Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Ryan Coogler Takes On Hollywood And Demands 'His Share': The Real Nexus Between Race, Art, and Class in the American Film Industry (Or Corporate Hegemony Vs. The Individual Artist and the Aesthetics/Dialectics of the Market}

 
The Movie Deal That Made Hollywood Lose Its Mind


Credit: Illustration by Sam Whitney/The New York Times

Listen to this article · 8:57 minutes

Learn more

by Tiana Clark
May 3, 2025
New York Times


[Ms. Clark is a poet who teaches creative writing at Smith College.]

In 2050, thanks to an advantageous deal he made with Warner Bros., Ryan Coogler will own the rights to “Sinners,” the Black Southern Gothic blockbuster he wrote and directed. The contract gave him final cut and a piece of the box office revenue right from the start, too. Owning his movie about Black ownership in the Jim Crow South was, Mr. Coogler has said, a nonnegotiable.

Since the film came out, these contract stipulations have been much discussed, even controversial. That has little to do with why “Sinners” is so enthralling to watch — after all it’s a genre-bending and -blending film, steeped in horror, blues and history, and even has vampires — but everything to do with the film’s central theme, and why it is so resonant: the art of the deal. Negotiation is a central thread in “Sinners,” a repeated motif about the power and consequence of deal-making in America. (This essay includes spoilers for “Sinners.”)

The protagonists of “Sinners” are identical twin brothers nicknamed Smoke and Stack, both played by Michael B. Jordan, Mr. Coogler’s longtime collaborator. After serving in World War I and becoming involved with Chicago gangsters, the slick-talking duo return in 1932 to their Mississippi Delta hometown to set up a juke joint, enlisting their gifted cousin Sammie to play guitar. The town, Clarksdale, happens to also be the location of the crossroads where the legendary blues musician Robert Johnson supposedly sold his soul to the devil for mastery over his guitar. With a satchel full of cash and a truck full of liquor, the twins come back to the South having realized that “Chicago is Mississippi with tall buildings instead of plantations.”

Their for-us-by-us plan was to generate wealth by owning and operating a blues-drenched sanctuary for Black joy, a private escape from the daily terror of racial oppression. Many of the clientele are Black sharecroppers who have been forced into exploitative contracts by white landowners, a point made evident in “Sinners” when a customer tries to use wooden coins to buy a drink. The fake money is good only at the plantation store.

Nobody Black had the leverage to negotiate a good deal in the Jim Crow South. Despite the vampires in the film, the real monsters are the ordinary-seeming men, like Hogwood, the covert Klansman from whom Smoke and Stack buy the mill they are going to turn into the juke joint, who smile as they take your money and shake your hand, and have no intention of honoring the terms.

During this time, legalistic disfranchisement was common for Black blues musicians, who were often unaware of how royalties worked, or were intentionally not told how they worked, or were just given a bottle of booze as payment. Bessie Smith thought she was signing a lucrative deal in 1923 with a white executive, Frank Buckley Walker, who oversaw “race records” for Columbia. Walker crossed out the royalty clause in her contract, and Smith was given a fixed fee of $200 per recording; she thought that was a good deal for a Black musician at the time, unaware that white country artists on Columbia often had royalty agreements, even though Smith was more successful than many. Smith received a little less than $30,000 for the 160 recordings she made for Columbia even though her estimated sales reached over six million records in the 1920s.

Smith died in 1937 in Clarksdale, from injuries sustained during a car crash on Highway 61, only a few miles from the mythical intersection where Johnson is said to have made his bargain with the devil. Johnson did not register any of his music and died penniless a year later, with no royalties for the 29 songs he recorded. However, his music keeps making money 87 years later for Columbia Records and other musicians covering his free, unprotected work, including Eric Clapton, Led Zeppelin and Bob Dylan.

All of which is the historical context for why Mr. Coogler’s successful negotiation matters to more than just him. And also, arguably, why it upset some people in the film industry.

On April 18, the day “Sinners” opened, Vulture published an article titled “Hollywood Execs Fear Ryan Coogler’s ‘Sinners’ Deal ‘Could End the Studio System.’” The reporter cited an unnamed studio executive calling the contract a “very dangerous” precedent. The most incendiary sentence, to me, was this: “The Coogler deal has come to be regarded as Hollywood’s latest (if not nearly greatest) extinction-level threat.”

When asked about the coverage on the “Democracy Now!” program, Mr. Coogler said, “I think a lot has been made of my deal in particular,” adding, “I’ve been in this industry long enough to know what kinds of deals are possible, and nothing in this deal is a new thing.” When the interviewer asked Mr. Coogler why he thought his agreement was drawing particular scrutiny, he laughed and responded, “I’d rather not say.”

And in fact his copyright arrangement is unusual, but not unprecedented. Quentin Tarantino secured a copyright-controlled deal for “Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood.” Similarly, in news media coverage at the time, nobody treated similar deals for Mel Gibson, Richard Linklater and Peter Jackson with such alarm, or even interest. Why is it somehow out of line for a bankable auteur like Mr. Coogler, who has a $2.5 billion track record with box office juggernauts like the “Black Panther” and “Creed” franchises?

Instead of viewing Mr. Coogler’s contract as a threat, why not criticize a movie industry that has exploited Black talent since it began? Again, I know the answer, which is why I do not see Mr. Coogler’s deal as a threat to what the Vulture article termed the “time-honored industry power balance.” The power was never in balance for Black people to begin with.

There is a goosebumps-inducing monologue early in “Sinners” by the old bluesman Delta Slim, riding in a car with Stack and Sammie as they pass a chain gang of Black prisoners. Delta Slim recalls his Black friend who tried to save money honestly and move away from Mississippi only to be castrated and lynched by the Ku Klux Klan for the audacity of wanting more for himself. Slim’s poetic speech of sorrow breaks into a dirge as his grief-drunk words dissipate into waves of uncontrollable moans, overtaken by a thunderhead of concentrated anguish as the groans morph into the bent, blue notes of the blues. Delta Slim slaps his thigh repeatedly like a bass drum — beat after beat after beat — an ancestral boom that resonates with the call-and-response reverberations in the leftover rhythms from the chain gang’s pounding hammers made into instruments to communicate to one another across the landscape of pain.

Having the power and privilege to make your own decisions is a central narrative struggle in “Sinners.” Throughout the film, characters are making and breaking deals, negotiating their needs and desires for money, sex, power, family, love, escape, music and freedom. In an early scene, Smoke asks a Black girl to watch his car and cargo for a small fee, and then teaches her how to negotiate: to never settle with the first offer, but to counteroffer, know her worth and ask for more.

In the coda of the film, we found out Sammie has lived a long life as a blues musician. (The older Sammie is played by the real-life blues legend Buddy Guy. The film was partly inspired by whiskey-sipping memories Mr. Coogler had of listening to old blues records and family stories about Mississippi with his uncle James, who loved Buddy Guy.) We found out that Smoke made a final deal with Stack (now a vampire) before he died to let Sammie live as a living testimony, an agreement made in thinking about what survives out of violence as a legacy to what came before, which is the main reason Mr. Coogler — who will be only 63 when the copyright of the film reverts back to him — fought for that copyright deal in the first place, for his children.

In an interview with Jelani Cobb for “The New Yorker Radio Hour,” Mr. Coogler talks about how hard Spike Lee had to work to get the funding he needed for his film “Malcolm X.”

“Hearing Spike talk about ‘Malcolm X’ and going door to door with Black celebrities to raise money for —— ” Here, Mr. Coogler cuts off his words as if to stop himself from breaking down, followed by a shaky sigh as his emotions overtake him as they do Delta Slim in his moving monologue.

Mr. Cobb then asks, “What does that mean to you to have to do that?” Mr. Coogler pauses as his voice trembled and trailed off. “I’m getting emotional because it’s hitting me now because I’m talking about the ease of which I can make a vampire movie this expensive.”

The ease that Mr. Coogler pinpoints here is why his deal for “Sinners” is so important and crucial to me as a Black writer navigating what’s possible. When I was negotiating my first book deal, I was given this piece of advice from one of my mentors: “They will make you feel like you have to be so grateful for everything that you’re not allowed to ask for anything. Ask anyway. Ask for what you need.”

More on ‘Sinners’ and cultural appropriation

‘Sinners,’ the Blues and Fighting for Artistic Control

April 28, 2025

The Symbolism in ‘Sinners’

April 26, 2025

Opinion | Tiana Clark

Kendrick Lamar’s Halftime Show Was Radically Political, if You Knew Where to Look

Feb. 14, 2025

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Tiana Clark is a poet who teaches creative writing at Smith College and is the author of the collection “Scorched Earth.”

Source images by Warner Bros. Pictures and mikroman6/Getty Images.

‘Extraordinary destruction’: American citizens weigh in on the True Meaning of the first 100 Days of the Fascist Terror that is the Donald J. Trump regime and its Relentless Ongoing Horrific Impact on the United States and the World

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/30/trump-100-days-reaction-responses

Readers give their verdict on Trump’s 100 days: ‘Extraordinary destruction’

The president promised an ‘extraordinary’ first 100 days in office but for many that has been true in all the wrong ways

 30 April 2025 The Guardian  (UK)

Composite: The Guardian/Getty Images

The first 100 days of Donald Trump’s second term have polarized the United States and the world.

Public opinion polls show the president’s approval rating is around 40% – having flipped from positive to negative since his inauguration. A vast majority of Americans are worried about a recession and how his trade war will affect the economy.

The Guardian asked readers to react to what the president said would be an “extraordinary” first 100 days in office.

Here, 100 Guardian readers share their thoughts on the first 100 days in 100 words or less:

A whirlwind 100 days

Readers give their verdict on Trump’s 100 days: ‘Extraordinary destruction’

The president promised an ‘extraordinary’ first 100 days in office but for many that has been true in all the wrong ways

Guardian readers

The first 100 days of Donald Trump’s second term have polarized the United States and the world.

Public opinion polls show the president’s approval rating is around 40% – having flipped from positive to negative since his inauguration. A vast majority of Americans are worried about a recession and how his trade war will affect the economy.

The Guardian asked readers to react to what the president said would be an “extraordinary” first 100 days in office.

Here, 100 Guardian readers share their thoughts on the first 100 days in 100 words or less:
 
A whirlwind 100 days

The 100 worst days of my life.
– James McGraw, Louisiana, 76 years old, retired

It’s extraordinary that he has made 100 days feel like 1,000.
– Joe, New Zealand

This was the plan and now it’s in action. People who were shocked weren’t listening, and the people who knew were mocked and called crazy.
– Aleesa Edwards, Georgia, 17, high school senior

I’m fearful of the future. And I’m sad to see what’s happening to our democracy and the erosion of our freedoms. So many people are suddenly less safe due to the policies of this administration. We’ve gone backwards.
– T Handley, Huntsville, Alabama, 44, working in the real estate industry

He’s an abuser, he’s a liar, and he fakes his golf game.
– Chris, Maine, 47

The pace and breadth of his destruction of the constitution and federal government makes me ill. I’ve never felt so afraid and powerless, but I suppose that is his goal.
– Amanda Harris, Louisiana, 42, caregiver for two disabled people

I didn’t vote for Trump, but I know that a lot of people regret it now because they realise they’ve voted against their own interests.
– Megan, Brainerd, Minnesota, 28, pregnant and disabled

Trump has succeeded in extraordinary destruction. He has warmongered, gutted time-honoured institutions and endangered everything Americans hold dear.
– Taraneh Ghajar, Washington DC, public relations

He’s a stupid, selfish, crass and unremarkable man. He knows this and is just taking it out on the rest of us. His first 100 days have been a nightmare.
– Paige Harris, Swansboro, North Carolina, 37, student and substitute teacher

His first 100 days? Deplorable!
– Christopher Stevens, Chattanooga, Tennessee, data analyst

President Trump has packed so much into his second presidency that I’m so excited about. The end of “woke” nonsense, DEI, etc has been a welcome step forward. The cutting the fat mentality has also been eye-opening and I’m excited to see corruption sniffed out and efficiency take hold.
– David, Davenport, Florida, 43, radio personality

Unmitigated disaster!
– Arjen Bootsma, Atlanta, Georgia, 60, county engineer

I’m terrified and angry and terrified for my teens and what type of future they will have, let alone my life as a middle-aged person with retired, elderly parents.
– Michele West, Oregon, 52, stay-at-home mom

Few of the promises he made to his supporters have been kept: the wars in Ukraine and Gaza are not over; the stock market has tanked; inflation can only go up due to tariffs; Musk is wreaking havoc, while failing to hit the trillions in cuts he projected. But on the positive side, I think Democrats will win big in 2026 and 2028, if this continues. Or rather, they should.
– Lucas Miller, Locust Valley, New York, TV advertising producer

Our other branches of government seem content to just sit back and let him do it. I have been waiting since his first campaign for the thing that would be “bad enough” to get everyone to wake up to his lunacy, but apparently we still aren’t there yet.
– Lacy, Colorado, marketing consultant

Trump has delivered on his promises with bold action and clear results. He prioritized securing the border, reinstated strong immigration policies, and finished the wall in key areas. Trump revitalized the economy by slashing regulations and bringing jobs back to America. He defended American energy, withdrew from harmful global agreements, and put American interests first. His swift executive actions dismantled Biden-era diversity mandates and returned power to the people. Trump restored law and order, backed law enforcement, and strengthened the military. In just 100 days, he kept his word and proved that leadership rooted in patriotism can get results fast.
– Felix Basco, Las Vegas, Nevada, chef

Short of a nuclear holocaust or a successful junta, it’s hard to imagine things can get much worse.
– Don Stevens, Washington, 68, IT in education

Trump has gutted our rights, social safety net, allies and trade relationships.
– Larry Gassan, Camarillo, California, mostly retired

We’re going to have to come up with a new word for whatever’s worse than a cluster fuck.
– Mark Warren, Michigan, 63, retired

His all-out assault on our freedom, our climate, our international relations, and our financial security is not only impulsive and ill-advised, it is dangerous to our democracy.
– Larry, Arlington, Texas, 65, retired

Fear and sorrow for my lovely planet, children, grandchildren, future. Aghast at the inhuman choices for cutting funding to science, the poor, everything just to enrich the rich. Totally engaged in personal and community resistance to the local politics and regime in place. Will never show loyalty to this buffoon.
– Elise, Michigan, retired

If this is what people define as great, they need to refer to a dictionary. I don’t know who is doing well under this administration except Trump and his buddies.
– Will C

The worst presidency I have personally lived through. An idiotic president with an incompetent cabinet that is working hard to dismantle our great country and its institutions.
– Preet, California, 32, software engineer

Are you familiar with the story of Pompeii and Mount Vesuvius? The only difference is that Trump will disappear all the bodies. Evidence? What evidence?
– Steven Baty, Maine, 65, retired

Full of chaos, cruelty and completely unconcerned with anyone but himself.
– Jen, Gainesville, Florida, retired doctor

There is no rating low enough. The Maga party is a danger to our country.
– Chris Gates, Portland, Oregon, healthcare worker

At this point, optimism has come down to hoping he’ll do something so horrendous that I’ll qualify as a political refugee in a functional nation. Spain, I’m looking a ti.
– Henry Quinn, Maine, 50, tutoring

He led his base to believe he was going to make our life better. He never gave details about how his plan would work. Now things appear to be off track. He has convinced his voters that they will have to suffer for a while before things get better. Yet many of his voters still believe him. I don’t know why.
– Bert, Wisconsin, chemical processes industry

It has been a catastrophic presidency. I am embarrassed and ashamed of his actions, words and decisions.

– Candace

It’s a daily rollercoaster, it is overwhelming and shocking. We are protesting, we are making calls to government officials. Trump doesn’t seem to care how he treats Americans. It is disgusting and quite terrifying!
– J Bowman, Alaska, 45, accountant

Trump has acted exactly as promised and expected. He promised tariffs; he delivered in a typical spasmodic manner. He promised an immigration crackdown; he delivered a “best that I can do” waddle. He promised dictatorship on day one; he’s done his best to supersede his incompetence.
– Darryl K, Virginia, retired

Chaotic at best, mediocre for sure, and totally fucked-up.
– Erik Charpentier, Montreal, Canada

He has succeeded beyond my greatest fears.
– Joe, California, business owner/operator

Trump’s second term has unfolded about as we expected, with an administration equal parts billionaire grifters and incompetent sycophants.
– Jim Summerville, South Carolina, 65, healthcare IT consultant

Trump has succeeded in remaking the government in his image and cowing Congress and rankling markets and all, but on a day-to-day level, on the ground, nothing has changed. Everything feels eerily normal. There’s a disconnect between everyday reality and Washington.
– Stephen Twentyman, northern Virginia, 39, meat guy at Walmart

Trump’s first hundred days are great; if you don’t care about clean air, clean water, freedom of speech, freedom of choice, or democracy.
– Craig, northern California, 78, retired high school teacher and Vietnam veteran
 
Project 2025

The nation was told by Trump, pre-election, that he knew nothing about Project 2025. On day one he swiftly began implementation of the program.
– Shirley Deakins, Tennessee, retired professional nurse

He seems to be following Project 2025 pretty closely. As of now, for me, little has changed in my daily life. But I drip with privilege. Everything he’s doing, he promised to do during the election. Anyone clutching their pearls at this time is a performance artist seeking attention.
– Paul Grajnert, Beverly Shores, Indiana, 60, writer, film-maker, social worker

He’s followed the Project 2025 plan alarmingly closely, occasionally veering off on his own to be extra crazy.
– James Gosling, California, 69, retired
 
Endangering democracy

I grew up hearing my grandmother’s stories about when the Germans came to her village in the 1930s, and I’m watching it happen all over again.
– Michelle, New Orleans

By definition Trump has succeeded at being extraordinary in almost all negative ways. He has violated laws, norms, decency, human rights, and morals. He is doing what his wealthy funders want and destroying all the best things in America.
– Oliver

He governs like a bull in a china shop, preferring chaos over law and order.
– Jacob Hansen DO, North Carolina, 48, physician

Trump is tearing down the foundations of American democracy, aspiring for autocracy, in service to fellow billionaires.
– Bruce Brod, Sequim, Washington, 76, retired software and IT manager

Trump is a psychopathic narcissist who is destroying the US, abetted by the spineless Congress. My father fought in the second world war to free Europe. He would be heartbroken to see those alliances destroyed. I am enraged and I am fighting back.
– Kathy Callaway, Woodacre, California, 75 years old

I feel like the iron curtain is falling over our country.
– Sara, Detroit, Michigan, 39, IT project manager

I knew Trump hoped to make drastic changes to the country on every level, but I thought saner heads would prevail and keep him in check.
– Christine, Georgia, 70, retired

Efforts to abolish ‘‘DEI’’ policies have been effective, and, in my opinion, need to be a continued focus of the current administration. Likewise, there has been some success in “downsizing”, or abolishing, some federal agencies, notably the US Agency for International Development. The motivation for previous US administrations to make an open-ended commitment to underwriting “social” programs in foreign countries was difficult to justify. Closing down such programs seemed appropriate.
– Martin F Heyworth, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 78, retired academic

He and his henchmen promised to institute fascism and they did.
– Mac Markeiwicz, Reno, Nevada, teacher

He has only riled up his supporters and base. He has hurt the majority of Americans with his attacks on the environment, education and health system. He is a nightmare one cannot wake from.
– Matthew Gallagher, New York, retired teacher

He’s taking us backwards in time.
– Teri Poyner, Colorado Springs, Colorado, disabled

Trump does not have the burden of responsibility for his rash actions.
– Frank Boekhout, Sint Maarten, retired teacher

One fails to remember how shortsighted and simple his mind is. When you elect a monkey, don’t then blame the monkey when he throws excrement on the walls.
– Jâms Ward, Liverpool, United Kingdom, musician and housing officer

If a foreign power had managed to gut federal agencies, crash the markets, alienate allies and take citizens off the streets and “disappear” them, it would be considered an act of war. The old America would muster all its resources and obliterate the attacker. But, the current lawless Republican cult is an insidious cancer consuming us from the inside.
– JP Hussey, Columbia, Maryland, 67, retired

[Trump] has also succeeded in showing how you build an oligarchy in the west.
– Gil Garces, Porto, Portugal, 43, entrepreneur

No time in our history have so many civil liberties been stripped while simultaneously destroying our global positions of strength economically and democratically. I am not sure the majority of Americans have realized the strides towards authoritarianism that have been made and am afraid they won’t realize before it’s too late.
– Ryan Sweet, South Carolina, 32, restaurant manager

He has gone against the constitution several times, and is slowly destroying our entire system of law.
– Victoria, Tennessee, 32

He (as expected) hasn’t done a single positive thing for the American people. Plenty for billionaires, his cronies and Musk, but he has not lowered costs for average Americans, hasn’t improved their day-to-day lives and hasn’t kept us safer.
– Sunni Willis, Florida

I wish the media would treat this administration as extraordinary instead of acting as if it’s “normal”. There is nothing normal about it. Trump has very rapidly demolished American democracy. I expect to never have another free and fair election in this country. He will simply declare a national emergency and cancel the elections, leaving his minions in place. The American experiment has failed.
– David, Arizona, 70, auditor

He has managed to turn the entire country into a failed Atlantic City casino. In the words of Pussy Riot we as Americans “have to wake up”.
– Mark, Arkansas, 66, physician
 
Economic turmoil

The most heartbreaking results of this catastrophic administration are seen daily in the faces and demeanor of my elderly patients, all of whom rely on social security, Medicare or Medicaid for survival. Every single patient is panicked about losing their earned benefits, and most are experiencing some amount of cognitive decline. So they worry. A lot.
– Andrew Maxwell, Thurston county, Washington, 40, in-home caregiver

My situation is not terrible as yet, but further economic turmoil will severely damage my pension and possibly my social security payments.
– Richard, North Carolina, 76, retired university professor

My retirement funds have diminished dramatically. I now add stress about continuing to receive social security and my retirement annuity to stress about healthcare costs and availability, food costs and availability. And stress about my poor children and grandchildren.
– Joan, Michigan, 68, retired healthcare provider

He promised lower prices. That seems to be the last thing he has on his mind. My small retirement fund has lost at least 25% (and counting).
– Michael Lynch, Billings, Montana, 70, retired

As my portfolio declines, my chances of a decent retirement decline. We seniors are through working and we do not have years and years to wait for our portfolios to regain what they have lost.
– Cecil Corson, Westfield, Indiana, retired, sales account representative

He did a phenomenal job of duping conservative working-class voters into voting for him and they will likely pay the biggest price
– Matthew, California, 41, hospitality leader

[Trump] might be able to skip the recession middleman and take us straight to depression – he’s that good. So if that’s the definition of extraordinary, (and with apologies to George W Bush) mission accomplished.
– Sylvia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 69, retired

A dictator wannabe who has simultaneously ruined our economy and our stability, our safety and our good name in the world.
– Deb Edge, Wisconsin, 67, retired

I believe we are headed towards a “Trumpression” – a Trump-led depression that will shake the world.
– Stuart Reis, New York, 75, retired, part-time tai chi instructor

His willingness to compromise the economy was a surprise. The myth that he understands the economy is extremely important to maintaining his power, so I tend to view undermining that as a sort of self-sabotage.
– Jasmine, Wisconsin, 37, self-storage

Everything is worse, scarier and more expensive.
– Joey Gonnella, New York City, 27, artist and college professor
 
Elon Musk

Trump has not succeeded. Bringing in Elon Musk was a bad idea, including setting up Doge to wreak havoc on our civil servants with firings and layoffs. The appointment of unqualified goons to cabinet positions is without merit.
– Paul G, Marana, Arizona, 65, process consultant

He violates US law and is not held accountable. He’s allowed Musk to destroy our government.
– JM, California, physician

Doge is not doing anything efficiently. It is targeting departments for layoffs that have zero understanding of the departments they are ravaging.
– Chris, Pennsylvania, 56, geriatric healthcare

Dismantling important agencies and betraying allies is lunacy.
– Jeff Stone, San Francisco, California, 73, retired surgeon

The staff around are dreadful. At best “C” players.
– Michael Bruno, New Jersey, management consultant
 
US leadership around the globe

What has taken me more by surprise is the international chaos. The president and his team have managed to evaporate American soft power in a matter of weeks, yet he seems to think that he can handle international trade like a mob boss running the least subtle protection racket in history. Sometimes I wonder if the country is mere months away from a sort of quiet pariah status. Or perhaps that’s already happened.
– Allan Scott, Sunnyvale, California, 45, software engineer

He has single-handedly wrecked decades of US leadership and international goodwill.
– William, South Carolina, retired teacher

He has destroyed the reputation of the US.
– Gary Farrar, United States, 72, retired

To our friends, allies and those seeking a home, I apologize, and know that many of us stand with you.
– Ian, Alexandria, Virginia, 35, consulting

I am heartbroken over America’s decline in morals and leadership.
– Margaret Szoke, Boulder, Colorado, 71, retired

Our president has isolated us from the rest of the world. We no longer have any allies that trust us.
– Chris, Michigan, non-profit executive

I think Trump has succeeded at further dividing our country, fracturing our institutions and alienating us from the rest of the world.
– Sarah, Reno, Nevada, 39, healthcare admin

Three months ago, I was a proud American. I loved my country, cherished our democracy, and appreciated our government for what it did domestically and internationally. I am now ashamed for all that has transpired these past 100 days.
– Keith, Smalltown, Washington, 67, retired

The US is in danger of losing its powerful position in the world and damaging itself beyond repair.
– Ed Strosser, New York City, 60, contractor and writer

For the first time in my life, I am embarrassed to be an American.
– Matt, Massachusetts, white-collar professional

[W]hen a 79-year-old man says that countries are “kissing his ass” to make deals, it makes me cringe.
– Chris Harvey, Illinois, 74, retired
 
Tariffs

It has been a disaster. The tariffs have taken away 20% of my business.
– John K Thomas, California, self-employed in manufacturing

The man is a fucking idiot. He has harmed most Americans with Doge, especially, and tariffs.
– Janet L Colbran, Nashville, Tennessee, retired biochemist

Trump’s tariffs are economic lunacy and unfair to Australia where the US had a trade surplus.
– Jim Graham, New South Wales, Australia, 78, retired teacher

This unstable tariff situation seems like a replay from his first time in office, his inability to actually understand finance and manufacturing is only creating uncertainty and fear.
– Wayne Stiles, grants administrator

His Maga base is willing to suffer the consequences to their retirement accounts from his tariff folly yet whined when they had to wear masks during the pandemic. Make it make sense!
– Brian, Massachusetts, 68, semi-retired marketing manager

Trump has choked the life out of the GOP, and is now strangling our economy with his absurd tariffs policy that seems to have been enacted for no reason other than providing a forum for transactional diplomatic flattery and grift.
– Geoff Morrison, San Diego, California

As a small business owner I am now fearful of the cost of my supplies ballooning and becoming unaffordable.
– Steven G Hittelman, California, attorney specializing in family law

Instead of honoring campaign promises to bring down the cost of living and broker peace in Ukraine, he has implemented radical tariffs and brought chaos to international trade agreements; alienated our best allies; and issued a slew of constitutionally questionable if not illegal executive orders.
– John O’Leary, Indiana, retired
 
Rule of law

Extraordinarily cruel and vindictive toward people who favored diversity and equity, opposed him or denied his false statements about the 2020 election, and pursued basic constitutional rights, including law firms, universities, and private businesses.
– Lewis Kirshner, Waterford, Vermont, retired professor at Harvard Medical School at the Brockton VA Medical Center

Trump has trashed the country, the constitution, our civil rights, and the things this nation was founded on, in order to make himself a king.
– Heather Swierczek, Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 49, physical therapist

Because of Trump we are moving towards a dictatorship. Need I say more?
– Patrick Doherty, Wisconsin, self-employed home remodeler
 
Diversity and protest

I’m afraid for my profession. I’m a proud librarian. And, I see how my profession and colleagues are being attacked by far-right extremism and how that’s being encouraged by this administration. I don’t plan on taking books off of our shelves because they feature queer characters or rolling back our DEI collection development policy. I feel grateful to live in a more liberal state, but Massachusetts libraries, including my own, have been targeted with challenges to programs and materials.
– Meaghan, Massachusetts, 44, librarian

There’s been an obvious focus on suppressing student dissent on Gaza and that’s frightening, but the Democrats have been almost silent on that front.
– Blair Zarubick, Petaluma, California, 64, living on a fixed income

As a gay man and immigrant, witnessing the rising tide of disrespect and animosity directed towards individuals who embody these dual identities is disheartening. The United States, often regarded as a land of opportunity and freedom, should ideally serve as a sanctuary for all individuals seeking a better life, irrespective of their sexual orientation or nationality.
– Carlo Licheri, Sydney, Australia, interior design

Explore more on these topics:


Friday, May 2, 2025

American Fascism On Steroids: The Trump Adminiostration's War On Free Speech, and Its Blatant Violations of the Human, Civil, and Constitutional Rights of College Students in the United States Today

 
Orders to Investigate Columbia Protesters Raised Alarms in Justice Dept.

Behind the scenes, a top department official pressed employees to gather a list of activists and investigate them, people familiar with the matter said.

Listen to this article · 10:20 minutes

Learn more


The Trump administration is seeking to crack down on student protesters amid accusations of rampant antisemitism on college campuses. Credit: Dave Sanders for The New York Times

by Devlin Barrett
Reporting from Washington
May 1, 2025
New York Times


A top Trump appointee in the Justice Department ordered an aggressive investigation in the last several months of student protesters at Columbia University, raising anger and alarm among career prosecutors and investigators who saw the demand as politically motivated and lacking legal merit, people familiar with the episode said.

The demand for the inquiry into students who protested Israel’s conduct of the conflict in Gaza also prompted pushback from a federal magistrate judge, who believed some of the steps being sought by the official, Emil Bove III, were unjustified and might violate the First Amendment, the people said.

The breadth of the investigation, conducted by the Justice Department’s civil rights division, has not been previously reported. The ensuing clash highlights the tensions roiling the department as administration officials seek to enact President Trump’s agenda. That bid includes redirecting the civil rights division away from its traditional approach of protecting the rights of minority groups to a new mission of fulfilling a campaign promise to crack down on student protesters amid accusations of rampant antisemitism on college campuses.

Those types of demands from political appointees at the Justice Department are part of the reason there has been an exodus of lawyers from the division in recent weeks, according to current and former officials.

The federal investigation into student protesters at Columbia appears to have stalled for now, but it represents one of the most contentious episodes yet inside the Justice Department during Mr. Trump’s second term. The dispute has left lingering ill will within the department, as well as the courts and the F.B.I., the people said.

Asked for comment, Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, said, “This is a false story fabricated by a group of people who allowed antisemitism and support of Hamas terrorists to fester for several years, standing by but doing nothing.”

The Trump administration has vowed to take on campus protests against Israel’s military campaign in the Gaza Strip, saying they reflect antisemitism that must be punished. Those efforts are aimed at both college administrators, who Trump officials say should have done more to rein in campus protests, and student activists themselves, some of whom immigration officials have detained. Activists, in turn, accuse the authorities of conflating criticism of Israeli and U.S. policy with antisemitism.

Tracking the First 100 Days ›

The Trump administration’s previous actions on Gaza

See every major action by the Trump administration ›

The investigation began shortly after masked protesters barged into Milbank Hall, a building at the Columbia-affiliated Barnard College, on Feb. 26 to demonstrate against the expulsion of students who had been accused of disrupting a “History of Modern Israel” class. Video shows students pushing past a security guard and occupying a hallway. School officials said at the time that the guard was assaulted and taken to the hospital for minor injuries.

Mr. Bove, a senior Justice Department official, ordered an immediate investigation, primarily of one particular student group, Columbia University Apartheid Divest, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss details intended to remain private.

Prodded by Mr. Bove, prosecutors in the civil rights division were told to obtain a membership list of the group. Investigators, however, pushed back on those instructions because they were skeptical such a list even existed, given the amorphous nature of online forums, and even if it did, scrutinizing people for their membership seemed like a possible violation of their First Amendment rights, these people said.

One of the Justice Department lawyers assigned to the case was Samantha Trepel, an experienced civil rights prosecutor who secured a federal conviction against Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis police officer who killed George Floyd in 2020, these people said.


Protesters against the expulsion of two activists staged a sit-in at Barnard College’s Milbank Hall on Feb. 26. Credit: C.S. Muncy for The New York Times

The prosecutors were told by superiors that Mr. Bove was seeking a list so the information could be shared with immigration agents, these people said. Inside the civil rights division, prosecutors came to fear that their criminal investigation was a pretext to facilitate an intimidation and deportation campaign by the Trump administration against student protesters, these people said. Prosecutors refused to compile such a list that could be given to Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, these people said.

Mr. Bove then shifted his focus to obtaining a search warrant for the group’s Instagram account, these people said. He ordered prosecutors to apply for a search warrant for the nonpublic data associated with the account, these people said.

The premise of the application was also contentious within the department. Mr. Bove insisted that the Instagram account in question had been used to make a threat, while line prosecutors said the statement at issue did not meet the legal definition of a threat, these people said. In late March, the social media company suspended the group’s account for failing to meet its “community standards.”

Mr. Blanche, in his statement, added that the warrant application focused on Columbia University Apartheid Divest “included a photograph from C.U.A.D.’s social media of an inverted triangle symbol used by Hamas to designate targets for violence, which was spray-painted on Columbia property along with red paint designed to look like blood.”

He said the investigation was “ongoing,” appearing to point to a related criminal investigation that the federal authorities have pursued, one that “included an independent magistrate judge finding probable cause to believe that there was evidence on Columbia property of harboring and concealing illegal aliens.”

Before Mr. Trump delivered a speech to the Justice Department on March 14, Mr. Blanche told the audience that the department was investigating whether anyone involved in the campus protests at Columbia violated civil rights laws and antiterrorism laws.

Mr. Blanche projected unwavering certainty about the wisdom of such an investigation. But behind the scenes, career lawyers had profound doubts about the merits of the case they were assigned, and deep concerns about the potential consequences if they refused.

Mr. Bove’s demands frustrated people in the civil rights division, but many of the managers were afraid to push back, having watched a month earlier as Mr. Bove pressed prosecutors in a different division, the public integrity section, to drop criminal charges against Mayor Eric Adams of New York, the three people said. That section, which once had about 30 lawyers, now has only a handful.

Bennett Gershman, a Pace University law professor who specializes in prosecutorial ethics, said the described conduct of Mr. Bove was “staggering.”

“He did something that prosecutors are absolutely forbidden to do — use the law enforcement powers of the government to try to intimidate these individuals or destroy their rights,” Mr. Gershman said. “This is so far past the line of prosecutorial professionalism and the commitment to principles of justice.”

In his statement, Mr. Blanche said that “unethical and inaccurate claims from deep state terrorist sympathizers who stood by as members of the Jewish faith were targeted across the country” would not deter Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and the Justice Department from “aggressively investigating criminal conduct and rooting out antisemitism.”

When the federal prosecutors involved in the investigation of student protesters applied for a search warrant, a magistrate judge in New York rejected the request, finding that the government did not have sufficient probable cause, these people said.

In an unusual move, Mr. Bove insisted that the prosecutors appeal the ruling to a district court judge, these people said. After weighing the request, Judge John G. Koeltl of Federal District Court of the Southern District of New York instructed the chief magistrate judge, Sarah Netburn, to reconsider the application, the people said.

But the second time, the government lawyers fared even worse. Judge Netburn not only rejected the request for a search warrant, but she also ordered the government to abide by a special condition: Should prosecutors ever try to refile such an application before another federal judge, they had to include a transcript of the sealed discussions in her court, these people said.

Part of the judge’s skepticism, these people said, stemmed from the absence from the case of lawyers with the Manhattan federal prosecutor’s office. But prosecutors in the Southern District of New York were wary of signing onto the effort and had minimal involvement with it, these people said. A spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan declined to comment.

While civil rights prosecutors conducted the investigation that Mr. Bove had demanded, they often pushed back against specific steps that he wanted taken, these people said, arguing that they were either not justified by the available facts or contrary to law and past practice, or both.

At one point, Mr. Bove instructed F.B.I. agents on the joint terrorism task force in New York to put on their raid jackets, go to Columbia’s campus and stand in a phalanx near any protesters. Within the civil rights division, the instruction was viewed as deeply improper and a blatant attempt to intimidate students, these people said. The F.B.I. agents did not make any such show of force.

By early April, the investigation seemed to have largely died, but nothing prevents Mr. Bove or others from reviving it. In its wake, however, people familiar with the case said it had only exacerbated the ill will and distrust between political appointees at the Justice Department’s headquarters in Washington and the prosecutor’s office in New York, as well as between those political appointees and veterans of the civil rights division.
 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Devlin Barrett covers the Justice Department and the F.B.I. for The Times.

A version of this article appears in print on May 2, 2025, Section A, Page 17 of the New York edition with the headline: Orders to Investigate Protesters at Columbia Raised Alarm at Justice.


Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

See more on: The Israel Hamas War, Barnard College, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Justice Department, Eric Adams, Donald Trump


Thursday, April 24, 2025

The Fascist and Clearly Anti-Black WAR that the Scumbag-in-Chief and his White Supremacist, Sexist, and Xenophobic Minions, Flunkies, Acolytes, and Fellow Reactionary Apparatchiks in the GOP, MAGA, and Beyond Are Waging And Are Absolutely Intent On Continuing To Destroy This Country No Matter What


"What's Past is Prologue..."

"The most deadly, dangerous, and powerful enemy of African Americans, Latino Americans, Asian Americans, and Native Americans in general, Women in general, the poor in general, the working class in general, children in general, Freedom in general and Democracy in general in American society today is the truly heinous Republican Party and their endless number of severely bigoted and demagogic minions, mentors, sponsors, and supporters. Anyone who doesn't know or believes this blatantly obvious fact is not only a hopeless FOOL but ultimately deserves their "fate.”
—Kofi Natambu, July 15, 2009

"The Republican Party is the most dangerous organisation in human history. 'Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?' Not that I'm aware of."
--Noam Chomsky, April 24, 2017

"Trump is not just an ethically dead aberration. Rather, he is the successor of a long line of fascists who shut down public debate, attempt to humiliate their opponents, endorse violence as a response to dissent and criticize any public display of democratic principles. The United States has reached its endpoint with Trump, and his presence should be viewed as a stern warning of the nightmare to come. Trump is not an isolated figure in US politics; he is simply the most visible and popular expression of a number of extremists in the Republican Party who now view democracy as a liability."
--Henry A. Giroux, "Fascism in Donald Trump's United States", December 8, 2015

"Like all fundamentally authoritarian and fascist expressions the political, social, economic, and cultural triumph of sheer hatred, greed, stupidity, cruelty, resentment, corruption, ignorance, paranoia, indifferance, psychosis, sadism, cowardice, hypocrisy, cultism, idolatry, and various forms of racial, gender, and class based violence promoted AS PUBLIC POLICY AND IDEOLOGICAL PLATFORM is what the Scumbag-in-Chief fully embodies and represents, and most importantly is what the great overwhelming majority of his over 63 million voters from 2016 most love, respect, encourage, endorse, and support about their very own national zombie cult "leader”. This is the clear and present danger on both an empirical and existential level that we are all up against and absolutely must defeat and remove from power in 2020 and beyond at all cost.”
—Kofi Natambu, December 22, 2019

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND THE 77 MILLION AMERICANS WHO ACTUALLY VOTED FOR A FASCIST FOR PRESIDENT AND THUS A FASCIST GOVERNMENT DOES NOT BELIEVE IN JUSTICE

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN TRUTH

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN FACTS
 
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DOES NOT BELIEVE
IN THE CONSTITUTION


THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN THE RULE OF LAW

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN DEMOCRACY

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND THE MORE THAN 77 MILLION AMERICANS WHO VOTED IN 2024 FOR A FASCIST PRESIDENT AND THUS A FASCIST GOVERNMENT MEANS THAT EVERYTHING THEY STAND FOR, REPRESENT, AND EMBODY IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THIS SOCIETY AND THE WORLD

 
Justice Dept.’s Civil Rights Division Pushes Trump’s Culture War Agenda

The head of the division directed its staff to focus on enforcing edicts on transgender women in sports and other issues, shifting from its founding purpose of fighting race-based discrimination.

Listen to this article · 5:08 minutes

Learn more


Harmeet Dhillon, the head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division, has taken steps to reverse a handful of high-profile Biden-era actions focused on addressing racial discrimination. Credit: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, via Getty Images


by Glenn Thrush
Reporting from Washington
April 18, 2025
New York Times

The head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division has rewritten a mission statement to prioritize enforcement of President Trump’s culture war edicts, including participation of transgender women in sports, in a sharp break from its founding purpose of fighting race-based discrimination.

In an email, Harmeet Dhillon, a conservative activist close to the White House who leads the unit, directed the division’s career work force to pursue the president’s agenda, outlined in executive orders and presidential memorandums, or face unspecified consequences. The revised statement encouraged investigations into antisemitism, anti-Christian bias and noncompliance with a range of Trump executive fiats.

“The zealous and faithful pursuit of this section’s mission requires the full dedication of this section’s resources, attention and energy to the priorities of the president,” Ms. Dhillon wrote. The memo, obtained by The New York Times, was addressed to the division’s enforcement arm responsible for prohibiting discrimination by recipients of federal funds — nearly every local government entity in the country.

In a separate mission statement sent to the division’s voting rights unit, Ms. Dhillon directed department lawyers to root out voter fraud and prosecute undocumented immigrants who tried to vote in U.S. elections. Both are rare events, despite efforts by Trump Republicans, including Ms. Dhillon, to portray them as a major threat to election integrity.


A Justice Department spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

She did not explicitly say she would not open investigations into racial discrimination, but Ms. Dhillon and the interim leadership that preceded her arrival this month have already moved to reverse a handful of high-profile Biden-era actions.

Last week, she nullified a 2022 agreement with an impoverished Alabama county intended to address troubling disparities in the quality of drinking water, infrastructure to protect residents from flooding and sewer systems for Black and white residents.

“The D.O.J. will no longer push ‘environmental justice’ as viewed through a distorting, D.E.I. lens,” Ms. Dhillon said in a statement announcing the action last week. “Americans deserve a government committed to serving every individual with dignity and respect, and to expending taxpayer resources in accordance with the national interest, not arbitrary criteria.”
Trump Administration: Live Updates


Updated

April 24, 2025, 5:54 p.m. ET58 minutes ago


H.U.D. is offering its workers tips on finding private-sector jobs.


The administration announces a grant program for statues to fill Trump’s ‘Garden of Heroes.’


Trump takes a major step toward seabed mining in international waters.

On March 27, the department’s political leadership repurposed a pivotal tool used to address police violence against minorities — so-called pattern-or-practice investigations — to challenge gun control measures enacted by Los Angeles, which, in the administration’s view, violated residents’ Second Amendment rights.

In her email this week, Ms. Dhillon directed her staff to pursue cases based on seven executive orders dealing with a range of culture war issues, including three addressing transgender women’s participation in sports and another declaring English to be the country’s official language.

The executive branch, as the Justice Department’s “sole client,” had an obligation to “administer and enforce” all directives from the White House without dissent, Ms. Dhillon wrote.

Ms. Dhillon’s marching orders, while expected, represent an abrupt U-turn for a celebrated division that has been at the center of fights for racial equality for decades.

Since its creation in 1957, the division — working closely with Martin Luther King Jr. and other civil rights leaders during the apex of its influence in the 1960s and ’70s — was instrumental in dismantling Jim Crow segregation, prosecuting crimes against Black people and other minorities, and expanding voting rights.

Its muscle has often grown under Democratic presidents, then waned under Republican administrations. What appears different this time is the determination of Ms. Dhillon, whose law firm supported Mr. Trump’s legal effort to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election, to repurpose its mission to serve the president’s agenda in a more vigorous way, according to current and former department officials.

Much of the division’s leverage comes from a section of the 1964 civil rights law, Title VI, that allows the federal government to withhold funding from localities that violate the constitutional rights of their citizens.

Ms. Dhillon’s shift “fundamentally alters the mission” of the division by pressuring career lawyers to pursue political objectives, said Vanita Gupta, a former head of the unit under President Barack Obama who served as a top Justice Department official in the Biden administration.

“It is highly significant and represents the weaponization of the Justice Department against the very civil rights principles that undergirded Title VI, in pursuit of a highly politicized and anti-civil-rights agenda,” she said in an interview.

Nick Corasaniti contributed reporting from New York.
 
Trump ally pushes DOJ unit to shift civil rights focus, new messages show

Internal mission statements from Harmeet Dhillon pivots division’s priorities away from marginalized groups’ rights



by Sam Levine in New York
Fri 18 April 2025
The Guardian (UK)


The justice department’s civil rights division is shifting its focus away from its longstanding work protecting the rights of marginalized groups and will instead pivot towards Donald Trump’s priorities including hunting for noncitizen voters and protecting white people from discrimination, according to new internal mission statements seen by the Guardian.

The new priorities were sent to several sections of the civil rights division this week by Harmeet Dhillon, a Trump ally who was confirmed a little more than two weeks ago to lead the division. Several of them give only glancing mention to the statutes and kinds of discrimination that have long been the focus of the division, which dates back to the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Several of the mission statements point to Trump’s executive orders as priorities for the section.

The mission statement for the voting section, for example, barely mentions the Voting Rights Act and instead says the section will focus on preventing voter fraud – which is exceedingly rare – and helping states find noncitizens on their voter rolls (noncitizen voting is also exceedingly rare). The guidance for the Housing and Civil Enforcement section does not make a single mention of the Fair Housing Act, the landmark 1968 civil rights law that has long been a central part of the department’s work.



Trump White House replaces Covid website with treatise on ‘lab leak’ theory

Read more

“It’s absolutely astonishing,” said Sasha Samberg-Champion, a former appellate lawyer in the justice department’s civil rights division. “This reflects the complete abdication of the core responsibilities of each of these sections.”

The justice department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The decision to send new mission statements to the sections is itself unusual. While the priorities of the sections often change from administration to administration, the core work often remains the same and the department’s career attorneys are expected to be apolitical. Trump has moved to end the independence of the justice department and use it as a tool to further his political goals and punish rivals.

“To me, these new mission statements signal a significant change in the priorities that each of these sections will be expected to pursue,” said Jocelyn Samuels, who led the civil rights division from 2013 to 2014. “Some of this is explicit – where, for example, the new statements specifically call out enforcement of some of the president’s executive orders as the guide for the section’s work. Some of it is a matter of omission.

“I suspect that the descriptions don’t themselves dictate what the sections will do, but they certainly manifest the expectations that leadership of the division will impose,” added Samuels, who is currently suing the Trump administration for firing her from her position on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The justice department has already begun to pull back on its civil rights cases. It has withdrawn from several of the voting cases filed under Joe Biden’s administration, terminated an environmental justice settlement on behalf of Black residents in Alabama, and dropped a pay discrimination lawsuit on behalf of a Black lawyer against the Mississippi senate.

The primary focus of the department’s voting section has long been ensuring that voting laws and practices aren’t tainted with discrimination. The new guidance this week shifts that focus and echoes Trump’s rhetoric around fraud.

“The mission of the Voting Rights Section of the DOJ Civil Rights Division is to ensure free, fair, and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion,” the new mission statement says. “The Section will work to ensure that only American citizens vote in US federal elections and do so securely. Other section priorities include preventing illegal voting, fraud, and other forms of malfeasance and error. All attorneys within the Voting Section will advocate with zeal on behalf of the United States of America in furtherance of all objectives as tasked.”

It also says the voting section will work with the Department of Homeland Security to help states access citizenship data so that they can remove noncitizens from their voter rolls. The section will also “vigorously enforce the statutes, orders, and priorities” in a recent Trump executive order that requires states to require proof of citizenship to vote and to decertify voting machines. Several civil rights groups are already challenging that order in court and say it is illegal.

“What’s missing from here is the idea that we’re going to protect the right to vote on a nondiscriminatory basis,” Samberg-Champion said. “Silly me, I always thought that was the core purpose of the voting section and the core purpose of the Voting Rights Act.”

Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School and a top official in the civil rights division during the Obama administration, noted that federal law puts certain restrictions in place “before anybody in the federal government, civil rights division included, can lawfully touch state database information”.

Noting that much of the language in the mission statement was broad, Levitt said he would be watching to see how it was implemented.

“Read through the lens of all of the rest that the administration is doing, this is a further example of how off-course the administration is. This isn’t the statement that any administration in the last 68 years would have written,” he said in an email. “But the way this gets cashed out is far more important.”

The new mission statement for the Housing and Civil Enforcement section says the section will focus on protecting the rights of members of the military and enforcing the Religious Land Use And Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which prevents zoning discrimination. “The aggressive and even-handed deployment of RLUIPA to restore religious liberty will be a top priority,” the document says.

The guidance also says the section will “focus on challenges to racially discriminatory lending programs”. Samberg-Champion said that was a “code red”.

“They’re going to look for opportunities to challenge special purpose credit programs and other lending programs that are meant to enhance credit opportunities for people who have been starved of credit historically,” said Samberg-Champion, who served as deputy general counsel for enforcement and fair housing during the Biden administration. “It’s just astonishing that what they’re trying to do is actually diminish the availability of credit for people and go after banks, go after lenders who presumably are trying to make their credit availability fairer.”

Guidance for the educational opportunities section focuses on preventing discrimination against white applicants and cites the supreme court’s 2023 ruling saying that affirmative action programs are unconstitutional. It also says the department will focus on anti-transgender issues.

“This mandate includes protecting the rights of women and girls to unfettered access to programs, facilities, extracurricular activities, and sports or athletic opportunities that exclude males from presence or participation,” the statement reads. “The mandate also includes preventing racial discrimination in school admissions policies and preventing antisemitism in education wherever it is found.”

The new mission statement for the disability rights section appears to have nothing to do with disability. “The zealous and faithful pursuit of this section’s mission requires dedication of the section’s resources, actions, attention, and energy to the priorities and objectives of the President,” the guidance says. It then goes on to list a series of executive orders that target transgender Americans.

Eve Hill, who served as a top lawyer in the civil rights division under the Obama administration, said she wasn’t “overly alarmed” by the message to the disability rights section.

“It’s hard to tell what effect it will have other than preventing [the disability rights section] from working for people with the disability of gender dysphoria. Which is important, but they hadn’t done much work in that space anyway,” she said.

Several of the mission statements include a similar line that says attorneys are expected to enforce the law “faithfully and zealously”.

That language is significant, Samberg-Champion said.

“They’re anticipating – and I think correctly – that they’re going to get considerable pushback from the career staff as to what they’re being asked to do,” he said. “This reflects their understanding that they are radically changing what each of these sections historically has understood its mission to be. And that this is not going to go over well with the people who have made it their life’s work to enforce these important laws.”

Explore more on these topics:

Trump administration

LGBTQ+ rights

Transgender

US politics

Donald Trump

Housing

news

The Trump Administration’s First 100 Days:

Challenging Migrants’ Due Process Rights: White House officials are eschewing normal legal processes as they ramp up deportations, saying there is no time to afford unauthorized immigrants any rights — and that they don’t deserve them anyway.

Approval Rating Falling Steadily: Trump’s approval rating has sunk to about 45 percent, down from 52 percent one week after he took office.

Musk Backs Away: As Elon Musk moves to spend less time in Washington, it is unclear whether his plan to overhaul the federal bureaucracy will have lasting power. The endeavor has still not come close to cutting the $1 trillion he vowed to find in waste, fraud and abuse.

Oil, Gas and Mining Projects: The Trump administration plans to dramatically reduce environmental reviews before permitting drilling and mining projects on public lands and in federal waters.

Private Dinner for Memecoin Investors: A website promoting $TRUMP, the president’s so-called memecoin, announced that the largest buyers would be invited to meet President Trump. It was, in effect, an offer of access to the White House in exchange for an investment in one of the president’s crypto ventures.

Meals on Wheels: A tiny division responsible for overseeing services for people with disabilities and older Americans, including programs like Meals on Wheels, is being dismantled as part of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s overhaul of his department.



https://www.anativeson.org/p/american-undone-by-its-own-racism
 
American Undone by Its Own Racism with Prof. Eddie Glaude

A recording from Eddie and THE LEFT HOOK with Wajahat Ali's

Guest: Eddie Glaude, Jr. 

THE LEFT HOOK with Wajahat Ali
April 16, 2025
Native Son


VIDEO: To access this video please click on the following link: https://www.anativeson.org/p/american-undone-by-its-own-racism


https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-justice-department-reassigns-about-dozen-civil-rights-attorneys-amid-shakeup-2025-04-22/

US Justice Department reassigns about a dozen civil rights attorneys amid shakeup, say sources

by Sarah N. Lynch and Dan Levine
April 23, 2025
Reuters


A U.S. Justice Department logo or seal showing Justice Department headquarters, known as "Main Justice," is seen behind the podium in the Department's headquarters briefing room, January 24, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

Summary

--About a dozen senior career Civil Rights Division being reassigned

--Reassignments include working on FOIA and internal discrimination complaints

--Personnel moves come as Trump administration steers Civil Rights Division away from its historic priorities

WASHINGTON, April 22 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department is reassigning about a dozen senior career attorneys from its civil rights unit, four people familiar with the matter said on Tuesday, as President Donald Trump's administration steers the division away from its historic priorities.

At least three senior career attorneys -- nonpolitical employees who typically remain in their jobs from administration to administration -- who managed offices that investigated abuse by police and handled violations of voting and disability rights, have been ordered to take other assignments, said three of the people, who were granted anonymity to discuss moves that had not been made public.

The Reuters Tariff Watch newsletter is your daily guide to the latest global trade and tariff news. Sign up here.

The changes are part of a wave of reassignments and resignations affecting at least another nine attorneys, including people who worked on probes of employment or educational discrimination, abuses inside correctional facilities, and voting rights cases, the people said.

Founded in 1957 following the passage of the Civil Rights Act, the division initially focused on protecting the voting rights of Black Americans. Over the decades that followed, Congress expanded its responsibilities to include protecting Americans from discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, sex, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity and military status.

The changes are part of a shakeup by Trump's pick to lead the Civil Rights Division, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon. The division has paused probes of alleged police abuse, launched its first investigation into whether Los Angeles violated gun rights laws, and following Trump's lead, changed the department's stance on transgender rights and probed alleged antisemitism at U.S. colleges involving pro-Palestinian protesters.

"When I assumed my duties as Assistant Attorney General, I learned that certain sections in Civil Rights had substantial existing caseloads and backlogs, and that formed the basis of temporary details to assist those sections in getting, and staying, caught up," Dhillon said in a statement to Reuters.

Division employees are also being urged to take advantage of a new wave of deferred resignation offers that were rolled out early last week, according to two people familiar with the matter and internal memos seen by Reuters.

Dhillon said the deferred resignation options are being offered throughout the government and provide a "unique, generous, and voluntary opportunity" for people to pursue their passions elsewhere. She declined to comment on the specific numbers of staff affected by the changes.

The reassignments for the senior attorneys include handling public records requests or adjudicating internal discrimination complaints, the people said.

In emails sent late last week, Dhillon gave each section in the Civil Rights Division a new "mission statement" that she told employees would "define our expectations going forward."


The Educational Opportunities Section, for example, was told that part of its mandate is to protect the rights of girls and women to have "unfettered access" to sports programs "that exclude males from presence or participation," according to an email seen by Reuters.

The Immigrant and Employee Rights Section was told it should investigate companies that "unlawfully discriminate against U.S. workers in favor of foreign visa workers."

"They are going to eliminate the Civil Rights Division as it was built to exist," one former department employee familiar with the changes told Reuters. "The only purpose now will be to victimize the very people it was created to protect."

Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch in Washington and Dan Levine in San Francisco; Editing by Scott Malone and Leslie Adler

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Sarah N. Lynch

Thomson Reuters

Sarah N. Lynch is the lead reporter for Reuters covering the U.S. Justice Department out of Washington, D.C. During her time on the beat, she has covered everything from the Mueller report and the use of federal agents to quell protesters in the wake of George Floyd’s murder, to the rampant spread of COVID-19 in prisons and the department's prosecutions following the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.