Friday, February 28, 2025

Transcript of Chris Hedges Full Speech at Workers Strike Back Conference February 22, 2025 in Seattle, Washington

https://chrishedges.substack.com/p/chris-hedges-full-speech-at-workers


Chris Hedges Full Speech at Workers Strike Back Conference

This was a talk I gave at the Workers Strike Back conference in Seattle earlier this week on February 22, 2025. 

VIDEO:   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8PnryeLUwQ

Transcript of my talk:

For over two decades, I and a handful of others — Sheldon Wolin, Noam Chomsky, Chalmers Johnson, Cornel West, Barbara Ehrenreich, Ralph Nader and of course Jill Stein and Kshama Sawant — warned that the expanding social inequality and the capture of our democratic institutions, including the media, the Congress, organized labor, academia and the courtsby corporations and oligarchs would lead to an authoritarian or Christian fascist state.

My books — American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America(2007), Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle(2009), Death of the Liberal Class (2010), Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt (2012), written with Joe Sacco, Wages of Rebellion (2015) and America: The Farewell Tour (2018) were a succession of impassioned pleas to take the decay seriously. I take no joy in being correct.

“The rage of those abandoned by the economy, the fears and concerns of a beleaguered and insecure middle class, and the numbing isolation that comes with the loss of community, would be the kindling for a dangerous mass movement,” I wrote in American Fascists in 2007.

“If these dispossessed are not reincorporated into mainstream society, if they eventually lose all hope of finding good, stable jobs and opportunities for themselves and their children — in short, the promise of a brighter future — the specter of American fascism will beset the nation. This despair, this loss of hope, this denial of a future, leads the desperate into the arms of those who promise miracles and dreams of apocalyptic glory.”

Donald Trump does not herald the collapse of democracy. He heralds the ripping away of the veneer that masked the corruption within the ruling class and their pretense of democracy. He is the symptom, not the disease.

The loss of basic democratic norms began long before Trump.

Deindustrialization, deregulation, austerity, unchecked predatory corporations, including the health-care industry, wholesale surveillance of every American, social inequality, an electoral system that is defined by legalized bribery, endless and futile wars, the largest prison population in the world, but most of all feelings of betrayal, stagnation and despair, are a toxic brew that culminate in an inchoate and justified hatred of the ruling class.

The Democrats are as guilty as the Republicans.

“Trump and his coterie of billionaires, generals, half-wits, Christian fascists, criminals, racists, and moral deviants play the role of the Snopes clan in some of William Faulkner’s novels,” I wrote in America: The Farewell Tour.

“The Snopeses filled the power vacuum of the decayed South and ruthlessly seized control from the degenerated, former slaveholding aristocratic elites. Flem Snopes and his extended family — which includes a killer, a pedophile, a bigamist, an arsonist, a mentally disabled man who copulates with a cow, and a relative who sells tickets to witness the bestiality — are fictional representations of the scum now elevated to the highest level of the federal government. They embody the moral rot unleashed by unfettered capitalism.”

“The usual reference to ‘amorality,’ while accurate, is not s ufficiently distinctive and by itself does not allow us to place them, as they should be placed, in a historical moment,” the critic Irving Howe wrote of the Snopeses. “Perhaps the most important thing to be said is that they are what comes afterwards: the creatures that emerge from the devastation, with the slime still upon their lips.”

“Let a world collapse, in the South or Russia, and there appear figures of coarse ambition driving their way up from beneath the social bottom, men to whom moral claims are not so much absurd as incomprehensible, sons of bushwhackers or muzhiks drifting in from nowhere and taking over through the sheer outrageousness of their monolithic force,” Howe wrote.

“They become presidents of local banks and chairmen of party regional committees, and later, a trifle slicked up, they muscle their way into Congress or the Politburo. Scavengers without inhibition, they need not believe in the crumbling official code of their society; they need only learn to mimic its sounds.”

The political philosopher Sheldon Wolin called our system of governance “inverted totalitarianism,” one that kept the old iconography, symbols and language, but had handed the internal levers of power to corporations and the rich.

Now we are shifting to totalitarianism’s more recognizable form, one dominated by a demagogue.

“We live in a two-tiered legal system, one where poor people are harassed, arrested and jailed for absurd infractions, such as selling loose cigarettes — which led to Eric Garner being choked to death by the New York City police in 2014 — while crimes of appalling magnitude by the oligarchs and corporations, from oil spills to bank fraud in the hundreds of billions of dollars, which wiped out 40 percent of the world’s wealth, are dealt with through tepid administrative controls, symbolic fines and civil enforcement that give these wealthy perpetrators immunity from criminal prosecution,” I wrote in America: The Farewell Tour.

The utopian ideology of neoliberalism and global capitalism is a vast con, a mechanism to funnel wealth upwards to the billionaire class.

The working poor, whose unions and rights have been stripped from them and whose wages have stagnated or declined over the past 40 years, have been disempowered and impoverished. Their lives, as Barbara Ehrenreich chronicled in Nickel and Dimed, are one long, stress-ridden emergency. The middle class is evaporating. Cities that once manufactured products and offered factory jobs are boarded up-wastelands. The destruction of trade barriers is a ruse corporations and the billionaire class use to stash $1.42 trillion in profits in overseas banks to avoid paying taxes.

The labels “liberal” and “conservative” are meaningless, evidenced by a Democratic presidential candidate who turned to Wall Street bankers to formulate her economic policies and bragged about an endorsement from Dick Cheney, a war criminal who left office with a 13 percent approval rating.

Fascism is always the bastard child of a bankrupt liberalism.

The attraction of Trump is that, although vile and buffoonish, he mocks the bankruptcy of the political charade. Trump lies like he breathes, but the lies told by the two establishment parties caused far more pain and did far more damage than the lies told by Trump. Trump is the apotheosis of this culture of mendacity, deception and exploitation.

We are a culture awash in lies.

It no longer matters what is true. It matters only what is correct. The correct ideology of neoliberalism is as delusional as the correct ideology of the Christian fascists. Neither are reality-based belief systems.

Totalitarianism elevates the brutal and the stupid, those with no genuine political philosophy, other than a lust for wealth and power. Empty, mind-numbing clichés and slogans, most of which are absurd and contradictory, replace political discourse. This is as true for the Christian right as it is for those that preach free market economics and globalization.

The illusions peddled on our screens — including the fictitious persona created for Trump on The Apprentice — have replaced reality. Politics is burlesque as Kamala Harris’ vapid, celebrity-filled, issueless campaign illustrated. It is smoke and mirrors created by the army of agents, publicists, marketing departments, promoters, script writers, television and movie producers, video technicians, photographers, bodyguards, wardrobe consultants, fitness trainers, pollsters, public announcers and television new personalities. Our money-drenched, heavily managed elections are little more than totalitarian plebiscites designed to give a veneer of legitimacy to oligarchic and corporate power.

The political malaise is mirrored in a cultural malaise, what Søren Kierkegaard calls “a sickness unto death,” the numbing of the soul by despair and moral nihilism.

“The cult of the self dominates our cultural landscape,” I wrote in Empire of Illusion:

“This cult has within it the classic traits of psychopaths: superficial charm, grandiosity and self-importance; a need for constant stimulation, a penchant for lying, deception, and manipulation, and the inability to feel remorse or guilt.

This is, of course, the ethic promoted by corporations. It is the ethic of unfettered capitalism. It is the misguided belief that personal style and personal advancement, mistaken for individualism, are the same as democratic equality.

In fact, personal style, defined by the commodities we buy or consume, has become a compensation for our loss of democratic equality. We have a right, in the cult of the self, to get whatever we desire.

We can do anything, even belittle and destroy those around us, including our friends, to make money, to be happy, and to become famous. Once fame and wealth are achieved, they become their own justification, their own morality. How one gets there is irrelevant. Once you get there, those questions are no longer asked.”

My book Empire of Illusion begins in Madison Square Garden at a World Wrestling Entertainment tour. I understood that professional wrestling was the template for our social and political life, but I did not know that it would produce a president and soon a Secretary of Education, who has vowed to shut the department down.

“The bouts are stylized rituals,” I wrote, in what could have been a description of a Trump rally:

“They are public expressions of pain and a fervent longing for revenge. The lurid and detailed sagas behind each bout, rather than the wrestling matches themselves, are what drive crowds to a frenzy.

These ritualized battles give those packed in the arenas a temporary, heady release from mundane lives. The burden of real problems is transformed into fodder for a high-energy pantomime.”

It is not going to get better. The tools to shut down dissent, the abuses of an imperial presidency, have been cemented into place. Our democracy cratered years ago. All Trump has to do to establish a naked police state is flip a switch. And he will.

“The worse reality becomes, the less a beleaguered population wants to hear about it,” I wrote at the conclusion of Empire of Illusion, “and the more it distracts itself with squalid pseudo-events of celebrity breakdowns, gossip and trivia. These are the debauched revels of a dying civilization.”

The system is not reformable. Either we obstruct, in the only form left to us, which is mass mobilization, acts of sustained civil disobedience, especially the strike, or we are frog-marched into serfdom. Either we are rebels or slaves.

To be innocent in the eyes of the state is to be guilty. It is to be complicit in this radical evil. It is to bear the mark of Cain. It is to do nothing to defend the weak, the oppressed, the poor and those who suffer, to protect the planet. Choose. But choose fast. Time is running out. The sick, unable to afford care, are dying. The poor, especially children, are going hungry. Families, along with the mentally ill, are thrown into our streets. The unemployed and underemployed are desperate. Schools are being defunded and privatized. Our prisons are packed. The undocumented, their families ripped apart, are being hunted down, imprisoned and deported. Our roads, bridges, dams, levees, power grids, rail lines, subways, bus services, schools and libraries are crumbling. The ecosystem is disintegrating as temperatures rise and freak weather patterns – wildfires, hurricanes, droughts, flooding, tornadoes, melting polar ice caps and glaciers – drive desperate migrants northwards from the Global South.

This is the dystopia the ruling class is shoving down our throats.

No social or revolutionary movement succeeds without a core of people who will not betray their vision and their principles. In other words, militants. They are the building blocks of social change. They are our only hope for a viable socialism. They are willing to spend their lives as political outcasts. They are willing to endure repression. They refuse to sell out the oppressed and the poor. They know that you stand with all of the oppressed—those in our prisons and marginal communities, the poor, unemployed workers, our LGBTQ community, undocumented workers, the mentally ill and the Palestinians—or you stand with none of the oppressed. They know when you fight for the oppressed you get treated like the oppressed.

Liberals plead with us to believe in the ultimate goodness of the ruling class, the fantasy that justice and social equality can be achieved through their bankrupt institutions, especially the Democratic Party, even though, like Herod of old, they repeatedly sell us out. We are castigated for our anger, our alienation from the centers of power, our bleakness. We are told to adopt a positive attitude, to trust the system, that we can awaken the dead consciences, the atrophied souls, of the plutocrats running Amazon, Halliburton, Goldman Sachs, ExxonMobil and the two ruling parties. I cannot count how many times I have been told this.

But this is the road to despair, not hope. Hope comes when we physically defy those in power. Those who succumb to apathy or complicity are enemies of hope. They become, in their passivity, agents of injustice.

Hope has a cost. Hope is not comfortable or easy. Hope requires personal risk. Hope does not come with the right attitude. Hope is not about peace of mind. Hope is an action. Hope is doing something. The more futile, the more useless, the more irrelevant and incomprehensible an act of rebellion is, the vaster and the more potent hope becomes. Hope never makes sense. Hope is absurd. Hope knows that an injustice visited on our neighbor is an injustice visited on us all. Hope posits that people are drawn to the good by the good. This is the secret of hope’s power. It is why it can never finally be defeated. Hope demands for others what we demand for ourselves. Hope does not separate us from them. Hope sees in our neighbor, even our enemy, our own face.

The powerful do not understand hope. Hope is not part of their vocabulary. They speak in the cold, dead words of national security, global markets, electoral strategy, staying on message, image and profits. The powerful protect their own. They divide the world into the damned and the blessed, the patriots and the enemy, the rich and the poor. They insist that extinguishing lives in foreign wars or in our prison complexes is a form of human progress. They cannot see that the suffering of a child in Gaza or a child in the blighted pockets of Washington, D.C., diminishes and impoverishes us all. They are deaf, dumb and blind to hope. Those addicted to power, consumed by self-exaltation, cannot decipher the words of hope any more than most of us can decipher hieroglyphics. Hope to Wall Street bankers and politicians, to the masters of war and commerce, is not practical. It is gibberish. It means nothing.

I cannot promise you it will be easy. I cannot assure you that tens of thousands will join us. I cannot pretend that going to jail is pleasant. I cannot say that anyone in Congress, anyone in the boardrooms of the corporations that cannibalize our nation, anyone in the press, will be moved by pity to act for the common good. I cannot tell you these wars will end or the hungry will be fed. I cannot say that justice will roll down like a mighty wave and restore our nation to sanity. But I can say this: If we resist and carry out acts, no matter how small, of open defiance, hope will not be extinguished. Hope cannot be sustained if it cannot be seen.

Any act of rebellion, any physical defiance, anything that seeks to draw the good to the good, nourishes our souls and holds out the possibility that we can touch and transform the souls of others. Every act that imparts hope is a victory in itself.

I saw the power of mass movements, of hope, in East Germany, Czechoslovakia and Romania that brought down those regimes. These uprisings were spontaneous outbursts by an enraged population that had had enough of repression, mismanagement and corruption. No one, from the dissidents themselves to the ruling communist parties, anticipated these revolts. They erupted, as all revolutions do, from tinder that had been waiting years for a spark. That this tinder exists in America is undeniable, although to date its primary expression has been fascistic.

These revolutions were led by a handful of dissidents who until the fall of 1989 were marginal and dismissed by the state as inconsequential. The state periodically sent state security to harass them. It often ignored them. I am not even sure you could call these dissidents an opposition. They were profoundly isolated within their own societies. The state media denied them a voice. They had no legal status and were locked out of the political system. They were blacklisted. They struggled to make a living. But when the breaking point in Eastern Europe came, when the ruling communist ideology lost all credibility, there was no question in the minds of the public about whom they could trust. The demonstrators that poured into the streets of East Berlin and Prague were aware of who would sell them out and who would not. They trusted those, such as Václav Havel, who had dedicated their lives to fighting for open society, those who had been willing to be condemned as nonpersons and go to jail for their defiance. No matter how tempting it was to give up, to make compromises with power, they did not.

Julien Benda reminds us that we can serve two sets of principles. Privilege and power or justice and truth. The more we make compromises with those who serve privilege and power the more we diminish the capacity for justice and truth. Our strength comes from our steadfastness to justice and truth, a steadfastness that accepts that the corporate forces arrayed against us may crush us, but that the more we make compromises with those who serve are privilege and power the more we diminish our strength.

Karl Popper in “The Open Society and Its Enemies” writes that the question is not how do you get good people to rule. Popper says this is the wrong question. Most people attracted to power, he writes, have “rarely been above average, either morally or intellectually, and often [have been] below it.” The question is how do we build mass organizations to hold the powerful to account, even when those in power come from our own ranks.

There is a moment in Henry Kissinger’s memoirs—do not buy the book—when Nixon and Kissinger are looking out at tens of thousands of anti-war protesters who have surrounded the White House. Nixon had placed empty city buses in front of the White House to keep the protesters back. He worried out loud that the crowd would break through the barricades and get him and Kissinger. And that is exactly where we want people in power to be. This is why, although he was not a liberal, Nixon was our last liberal president. He was scared of movements. And if we cannot make the elites scared of us, we will fail. This is our calling.

Our failure to immediately build a counterweight to the Democratic Party after it abandoned the working class with the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 was our gravest mistake. This mistake was compounded by allowing liberals to herd us back into the embrace of the Democratic Party, promising it could be changed from within, that its corporate-indentured leadership would permit Bernie Sanders to be the nominee or the stated goals of his platform to be enacted.

Alexis de Tocqueville correctly saw that when citizens can no longer participate in a meaningful way in political life, political populism is replaced by a cultural populism of sameness, resentment and mindless patriotism and by a form of anti-politics he called “democratic despotism.”

Only 11.3 percent of workers in this country belong to unions. This is the lowest percentage in 80 years. And nearly all these unions, and especially the AFL-CIO, have been emasculated by corporate power.

We are not going to be assisted in our revolt by established unions. Union leaders, such as Teamsters’ Sean O’Brien, are bought off. They are comfortable. They are pulling down at least five times what rank-and-file workers make. They have sold out to the Democratic Party, or in the case of O’Brien to Trump.

We forgot, as Alexander Herzen said, that we are not the doctors, we are the disease.

We have to mount protests not only outside the doors of Walmart and Amazon, not only outside congressional offices, but outside the doors of union headquarters. There is no established institution we can trust. They are broken. But there are the 30 million working poor who, victims of mass layoffs, trapped in debt peonage, manipulated and used by the political elite, willing to rise up if we stop our virtue signaling and woke purity tests and speak to them in the language of class warfare. This is why I support Worker’s Strike Back.

But let us be cleared eyed about what lies ahead. The enemies of freedom throughout history have always charged its defenders with subversion. The enemies of freedom have always convinced segments of a captive population to parrot back mind-numbing clichés to justify their rule and serve as goons and vigilantes in the name of patriotism.

Those who create a mafia economy make inevitable a mafia state. We must organize, and organize fast, to break our chains, one-by-one, to use the power of the strike to cripple the state machinery. We must embrace a militant radicalism, one that offers a new vision and a new social structure. We must hold fast to moral imperatives. We must forgive mortgage and student debt, institute universal health care and break up monopolies. We must raise the minimum wage and end the squandering of hundreds of billions of dollars to sustain the empire and the war industry. We must establish a nationwide jobs program to rebuild the country’s collapsing infrastructure. We must take into public ownership the banks, pharmaceutical corporations, military contractors and transportation and end the extraction of fossil fuels. We must end the genocide in Gaza and that means the boycott, divestment and sanctioning of the apartheid state of Israel.

None of this will happen until we organize and refuse to dilute our commitment to justice and to socialism, until we build a society that sgtops investing in forms of control and invests in people.

As the country disintegrates, as feelings of betrayal and abandonment mount, the ruling class will use their organs of propaganda, including the media, to blame us, those in open defiance of authority, for the chaos.

The mafia state will be brutal. Capitalists, as Eduardo Galeano writes, view communal cultures as “enemy cultures.” The billionaire class will do to us what it did to the radicals who rose up to form militant unions in the past. We had the bloodiest labor wars in the industrialized world. Hundreds of American workers were killed, tens of thousands were beaten, wounded, jailed and blacklisted. Unions were infiltrated, shut down and outlawed. We cannot be naïve. It will be difficult, costly and painful. But this confrontation is our only hope. Otherwise, we, and the planet that sustains us, are doomed.

I concede we may not succeed. So be it. At least those who come after us, and I speak as a father, will say we tried. The corporate forces that have us in their death grip will destroy the lives of my children. They will destroy the lives of your children. They will destroy the ecosystem that makes life possible. We owe it to those who come after us not to be complicit in this evil. We owe it to them to refuse to be good Germans.

This is a battle, quite literally, between freedom and slavery, life and death. It is that grave. It is a battle that no matter the odds must be fought.

In the end, I do not fight fascists because I will win. I fight fascists because they are fascists. [end]


The Chris Hedges Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Thanks for reading The Chris Hedges Report! This post is public so feel free to share it.

IMPORTANT NEW BOOK:

For Gaza's Children: Progressive Black, Brown and Jewish Writers and Poets Speak Out

Marc Lamont Hill (Editor)
Haki R. Madhubuti (Editor)
Keith Gilyard (Editor)

Third World Press, 2025

[Publication date: February 11, 2025]

We firmly believe that our children are the stewards of our liberation.

When we prioritize our children, we are also prioritizing a world shaped by peace, safety, love and justice. When we protect our children, we are also protecting our most beautiful legacies and coveted traditions. When we invest in our children, we are also investing in our most audacious freedom dreams and our most impossible future worlds.

The children of Gaza, and indeed all of Palestine, are no different. Driven by this commitment, we have decided to assemble an anthology that prioritizes children. We hope to contribute to the present moment of radical resistance and revolutionary possibility by placing the lives, experiences, conditions, feelings, perspectives, and stories of the region’s children at the center of our social, cultural, moral, legal, and political analysis. For this anthology, we have chosen to exclusively spotlight the voices of progressive Black and Jewish American writers. In foregrounding Black and Jewish identities, including those writers who identify as both Black and Jewish, we hope to refute several dangerous myths about Black and Jewish Americans on the question of Israel/Palestine.


ABOUT THE EDITORS: 

 

Marc Lamont Hill is one of the leading intellectual voices in the country. Hill is a Presidential Professor of Anthropology and Urban Education at the City University of New York Graduate Center. Since his days as a youth in Philadelphia, Hill has been a social justice activist and organizer. He has worked on campaigns to end the death penalty, abolish prisons, and release numerous political prisoners. He has also worked in solidarity with human rights movements around the world.

Haki R. Madhubuti is a best-selling poet, author, publisher, and educator, and is widely regarded as one of the architects of the Black Arts Movement and is founder and publisher of Chicago's Third World Press. Professor Madhubuti has published more than 37 books and his poetry and essays have been selected for more than 100 anthologies. In 1967, Madhubuti founded Third World Press, the oldest continuously publishing Black-owned book publisher in the United States. In 2015, the publishing house expanded its mission as Third World Press Foundation. Among his many awards, he received the Literary Legacy Award from the National Black Writers Conference for creating and supporting Black literature and for building Black literary institutions. Professor Madhubuti received his 5th Honorary Doctorate of Literature from Knox College in May 2022 and was also named University Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Chicago State University. He was a recipient of the Pegasus Lifetime Achievement Award from the Poetry Foundation in October of 2022. 

Since the 1970s, Keith Gilyard has made significant contributions to English studies as a writer, teacher, and participant in professional associations. His more than 100 publications include the influential education memoir
Voices of the Self: A Study of Language Competence, the wide-ranging True to the Language Game: African American Discourse, Cultural Politics, and Pedagogy, and the revivifying On African-American Rhetoric. He received an American Book Award for his biography John Oliver Killens: A Life of Black Literary Activism. His dozens of creative works include the novella The Next Great Old-School Conspiracy and the poetry volumes Dominant Seventh and Monologues.

 

Despicable Visions of 21st Century American Imperialism and Ethnic Cleansing in Gaza by Donald Trump and the Fascist U.S. Government and the Global Outrage in Response To It

The Madness of Donald Trump

To Benjamin Netanyahu’s delight, Trump proposes the wholesale ethnic cleansing of Gaza and the creation of a new “Riviera.”


by David Remnick
February 5, 2025
The New Yorker


Photograph by Mohammed Salem / Reuters

More than five hundred years ago, Machiavelli, the philosopher of political practice and modern republicanism, suggested, in “Discourses on Livy,” that “at times it is a very wise thing to simulate madness.” Richard Nixon, according to his chief of staff H. R. Haldeman, apparently arrived at a similar conclusion, saying, “I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. I want the North Vietnamese to believe I’ve reached the point where I might do anything to stop the war. We’ll just slip the word to them that, ‘for God’s sake, you know Nixon is obsessed about communism. We can’t restrain him when he’s angry—and he has his hand on the nuclear button’—and Ho Chi Minh himself will be in Paris in two days begging for peace.”

On Tuesday, President Trump appeared alongside the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in the East Room at the White House, and declared that the two million Palestinians in Gaza should be forced out of the Strip. The United States would “take over” Gaza and “own” it. The Palestinians, after having suffered tens of thousands of deaths and the destruction of countless homes, schools, mosques, hospitals, and other infrastructure, would, it appears, have nothing to say about any of this and would be sent . . . elsewhere. Egypt. Jordan. Whatever. It hardly seemed to matter to Trump that such a policy represents ethnic cleansing. Morality is of no interest when there is a real-estate deal to be made.

“We have an opportunity to do something that could be phenomenal, and I don’t want to be cute, I don’t want to be a wise guy, but the Riviera of the Middle East—this could be something that could be so—this could be so magnificent,” Trump said. (The Riviera: “A sunny place for shady people,” as W. Somerset Maugham put it.) “We’ll make sure that it’s done world-class,” Trump went on, building on the real-estate pitch. As he’d noted earlier in the day, “It doesn’t have to be one area, but you take certain areas and you build really good-quality housing, like a beautiful town, like someplace where they can live and not die, because Gaza is a guarantee that they’re going to end up dying.”

Netanyahu expressed confidence that the plan would “usher in the peace with Saudi Arabia and with others.” The Saudis issued an official statement rejecting Trump’s proposal, but the newly minted yes-men performed on cue: Secretary of State Marco Rubio tweeted that “the United States stands ready to lead and Make Gaza Beautiful Again.”

As Trump spoke, Netanyahu could not resist a smile so broad that it must have ached after a while. He could not have imagined a greater gift from the American President or the provision of greater political cover back home. His gratitude was boundless, and he knew well enough to slather on the grease of flattery. “I’ve said this before, I’ll say it again: you are the greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House,” Netanyahu said to Trump, for the cameras. “I believe, Mr. President, that your willingness to puncture conventional thinking, thinking that has failed time and time again, your willingness to think outside the box with fresh ideas, will help us achieve all of these goals.”

Netanyahu’s cheerleaders in the Israeli press, such as Amit Segal, of Channel 12, hailed the news, and Itamar Ben-Gvir, one of the leaders of the annexationist wing of Israeli politics, tweeted, “Donald, this looks like the beginning of a beautiful friendship.” Amos Harel, the well-respected reporter and analyst for Haaretz, the liberal daily, told me, “The right wing here is euphoric. There is no way to figure this out. Maybe Trump is more delusional than I thought. He has more energy than Biden, but . . . wow.”

This is not the first time that the Trump family, which has made substantial financial investments in the region in recent years, has envisioned Gaza for its resort potential. Last February, Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner said in an interview at Harvard University that “Gaza’s waterfront property could be very valuable. . . . It’s a little bit of an unfortunate situation there, but from Israel’s perspective I would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up.” Kushner has retreated from White House politics, remaining for now in Miami, but he views himself as a grand strategist of the Middle East. At Harvard, he said that “proactively recognizing” a Palestinian state would be a “super-bad idea.”

After watching Trump and Netanyahu, I spoke with Mkhaimar Abusada, a political scientist at Al-Azhar University, in Gaza, who has been teaching this year at Northwestern University. “I’m depressed, man,” he told me. “I don’t even know what will happen, but I do know that the Palestinians are against this and would rather live in tents and in the rubble of their destroyed homes than leave. And we all know that the neighboring countries, Egypt and Jordan, have said no to this idea.” King Abdullah II, of Jordan, and President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, of Egypt, both see an increased Palestinian population in their countries as a demographic and political threat to their regimes. Also, although both countries have long-standing peace treaties with Israel, it is unclear how Trump’s proposal and Netanyahu’s pleasure in its pronouncement might affect those arrangements.

Aaron David Miller, a veteran diplomat and analyst of the Middle East, told me that his “head was exploding” as he watched Trump. “In twenty-seven years of working for Democrats and Republicans, I’ve never heard a press conference like this,” he said.

Miller, of course, is aware that Trump’s intention, always, is to shock, to play the madman, and thus frighten his rivals and alter the terms of the debate. Maybe, just maybe, it will all dissipate, Miller suggested. Trump habitually says outrageous things, watches how they land, and, often enough, distances himself from his own provocations. (Will he seize Greenland? The Panama Canal? Make Canada the fifty-first state?) Perhaps Trump thinks he’ll be able to prop up Netanyahu at home and so deeply alarm other Middle Eastern leaders that he will be able to both muscle Iran into a deal that ends its nuclear ambitions and complete a broader regional settlement with Saudi coöperation. Or perhaps Trump’s latest performance is of a piece with the strategy of “flooding the zone” with so much chaos and deceptive rhetoric, and with so many mind-altering proposals and appointments, that, while the establishment’s collective head explodes on an hourly basis, he achieves at least some of his fondest ambitions.

And yet it seems inevitable that there will be a price for all the madness. Miller cautioned that, although Trump may back away from his proposal of ethnic cleansing and Riviera creation, such a performance sends a particularly dangerous message: “It is a nod to Putin that he can keep the territory he’s taken in Ukraine, and to Xi, who might now have more confidence about establishing a blockade of Taiwan in preparation for an invasion. It all reflects the mind-set of an unserious man.”

Nixon considered himself to be a profound thinker on global strategy. And yet it’s important to recall that, though he might have convinced himself that his act would bring the North Vietnamese leadership to heel, that misbegotten war ended in American defeat. Similarly, Putin’s veiled nuclear threats during his war on Ukraine, and Trump’s threats of “fire and fury” against North Korea, in 2017, hardly proved decisive, much less constructive. The President’s decision to deploy, yet again, a display of chaotic bravado—an enactment of the Madman Theory, if that’s what it is—will do nothing to bring a lasting peace to the Middle East, and brings disgrace to the United States. ♦



ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
 
 
David Remnick has been the editor of The New Yorker since 1998 and a staff writer since 1992. He is the author of seven books; the most recent is “Holding the Note,” a collection of his profiles of musicians.
 

https://truthout.org/articles/trump-gaza-video-reflects-shared-us-and-israeli-histories-of-ethnic-cleansing/

Op-Ed
War & Peace

Trump Gaza Video Reflects Shared US and Israeli Histories of Ethnic Cleansing

The video’s disturbing futuristic vision of Gaza is an AI version of “The White Man’s Burden.”

by Seraj Assi
February 27, 2025
Truthout

 
Palestinians walk past tents lining the streets amid the rubble of destroyed buildings in Jabalia, in the northern Gaza Strip, on February 21, 2025. Majdi Fathi / NurPhoto via Getty Images

U.S. President Donald Trump recently shared an AI-generated video that shows his horrific futuristic vision for Gaza, featuring Trump himself, Elon Musk and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reveling and enjoying themselves on the ruins of displaced Palestinians and basking in the glory of an ethnically cleansed Gaza.

The brazen footage, which Trump posted late Tuesday to Instagram and Truth Social, reimagines the devastated strip as a “Middle East Riviera” boasting of a luxury Trump hotel, glittering Western skyscrapers, beach resorts with bearded belly dancers and a colossal Trump golden statue hovering godlike over the besieged strip. A “Trump Gaza” shop offers golden merchandise of the U.S. president, where a child is carrying a helium-inflated golden balloon shaped like Trump’s head.

The video shows Trump waltzing with a belly dancer in a nightclub, Netanyahu enjoying poolside drinks at a luxury resort, and Musk eating a dip and showering locals with U.S. dollar bills. The dehumanizing footage is set to an up-tempo dance track featuring patronizing and personality cult-infused lyrics: “Donald Trump will set you free, bringing the light for all to see, no more tunnels, no more fear, Trump Gaza is finally here. Trump Gaza shining bright, golden future, a brand new light.”

“Trump Gaza” celebrates ethnic cleansing — nothing says Indigenous erasure like renaming.

This unhinged celebration of war crimes and crimes against humanity almost has no precedent in human history. It shows total contempt for basic principles of international justice and human rights, and makes mockery of the more than 61,000 Palestinian victims, including 17,000 children, who have been massacred by Israel in Gaza over the past 15 months, with U.S. funds and arms.

The video, which appeared to take inspiration from the genocidal imaginations of some Zionist social media accounts, has since gone viral. It has sparked outrage among anti-genocide activists and Palestinians, who understood the dystopian horror lurking beneath the outlandish AI-generated scenes, evoking long-held colonial fantasies of civilizing missions and “the white man’s burden.” Ghassan Abu Sitta sums it up quite eloquently: “The delusions of godlike divinity that shapes the colonial mindset of White supremacy. Both in the need for violence to be performative and in their belief of the benevolent nature of their crimes.”

Over the past weeks, Trump has repeated his proposal to ethnically cleanse Gaza with shocking persistence. “We just clean out that whole thing,” the newly inaugurated president told reporters on Air Force One in the early days of his presidency. He further described Gaza as a “demolition site,” with “phenomenal location, on the sea” and “the best weather.” Calling for the forced relocation of Palestinians from Gaza, Trump has further suggested that Egypt and Jordan should accept Palestinian refugees from Gaza as part of a plan to “clean out” the territory. Another alleged Trump administration proposal suggested forcibly relocating Palestinians from Gaza to Indonesia, reviving decadeslong Israeli campaigns to depopulate and ethnically cleanse Gaza.

Trump’s ethnic cleansing proposals clearly echo Jared Kushner’s comments, made in a March 2024 interview with Harvard, that “Gaza’s waterfront property could be very valuable.” Those aren’t the only comments Kushner has made that suggest he sees the broader Middle East as empty land ready to be morphed by him and his allies. In a long social media post after Israel bombed a Beirut suburb to kill former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, the president’s son-in-law openly touted his imperialist visions as a historic opportunity, reflecting one of the more terrifying foreign policy ideas pouring out of Trump’s inner circle: “Moments like this come once in a generation, if they even come at all. The Middle East is too often a solid where little changes. Today, it is a liquid and the ability to reshape is unlimited. Do not squander this moment.”

“Trump Gaza” celebrates ethnic cleansing — nothing says Indigenous erasure like renaming.

We are entering a perilous stage in which Trump’s pro-Israel megadonors, led by figures such as Miriam Adelson, and cheered on by genocide-mongers like Kushner and Marco Rubio, are openly pushing for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. This represents a dangerous phase in U.S. genocidal complicity in Gaza, especially since policies that enable ethnic cleansing seem to enjoy bipartisan support. As Rep. Rashida Tlaib bluntly put it after Trump first elucidated his plans to take over the Strip: Trump “can only spew this fanatical bullshit because of bipartisan support in Congress for funding genocide.”

U.S. complicity in Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians does not stop in Gaza. In recent weeks, anticipating Trump’s official recognition of Israel’s illegal annexation of the West Bank, Israel has forcibly expelled the residents of three refugee camps in the occupied West Bank — Jenin, Tulkarem and Nur Shams — as it gears up to escalate its military operations in the area. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared the camps “empty” and ready to be occupied by the Israeli military, which has deployed a tank division to the area, while vowing that Israel will not allow displaced Palestinians to return to the cleared camps. The operation has resulted in the forced displacement of 40,000 Palestinians. This is ethnic cleansing in broad daylight, funded and abetted by Western democracies. To cite Jeremy Corybn, “For the first time in over 20 years, Israel has deployed tanks in the West Bank, after expelling 40,000 Palestinians from refugee camps. This is a prelude to full annexation, and makes a mockery of the ceasefire agreement that Israel continues to violate. We are witnessing ethnic cleansing — and our government’s ongoing failure to defend international law is utterly, utterly shameful.”

The U.S. and Israel share a history of ethnic cleansing. Trump’s plans for Gaza echoes the forced displacement of Native Americans, via the Indian Removal Act, which is widely described by historians as ethnic cleansing, or genocide. U.S. founders and politicians invoked similar justifications for the genocide of Native Americans — always in the name of “civilization.” Thomas Jefferson declared that the “barbarities” of the Native Americans “justified extermination.” A century later, President Theodore Roosevelt said that “extermination was as ultimately beneficial [to Native Americans] as it was inevitable.” Following in U.S. footsteps, SS chief Heinrich Himmler, the principal overseer of Nazi Germany’s genocidal pogroms, declared: “It is the curse of greatness that it must step over dead bodies to create new life.”

Aware of this shared history, North American Indigenous scholars see a common struggle against settler colonialism. An October 2023 Gaza solidarity letter, signed by over 1,100 North American Indigenous scholars, workers, students and activists, demanded: “Stop the genocide. End the siege. End the occupation. Dismantle apartheid. Decolonize Palestine.” The letter added: “The … horrific violence in Gaza resulted from 75 years of Israeli settler colonial dispossession, 56 years of military occupation, and 16 years of an open-air prison for 2.2 million people, half of whom are children. The atrocities of the Israeli apartheid regime in Palestine are relentless, illegal under international law, and consistent with settler-colonial projects globally.”

We must understand Trump’s real estate imperialism, or what anti-colonial scholars term “violent dispossession,” within the framework of Israel’s resettlement plans in Gaza. To cite historian Patrick Wolfe, author of Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native: “Settler colonialism destroys to replace.” Or as Theodor Herzl, founding father of Zionism, put it: “If I wish to substitute a new building for an old one, I must demolish before I construct.” Israel’s razing of Gaza is inextricably linked to those settler-colonial ambitions envisioned by Zionist founders and now echoed by Trump’s depiction of Gaza as a “demolition site.” It’s hard to think of a worse case of premeditated ethnic cleansing.

Trump’s genocidal plan for Gaza is also inexorably linked to white supremacy. It has all the imprints of what anticolonial historians term the “White Man’s Burden syndrome.” In 1899, British novelist and poet Rudyard Kipling wrote a poem entitled “The White Man’s Burden: The United States and The Philippine Islands,” which has ever since served as a hymn to U.S. imperialism. Theodore Roosevelt, soon to become president, copied the poem with avid interest and sent it to his friend, Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge, commenting that it was “rather poor poetry, but good sense from the expansion point of view.” The poem is a metaphor for the civilizing mission that portrays colonialism as a benevolent enterprise, bringing the “light” of “civilization” to “primitive” Indigenous people, and urging the U.S. to take up the “burden” of empire, following in the footsteps of Great Britain and other European nations. Here we can’t help but notice the overt meaning in the lyrics of Trump’s AI-generated video: “Trump Gaza shining bright, golden future, a brand new light.”

It’s hard to fathom Trump’s genocidal musings on Gaza without harking back to Kipling’s poem. While Trump’s poetic skills can be described as shaky at best, he seems to follow quite closely Kipling’s urge to “Take up the White Man’s burden — Send forth the best ye breed, Go send your sons to exile, To serve your captives’ need … To seek another’s profit, And work another’s gain … And reap his old reward.” And while Trump has probably never heard of (let alone read) Kipling, his dehumanizing view of Palestinians eerily evokes the writer’s depiction of Indigenous inhabitants as “half devil and half child,” where the “benevolent” Western colonizer, Trump — the self-declared emperor of our era — is urged to “wait in heavy harness, On fluttered folk and wild — Your new-caught, sullen peoples.”

We must resist ethnic cleansing and settler colonialism everywhere we can. As the Indigenous solidarity letter, referring to U.S. genocidal complicity in Palestine, concluded: “Israeli settler colonialism, apartheid, and occupation are only possible because of international support. The settler states that dispossess and occupy our lands support Israel in dispossessing and occupying Palestine. We see and feel the strength of Palestinian families in the face of the quotidian violence of the Israeli apartheid regime.”
 


ABOUT THE AUTHOR:


Seraj Assi


Seraj Assi is a Palestinian writer living in Washington, D.C. and the author, most recently, of My Life as an Alien (Tartarus Press).
 
 
 
https://www.npr.org/2025/02/26/nx-s1-5309695/trump-gaza-video

Politics

Trump's social media video garners pushback from Arabs and Muslims in U.S. and Gaza

February 26, 2025
 
Heard on All Things Considered


by Sarah McCammon, Hadeel Al-Shalchi,Anas Baba
NPR

3-Minute Listen

Transcript



A composite made from an AI-generated video President Trump posted to social media on Tuesday night. Screenshots via Instagram. Annotation by NPR

Arabs and Muslims in the United States and abroad are criticizing a controversial video posted by President Trump on social media.

The apparently AI-generated video includes depictions of Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sunbathing in Gaza, and imagines scenes of destruction in Gaza transformed into a glitzy Riviera-style resort called "TRUMP GAZA."


The video also shows children running out of the rubble into a world of palm trees and luxury buildings, and a towering golden statue of Trump. It depicts men in apparent drag dancing in bikinis on the beach, Trump enjoying a belly dancer and a man resembling Elon Musk being showered with cash in the form of U.S. currency.

The post comes weeks after Trump suggested the U.S. should take over the Gaza Strip and relocate Palestinians.

Middle East
Trump floats idea for U.S. to take ownership of the Gaza Strip and redevelop it

In Gaza, many residents have little to no internet service, but some who viewed the video expressed anger to NPR Gaza producer Anas Baba. Baba showed the video to 20-year-old Mohamed Abdelrahman who rejected the idea.

"We won't be lured by a few statues and money, leave us alone and let us rebuild our homes by ourselves," he told Baba.



Politics
Trump introduces a green card for the rich: the gold card

Faye Nemer, CEO and founder of the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) American Chamber of Commerce in Dearborn, Michigan, called the video "offensive and counterproductive to peace talks" in a statement to NPR.

Nemer, who says she voted for Trump in November, is calling on him to remove the video and issue a "reconciliatory statement."

When asked about the video and the president's messaging about Gaza, the White House reinforced his previous statements.

"As President Trump has said, Gaza in its current state is [uninhabitable] for any human being," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in the statement to NPR.


"President Trump is a visionary, and his plan to have the United States involved in Gaza's rebuilding will allow for Palestinians to resettle in new, beautiful communities while improving conditions in the region for generations to come," she added. 

Public Intellectual, Journalist, Historian, Political Theorist, Social Critic, Activist, and Teacher Chris Hedges On American Fascism at the Workers Strike Back Conference in Seattle, Washington

Chris Hedges In Seattle On Fascism



Laborvideo


February 26, 2025


At a conference of Workers Strike Back in Seattle, writer Chis Hedges talked about the threat of fascism and the need for the working class to use its power to challenge the fascist government. This talk was made on February 22, 2025. Green Party leader Jill Stein also spoke as well as Workers Strike Back leader Kshama Sawant. Sawant at the conference argued that there is no fascist government and fascism is not an imminent threat in the United States. 
 
Additional Media: Chris Hedges On US Imperialism, Zionism & The Rise Of Fascism In The US


• Chris Hedges On US Imperialism, Zioni... Chris Hedges On Imperialist Wars, Capitalist Media & The Censorship


• Chris Hedges On Imperialist Wars, Cap...


Production Of Labor Video Project
 

https://panopticonreview.blogspot.com/2025/02/transcript-of-chris-hedges-full-speech.html

Friday, February 28, 2025

Transcript of Chris Hedges Full Speech at Workers Strike Back Conference February 22, 2025 in Seattle, Washington

https://chrishedges.substack.com/p/chris-hedges-full-speech-at-workers


 
Chris Hedges Full Speech at Workers Strike Back Conference

This was a talk I gave at the Workers Strike Back conference in Seattle earlier this week on February 22, 2025.

VIDEO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8PnryeLUwQ

Transcript of my talk:

For over two decades, I and a handful of others — Sheldon Wolin, Noam Chomsky, Chalmers Johnson, Cornel West, Barbara Ehrenreich, Ralph Nader and of course Jill Stein and Kshama Sawant — warned that the expanding social inequality and the capture of our democratic institutions, including the media, the Congress, organized labor, academia and the courtsby corporations and oligarchs would lead to an authoritarian or Christian fascist state.

My books — American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America(2007), Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle(2009), Death of the Liberal Class (2010), Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt (2012), written with Joe Sacco, Wages of Rebellion (2015) and America: The Farewell Tour (2018) were a succession of impassioned pleas to take the decay seriously. I take no joy in being correct.

“The rage of those abandoned by the economy, the fears and concerns of a beleaguered and insecure middle class, and the numbing isolation that comes with the loss of community, would be the kindling for a dangerous mass movement,” I wrote in American Fascists in 2007.

“If these dispossessed are not reincorporated into mainstream society, if they eventually lose all hope of finding good, stable jobs and opportunities for themselves and their children — in short, the promise of a brighter future — the specter of American fascism will beset the nation. This despair, this loss of hope, this denial of a future, leads the desperate into the arms of those who promise miracles and dreams of apocalyptic glory.”

Donald Trump does not herald the collapse of democracy. He heralds the ripping away of the veneer that masked the corruption within the ruling class and their pretense of democracy. He is the symptom, not the disease.

The loss of basic democratic norms began long before Trump.

Deindustrialization, deregulation, austerity, unchecked predatory corporations, including the health-care industry, wholesale surveillance of every American, social inequality, an electoral system that is defined by legalized bribery, endless and futile wars, the largest prison population in the world, but most of all feelings of betrayal, stagnation and despair, are a toxic brew that culminate in an inchoate and justified hatred of the ruling class.

The Democrats are as guilty as the Republicans.

“Trump and his coterie of billionaires, generals, half-wits, Christian fascists, criminals, racists, and moral deviants play the role of the Snopes clan in some of William Faulkner’s novels,” I wrote in America: The Farewell Tour.

“The Snopeses filled the power vacuum of the decayed South and ruthlessly seized control from the degenerated, former slaveholding aristocratic elites. Flem Snopes and his extended family — which includes a killer, a pedophile, a bigamist, an arsonist, a mentally disabled man who copulates with a cow, and a relative who sells tickets to witness the bestiality — are fictional representations of the scum now elevated to the highest level of the federal government. They embody the moral rot unleashed by unfettered capitalism.”

“The usual reference to ‘amorality,’ while accurate, is not s ufficiently distinctive and by itself does not allow us to place them, as they should be placed, in a historical moment,” the critic Irving Howe wrote of the Snopeses. “Perhaps the most important thing to be said is that they are what comes afterwards: the creatures that emerge from the devastation, with the slime still upon their lips.”

“Let a world collapse, in the South or Russia, and there appear figures of coarse ambition driving their way up from beneath the social bottom, men to whom moral claims are not so much absurd as incomprehensible, sons of bushwhackers or muzhiks drifting in from nowhere and taking over through the sheer outrageousness of their monolithic force,” Howe wrote.

“They become presidents of local banks and chairmen of party regional committees, and later, a trifle slicked up, they muscle their way into Congress or the Politburo. Scavengers without inhibition, they need not believe in the crumbling official code of their society; they need only learn to mimic its sounds.”

The political philosopher Sheldon Wolin called our system of governance “inverted totalitarianism,” one that kept the old iconography, symbols and language, but had handed the internal levers of power to corporations and the rich.

Now we are shifting to totalitarianism’s more recognizable form, one dominated by a demagogue.

“We live in a two-tiered legal system, one where poor people are harassed, arrested and jailed for absurd infractions, such as selling loose cigarettes — which led to Eric Garner being choked to death by the New York City police in 2014 — while crimes of appalling magnitude by the oligarchs and corporations, from oil spills to bank fraud in the hundreds of billions of dollars, which wiped out 40 percent of the world’s wealth, are dealt with through tepid administrative controls, symbolic fines and civil enforcement that give these wealthy perpetrators immunity from criminal prosecution,” I wrote in America: The Farewell Tour.

The utopian ideology of neoliberalism and global capitalism is a vast con, a mechanism to funnel wealth upwards to the billionaire class.

The working poor, whose unions and rights have been stripped from them and whose wages have stagnated or declined over the past 40 years, have been disempowered and impoverished. Their lives, as Barbara Ehrenreich chronicled in Nickel and Dimed, are one long, stress-ridden emergency. The middle class is evaporating. Cities that once manufactured products and offered factory jobs are boarded up-wastelands. The destruction of trade barriers is a ruse corporations and the billionaire class use to stash $1.42 trillion in profits in overseas banks to avoid paying taxes.

The labels “liberal” and “conservative” are meaningless, evidenced by a Democratic presidential candidate who turned to Wall Street bankers to formulate her economic policies and bragged about an endorsement from Dick Cheney, a war criminal who left office with a 13 percent approval rating.

Fascism is always the bastard child of a bankrupt liberalism.

The attraction of Trump is that, although vile and buffoonish, he mocks the bankruptcy of the political charade. Trump lies like he breathes, but the lies told by the two establishment parties caused far more pain and did far more damage than the lies told by Trump. Trump is the apotheosis of this culture of mendacity, deception and exploitation.

We are a culture awash in lies.

It no longer matters what is true. It matters only what is correct. The correct ideology of neoliberalism is as delusional as the correct ideology of the Christian fascists. Neither are reality-based belief systems.

Totalitarianism elevates the brutal and the stupid, those with no genuine political philosophy, other than a lust for wealth and power. Empty, mind-numbing clichés and slogans, most of which are absurd and contradictory, replace political discourse. This is as true for the Christian right as it is for those that preach free market economics and globalization.

The illusions peddled on our screens — including the fictitious persona created for Trump on The Apprentice — have replaced reality. Politics is burlesque as Kamala Harris’ vapid, celebrity-filled, issueless campaign illustrated. It is smoke and mirrors created by the army of agents, publicists, marketing departments, promoters, script writers, television and movie producers, video technicians, photographers, bodyguards, wardrobe consultants, fitness trainers, pollsters, public announcers and television new personalities. Our money-drenched, heavily managed elections are little more than totalitarian plebiscites designed to give a veneer of legitimacy to oligarchic and corporate power.

The political malaise is mirrored in a cultural malaise, what Søren Kierkegaard calls “a sickness unto death,” the numbing of the soul by despair and moral nihilism.

“The cult of the self dominates our cultural landscape,” I wrote in Empire of Illusion:

“This cult has within it the classic traits of psychopaths: superficial charm, grandiosity and self-importance; a need for constant stimulation, a penchant for lying, deception, and manipulation, and the inability to feel remorse or guilt.

This is, of course, the ethic promoted by corporations. It is the ethic of unfettered capitalism. It is the misguided belief that personal style and personal advancement, mistaken for individualism, are the same as democratic equality.

In fact, personal style, defined by the commodities we buy or consume, has become a compensation for our loss of democratic equality. We have a right, in the cult of the self, to get whatever we desire.

We can do anything, even belittle and destroy those around us, including our friends, to make money, to be happy, and to become famous. Once fame and wealth are achieved, they become their own justification, their own morality. How one gets there is irrelevant. Once you get there, those questions are no longer asked.”

My book Empire of Illusion begins in Madison Square Garden at a World Wrestling Entertainment tour. I understood that professional wrestling was the template for our social and political life, but I did not know that it would produce a president and soon a Secretary of Education, who has vowed to shut the department down.

“The bouts are stylized rituals,” I wrote, in what could have been a description of a Trump rally:

“They are public expressions of pain and a fervent longing for revenge. The lurid and detailed sagas behind each bout, rather than the wrestling matches themselves, are what drive crowds to a frenzy.

These ritualized battles give those packed in the arenas a temporary, heady release from mundane lives. The burden of real problems is transformed into fodder for a high-energy pantomime.”

It is not going to get better. The tools to shut down dissent, the abuses of an imperial presidency, have been cemented into place. Our democracy cratered years ago. All Trump has to do to establish a naked police state is flip a switch. And he will.

“The worse reality becomes, the less a beleaguered population wants to hear about it,” I wrote at the conclusion of Empire of Illusion, “and the more it distracts itself with squalid pseudo-events of celebrity breakdowns, gossip and trivia. These are the debauched revels of a dying civilization.”

The system is not reformable. Either we obstruct, in the only form left to us, which is mass mobilization, acts of sustained civil disobedience, especially the strike, or we are frog-marched into serfdom. Either we are rebels or slaves.

To be innocent in the eyes of the state is to be guilty. It is to be complicit in this radical evil. It is to bear the mark of Cain. It is to do nothing to defend the weak, the oppressed, the poor and those who suffer, to protect the planet. Choose. But choose fast. Time is running out. The sick, unable to afford care, are dying. The poor, especially children, are going hungry. Families, along with the mentally ill, are thrown into our streets. The unemployed and underemployed are desperate. Schools are being defunded and privatized. Our prisons are packed. The undocumented, their families ripped apart, are being hunted down, imprisoned and deported. Our roads, bridges, dams, levees, power grids, rail lines, subways, bus services, schools and libraries are crumbling. The ecosystem is disintegrating as temperatures rise and freak weather patterns – wildfires, hurricanes, droughts, flooding, tornadoes, melting polar ice caps and glaciers – drive desperate migrants northwards from the Global South.

This is the dystopia the ruling class is shoving down our throats.

No social or revolutionary movement succeeds without a core of people who will not betray their vision and their principles. In other words, militants. They are the building blocks of social change. They are our only hope for a viable socialism. They are willing to spend their lives as political outcasts. They are willing to endure repression. They refuse to sell out the oppressed and the poor. They know that you stand with all of the oppressed—those in our prisons and marginal communities, the poor, unemployed workers, our LGBTQ community, undocumented workers, the mentally ill and the Palestinians—or you stand with none of the oppressed. They know when you fight for the oppressed you get treated like the oppressed.

Liberals plead with us to believe in the ultimate goodness of the ruling class, the fantasy that justice and social equality can be achieved through their bankrupt institutions, especially the Democratic Party, even though, like Herod of old, they repeatedly sell us out. We are castigated for our anger, our alienation from the centers of power, our bleakness. We are told to adopt a positive attitude, to trust the system, that we can awaken the dead consciences, the atrophied souls, of the plutocrats running Amazon, Halliburton, Goldman Sachs, ExxonMobil and the two ruling parties. I cannot count how many times I have been told this.

But this is the road to despair, not hope. Hope comes when we physically defy those in power. Those who succumb to apathy or complicity are enemies of hope. They become, in their passivity, agents of injustice.

Hope has a cost. Hope is not comfortable or easy. Hope requires personal risk. Hope does not come with the right attitude. Hope is not about peace of mind. Hope is an action. Hope is doing something. The more futile, the more useless, the more irrelevant and incomprehensible an act of rebellion is, the vaster and the more potent hope becomes. Hope never makes sense. Hope is absurd. Hope knows that an injustice visited on our neighbor is an injustice visited on us all. Hope posits that people are drawn to the good by the good. This is the secret of hope’s power. It is why it can never finally be defeated. Hope demands for others what we demand for ourselves. Hope does not separate us from them. Hope sees in our neighbor, even our enemy, our own face.

The powerful do not understand hope. Hope is not part of their vocabulary. They speak in the cold, dead words of national security, global markets, electoral strategy, staying on message, image and profits. The powerful protect their own. They divide the world into the damned and the blessed, the patriots and the enemy, the rich and the poor. They insist that extinguishing lives in foreign wars or in our prison complexes is a form of human progress. They cannot see that the suffering of a child in Gaza or a child in the blighted pockets of Washington, D.C., diminishes and impoverishes us all. They are deaf, dumb and blind to hope. Those addicted to power, consumed by self-exaltation, cannot decipher the words of hope any more than most of us can decipher hieroglyphics. Hope to Wall Street bankers and politicians, to the masters of war and commerce, is not practical. It is gibberish. It means nothing.

I cannot promise you it will be easy. I cannot assure you that tens of thousands will join us. I cannot pretend that going to jail is pleasant. I cannot say that anyone in Congress, anyone in the boardrooms of the corporations that cannibalize our nation, anyone in the press, will be moved by pity to act for the common good. I cannot tell you these wars will end or the hungry will be fed. I cannot say that justice will roll down like a mighty wave and restore our nation to sanity. But I can say this: If we resist and carry out acts, no matter how small, of open defiance, hope will not be extinguished. Hope cannot be sustained if it cannot be seen.

Any act of rebellion, any physical defiance, anything that seeks to draw the good to the good, nourishes our souls and holds out the possibility that we can touch and transform the souls of others. Every act that imparts hope is a victory in itself.

I saw the power of mass movements, of hope, in East Germany, Czechoslovakia and Romania that brought down those regimes. These uprisings were spontaneous outbursts by an enraged population that had had enough of repression, mismanagement and corruption. No one, from the dissidents themselves to the ruling communist parties, anticipated these revolts. They erupted, as all revolutions do, from tinder that had been waiting years for a spark. That this tinder exists in America is undeniable, although to date its primary expression has been fascistic.

These revolutions were led by a handful of dissidents who until the fall of 1989 were marginal and dismissed by the state as inconsequential. The state periodically sent state security to harass them. It often ignored them. I am not even sure you could call these dissidents an opposition. They were profoundly isolated within their own societies. The state media denied them a voice. They had no legal status and were locked out of the political system. They were blacklisted. They struggled to make a living. But when the breaking point in Eastern Europe came, when the ruling communist ideology lost all credibility, there was no question in the minds of the public about whom they could trust. The demonstrators that poured into the streets of East Berlin and Prague were aware of who would sell them out and who would not. They trusted those, such as Václav Havel, who had dedicated their lives to fighting for open society, those who had been willing to be condemned as nonpersons and go to jail for their defiance. No matter how tempting it was to give up, to make compromises with power, they did not.

Julien Benda reminds us that we can serve two sets of principles. Privilege and power or justice and truth. The more we make compromises with those who serve privilege and power the more we diminish the capacity for justice and truth. Our strength comes from our steadfastness to justice and truth, a steadfastness that accepts that the corporate forces arrayed against us may crush us, but that the more we make compromises with those who serve are privilege and power the more we diminish our strength.

Karl Popper in “The Open Society and Its Enemies” writes that the question is not how do you get good people to rule. Popper says this is the wrong question. Most people attracted to power, he writes, have “rarely been above average, either morally or intellectually, and often [have been] below it.” The question is how do we build mass organizations to hold the powerful to account, even when those in power come from our own ranks.

There is a moment in Henry Kissinger’s memoirs—do not buy the book—when Nixon and Kissinger are looking out at tens of thousands of anti-war protesters who have surrounded the White House. Nixon had placed empty city buses in front of the White House to keep the protesters back. He worried out loud that the crowd would break through the barricades and get him and Kissinger. And that is exactly where we want people in power to be. This is why, although he was not a liberal, Nixon was our last liberal president. He was scared of movements. And if we cannot make the elites scared of us, we will fail. This is our calling.

Our failure to immediately build a counterweight to the Democratic Party after it abandoned the working class with the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 was our gravest mistake. This mistake was compounded by allowing liberals to herd us back into the embrace of the Democratic Party, promising it could be changed from within, that its corporate-indentured leadership would permit Bernie Sanders to be the nominee or the stated goals of his platform to be enacted.

Alexis de Tocqueville correctly saw that when citizens can no longer participate in a meaningful way in political life, political populism is replaced by a cultural populism of sameness, resentment and mindless patriotism and by a form of anti-politics he called “democratic despotism.”

Only 11.3 percent of workers in this country belong to unions. This is the lowest percentage in 80 years. And nearly all these unions, and especially the AFL-CIO, have been emasculated by corporate power.

We are not going to be assisted in our revolt by established unions. Union leaders, such as Teamsters’ Sean O’Brien, are bought off. They are comfortable. They are pulling down at least five times what rank-and-file workers make. They have sold out to the Democratic Party, or in the case of O’Brien to Trump.

We forgot, as Alexander Herzen said, that we are not the doctors, we are the disease.

We have to mount protests not only outside the doors of Walmart and Amazon, not only outside congressional offices, but outside the doors of union headquarters. There is no established institution we can trust. They are broken. But there are the 30 million working poor who, victims of mass layoffs, trapped in debt peonage, manipulated and used by the political elite, willing to rise up if we stop our virtue signaling and woke purity tests and speak to them in the language of class warfare. This is why I support Worker’s Strike Back.

But let us be cleared eyed about what lies ahead. The enemies of freedom throughout history have always charged its defenders with subversion. The enemies of freedom have always convinced segments of a captive population to parrot back mind-numbing clichés to justify their rule and serve as goons and vigilantes in the name of patriotism.

Those who create a mafia economy make inevitable a mafia state. We must organize, and organize fast, to break our chains, one-by-one, to use the power of the strike to cripple the state machinery. We must embrace a militant radicalism, one that offers a new vision and a new social structure. We must hold fast to moral imperatives. We must forgive mortgage and student debt, institute universal health care and break up monopolies. We must raise the minimum wage and end the squandering of hundreds of billions of dollars to sustain the empire and the war industry. We must establish a nationwide jobs program to rebuild the country’s collapsing infrastructure. We must take into public ownership the banks, pharmaceutical corporations, military contractors and transportation and end the extraction of fossil fuels. We must end the genocide in Gaza and that means the boycott, divestment and sanctioning of the apartheid state of Israel.

None of this will happen until we organize and refuse to dilute our commitment to justice and to socialism, until we build a society that sgtops investing in forms of control and invests in people.

As the country disintegrates, as feelings of betrayal and abandonment mount, the ruling class will use their organs of propaganda, including the media, to blame us, those in open defiance of authority, for the chaos.

The mafia state will be brutal. Capitalists, as Eduardo Galeano writes, view communal cultures as “enemy cultures.” The billionaire class will do to us what it did to the radicals who rose up to form militant unions in the past. We had the bloodiest labor wars in the industrialized world. Hundreds of American workers were killed, tens of thousands were beaten, wounded, jailed and blacklisted. Unions were infiltrated, shut down and outlawed. We cannot be naïve. It will be difficult, costly and painful. But this confrontation is our only hope. Otherwise, we, and the planet that sustains us, are doomed.

I concede we may not succeed. So be it. At least those who come after us, and I speak as a father, will say we tried. The corporate forces that have us in their death grip will destroy the lives of my children. They will destroy the lives of your children. They will destroy the ecosystem that makes life possible. We owe it to those who come after us not to be complicit in this evil. We owe it to them to refuse to be good Germans.

This is a battle, quite literally, between freedom and slavery, life and death. It is that grave. It is a battle that no matter the odds must be fought.

In the end, I do not fight fascists because I will win. I fight fascists because they are fascists. [end]

The Chris Hedges Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading The Chris Hedges Report! This post is public so feel free to share it.



Posted by Kofi Natambu at 9:22 PM