspire people of all colors, classes and generations to uplift vulnerable people, while protecting our vulnerable planet. His sparkling intelligence, powerful vision and deep empathy are all on full display in The Green-Collar Economy." -- Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives

"Van Jones reminds us that the worst of times can also be the best of times -- that a nation with an abundance of resources it’s wasting -- beginning with its youth -- has an enormous opportunity to stop foolishly bankrupting itself by chasing resources it is running out of -- like oil." -- Carl Pope, Executive Director Sierra Club

"Van Jones’ authentic and passionate arguments trump the status quo. In The Green Collar Economy he holds the welfare of our neediest people front and center as he lays out a viable plan for the remainder of the 21st century." -- Tavis Smiley, Author, Television and Radio Host

"Van’s words echo the sentiments of many indigenous communities, who have endured the effects of coal strip mining, uranium mining and mega dams. The Green Collar Economy outlines industrial society’s path towards a just future." -- Winona LaDuke, Native American and environmental activist --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.


Van Jones

Born
Anthony Jones
September 20, 1968 (age 40)
Jackson, Tennessee, United States
Education
University of Tennessee at Martin
Yale Law School
Occupation
Environmental advocate
Civil rights activist
Attorney
Author
Known for
Former Special Advisor for Green Jobs in the Obama administration
2009 Time magazine 100 Most Influential People
2009 New York Times bestselling author
Website

Anthony "Van" Jones (born September 20, 1968) is an environmental advocate, civil rights activist, attorney and author, who served for several months as Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in the United States before resigning amidst a political controversy.

Jones founded the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights in 1996, a California non-governmental organization (NGO) working for alternatives to violence. In 2005, Jones co-founded Color of Change, an advocacy group for African Americans.[1] Formerly based in Oakland, California, Jones founded Green For All in 2007, a national NGO dedicated to "building an inclusive green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty."[2] His first book, The Green Collar Economy, was released on October 7, 2008, and reached number 12 on the New York Times Best Seller list.[3] In 2008, Time magazine named Jones one of its "Environmental Heroes".[4] Fast Company called him one of the "12 Most Creative Minds of 2008".[5]

He was appointed by President Barack Obama in March 2009, to the newly-created position on the White House Council on Environmental Quality, where he worked with various "agencies and departments to advance the administration's climate and energy initiatives, with a special focus on improving vulnerable communities."[6] In July 2009 he became "embroiled in controversy"[7] over past political activities, comments and signing a petition for 911Truth.org.[8] He resigned from the position in early September.[9]

Early life

Jones and his twin sister Angela were born in 1968 in Jackson, Tennessee. Their mother was a teacher at a high school and their father was a principal at a junior high school. Jones's sister says that as a child he was "the stereotypical geek—he just kind of lived up in his head a lot."[10] He has described his own childhood behavior as "bookish and bizarre."[10] His grandfather was a leader of the Christian Methodist Episcopal Church, and Jones sometimes accompanied his grandfather to religious conferences, where he would sit all day listening to the adults "in these hot, sweaty black churches".[10] Jones was a young fan of John and Bobby Kennedy, and would pin photographs of them to a bulletin board in his room in the specially delineated "Kennedy Section". He used to imagine his Star Wars action figures were politicians: Luke Skywalker was John, Han Solo was Bobby, and Lando Calrissian was Martin Luther King, Jr..[11] He graduated from Jackson Central-Merry High School in 1986. Jones earned his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Tennessee at Martin (UT Martin). Before entering law school, Jones worked as an intern at the Jackson Sun (Tennessee), the Shreveport Times (Louisiana) and the Associated Press (Nashville bureau). He also helped to launch and spearhead a number of independent, campus-based publishing efforts. These publications included the Fourteenth Circle (University of Tennessee), the Periscope (Vanderbilt University), the New Alliance Project (state-wide in Tennessee), and the Third Eye (Nashville's African American community).[12] Jones credits UT Martin for preparing him for life on a global stage:[13]

I left UT Martin confident that I could take on any challenge and do well at it if I studied hard and worked hard and kept my nose clean. I really do think you can get absolutely anywhere from UT Martin . . . because of the quality of caring and individual attention.
After graduating from UT Martin, Jones left his home state to attend Yale Law School. In 1993, Jones earned his Juris Doctor and moved to San Francisco, California.

Social and environmental activism


Early activism


In 1992, while still a law student at Yale, Jones participated as a volunteer legal monitor for a protest of the Rodney King verdict in San Francisco. He and many other participants in the protest were arrested. The district attorney later dropped the charges against Jones. The arrested protesters, including Jones, won a small legal settlement. Jones later said that "the incident deepened my disaffection with the system and accelerated my political radicalization."[14] Jones said he was "a rowdy nationalist"[11] before the King verdict was announced. By August of that year, he said, "I was a communist."[11] Jones's activism was also spurred on by witnessing racial inequality in New Haven, Connecticut: "I was seeing kids at Yale do drugs and talk about it openly, and have nothing happen to them or, if anything, get sent to rehab...And then I was seeing kids three blocks away, in the housing projects, doing the same drugs, in smaller amounts, go to prison.”[10]

When he graduated law school, Jones gave up plans to take a job in Washington, D.C., and moved to San Francisco instead.[11] He got involved with Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM), a group explicitly committed to revolutionary Marxist politics[15] whose points of unity were revolutionary democracy, revolutionary feminism, revolutionary internationalism, the central role of the working class, urban Marxism, and Third World Communism.[16] While associated with STORM, Jones actively began protesting police brutality.[11]

Ella Baker Center for Human Rights

In 1995, Jones started Bay Area PoliceWatch, the region's only bar-certified hotline and lawyer-referral service for alleged victims claiming police abuse. The hotline started receiving fifteen calls a day.[10] PoliceWatch began as a project of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights. "We designed a computer database, the first of its kind in the country, that allows us to track problem officers, problem precincts, problem practices, so at the click of a mouse we can now identify trouble spots and troublemakers," says Jones "This has given us a tremendous advantage in trying to understand the scope and scale of the problem. Now, obviously, just because somebody calls and says, "Officer so-and-so did something to me," doesn't mean it actually happened, but if you get two, four, six phone calls about the same officer, then you begin to see a pattern. It gives you a chance to try and take affirmative steps.".[17] By 1996, Jones founded a new umbrella NGO, the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, which "consisted of a closet-like office and a computer that Jones had brought from his apartment."[11]
From 1996-1997, Jones and PoliceWatch led a campaign which was successful in getting officer Marc Andaya fired from the San Francisco Police Department. Andaya was the lead officer accused of the in-custody death of Aaron Williams, an unarmed black man. In 1999 and 2000, Jones was a leader in the failed campaign to defeat Proposition 21, which sparked a student movement that made national headlines.[18][19] In 2001, Jones and the Ella Baker Center launched the Books Not Bars campaign. From 2001-2003, Jones and Books Not Bars led a campaign to block the construction of a proposed "Super-Jail for Youth" in Oakland's Alameda County. Books Not Bars later went on to launch a statewide campaign to transform California's juvenile justice system.[20]

Color of Change

Following Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Jones and James Rucker co-founded a Web-based grassroots organization to address Black issues called Color of Change. Color of Change's mission as described on its web site is as follows: "ColorOfChange.org exists to strengthen Black America's political voice. Our goal is to empower our members—Black Americans and our allies—to make government more responsive to the concerns of Black Americans and to bring about positive political and social change for everyone."[1] Within two years of co-founding the organization, Jones moved on to other pursuits, but remains listed on the Color of Change website as "Former Staff".[1][21]

Shift to environmentalism and Green for All

By 2005, Jones had begun promoting eco-capitalism.[22] In 2005 the Ella Baker Center expanded its vision beyond the immediate concerns of policing, declaring that "If we really wanted to help our communities escape the cycle of incarceration, we had to start focusing on job, wealth and health creation."[20] In 2005, Jones and the Ella Baker Center produced the "Social Equity Track" for the United Nations' World Environment Day celebration, held that year in San Francisco.[23] It was the official beginning of what would eventually become Ella Baker Center's Green-Collar Jobs Campaign.

The Green-Collar Jobs Campaign was Jones' first concerted effort to meld his desire to improve racial and economic equality with his newer desire to mitigate environmental concerns. It soon took as its mission the establishment of the nation's first "Green Jobs Corps" in Oakland. On October 20, 2008, the City of Oakland formally launched the Oakland Green Jobs Corps, a public-private partnership that will "provide local Oakland residents with job training, support, and work experience so that they can independently pursue careers in the new energy economy."[24]

In September 2007, Jones attended the Clinton Global Initiative and announced his plans to launch Green For All, a new national NGO dedicated to creating green pathways out of poverty in America. The plan grew out of the work previously done at local level at the Ella Baker Center. Green For All would take the Green-Collar Jobs Campaign mission — creating green pathways out of poverty — national.

Green For All formally opened its doors on January 1, 2008. In its first year, Green For All organized "The Dream Reborn," the first national green conference where the majority of attendees were people of color. It co-hosted, with 1Sky and the We Campaign, a national day of action for the new economy called "Green Jobs Now." It launched the Green-Collar Cities Program to help cities build local green economies and started the Green For All Capital Access Program to assist green entrepreneurs. As part of the Clean Energy Corps Working Group, it launched a campaign for a Clean Energy Corps initiative which would create 600,000 'green-collar' jobs while retrofitting and upgrading more than 15 million American buildings.[25]

In reflecting on Green For All's first year, Jones wrote, "One year later, Green For All is real – and we have helped put green collar jobs on the map... We have a long way to go. But today we have a strong organization to help get us there."[25]

Other

Jones has served on the boards of numerous environmental and nonprofit organizations, including 1Sky, the National Apollo Alliance, Social Venture Network, Rainforest Action Network, Bioneers, Julia Butterfly Hill’s "Circle of Life" organization and Free Press. He was also a Senior Fellow with the Center for American Progress and a Fellow at the Institute of Noetic Sciences. He was a keynote speaker at the youth conference Power Shift 2009 in Washington, D.C.[1]

During the 2003 California gubernatorial recall election, Jones served as Arianna Huffington's statewide grassroots director.[26]

The Green Collar Economy


On October 7, 2008, HarperOne released Jones's first book, The Green Collar Economy. The book outlines Jones's "substantive and viable plan for solving the biggest issues facing the country--the failing economy and our devastated environment."[27] The book has received favorable reviews from Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, Laurie David, Paul Hawken, Winona LaDuke and Ben Jealous.[28]

In the book, Jones contended that invention and investment will take us out of a pollution-based grey economy and into a healthy new green economy.[29] Jones wrote:
[W]e are entering an era during which our very survival will demand invention and innovation on a scale never before seen in the history of human civilization. Only the business community has the requisite skills, experience, and capital to meet that need. On that score, neither government nor the nonprofit and voluntary sectors can compete, not even remotely.
So in the end, our success and survival as a species are largely and directly tied to the new eco-entrepreneurs — and the success and survival of their enterprises. Since almost all of the needed eco-technologies are likely to come from the private sector, civic leaders and voters should do all that can be done to help green business leaders succeed. That means, in large part, electing leaders who will pass bills to aid them. We cannot realistically proceed without a strong alliance between the best of the business world —and everyone else.
Jones had a limited publicity budget and no national media platform. But a viral, web-based marketing strategy earned the book a #12 debut on the New York Times bestseller list. Jones and Green For All used "a combination of emails and phone calls to friends, bloggers, and a network of activists" to reach millions of people.[30] The marketing campaign's grassroots nature has led to Jones calling it a victory not for him but for the entire green-collar jobs movement. The Green Collar Economy is the first environmental book authored by an African-American to make the New York Times bestseller list.[25]

White House Council on Environmental Quality

On March 10, 2009, it was announced that Jones would serve as Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality.[7] Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality Nancy Sutley praised Jones's appointment:[7]
Van Jones has been a strong voice for green jobs and we look forward to having him work with departments and agencies to advance the President’s agenda of creating 21st century jobs that improve energy efficiency and utilize renewable resources. Jones will also help to shape and advance the Administration’s energy and climate initiatives with a specific interest in improvements and opportunities for vulnerable communities.
Jones, while an ardent supporter of President Barack Obama, originally did not intend to work for the White House, later explaining:[31]
Not only did I say I had no intention of going, when they asked the question, I burst out laughing because at the time it seemed completely ludicrous that it would even be an option. I think what changed my mind was interacting with the administration during the transition process and during the whole process of getting the recovery package pulled together. I began to see that there was an important role at the table, inside the process, to do make sure all the great things the president wants to do can get done well. But the real miracle was Phaedra [Ellis-Lamkins, who replaced Jones as head of Green for All]. Having done such an extraordinary job in San Jose and California, Phaedra was ready to graduate to a national role, wanted to stay in the Bay Area. ... Once you begin to see that you're not indispensable—in fact somebody can probably do your job better than you—then your mind kind of opens up to other possibilities. I couldn't be prouder to be laying my sword on the table along with everybody else in the Obama Love Army, and I'm excited about it.
His previous position with the Obama Administration had been described by columnist Chadwick Matlin as "switchboard operator for Obama's grand vision of the American economy; connecting the phone lines between all the federal agencies invested in a green economy."[32] Jones's responsibility is to work with various government agencies to make sure the $30 billion from the stimulus earmarked for green-jobs funding attached to it gets "doled out appropriately."[32] Jones described his position as "the green-jobs handyman. I'm there to serve. I'm there to help as a leader in the field of green jobs, which is a new field. I'm happy to come and serve and be helpful, but there's no such thing as a green-jobs 'czar.'"[33]

Resignation from administration

In August 2009, a controversy arose as some past statements and activities of Jones came to light.

9/11 Truth petition

In 2004, Jones was one of "100 notable Americans" who signed a "911 Truth Statement" from 911Truth.org. The statement among other things called (referring to the George W. Bush administration) "for immediate public attention to unanswered questions that suggest that people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war."[34] On September 3, 2009, after widespread criticism, Jones issued a statement, "I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever."[35]

Berkeley Green Energy Conference statement


Jones was criticized for comments he made about Republicans during a question and answer session following a speech given at Berkeley Energy and Resources Collaborative's 2nd Annual Lecture on February 11, 2009, one month prior to his White House appointment. [36] Responding to a question on why Democrats are having trouble moving their initiatives through Congress while Republicans seemed to be more successful when they were in control, Jones replied,
The answer to that is: They're assholes. That's a technical political science term. And Barack Obama's not an asshole. I will say this, I can be an asshole. And some of us who are not Barack Hussein Obama are gonna have to start getting a little bit uppity.[37][38]

Responses

Controversy over the disparagement of Republicans and Jones's signing of the "911 Truth Statement" led to calls for his resignation or firing, first by Glenn Beck of Fox News Channel[39], who had been under fire from the Color of Change organization, leading to an advertiser boycott. Other conservative commentators soon joined in [40] along with legislators. Representative Mike Pence (R-Indiana), the chairman of the Republican Conference in the United States House of Representatives, said of Jones, "His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this administration or the public debate."[41] Senator Kit Bond (R-Missouri) urged Congress to investigate Jones' "fitness" for the position, writing in an open letter, "Can the American people trust a senior White House official that is so cavalier in his association with such radical and repugnant sentiments?" Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas), Chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, chimed in via Twitter saying, "Van Jones has to go."[42]

Jones responded to the criticisms by issuing a statement saying, "In recent days some in the news media have reported on past statements I made before I joined the [Obama] administration – some of which were made years ago. If I have offended anyone with statements I made in the past, I apologize."[43] Regarding his comments about Republicans, Jones said those comments "were clearly inappropriate" and that "they do not reflect the experience I have had since I joined the [Obama] administration."[37]

Announcement

Following weeks of controversy Jones resigned shortly after midnight (ET) on September 6, 2009, Labor Day weekend. His resignation letter contained the following:[44]

"On the eve of historic fights for health care and clean energy, opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me. They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide. I have been inundated with calls -- from across the political spectrum -- urging me to 'stay and fight.' But I came here to fight for others, not for myself. I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past. We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future."

White House Council on Environmental Quality chair Nancy Sutley did not argue with Jones' resignation, saying only he had been a strong voice for renewable energy jobs and wished him well in the future.[45]

Awards and honors

Jones's awards and honors include:[46]

1997-1999 - Rockefeller Foundation "Next Generation Leadership" Fellowship
1998 - Reebok International Human Rights Award
2000 - International Ashoka Fellowship
2008 - Best Dressed Environmental List (#1 of 30); Sustainable Style Foundation[47]
2008 - Time Magazine Environmental Hero
2008 - Elle Magazine Green Award
2008 - One of the George Lucas Foundation's "Daring Dozen"
2008 - Hunt Prime Mover Award
2008 - Campaign for America's Future "Paul Wellstone Award"
2008 - Global Green USA "Community Environmental Leadership" Award
2008 - San Francisco Foundation Community Leadership Award
2008 - Puffin/Nation prize for "Creative Citizenship"
2008 - World Economic Forum "Young Global Leader"
2009 - Hubert H. Humphrey Civil Rights Award[48]
2009 - Eco-Entrepreneur Award, Institute for Entrepreneurship, Leadership & Innovation; Howard University
2009 - Individual Thought Leadership, Energy & Environment Awards; Aspen Institute[49]

Publications

Van Jones with Ariane Conrad. (2008). The Green Collar Economy. New York: HarperOne. ISBN 978-0-06-165075-8.

See also

Eco-capitalism
Social justice
Green job
Green collar worker

References

^ a b c d "What Is ColorOfChange.org?". Color of Change. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ "About Us". Green For All. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ "Best Sellers". nytimes.com. 18 October, 2008. Retrieved 04 September, 2009.
^ Elliot, Michael (2008). "Van Jones: Heroes of the Environment 2008". Time. Retrieved 2009-08-31.
^ "The 12 Most Creative Minds Of 2008". Fast Company. December 23, 2008. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ Judkis, Maura (10 March, 2009). "Obama Drafts Van Jones as Green Jobs Adviser". U.S.News & World Report. Retrieved 04 September, 2009.
^ a b c Lee, Jesse (March 10th, 2009). "Van Jones to CEQ". The Blog. The White House.
^ "Embattled Environmental Aide Resigns". Washington Post. 2009-09-06. Retrieved 2009-09-06.
^ "Jones Leaves Obama Adviser Job Amid Controversy". 06 September, 2009. Retrieved 06 September, 2009.
^ a b c d e Kolbert, Elizabeth (2009-01-12). "Greening the Ghetto". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2009-08-25.
^ a b c d e f Strickland, Eliza (November 2, 2005). "The New Face of Environmentalism". East Bay Express. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ "Luminary: Van Jones". Institute of Noetic Sciences. Shift in Action. Retrieved 2009-09-05.
^ Mitchell, Rita (2009-05-25). "Van Jones and the Promise of a Green Future". Tennessee Alumnus. Retrieved 2009-09-05.
^ Jones, Van (May 13, 2007). "15 Years Ago: Rodney King Uprising Left LA in Flames -- And Me in Jail!". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ "Reclaiming Revolution: History, Summation, and Lessons from the Work of Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM)" (PDF). Spring 2004. p. 21. Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ "Reclaiming Revolution: History, Summation, and Lessons from the Work of Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM)" (PDF). Spring 2004. p. 24. Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ Kennedy, Kerry (2004). "Van Jones". in Richardson, Nan. Speak Truth to Power: Human Rights Defenders Who are Changing Our World (2nd ed.). New York: Umbrage Editions. p. 70. ISBN 1-884167-33-0.
^ Templeton, Robin (February 23, 2000). "California Youth Take Initiative". The Nation. Retrieved 2009-09-02.
^ Hsiao, Andrew (July 18th 2000). "Color Blind". Retrieved 2009-09-02.
^ a b Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, Ella Baker Center: A Brief History, accessed 17 August 2009
^ "Former Staff". colorofchange.org. Retrieved 03 September, 2009.
^ Jones, Van (July/August 2007). "The New Environmentalists". Time. Retrieved 2009-08-31.
^ "Van Jones, esq". Ella Baker Center for Human Rights. Retrieved 2009-08-28.
^ "Oakland Green Jobs Corps". Ella Baker Center for Human Rights. Retrieved 2009-08-28.
^ a b c "A New Movement for a New Century: 2008 Annual Report". Green For All. Retrieved 2009-08-28.
^ Coile, Zachary (September 30, 2003). "Huffington considering leaving governor's race". San Francisco Chronicle: p. A1.
^ "About The Book: The Green Collar Economy". HarperCollins. Retrieved 2009-08-28.
^ http://vanjones.net/page.php?pageid=10[dead link]
^ Jones, Van (2008). The Green Collar Economy. New York: HarperOne. ISBN 978-0-06-165075-8.
^ Sabloff, Nicholas (2008-10-20). "How Environmental Activist Van Jones' Book 'The Green Collar Economy' Reached The NYT Best Sellers List". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ Pibel, Doug (March 10, 2009). "Van Jones: Why I’m Going to Washington". Yes Magazine. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ a b Matlin, Chadwick (April 19, 2009). "Van Jones: The Face of Green Jobs". The Big Money (Slate). Retrieved 2009-08-25.
^ Burnham, Michael (March 10, 2009). "Obama's 'green jobs handyman' ready to serve". Greenwire. The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-09-01.
^ "911 Truth Statement". 911Truth.org. October 26, 2004. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
^ Garofoli, Joe (2009-09-05). "Obama adviser on green jobs under attack". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-09-06.
^ "BERC 2nd Annual Lecture: Van Jones and the Green Collar Economy". Berkeley Energy and Resources Collaborative. Retrieved 2009-09-04.
^ a b "White House Green Jobs Adviser Apologizes for Calling Republicans 'Assholes'". FOXNews.com. September 02, 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-04.
^ "Obama's Green Jobs Czar Van Jones: Republicans Are "A**holes"". Real Clear Politics. September 02, 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-04.
^ Sarah Wheaton (2009-09-06). "White House Adviser on ‘Green Jobs’ Resigns". New York Times.
^ Cooper, Charles (September 3, 2009). "For Van Jones, A Week Already Feels Like A Year". Coop's Corner (CBS News). Retrieved 2009-09-05.
^ Franke-Ruta, Garance (Sep 4, 2009). "Leading Republican Demands That White House Fire 'Green Collar' Adviser". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-09-04.
^ Franke-Ruta, Garance (05 September, 2009). "White House Says Little About Embattled Jones". washingtonpost.com. Retrieved 05 September, 2009.
^ Garofoli, Joe (2009-09-05). "Obama adviser on green jobs under attack". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-09-06.
^ Kornblut, Anne E. (06 September, 2009). "White House Adviser Van Jones Resigns Amid Controversy Over Past Activism". washingtonpost.com. Retrieved 06 September, 2009.
^ "Obama's green jobs czar Van Jones quits under fire". latimes.com. 05 September, 2009, 10:10 PM PST. Retrieved 06 September, 2009.
^ HarperCollins, About the Author, Van Jones (2008)
^ "Best Dressed Environmental List". Sustainable Style Foundation. Retrieved August 18, 2009.
^ "Van Jones: 2009 Hubert H. Humphrey Civil Rights Award Honoree". Civilrights.org. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
^ "Aspen Institute Energy and Environment Awards". Aspen Institute. Retrieved August 18, 2009.

External links

Van Jones' personal website
Biography of Van Jones
'Ella Baker Center for Human Rights in California', The Nathan Cummings Foundation (2004) Retrieved January 28, 2007.
Van Jones' blogs at The Huffington Post
'Van Jones: Speak Truth to Power Defender' Speaktruth.org (2007 interview) Retrieved February 6, 2007.
'Miracles', Jones' biographical keynote at the Craigslist Foundation's 'Nonprofit Boot Camp' Retrieved September 4, 2009.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Have a Book and a Beatdown: Abuse of the Homeless in Detroit


Want a kick with that Karamazov? How about a shove with that Shakespeare? You can get that and more at the Detroit Public Library, just fall asleep inside. Oh, and be homeless.


By Patricia Calloway

It’s happening everywhere:

• In Toms River, N.J., five high-school students were charged with beating a 50-year-old homeless man nearly to death with pipes and baseball bats — throwing hockey pucks at him for good measure — as he slept in the woods.

• In Butte, MT, a 53-year-old homeless man was killed at a Greyhound bus depot because he refused to give another man a cigarette, according to court records. The man's skull was fractured by his attacker.

• In Spokane, WA, a one-legged, 50-year-old homeless man was set on fire in his wheelchair on a downtown street; he died as a result of his injuries. Police charged a 22-year-old man with first-degree murder in his death.

• In Nashville, TN, a homeless woman sleeping on a boat ramp was shoved into the Cumberland River, according to witnesses. Two men were charged with homicide in her drowning; authorities say the attack was unprovoked.

The homeless of America are under attack at record rates. According to the National Coalition for the Homeless, of 142 homeless people who were attacked in 2006, 20 attacks resulted in death. This was a 65% increase from the previous year, when 86 attacks resulted in the deaths of 13 people.

In its November 2008 study, "Hate, Violence, and Death on Main Street USA," the NCH documents that from 1999-2007, 774 acts of violence were perpetrated against the homeless. Of these violent acts, 217 resulted in death; the remaining 557 were non-lethal attacks, which basically means the victims didn’t die. These reports were collected from 235 cities in 45 states and Puerto Rico.

In Fort Lauderdale, FL, three men mercilessly beat a homeless man sleeping on a bench on a college campus with baseball bats, an attack caught on videotape.

In Los Angeles, CA, a homeless man was beaten with an aluminum bat as he slept on the sidewalk, an attack which cost him the sight in one eye and put him in a coma for three weeks.

And in Detroit, MI, a homeless man was kicked off a chair and onto the floor as he slept at Detroit Public Library by a DPL security officer. I witnessed that one personally.

A PERFECT PUMMELING

On March 7, 2009, I was doing research for a writing project at the Main Library when I looked up and saw a security guard approach a gentleman who appeared to be asleep in a chair. The gentleman was unresponsive to her attempts to rouse him from his sleep. I suggested to the guard that he may be on meds; many Detroiters are on prescription medications and this would explain his unresponsiveness.

After a few more attempts to rouse him from his sleep, and when she thought I wasn’t looking, the security guard delivered a low, quick side kick to the sleeping man’s legs, causing him to slide off his chair and topple over onto the floor. He landed on his head with a loud “smack!”. I cried out and ran to where he had fallen. The man never awakened.

And so it began.

“HE DRUNK”

Just as she delivered the kick to the man’s legs, the security guard looked up and saw me looking at her. This prompted her, like a guilty child, to walk toward me as I ran toward the man and explain to me that he was drunk (as if that could possible justify her kicking him). The man lay there on the floor, still unresponsive. After a few minutes he began to awaken, and then he sat up. I asked him if he was alright, did he need any help, etcetera. I was concerned because of the sound his head made when it hit the cement floor. He sat up and was talking and once I was satisfied that he was not seriously hurt, I went back to my seat where I could watch out of the way.

The security guard did radio for help, but, strangely enough, disappeared off the floor immediately after the incident. After another ten minutes or so, a male officer came to the area and stood watch while waiting for a second officer, who joined him near the man, who was still on the floor.

After twenty minutes or so of enduring his insults, the guards were able to get the man to his feet and escort him from the library. Yes, he did smell of liquor when he passed me. However, the sight of the guard kicking him onto the floor was so disturbing to me that I went home and e-mailed Uzoma Oenymaechi, Director of the Main Library, and complained bitterly about what I had witnessed. And what did I do THAT for?

GEE, THANKS. NOW BEAT IT.

Oenyamaechi assured me that it was not the library’s policy to pummel its patrons and that he would look into the incident and report his findings to me.

Approximately thirty days went by before I emailed him inquiring about the outcome of his findings. He assured me that he was still investigating and that he would get back to me with his conclusions.

Another thirty days went by without word from Mr. Oenyamaechi; I decided not to contact him, but to give him another 30 days.

Finally, one week short of 90 days after the incident, Mr. Oenyamaechi contacted me via email to report his findings.

WHATCHA TALKIN’ ‘BOUT, WILLIS?

Mr. Oenyamaechi informed me that he found no wrongdoing on the part of the guard in the incident of March 7, 2009. He stated that he found no impropriety in the way the incident was handled and that he had concluded that the guard did not kick him, that she only tapped his shoulder and that he fell getting up out of the chair on his own (presumably under his own power).

After playing “Blame the Victim” (supposedly the man made subsequent visits to the library where he was drunk and disorderly and had to be escorted out again), the library director claimed he had videotape of the incident which did not show the officer kicking the man. His investigation complete, he thanked me and encouraged my continuing being “an advocate for the less fortunate” (his exact words), and sent me on my way.

NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED

I explained to Mr. Oenyamaechi that his investigation was flawed because he had not interviewed me, the eyewitness. I pointed out that no one confesses to something like assault, and that since the other guards arrived after the fact, they are flawed witnesses.

The other witness, the victim, was unconscious at the time he was assaulted; to this day he has no idea the guard kicked him out of that chair. He never got out of the chair, as the DPL director claimed in his email to me, because he was unconscious at the time. He fell out of the chair and went straight to the floor from the momentum of the security guard’s kick.

He explained to me that the videotape confirmed no wrongdoing.

I argued that I did not believe he viewed a videotape, because he would have seen what happened and contacted me to confirm what he saw. I offered to view the tape with him and show him how and where this happened. He claimed to have seen me on the videotape attending to the man, but claimed that he did not see the officer kick the man from the chair. I find that odd, very odd indeed.

As of this writing, I have not been interviewed by anyone at Detroit Public Library regarding this incident, and I am the eyewitness to the assault on this man. I have been available to make a formal statement regarding this matter since the day it happened, and continue to be available for interview. However, I doubt if I will be called; the Detroit Public Library feels it has concluded its investigation, glaringly obvious flaws and all.

WHAT’S GOING ON?

Michael Stoops, Executive Director of the National Coalition for the Homeless explains: "Homeless people are the newest minority group in America that is 'OK' to hate and hurt," he said. "It's as though, somehow, they're viewed as less deserving, less human than the rest of us."

Some homeless advocates say that city ordinances that restrict where the homeless can sleep, beg, congregate or bathe unintentionally reinforce the negative stereotype of homelessness and contributes to violence. It is this criminalization of homelessness that encourages the abuse. They are perceived as having no rights (because they are outdoors), which, in the mind of a social deviant, means they are unprotected under the law (since laws target the homeless specifically) and are therefore easy prey.

TURNING A BUCK: CORPORATE VIDEO EXPLOITATION OF THE HOMELESS

The CBS News magazine “60 Minutes”, in a story about the upsurge in violence against the homeless, reported on the phenomenon called “bum hunting”, in which teens stalk the homeless and hunt then down to be savagely beaten, sometimes to death. The NCH estimates that as many as 500 homeless people have died as a result of this “sport” since 1999. The popular video series “Bum Fights”, in which the homeless, some of whom are mentally ill, are bribed with liquor and small amounts of money to fight each other, light their hair on fire and hurt themselves on camera, has been named as the inspiration for many of these attacks by the actual perpetrators in court proceedings. The exploitation of the weak, powerless and homeless has become genuine home entertainment.

You haven’t seen anything until you have seen The Bum Hunter. The Bum Hunter is a sick parody of Steve Irwin’s Crocodile Hunter, only the Bum Hunter hunts bums.

He sneaks up on them while they are asleep, referring to them as “creatures” and “fine specimens”, then falls upon them and restrains them by duct taping (yes!) their feet, hands and mouths. Sometimes he rolls them over and makes remarks about their skin, hair, nails and once he opened a homeless man’s mouth (yes, he did!) to inspect his teeth on camera.

He then ransacks their buggies, carts and bags, holding them up and describing their contents to the camera.

What did the producer of “Bum Fights” have to say for his sorry, perverted self? And I quote:

“We’re merely exposing something that people didn’t know exists. I think it’s interesting. I can’t imagine what would make somebody do the things that Rufus [a homeless man paid by the producer in alcohol and a ten-spot to humiliate himself on-camera] has done to himself……..”

Not only could he not see why Rufus would do these things, he couldn’t see the connection between his videos and the upswing in violence against the homeless by teenagers, even though his videos were cited as inspiration by millions of teens who engage in bum hunting.

In 2004, nine national retailers, including Target, Borders, Blockbuster, Barnes and Noble, Tower Records, Best Buy and Amazon saw nothing wrong with selling these “Bum Hunter” videos in their stores or on their websites. After the NCH called these national retailers out for their exploitation of the lost and unsheltered in a Cleveland press conference, they immediately stopped selling them.

These videos have found a second life on YouTube, but then you knew they would, didn’t you? Check it out and be sickened.

DON’T HATE ME BECAUSE I’M INDIGENT

Should assaulting a homeless person be considered a hate crime? The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups and their activities in the United States, certainly thinks so. According to The Intelligence Report, formerly known as Klanwatch, crimes against the homeless resemble hate crimes.

Brian Levin, a criminologist and hate-crimes expert at Cal State San Bernardino, says attacks on homeless people "fit the category like a glove" and should be punished as severely. He explains that hate crimes and attacks on the homeless bear an uncanny resemblance to one another: stereotyped victims, offenders who act on latent prejudices, offenders who seek thrills or feel superior to their victims (like, say, a uniformed security guard in a public library), and a mob mentality.

"And on all these points the attacks against the homeless are really indistinguishable from other hate crimes except for one difference — there are a heck of a lot more of them", Levin says.

According to the FBI, which has been collecting hate crimes data since 1990, between 1999 and 2005, 82 people were killed in the United States of America because of their race, ethnicity, or religious or sexual orientation.

There were 169 homeless people murdered-more than twice as many people-during that same period, the National Coalition for the Homeless says. In the next 2 years 56 more homeless people would be murdered on the basis of their lack of housing.

By 2007, 26 members of Congress had asked the GAO to determine whether attacks on the homeless can be classified as federal hate crimes, and six states, Maryland, California, Massachusetts, Nevada, Texas and Florida, put homeless hate crimes bills into their legislatures.

BACK TO THE STACKS

I don’t look at the incident of March 7, 2009 as a tragedy, because it’s not. I see it as an opportunity to inform the public about the seriousness of this problem that few people even think about. A society is judged on how it treats its lessers; its poor, its uneducated, its children, its elderly. Detroiters should know that their fellow citizens are being abused and mistreated.

The fact that the abuser, in this situation, is a municipal employee or perhaps a contractor, just makes it all that more difficult to understand.

Strangely enough, this is not the first time I’ve witnessed the callousness of a City of Detroit employee toward a homeless person.

IT’S DÉJÀ VU ALL OVER AGAIN

A little over a year ago, I was riding the Fort Street bus when a homeless man tripped off the curb into its path. He hit his head on the pavement and was knocked unconscious.

As a tiny but slow river of blood flowed from and puddled under his head, the bus driver remained behind the wheel of the bus while staunchly refusing to see about the man. “I don’t want to get sued”, she said. Instead of calling EMS, she called her dispatcher and told him she couldn’t move her bus because a man was laying in front of it.

She didn’t want to get in trouble for being late on her bus route, so she cleared herself with a DOT supervisor first. Myself and another passenger called EMS for him. She radioed for an ambulance, but only after we had already used our cell phones to call.

So when I saw the DPL guard kick the sleeping man, I knew I had a job to do.



WHEN YOU GET RIGHT DOWN TO IT

The recent collapse of the American dream has revealed the ugly truth, that a society that worships money, material possessions, youth and beauty is not so rich, accomplished, young and pretty after all, but a seriously deluded collective who must keep the hoax going by any means necessary.

The homeless are a staunch reminder of what a joke the American dream really is, how unattainable it really is and how quickly it can become a nightmare. We see how far and how fast one can fall after losing a paycheck, and our wage slavery becomes apparent. We feel cheap and gutless, like frightened whores standing in the rain.

The homeless reflect the truth about the society we live in, a society that would spend trillions of dollars killing people on the other side of the world instead of spending millions saving lives at home; the brutality of our socioeconomic system is oh so very obvious and becomes glaringly apparent, but we can’t stop worshipping it.

We can’t look at the homeless, lest we see who we really are. Besides, it might be catching, so wemust run away from it as fast as we can.

And maybe that’s it; maybe the sight of ourselves if not for the grace of God disturbs us on some primal level. We have to ignore them (us) and if that doesn’t work, destroy what they represent (our true selves outside of God’s mercy and grace) even if it means destroying them, period.

That is why the man at the Main Library ended up on the floor. He was appropriately feisty and belligerent toward the guards when he came to himself. I was relieved to hear from the library director that he had returned to the library, all piss and vinegar and insult and trouble, because it meant he had survived his fall and was alright. I’ve wondered in the 80 or so days since he crashed to the floor if he was okay.

Nothing is coincidence; I witnessed the injustice done to the sleeping man for a reason. Perhaps it’s because I’m like him, all piss and vinegar and insult and trouble, appropriately feisty and belligerent and unafraid to stand up and speak truth to power; maybe I’m the only one who could write this editorial not for the glorification of self, but in the hopes that it will spur someone to action and bring about a change.

And if that is so, then God’s mercy and grace has not been far from him at all; His mercy is my witnessing what happened and standing up for the homeless man, His grace, the man’s ignorance of what was done to him in the library that day.

God is good. All the time.

You can contact Uzoma Onyemaechi via email at uonyema@detroitpubliclibrary.org, or you can call him at (313) 833-1000. Drop him a line; let him know you read this and tell him what you think. I told him I would write this, so you won’t be surprising him. Go ahead, email the guy; after all, he, like the security guard, is a public employee.

Mr. Onyemaechi has this weird habit of referring to Detroiters who use the DPL as “customers”; I had to correct him on that. People who support libraries and other institutions through tax dollars are not customers. They are patrons; he and his employees are on the public’s dime. It’s that corporate crap they’re teaching to public institutions these days.

Go ahead, email him and let him know that in light of the foreclosure crisis that has touched every city in this country and the many families that have been displaced from their homes that you don’t appreciate his lack of compassion for our most vulnerable citizens.

There but for the grace of God go us all, and he can go, too. Tell him that.

Call Onyemaechi and tell him to respect the dignity of the homeless.


Patricia Calloway writes Citizen Pat’s Blog at
www.thepatshow.wordpress.com. She lives in Detroit, Michigan






Sunday, August 30, 2009

Dick Cheney Is a War Criminal--What Are You Going to Do about It Mr. President?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26587.html

All,

Enough already with this contemptible bullying creep! There's no two ways about it folks: Obama is going to have to find the GUTS, INTEGRITY, AND INDEPENDENCE to tell this notorious war criminal and first class political cretin TO GO STRAIGHT TO HELL (Cheney's favorite habitat) or suffer the dire consequences (and we're the ones who will suffer the most as always). Cheney is nothing but an arrogant authoritarian prick and serious national menace and what he and the rest of the gangbanging Bushwhackers did with their draconian and blatantly unconstitutional, illegal and immoral torture, rendition, and detention policies is nothing short of treason. The real question before us all then is whether Obama's administration is going to actually enforce the law when it comes to the criminals from this country's political and economic elites. So far the President has been nothing but a cringing, passive chump in the face of Cheney's vicious streetcorner signifying and if Obama, Holder, and the rest of his team is ever to receive the kind of genuine respect and support from those of us who voted for him he's got to be a real leader of integrity and vision who demands and deserves it on the basis of what he actually does and not on meaningless celebrity 'style points'. We're all way past the "congratulations brother!" stage of our relationship with our new President and I sincerely hope Barack fully understands that. We're not his frontline syncophants after all, WE'RE CITIZENS. As I've said from day one of his inauguration I deeply want President Obama to succeed as a genuine political and economic reform leader (and I still do) but not at our collective expense, and standing up to and vigorously opposing vile reactionary gangsters like Dick Cheney and everything he and his moronic minions and defenders stand for is an absolute prerequisite in that respect. Anything less is absolute failure and I for one have no intention of settling for that...

Kofi




Cheney digs in
By: Carol E. Lee
August 30, 2009
Politico


Former Vice President Dick Cheney delivered another harsh rebuke of the Obama administration, calling the Justice Department’s new investigation into whether CIA interrogators broke the law "an outrageous political act” and questioning Barack Obama’s ability to lead the country.

“I wasn’t a fan of his when he got elected, and my views haven’t changed any,” Cheney said in an interview that aired on Fox News Sunday. “I have serious doubts about his policies, serious doubts especially about the extent to which he understands and is prepared to do what needs to be done to defend the nation.”

While Cheney has been uncharacteristically vocal since leaving office in January, this was his first interview since Attorney General Eric Holder announced an investigation into interrogations carried out by CIA personnel during the Bush administration.

He said the investigation is “an outrageous precedent to set” and will have consequences for the country’s national security.

“It’s clearly a political move,” Cheney said. “There’s no other rationale for why they’re doing this.”

Cheney accused Obama of going back on his word not to look back and investigate enhanced interrogation techniques sanctioned by the Bush administration because he got “a little heat from the left wing of the Democratic Party.”

He dismissed the idea that Holder is acting independently and suggested Obama could have stopped the investigation.

“The president is the chief law enforcement officer in the administration,” Cheney said. “He’s now saying, well, this isn’t anything that he’s got anything to do with. He’s up on vacation at Martha’s Vineyard, and his attorney general is going back and doing something that the president said some months ago they wouldn't do.”

Asked if he will speak with investigators if they want to talk to him, Cheney said, “It’ll depend on the circumstances.”

Democrats hit back just minutes after Cheney’s interview aired. The Democratic National Committee fired off an e-mail to reporters disputing Cheney’s argument that the CIA records released last week showed the enhanced interrogation techniques under the Bush administration were effective in gathering intelligence about Al Qaeda. The e-mail, which cited various news reports, also accused the former vice president of being a “strong and vocal proponent of torture,” and pointed to polls that show “American’s don’t agree with Cheney on national security.”




Cheney’s daughter Liz was also out Sunday to defend her father and the Bush administration on CIA interrogation policies.

But her comments during a roundtable discussion on ABC’s “This Week” often sparked a spirited debate and left her and the other panelists talking over each other.

Liz Cheney, like her father, pointed out that the Justice Department had looked into the same issue five years ago.

“And this investigation has already been done,” Cheney said.

“By the Bush administration,” Sam Donaldson interjected.

“Excuse me, Sam,” host George Stephanopoulos jumped in.

At one point, the exchanges had gotten so intense as Stephanopoulos tried to move on that Gwen Ifill of PBS NewHour piped up: “Hello, George is talking.”

“You guys continue this in the green room,” Stephanopoulos quipped.

During the discussion, Liz Cheney said that “waterboarding isn’t torture,” and said that a newly declassified report by the CIA's inspector general showed that the aggressive interrogation techniques produced critically important information — a conclusion other panelists contested.

The former vice president also defended the Bush administration’s policies on enhanced interrogations in his Fox interview. He said he knew about waterboarding as a policy in general but not specific cases, and characterized it and other techniques as “absolutely essential” to saving American lives.

Cheney predicted the Justice Department investigation will deplete morale at the CIA.

“We ask those people to do some very difficult things,” he said. “Nobody’s going to sign up for those kinds of missions.”

And he mocked President Obama's creation last week of a High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group — which effectively moves control of those detainees from the CIA to the White House — calling it “silly.”

“If we had tried to do that back in the aftermath of 9/11,” he said, “we’d have gotten no place.”

© 2009 Capitol News Company, LLC





Sunday, August 23, 2009

California: Disaster (and Hope?) Ahead

by Chuleenan Natambu

Today I passed by four homeless men during the seven blocks I walked to Walgreen's drugstore to buy the latest issue of Rolling Stone -- the new one featuring Matt Taibbi's health care article. After I walked one block, a young man standing about 20 feet to my left, called out "Do you have a dollar?" "Sorry," I replied. Then he asked if I had a cigarette and I told him I don't smoke. He muttered something else but I kept walking. About three blocks later another young man asked me if I had five cents. A few blocks later I saw still another man who looked to be in his 40s, approach two older women coming out of a local bar. I passed by them as they stopped and one opened her purse to give him something.

When I got to the Walgreen's there was a middle-aged man selling Street Sheets. He's a regular at Walgreen's, always neatly dressed and polite. Sometimes I give him something on my way out or I at least say, "Sorry" or something but today I just hurried into the store. I was feeling a bit depressed by how many panhandlers I'd passed during my short walk. And I just didn't want to face another request for money.

While I live in a neighborhood that has been undergoing extensive gentrification over the past few years my short walk offers a brief glimpse of how bad things are in California and how much worse it will get. As most people know, unless you've been living in a cave and have no access to any media whatsoever, California is in the midst of a horrendous budget crisis. (The deficit was reported at $26.3 billion last month.)

In this week's New Yorker, Hendrik Hertzberg sums it up nicely: "California, it turns out, is ungovernable. Its public schools, once the nation’s best, are now among the worst. Its transportation and water systems are deteriorating. Its prisons are so overcrowded that it has to turn tens of thousands of felons loose." Yep. The situation is so bad that a panel of federal judges recently ordered that the state must reduce its prison population by 27 percent. Inmates are stacked up in triple bunk beds. You can read all about the recent court order in this New York Times article. The budget crisis has made it more likely that inmates will be released early, but of course Attorney General Jerry Brown will appeal the ruling.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's proposal to release 27,000 inmates early, is opposed by Republicans. Law enforcement and victims' rights groups aren't so keen on the idea either. But what will happen to the folks who are released early? California's unemployment rate reached a high of 12.1 percent in July. How can former inmates possibly get a job interview in this economy? At the rate we're going, you won't be able to walk one block without encountering homeless people every step of the way.

Is there a glimmer of hope? Well, Hertzberg's article mentions that California could have a constitutional convention and start over again. There has been a lot of discussion about it over that past year and with the budget crisis, there is a possibility that it may actually happen. The initial impetus was this San Francisco Chronicle opinion piece by Jim Wunderman, president and CEO of the Bay Area Council.

A constitutional convention would wipe the slate clean and delegates would write a new state constitution. The current state constitution is an unwieldly document with hundreds of amendments courtesy of our initiative process. Repair California is working on getting an initiative for a constitutional amendment on the ballot for 2010. If that happens, the goal is to hold the constitutional convention in 2011 and then have citizens vote on it in the 2012 election. Perhaps the one good thing that has resulted from this budget fiasco is that people can no longer deny that California's state government is truly broken. And come November 2012, we may indeed be voting for true reform.