Monday, November 9, 2026

Jean Guerrero wrote a definitive biography on Stephen Miller, now chief of staff of the Trump fascist regime, entitled 'Hatemonger' which was published by William Morrow in 2020. In the video below Guerrero explains exactly why Trump has chosen his favorite advisor and in-house henchman to be his new chief of staff at the White House

Jean Guerrero wrote a definitive biography on Stephen Miller, now chief of staff of the Trump fascist regime, entitled 'Hatemonger' which was published by William Morrow in 2020--(See details following the video below in which Ms. Guerrero explains who and what Miller is and has always been and why Trump has consistently chosen him as his primary advisor and in-house henchman for the past decade)...
Hatemonger: Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, and the White Nationalist Agenda
by Jean Guerrero
William Morrow, 2020

[Publication date: August 11, 2020]
 
“A vital book for understanding the still-unfolding nightmare of nationalism and racism in the 21st century.” –Francisco Cantu, author of The Line Becomes a River

Stephen Miller is one of the most influential advisors in the White House. He has crafted Donald Trump’s speeches, designed immigration policies that ban Muslims and separate families, and outlasted such Trump stalwarts as Steve Bannon and Jeff Sessions. But he’s remained an enigma.

Until now. Emmy- and PEN-winning investigative journalist and author Jean Guerrero charts the thirty-four-year-old’s astonishing rise to power, drawing from more than one hundred interviews with his family, friends, adversaries and government officials.

Radicalized as a teenager, Miller relished provocation at his high school in liberal Santa Monica, California. He clashed with administrators and antagonized dark-skinned classmates with invectives against bilingualism and multiculturalism. At Duke University, he cloaked racist and classist ideas in the language of patriotism and heritage to get them airtime amid controversies. On Capitol Hill, he served Tea Party congresswoman Michele Bachmann and nativist Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions.

Recruited to Trump’s campaign, Miller met his idol. Having dreamed of Trump’s presidency before he even announced his decision to run, Miller became his senior policy advisor and speechwriter. Together, they stoked dystopian fears about the Democrats, “Deep State” and “American Carnage,” painting migrants and their supporters as an existential threat to America. Through backroom machinations and sheer force of will, Miller survived dozens of resignations and encouraged Trump’s harshest impulses, in conflict with the president’s own family. While Trump railed against illegal immigration, Miller crusaded against legal immigration. He targeted refugees, asylum seekers and their children, engineering an ethical crisis for a nation that once saw itself as the conscience of the world. Miller rallied support for this agenda, even as federal judges tried to stop it, by courting the white rage that found violent expression in tragedies from El Paso to Charlottesville.

Hatemonger unveils the man driving some of the most divisive confrontations over what it means to be American––and what America will become.

REVIEWS:

“Investigative reporter Jean Guerrero deftly uncovers how Stephen Miller—as a privileged California teenager desperate for attention and power—immersed himself in right-wing dark arts, attracting a motley crew of white supremacists and extremists eager to cultivate the precocious boy's interests. Under their tutelage, Miller developed a talent for twisting progressive rhetoric to his will—a skill the Trump administration has used to shape its most sadistic policies. Hatemonger is a must-read for those who want to understand how small minds steeped in extremist methods have amassed great power in the 21st century. A superbly reported and haunting American tragedy.” --Rachel Slade, author of the national bestseller Into the Raging Sea

“In Hatemonger, Jean Guerrero doesn’t just catalogue Stephen Miller’s scorched-earth campaign to relentlessly vilify and abuse migrants from the nucleus of American politics—she also shines a light on the casual radicalization of a life-long troll and his gleeful ascendance to the halls of power, revealing the insidious inner workings of modern-day white supremacy. A vital book for understanding the still-unfolding nightmare of nationalism and racism in the 21st century.”
--Francisco Cantu, author of The Line Becomes a River

“An urgent story. Jean Guerrero writes with piercing clarity about one of the most powerful and elusive figures in America today.”
--Wil S. Hylton, author of Vanished

"A brilliant and necessary look into the making of the mastermind behind the worst of America's policies. Guerrero's deep dive into Stephen Miller was enlightening and terrifying all at once. Hatemonger is required reading to understand what we are truly up against in America."
--Julissa Arce, bestselling author of My (Underground) American Dream and Someone Like Me
 
Black and white portrait of Jean Guerrero 
JEAN GUERRERO
(b. March 31, 1988)

Posted by at

FASCIST AMERICA 2026: Writer, Philosopher, Public Intellectual and Activist M. Gessen On Why We Must Not Misread the Complexity or Contradictions of the Results Of the Midterm Elections

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/06/opinion/trump-era-blue-wave-democrats-midterms.html

Opinion


The Most Dangerous Way to Misread the Midterm Results


Credit: Photo Illustration by Philotheus Nisch for The New York Times

Listen · 5:31 minutes

by M. Gessen
November 6, 2028
New York Times

The air in this country has been easier to breathe since Tuesday’s election results started coming in. With majorities in both chambers of Congress, Democrats can now place limits on the Trump administration’s destructive powers. It would be foolhardy, however, to conclude that the Trump era is therefore necessarily coming to an end.

In midterm elections, voters express their dissatisfaction with the present. In presidential elections, on the other hand, people vote based on their hopes and fears for the future. The experience of other countries shows that autocratic leaders are peculiarly difficult to unseat, and not just because they have a tendency to undermine the voting process itself. The more instability voters live with — the higher the gas prices, the more tenuous their access to health care, the more palpable the threat of war — the stronger the autocrats’ appeal, even when it was their policies that caused the instability.

I have just returned from Israel, where an unpopular autocrat’s party won the largest number of votes even though the worst security failure in the nation’s history took place on his watch, even though he has dragged his country into one forever war and started several others, even though he is under investigation for corruption. How did this happen?

Fact is, it happens all the time. Viktor Orban, who led Hungary for a total of 20 years, enriched his family and his cronies while his country grew poorer than its European neighbors and many of its citizens lost access to decent health care and education. As successive elections approached, his party’s popularity seemed to falter. And yet, he kept winning — in 2014, 2018, 2022.

Even Vladimir Putin fits this pattern. These days, criticizing him can be deadly, but back when Russians could still express their opinions, they consistently gave Putin poor marks for several aspects of his job performance. They said he had not improved their economic well-being or done a good job ending the very long war in Chechnya, and they held him responsible for the self-dealing and corruption among the Kremlin elite. And yet, even when they had a semblance of choice, most Russians voted for him.

This is a pattern, not a coincidence. Many people — generally speaking, majorities — vote for ineffective, corrupt, warmongering autocrats not in spite of the hardships and dangers that their governments impose but because of them.

Autocrats rise to power in times of fear and dislocation. They get elected on promises of stability and security. Most of the time, they also promise a return to a glorious imaginary past, when the world felt safe and you didn’t feel poor. They never deliver. Instead of stability, they bring chaos, confusion and often war.

Rather than expose the autocrat as a liar, however, the instability affirms the worldview that brought him to power in the first place. The world, it seems, really is terrifying. Life really is hard and getting harder. We really are on the verge of catastrophe. Just weeks before the Israeli election, an apparent terrorist came within seconds of crashing an airplane full of Israelis — another catastrophic security failure on Netanyahu’s watch. Two days ahead of the vote, he shared an artificial-intelligence-generated image of a nuclear strike on Tel Aviv, warning that “the State of Israel is in real and tangible existential danger.” You’d think the airplane incident and the danger warning would work against the sitting prime minister, who has instigated two wars with Iran, but Netanyahu’s message is I alone stand between you and annihilation. A critical number of people appear to believe this.

I don’t know if every language in the world has this expression, but English, Russian and Hungarian have an identical idiom: “Don’t change horses midstream.” The Hebrew equivalent is “Don’t change horses while climbing a hill.” The harder life gets, the more this message resonates. And the autocrat continues feeding the people the same old promise: We just need to cross the waters and climb the hill, and then we will reach stability. Hunker down and vote for me again.

The classic mistake the opposition to such leaders makes is to affirm the terrifying worldview but argue for a more measured, reasonable solution. This is what much of the anti-Netanyahu opposition did, what the Hungarian opposition used to do. Democratic politicians in the United States do it, too, when they agree with Trump that immigration is a gigantic security problem — and merely offer less extreme solutions. Or when they agree with Republicans that “wokeness,” of all things, is an urgent problem America needs to address. But if the autocrat is essentially right in his analysis, what is the argument for voting for someone else?

By now, we know what does work. We saw it in Hungary. We saw it in New York when Zohran Mamdani came out of nowhere to wipe the floor with the sitting mayor and the former governor. We saw it in midterm campaigns across the country, but perhaps nowhere more clearly than in Texas, in James Talarico’s winning campaign for the Senate and Gina Hinojosa’s for the governorship. What works is opposing the autocratic worldview itself. It’s asserting that while life really is hard and the world really can be scary, we need not live in fear and isolation. Rather than conjuring an imaginary past, it’s promising an achievable future. Rather than setting people against one another, it’s helping them to find common ground. Rather than asking voters to hunker down and trust the leader to guide us toward stability that will never arrive, it’s inviting them to create a better world right now, together.



Posted by at

The Always On Time and Truly Ready to Rumble Danielle Moodie, one of the most dynamic and effective progressive organizers, journalists, FIGHTERS, and public intellectuals in the country today tells us what we NEED to hear and once again ACT ON. See hear and share the video below and PASS THE WORD...

 
The always on time and truly ready to rumble Danielle Moodie, one of the most dynamic and effective progressive organizers, journalists, and public intellectuals in the country today tells us what we NEED to hear and once again ACT ON. Listen and Learn as Ms. DM throws it all down as usual for all of us…So let's join her, kick ass, and take names and like ALWAYS: Pass the Word...
Posted by at

A Very Important And Necessary Message From Sentor Bernie Sanders. We All MUST ACT on Everything He's Putting Forth Here And More. There is No More Time To Hesitate Or Simply Fail Out of Fear, Cynicism, Or Hubris. Or complacency. This Is In Fact the Greatest Chance We Have To Positively Change The Fundamental Direction Of the Country Since The 1960s. So Let's Follow Bernie's Lead and Do It. And Remember: PASS THE WORD...




Sisters and brothers -

Tuesday was an extraordinary day for the United States. All across the country the American people made it clear that status quo politics and status quo policies were no longer acceptable. They stood up and demanded, in record breaking numbers, REAL change. And it was not just the election results. According to a recent AP poll, 80 percent of registered voters want either “complete and total upheaval” or “substantial change” in how this country is run - including 97 percent of Democrats, 90 percent of independents and 58 percent of Republicans.

Bottom line: the new Democratic majority must deliver. No more empty rhetoric. No more telling us how terrible Trump and the Republicans are. No more excuses. We now have the votes to pass legislation that will demonstrably improve the lives of millions of working families. And that’s what we must do.

What does that mean?

HEALTH CARE: In America today, our healthcare system is broken, dysfunctional, and wildly expensive. We spend twice as much per person on healthcare as other major countries. Yet more than 90 million Americans are uninsured or underinsured, over half a million people go bankrupt each year because of medical debt, and we pay the highest prescription drug prices in the world. Tragically, more than 60,000 Americans die unnecessarily each year because they cannot afford medical care.

Healthcare must be considered as a human right for all, not a privilege. That means passing Medicare for All, legislation now supported by a record 66 percent of the American people. In the first year of a four year transition process, Democrats must lower the Medicare eligibility age to 55, expand Medicare to cover dental, vision and hearing, and guarantee universal healthcare coverage for every child from birth through age 19.

INCOME AND WEALTH INEQUALITY: In America today, income and wealth inequality have reached unprecedented levels. The top 1 percent owns more wealth than the bottom 93 percent. One man, Elon Musk, owns more wealth than the bottom 53 percent of American households.

Democrats cannot ignore this grotesque inequality. That means a Democratic Congress must pass a wealth tax on billionaires, now supported by 61% of Americans. At a time when billionaires pay a lower effective tax rate than truck drivers or nurses, we must enact a 5 percent wealth tax on billionaires to provide every working-class family of four with a $12,000 direct payment, build 7 million units of affordable housing, make public colleges and universities tuition-free, establish free childcare for 13 million children and greatly improve public education.

RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE: In America today, while the rich get richer, 60 percent of our people live paycheck to paycheck, and millions work for inadequate wages. That must change. The $7.25 federal minimum wage is a starvation wage. Democrats must raise it to a living wage of at least $20 an hour and make it easier for workers to form unions by passing the PRO Act. A job must lift people out of poverty, not keep them in it.

PROTECTING SENIORS: In America today, one-third of our seniors are struggling economically, and more than 20 percent are trying to survive on less than $15,000 a year. Nearly half of older Americans have no retirement savings and no idea how they will retire with dignity. Meanwhile, Elon Musk pays the same amount into Social Security as someone earning $184,600 a year.

That is obviously absurd. By applying the Social Security payroll tax to all income above $250,000, including capital gains and dividends, we can increase benefits by $2,400 a year, lift millions of seniors out of poverty and keep Social Security solvent for generations - without raising taxes on the bottom 91 percent of Americans. We must also restore the traditional pension plans corporate America took away so that every worker can count on a guaranteed income in retirement.

AI AND ROBOTICS: In America today, Big Tech oligarchs are spending trillions of dollars on artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics with virtually no regulation. This revolutionary technology will transform the lives of every man, woman and child in America and around the world.

Left unchecked, AI and robotics will destroy tens of millions of jobs, devastate our children's mental health, eviscerate our privacy, drive up electricity rates and strain water supplies. If AI becomes smarter than human beings, and escapes human control, it will pose an existential threat to the very existence of humanity.

We cannot allow a handful of Big Tech oligarchs to become even richer and more powerful by ramming this dangerous technology down our throats. Democrats must enact a national moratorium on AI data centers which is now supported by 63% of Americans, pause advanced AI development and ban superintelligence.

CLIMATE CHANGE: The planet is becoming warmer and warmer. Tens of thousands have died in the last year from heat waves, and we are seeing unprecedented extreme weather disturbances including massive forest fires. If we don’t act boldly, the future will only become worse. Democrats must create millions of good paying jobs moving our energy systems away from fossil fuels to energy efficiency and sustainable energy.

MILITARY SPENDING: Let’s be clear. The war in Vietnam was based on a lie. The war in Iraq was based on a lie. The current war in Iran is based on a lie. Democrats need to take a very hard look at the very foundation of American foreign policy and the outrageous amount of money we spend on the military.

In America today, we spend more on the military than the next six countries combined. Despite massive waste, fraud and abuse, the Pentagon has repeatedly failed independent audits and cannot account for trillions of dollars in spending. Adding insult to injury, Trump dragged us into an illegal war in Iran that could cost another trillion dollars.

We must end this disastrous war, cut off all funding for the genocidal government in Israel and substantially reduce military spending.

ICE AND IMMIGRATION: As most Americans understand, since Trump took office ICE agents have shot American citizens in cold blood, have broken down doors to arrest people and sent 5-year-old children to detention centers. These actions are not only immoral and disgraceful. They are unconstitutional and economically counterproductive.

Democrats must immediately rescind the $75 billion Republicans gave Trump to fund his ICE domestic army. Instead of ICE Agents terrorizing communities throughout the country we must finally move to comprehensive immigration reform and a path toward citizenship for the undocumented.

CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM: Elon Musk and his billionaire friends have poured a record-breaking $2 billion into the recent elections. That is absurd. The American people, in overwhelming numbers, want Congress to overturn Citizens United and abolish super PACs. Democracy must mean one person, one vote — not billionaires buying elections.

Let's be clear. While wealthy campaign contributors and establishment politicians may disagree, none of the policies I have just discussed are “radical.” They are now mainstream concepts supported by the overwhelming majority of the American people.

At this extraordinary moment in American history, we must restore faith in democracy. And the way we do that is by actually delivering for working families, allowing every man, woman, and child in this country to see that they have a government that works for them, and not just the 1%.

In the last year we have come a long way. Now, let’s finish the job.

In Solidarity,

Bernie
Posted by at

LONG LIVE MEHDI HASSAN!--"HE WON!" SO..."CRY MORE"--SEE VIDEO BELOW. And Once Again Congratulations Abdul...Welcome to the U.S. Senate...

https://youtube.com/shorts/T4DxXscSqVw?si=Cu4MeFJyBmJwM0Dh



Posted by at

FASCIST AMERICA 2026: The Elevation of the Notorious Fascist Advisor Stephen Miller To the Position of Chief of Staff in the White House Is a Loud and Malevolently Direct Signal To This Country That the Criminally Corrupt and Deadly Trump/GOP/MAGA Regime Is Dangerously Intent On Continuing Imposing Its Will on This Society and Its Democracy Regardless of the Results Of The Midterm Elections Which Overwhelmingly Repudiated And Soundly Rejected Its Despicable Authority

 
Trump Elevates Stephen Miller, a Fiery Hard-Liner, to Chief of Staff

The promotion of Mr. Miller, who has led the administration’s immigration crackdown, signals a doubling down by the president on policies that voters decisively rejected in the midterm elections.

November 6, 2026
New York Times

Stephen Miller with President Trump in the Oval Office in August. Credit: Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
 
Here’s the latest:

President Trump is elevating Stephen Miller, his powerful domestic policy adviser, to be his next chief of staff in the wake of shattering Republican losses in the midterm elections. The decision to replace Susie Wiles, set to take effect on Monday, will fundamentally shift the circle of advisers around the president.

Mr. Miller, a deeply ideological Trump loyalist, has been the architect of some of the most polarizing domestic policies in Mr. Trump’s second term. His promotion signals an aggressive doubling-down by Mr. Trump days after voters delivered a decisive rebuke of his handling of a range of issues, including the economy, the war with Iran and the aggressive deportation campaign directed by Mr. Miller.

The Republican wipeout has inflamed tensions within the administration, as officials brace for congressional investigations by Democrats and further turnover in the West Wing and the cabinet. Mr. Miller’s pitch for the job as the gatekeeper to the president, according to people who heard it, was that Mr. Trump needed to wind down the Iran war, a conflict that the president’s core supporters viewed as a betrayal.

People familiar with Mr. Miller’s views say he is also likely to steer the president away from his early instinct after Tuesday’s losses to seek deals with Democrats. That could involve leaning even more into culture war issues, such as hard-line immigration enforcement and efforts to target diversity initiatives.

Democrats immediately criticized the decision, and Mr. Miller. Representative Hakeem Jeffries, the New York Democrat who is poised to be the next House speaker, called Mr. Miller “a dangerous xenophobe” who should have been fired instead. Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, said that handing Mr. Miller an even more powerful role showed that Mr. Trump had “learned nothing” from Republicans’ losses on Election Day.

Ms. Wiles, who said Friday would be her last day, is the highest-ranking White House official to leave in the wake of the midterm elections, which cost Republican majorities in the House and Senate. The first woman to hold the top staff job in the West Wing, she helped steer Mr. Trump to his election victory in 2024 but now joins a recent exodus of high-profile women from the administration in his second term.

Here’s what else to know:

Miller’s move: For weeks, Mr. Miller had been making known his interest in the job if Ms. Wiles left, and Mr. Trump had been asking people privately in recent days what they thought about him for the job.

Loyal ally: Mr. Miller, 41, has worked for President Trump since his first presidential campaign, served all four years in the White House during the president’s first term and has amassed immense power since Mr. Trump retook office.

Internal criticism: Before the departure of Ms. Wiles was announced on Friday, a former Trump health official, Calley Means, accused her of bowing to “unrelenting” pressure from industry lobbyists while prioritizing political fund-raising over Americans’ health. 
 
In Elevating Stephen Miller, Trump Doubles Down on Hard-Line Agenda

The new White House chief of staff is responsible for some of the most provocative policies of President Trump’s second term, as well as an aggressive approach to executive power.

Listen · 8:13 minutes

VIDEO: 
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000011269719/trump-stephen-miller-chief-of-staff.html?smid=url-share

Stephen Miller has replaced Susie Wiles as President Trump’s White House chief of staff. Miller is the hard-line policy adviser responsible for many of Trump’s most aggressive immigration policies. Credit: Alex Kent/The New York Times

by Maggie Haberman Jonathan Swan and Tyler Pager
November 6, 2026
New York Times

In the initial days after the staggering rebuke Republicans suffered in Tuesday’s midterm elections, President Trump appeared subdued — almost conciliatory.

He said he would work with Democrats, claiming as he has over the years that he could forge a deal with them on immigration, perhaps the most polarizing domestic issue of his second term.

But near the week’s end, instead of ceding to the clear evidence of voter displeasure, Mr. Trump pivoted to a familiar move: more MAGA.

On Friday, the president ousted his onetime close adviser, Susie Wiles, from the role of White House chief of staff, replacing her with Stephen Miller, his deputy chief of staff. More than any other top adviser, Mr. Miller encouraged an aggressive flexing of executive power when Mr. Trump returned to office.

Mr. Miller has been the driver of the president’s most muscular actions, including the use of increasingly hostile tactics to capture immigrants across the country and the bombing of small boats in the Caribbean Sea and the eastern Pacific Ocean that he and Mr. Trump declared constituted a foreign invasion.

The president’s choice sent a clear signal about the posture he intends to strike in his final two years in office and how little he intends to alter his approach in response to the most decisive political rout in half a century. He also put on center stage a figure who had already been a galvanizing target for Democrats intent on using their new powers in Congress to check the administration.

In a social media post, Mr. Miller praised Mr. Trump as “the most transformative political leader” in U.S. history, saying that he had “single-handedly saved America from those who would destroy it.”

“The mission now is more clear than ever: Fight with all of our soul to support our president and defend this magnificent Republic,” he added.

People close to Mr. Miller said he had shown no interest in compromising with congressional Democrats and was ready for a fight over subpoenas and investigations that are expected to emanate from the Hill. His top priority, they said, is rebuilding the fractured MAGA coalition and pursuing policies that will energize the voters who elected Mr. Trump in 2024.

“Stephen is and always has been the eternal flame of the MAGA movement — putting the president’s words and policy into action,” Hunter Morgen, who worked as a deputy to Mr. Miller during the president’s first term and is now a lobbyist at Ballard Partners, wrote in a text message.

While Ms. Wiles made clear she did not consider her job to be protecting the country from the president, as some of his first-term senior aides did, Mr. Miller is far more willing than she ever was to push legal boundaries.

He knows how the levers of government function. He is one of two top West Wing staff members who were part of the first administration when the House majority flipped in 2018, prompting a blitz of subpoenas from Congress.

Mr. Miller spent the years between Mr. Trump’s two terms recruiting a team that would help him put in place a sweeping agenda once back in power. Today, he has allies among the lawyers in key agencies across the executive branch, as well as a running dialogue with Attorney General Todd Blanche and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Mr. Hegseth celebrated Mr. Miller’s promotion with several posts on social media. “Huge CONGRATS,” he wrote, calling Mr. Miller “a true patriot and America First fighter.” He followed that with a post that declared: “Patriots in control,” and a subsequent one that included a picture of himself and Mr. Miller.

Still, Mr. Miller’s allies have indicated that he understands the Iran war has been a political disaster, and believes the president needs to get back to policies that are popular with the MAGA base.

While Ms. Wiles may be staying in Mr. Trump’s orbit by moving to the president’s outside political operation in a still undefined role, her departure and the ascent of Mr. Miller will fundamentally shift the circle of advisers around the president as the White House absorbs the shock of the midterm elections.

“I wanted to make a change,” Mr. Trump told reporters as he departed the White House for a trip to Florida. Ms. Wiles did a “great job,” he said, but added: “Sometimes in life, you have to make moves.”

Asked what he wanted Mr. Miller to do differently than Ms. Wiles, who he had previously claimed wasn’t going anywhere, the president said, “Just run things well.”
I
Ms. Wiles, the first woman to hold the top staff job in the West Wing, played a central role in President Trump’s return to power. Credit: Doug Mills/The New York Times

Mr. Trump, in his private conversations as well as his public remarks, has not accepted blame for the election results.

Instead, he repeatedly blasted Ms. Wiles and his other political advisers, insisting he was poorly served in the lead-up to the midterms. He criticized Ms. Wiles in front of several people at an East Room election watch party Tuesday night, according to people with knowledge of the incident, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal conversations.

Mr. Trump has also been privately critical of James Blair, Ms. Wiles’s ally, who ran the president’s outside political operation, people with knowledge of the comments said.

Mr. Trump publicly expressed his confidence in Ms. Wiles in recent months. But behind the scenes, there were signs that her standing with the president was shaky, according to officials with knowledge of the dynamics.

He has berated Ms. Wiles in front of other staff members about his frustrations that his administration has not moved faster to find people he brands as “leakers,” as well as the stalled prosecutions of his perceived political enemies, they said. In front of several advisers, he would accuse her of being among the leakers.

Mr. Trump began cutting Ms. Wiles out of hiring decisions, including when he chose an inexperienced television pundit to replace the departing press secretary, Karoline Leavitt.

Allies of Ms. Wiles described her as prepared to leave her role, and uninterested in fighting to stay in it. Her supporters saw the criticism of her as an effort to assign blame for a political and policy strategy largely driven by Mr. Trump himself. And they faulted her detractors inside and outside the administration for spreading information meant to undercut her with Mr. Trump, including stories about her daughter’s lobbying work.

In her own statement posted on social media, Ms. Wiles described working for Mr. Trump in the White House as the “honor of a lifetime.”

“While my role may be changing, my commitment to the President and the mission never will,” she added.

Ms. Wiles, the first woman to hold the top staff job in the West Wing, helped steer Mr. Trump to his election victory in 2024, playing a central role in his return to power four years after his loss to Joseph R. Biden Jr.

She was diagnosed with breast cancer in early 2026. Ms. Wiles stayed in her role as she started treatment and recently announced that she was cancer free.

Ms. Wiles came into the job having established a rapport with Mr. Trump and a level of trust that none of his four first-term chiefs of staff had enjoyed.

She tried to influence his decisions on core issues including his immigration crackdown, even if only on the margins, according to people with knowledge of her role. She pushed for the appointments of Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and both have been seen by many outside the government as stabilizing figures.

But Mr. Trump has relied primarily on his own instincts this term, and few advisers have engaged him in the kind of direct confrontations over policy that characterized his first administration.


ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

Maggie Haberman is a White House correspondent for The Times, reporting on President Trump.

Jonathan Swan is a White House reporter for The Times, covering the administration of Donald J. Trump. Contact him securely on Signal: @jonathan.941

Tyler Pager is a White House correspondent for The Times, covering President Trump and his administration.

A version of this article appears in print on Nov. 7, 2026, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Miller Promoted To Top Trump Aide In Staff Shakeup
 
Trump’s elevation of Stephen Miller a middle finger to millions of voters
 
David Smith in Washington

Architect of Trump’s far-right immigration agenda is now most powerful unelected figure in government – it suggests White House is moving to a war footing

Saturday 7 November 2026 
The Guardian

PHOTO: Stephen Miller outside the White House in October. Photograph: Annabelle Gordon/Reuters

Donald Trump just gave the middle finger to millions of American voters.

Any other president who suffered the kind of drubbing at the polls that Trump did this week might have felt at least a sliver of humility – and perhaps even an obligation to work with the new opposition in Congress.

But not for the first time in his political career, Trump veered in the opposite direction. On Friday he made Stephen Miller, condemned by Democrats and civil rights groups as a white nationalist, one of the most powerful unelected officials in Washington by naming him White House chief of staff.

What happens after the ‘blue wave’? Your questions on the US midterm election results answered

Read more

Miller is the architect of Trump’s far-right, nativist immigration agenda. He is, therefore, arguably the architect of the blue wave that engulfed Republicans in Tuesday’s midterm elections as voters – including many Latinos – expressed their disgust. Yet instead of firing Miller, Trump promoted him.

It was a declaration of war. Miller, 41, is a longtime proponent of the presidential authority that Trump has spent the past two years expanding at the expense of Congress. In 2017 he declared: “The powers of the president to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned.”

Now Republicans’ catastrophic defeat is likely to leave Trump more reliant on unilateral executive action than ever to advance his domestic agenda.

“In a lot of ways Stephen Miller has been the id to Trump’s authoritarian impulses and machinations,” Kurt Bardella, an adviser to Democrats in Texas, said. “I have to imagine that anointing this person chief of staff – the most powerful non-elected position in all of government – is a signal that they intend to double down on that authoritarianism.

“You’re going to see a lot of executive orders, unilateral action and stress testing of the checks and balances system continue for the final two years of his presidency.”

Trump’s second term has presented a concerted effort to dismantle those checks and balances that have traditionally constrained the occupant of the White House. He has signed 292 executive orders in less than two years, more than in his entire first term and a record pace for a modern presidency.

He has bypassed Congress on military action and tariffs, withheld congressionally approved spending, deployed the National Guard against the will of state authorities, politicised the justice department, punished critics and challenged judicial independence. Congress, dominated by Republicans reluctant to confront him, offered little resistance.

But this week’s landslide, the biggest in a midterm election since Watergate, puts Democrats back in charge of the House of Representatives and Senate. That the elections were free and fair, and that Trump did not dispute the result, was itself a victory for democracy.

Democrats will now seek to rein in the president and block his legislative agenda, bringing them into direct conflict with Miller, who was already a hugely powerful deputy chief of staff at the White House and now takes over from Susie Wiles.

Miller has been a champion of the Iran war and prominent voice on many of the president’s other priorities, including countering diversity initiatives and targeting transgender rights. He is reportedly one of a small group of White House staffers who approve all executive orders.

He is best known for driving the ‌immigration crackdown in Trump’s second term, setting ‌a target of 3,000 arrests per day – far above levels under previous administrations. He has pushed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to target anybody in ‌the country illegally, not just those with criminal records.

There are limits on what Democrats can do to stop the immigration drive since the One Big Beautiful Bill Act included major increases for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that will keep it funded for the rest of Trump’s term.

Even so, they will now chair House committees with the ability to launch investigations, issue subpoenas and hold high profile hearings. Along with ICE, they might scrutinise Jeffrey Epstein files and the department of government efficiency (Doge). They have also vowed to look at how Trump and his family have become wealthier since he returned to office.

The appointment of the pugnacious Miller as Trump’s consigliere suggests that the White House is moving to a war footing. He is likely to marshal a team of lawyers and attack Democrats by accusing them of weaponising the deep state against the president. As a frequent guest on the conservative Fox News network, he will also wage war in the court of public opinion.

“Trump’s decision to elevate Stephen Miller means that he’s spoiling for a fight with Democrats and they’re going to just rely on executive action to try and push their agenda through,” said David Cohen, a political science professor at the University of Akron in Ohio, who studies the American presidency and White House staffing.

Cohen added: “It’s a White House that doesn’t seek out cooperation with Congress. It’s their way or the highway, essentially, and it’s possible Stephen Miller is relishing this because he’s a believer in the unitary presidency and executive presidential action and he views this as a way where he can expand the powers of the presidency.”

Trump is not the first president to seek to consolidate authority. Arthur Schlesinger Jr’s 1973 book The Imperial Presidency warned that an accumulation of presidential power threatened the constitutional separation of powers.

In 1989 the American Enterprise Institute thinktank published The Fettered Presidency, a counterpoint arguing that legal and congressional constraints had unduly weakened the executive. It helped inspire a modern conservative drive to expand presidential authority, which accelerated under George W Bush and was subsequently exploited by Barack Obama as congressional gridlock made legislating increasingly difficult.

The combination of Trump and Miller, however, takes the concept of an American Caesar to a new extreme – and flies in the face of the verdict delivered by the electorate on Tuesday.

“It’s a step that I find hard to fathom except as the president giving the middle finger to the American public,” said Bill Galston, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution thinktank in Washington.

“In the same way that he ransacked the state of Texas for the very worst senatorial nominee imaginable, now he’s done the same thing with the chief of staff position. This is simply outrageous.”

Explore more on these topics

Donald Trump
Democrats
US politics
US midterm elections 2026
Trump administration
Republicans
analysis


Posted by at

Saturday, November 7, 2026

FASCIST AMERICA 2026: In The Following Three (3) Pivotal Articles Here Are Two (2) Crucial, Groundbreaking, and Absolutely Significant Reasons To Pay Very Close Attention To Where American Politics Is And Where It Is Going Now And In The Future--And For Two Entirely Opposite Reasons

Black voters turned out at their highest rate since 2008 and delivered decisive margins for Democrats, helping elect the first Black woman governor (Keisha Lance Bottoms in Georgia) and the first Muslim U.S. senator (Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan), while also boosting Democratic Senate candidates in Texas and Mississippi. Roughly nine in 10 Black voters backed Democratic House candidates, according to AP polling, underscoring their pivotal role in shaping the 2026 midterm outcomes.

https://www.axios.com/2026/11/05/black-voters-democrats-2026-midterms-trump

Politics & Policy
 
Black voters deliver a GOP reckoning
by Russell Contreras
November 5, 2026
AXIOS
 
Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate, Keisha Lance Bottoms (2nd R) appears onstage during her election night watch party in Atlanta. Bottoms defeated Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Jackson to become the nation's first Black woman elected governor. Photo: Paras Griffin/Getty Images

Why it matters: Democrats feared the Supreme Court's decision weakening the Voting Rights Act would threaten their political future in the South. Instead, Black voters helped deliver historic Democratic victories in Texas and Georgia, with a potential upset brewing in Mississippi.

By the numbers: Roughly nine in 10 Black voters backed Democratic House candidates Tuesday, according to the AP Voter Poll.

Only about one in 10 Black men backed Republicans. 

For context, a separate 2024 national House exit poll found Black voters favored Democrats 84%–14%. Black men split 75%–24%, while Black women backed Democrats 90%–8%.

State of play: Two Democrats who faced questions about their support among Black voters won crucial Senate races.

Michigan: Progressive Democrat Abdul El-Sayed defeated Republican Mike Rogers, becoming the nation's first Muslim senator. A late-October poll showed El-Sayed drawing 87% support among likely Black voters.

Texas: Democrat James Talarico defeated Republican Ken Paxton after courting Black voters who overwhelmingly backed Rep. Jasmine Crockett in the Democratic primary. An August Texas Southern University poll showed Talarico leading Paxton 79%–12% among likely Black voters.

Zoom in: Talarico built commanding margins in Harris County, home to Houston, and Dallas County, both home to large Black electorates, according to AP county-level returns.

Zoom out: Black voters helped elect former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms as the first Black woman governor in U.S. history.

About nine in 10 Black men voted for Bottoms, compared with roughly three-quarters who supported Kamala Harris in Georgia in 2024, according to the AP Voter Poll. Black women's support remained around 90%.

In majority-Black Clayton County, Bottoms received nearly 86,000 votes — about 13,600 more than Democrat Stacey Abrams received in the 2022 governor's race, AP reported.

In Mississippi's U.S. Senate election, Democrat Scott Colom built commanding leads over Republican incumbent Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith in heavily Black Hinds County, home to Jackson, and majority-Black Claiborne and Jefferson counties, according to unofficial overnight returns.

Colom held a narrow statewide lead Thursday morning, with thousands of ballots outstanding and the race still uncalled.

The intrigue: Florida Republican Byron Donalds became the state's first Black governor, but most Black voters backed Democrat David Jolly.

About one-quarter of Black men voted for Donalds, compared with just one in 10 Black women, according to the AP Voter Poll.

Between the lines: Election returns don't prove a nationwide surge in Black turnout or establish that anger over civil rights rollbacks motivated voters. But early voting offered signs of heightened Black participation in Georgia.

Black voters accounted for 32.4% of Georgia's early ballots, up from 30.2% in 2022, according to an Atlanta Journal-Constitution analysis. The figures don't establish whether the overall Black turnout rate increased.

Voting rights concerns may also have motivated some Black voters.

A Democratic-aligned August Data for Progress survey in Mississippi found 43% of Black voters more enthusiastic than usual about the midterms, compared with 31% of white voters.

Another 53% of Black voters said politicians making voting harder, gerrymandering and spreading false election claims made participation feel more important.

Worth noting: Yolanda Renee King, the 18-year-old granddaughter of Martin Luther King Jr., cast her first ballot Tuesday in Atlanta.

The bottom line: Democrats needed Black voters to win.

Tuesday's results suggest they held together a coalition that looked vulnerable after 2024 — potentially giving Black voters more leverage heading into 2028.

Black Representation in the 2026 Midterm Elections

 
November 4, 2026
Listen 

The 2026 Midterm Elections produced several historic wins, including gains in Black representation in gubernatorial offices and the Senate. At the same time, Black representation may decrease in the House. Our overview is below.

This will be updated as races are called. The most recent update happened at 12:05 pm ET on Nov. 6, 2026.



120th Congress: 60 Black members of Congress so far, down from 65. That’s 58 voting House members and 6 to 7 senators. Both totals leave out the two non-voting delegates.

Senate: 6 to 7, which is a record number of Black representation in the Senate, however, this would only make the Senate 6% to 7% African American, while African Americans are about 14% of the population.

 

Infographic showing that Black representation in the U.S. Senate rose to 6% following the 2026 election, while the Black share of the U.S. population is approximately 14%, and listing the names and party affiliations of Black senators.

  • Elected Tuesday: Senator-elect Juliana Stratton (D-IL), the only new member, and Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), re-elected.
  • Not up this year: Senators Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), and Tim Scott (R-SC).
  • Black senators go from 5 to 6, but the results of the Mississippi Senate race are still underway, so the total of Black Senators could rise to 7 if Scott Colom (D) wins.

Election results for the Mississippi Senate race showing Scott Colom leading Cindy Hyde-Smith by 1,138 votes, with bar charts displaying the current vote count and the progression of the lead over the day.


Infographic titled “What’s at Stake in Mississippi” detailing the implications of a potential Scott Colom victory, including historical statistics and a timeline of the upcoming vote-counting and certification process.

House: 58 voting members, down from 61.

Starting point (119th Congress): 58 Black lawmakers in total, including 2 delegates. That’s 5 senators and 61 voting House members.

A waterfall chart showing the change in the number of Black House members from the 119th to the 120th Congress, decreasing from approximately 60 to 55, with a breakdown by party showing Black House Republicans dropping from 4 to 0.Infographic showing 2026 election results regarding Black members of Congress, listing seats lost, new seats won, and Black successors, with a note that figures are preliminary estimates.

Seats moving to non-Black members (−8):

  • All 4 Black House Republicans: Congressmen Byron Donalds (R-FL), Wesley Hunt (R-TX), and John James (R-MI) ran for higher office, and Congressman Burgess Owens (R-UT) seat was redrawn.
  • Al Green (D-TX), whose districts were redrawn. Leticia Gutierrez won the seat.
  • Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), who retired. Adam Hamawy (D-NJ) won the seat.
  • Cleo Fields (D-LA). That seat won’t be decided until Dec. 12, but the district is now only about one-quarter Black.

New seats won by Black candidates (+5):

  • Melat Kiros (D-CO), the first Black woman Colorado has sent to Congress.
  • Adrian Boafo (D-MD), who replaces Steny Hoyer (D).
  • Lakesha Womack (D-NC)
  • Cyril Jefferson (D-NC)
  • Donavan McKinney (D-MI)

Black successors to departing Black members (no net change):

  • Donna Miller (D-IL)
  • La Shawn Ford (D-IL)
  • Jasmine Clark (D-GA)
  • Oliver Gilbert (D-FL)
  • Frederick Haynes III (D-TX)
  • Chris Rabb (D-PA)
  • Colin Allred (D-TX)
  • Darializa Avila Chevalier (D-NY)

Held despite redrawn maps: Shomari Figures (AL-02) and Don Davis (NC-01).

Net: About 61 − 8 + 5 = 58 voting House members, a loss of about 3. All four Black Republicans left, while Black Democrats gained one seat from the record high representation of the 119th Congress in 2025.

Governor Races: 

Five Black governors were elected Tuesday. That’s more than double the number ever elected in U.S. history, from three to seven. Before this election, no two elected Black governors had served at the same time. In January, five will.

Infographic titled “Five Black Governors Elected in One Night” showing a table of elected governors in Georgia, Florida, Nevada, Wisconsin, and Maryland, and noting that 5 of 9 Black major-party nominees for governor won.

Lost: Jermaine Johnson (D-SC), John James (R-MI), Lisa Demuth (R-MN), and Fred Love (D-AR). This makes 5 of 9 Black major-party nominees who won.

In history

Timeline showing the history of Black governors in the U.S. from 1870 to 2026, noting that seven have been elected, nine have served, and five are serving simultaneously as of 2027.

  • Ever elected: 7.  Before Tuesday, there were three: Governors Doug Wilder (D-VA, 1989), Deval Patrick (D-MA, 2006), and Wes Moore (D-MD, 2022). Bottoms, Donalds, Ford, and Crowley bring it to seven.
  • Ever served: 9. Two Black governors took office without being elected: P.B.S. Pinchback (LA, 1872-73) and David Paterson (D-NY, 2008-10).
Array
Tagged ,
 
 
 
Posted by at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)