Saturday, December 5, 2020

The Squad Demands Medicare For All in the Name of Both Public Health and Genuine Democracy For All. Support the Squad Victory Fund!

Squad Victory Fund
Health care is a human right. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib all believe in that principle, and they are fighting every day to advance health care justice for our communities.
If you believe that health care is a human right, will you add your name alongside Alexandria, Ayanna, Ilhan, and Rashida to say that you support Medicare for All — a single-payer health care system that will guarantee health care for all?
Add Your Name
COVID-19 has made the need for Medicare for All even more abundantly clear. Amidst the economic downturn caused by the pandemic, millions of people who have lost their jobs have also lost their employer sponsored health care — at a time when access to high-quality care is more essential than ever.
Medicare for All will mean that every person — regardless of income or wealth — will have access to comprehensive health care that includes preventative and emergency care, along with prescription medicines, dental, vision, and mental health services.
We need you in this fight with us to create a future where every person has the care they need. Will you add your name now to voice your support for Medicare for All?
Add Your Name
Thank you so much for your support,
Squad Victory Fund
 
NOTE:  This post can also now be found here at the Panopticon Review On Facebook page.


Friday, December 4, 2020

ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ Fights For Solidarity Via The Struggle For Freedom, Justice, and Equality. Join Her.


 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Verified @AOC
@aoc
I find it amusing when politicians try to diminish the seriousness of our policy work, movement organizing & grassroots fundraising to “she just tweets,” as though “serious” politics is only done by begging corporate CEOs for money through wax-sealed envelopes delivered by raven
As we wrap up 2020, let’s talk about what Alexandria accomplished in her very first term in Congress:
Raised $1.25 million for frontline charities and organizations working on COVID relief in our district.
Launched a $1 million census awareness campaign to help register as many people as possible, bringing back up to $58 million to her district.
Helped deliver 80,000 meals to families in need in the district.
Raised $568,000 for grassroots organizations on the ground in Georgia who are working to take the Senate majority back from Republicans next month.
Raised more than $1.5 million for progressive candidates and swing-district House Democrats.
Introduced more amendments than 90% of other freshman lawmakers.
Crafted the Green New Deal with Senator Ed Markey, the gold standard for climate action.
Worked with the Unity Task Force to secure progressive environmental policies in the Democratic Party Platform.
Opened over 1000 cases to serve NY-14 constituents with issues like veterans benefits, Social Security, immigration visas and more.
Held monthly town halls to update constituents on her legislative agenda and community work, and take questions.
Executed tough, thorough lines of questioning in committee hearings, revealing valuable information that has been used in investigations against the Trump administration and pressuring Big Pharma execs to make drugs more affordable.
Fended off over $12M dollars in attack ads, mailers, and more to win nearly 72% of our district’s vote in 2020.
The list could go on and on. And that’s just a snapshot of our first term! We’re just getting started, and our movement is growing larger by the day.
Each and every time you donate, you grow the size and strength of our movement. 
Movement building and changemaking is tough, but the good news is we aren’t alone in the work. Everything that Alexandria has accomplished, from winning an upset victory in 2018 to introducing the Green New Deal, has been made possible by generosity, hard work, and solidarity from people like you.
Thanks for all you do,
Team AOC
NOTE:  This post can also now be found here at the Panopticon Review On Facebook page. 

Thursday, December 3, 2020

Republicans Brutally Imposes Corporate Bailouts For the 1% In Response to Proposed Stimulus Legislation for the Working Class During the Covid-19 Crisis As National Rightwing Protects the Wealthy At the Expense of the 99%

https://truthout.org/.../as-covid-spikes-the-gop-pushes.../

News
Economy & Labor
As COVID Spikes, the GOP Pushes Bans on Suing Negligent Businesses
by Billy Corriher
Facing South
December 3, 2020 
Truthout
PHOTO: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell removes his face mask as he leads fellow Republican senators into a news conference in the Mike Mansfield Room at the U.S. Capitol on December 1, 2020, in Washington, D.C. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

As COVID Spikes, the GOP Pushes Bans on Suing Negligent Businesses 
Officials estimate that 1 million people in Florida are infected with COVID-19 in the wake of the 2020 Thanksgiving holiday weekend. Meanwhile, state legislators are meeting with business lobbyists at a conference, which includes a golf tournament at the Orlando Ritz-Carlton, to discuss legislation that could prohibit consumers from suing businesses that negligently exposed them to COVID-19.
One of the sponsors of the event is Publix. The Florida-based, employee-owned chain of grocery stores throughout the Southeast is facing a lawsuit filed by the family of Gerardo Gutierrez, who worked behind a deli counter at the company’s Miami Beach store. The lawsuit alleges that Gutierrez, who was 70 years old, asked to wear a mask at work when the pandemic began, but the company wouldn’t let him. He contracted COVID-19 from a coworker and died in April.
Publix then changed its policy to allow masks and gloves. A report in April by the Tampa Bay Times described the company’s slow response to the pandemic compared to other grocery store chains. A spokesperson told the paper that Publix has been “keenly focused on intensive, ongoing protective measures in all our stores.” The Gutierrez family’s lawsuit said the company “chose to protect sales over the health and well-being of its employees and customers.”
With the lawsuit pending, Publix is co-sponsoring this week’s Associated Industries of Florida conference with lobbyists and legislators, all Republicans except for newly-elected Democratic Rep. Christine Hunschofsky, former mayor of Parkland. Lawmakers will discuss their priorities for the 2021 legislative session.
Republican legislative leaders have discussed plans to introduce a bill next year to limit lawsuits over COVID-19 exposure. Senate President Wilton Simpson, for example, suggested that legislators consider legal immunity for companies that follow CDC guidelines. House Speaker Chris Sprowls said their intent is to ensure people “don’t get blindsided by a frivolous lawsuit, while making sure that if somebody is doing the wrong thing, that they’re still held accountable.”
Simpson said the bill shouldn’t include “a blanket statement that no one would have any liability associated with COVID.” He also rejected a proposal from the RESET Task Force, an alliance of industry groups, to grant blanket immunity from COVID-19 lawsuits for “essential businesses” like grocery stores, which stayed open when others shut down in the early months of the pandemic.
The head of Florida’s Chamber of Commerce argued legal immunity is necessary because Florida has the “fifth worst legal climate in the United States.” He was presumably referring to a biannual survey of corporate lawyers and executives conducted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, which spends millions of dollars lobbying for legislation to limit lawsuits by injured workers and consumers.
In an editorial opposing immunity, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel argued that “campaign contributions and high-power lobbying leave [the legislature] perpetually predisposed to make life easier for employers and harder for workers.”
Although Simpson said he “cannot imagine that we are going to let people off the hook for negligence,” the immunity laws passed by Southern states all prohibit COVID-19 lawsuits based on negligence, the normal legal standard, while allowing lawsuits for gross negligence, intentional harm, or another higher standard.
The enacted bills are temporary, with the expiration tied to the governor’s declaration of a public health emergency. But the emergency shows no signs of abating in Southern states, where many hospitals are overflowing with COVID-19 patients. Thousands of meatpacking workers in the rural South have also contracted the virus.
If Florida passes an immunity bill, it would join states around the country that have passed bills that keep people who get COVID-19 from suing their health care providers, “essential businesses,” or government entities.
Governors and legislators from both parties have signed on to bills that prohibit lawsuits against negligent businesses or health care providers. As Facing South reported, the Republican-led North Carolina legislature unanimously passed a COVID-19 relief bill in May that included legal immunity for essential businesses. The legislature, with just 13 Democrats voting no, then broadened immunity from COVID-19 suits to cover any individual, corporation, or other “legal entity.”
Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper signed both bills into law. And in Louisiana, Democratic governor John Bel Edwards signed a bill that immunized restaurants and other businesses from lawsuits. Republican governors in Alabama, Arkansas, and other Southern states have issued executive orders giving certain businesses immunity. And many of them have called on Congress to pass a federal immunity bill.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and other Republicans have been insisting that any further COVID-19 stimulus bill, which could include more stimulus checks and aid for desperate state and local governments, also include legal immunity.
McConnell’s proposal would override every state’s laws for holding businesses accountable for injuries to their workers or customers. Nearly every personal injury lawsuit in the U.S., even many cases filed in federal court, are now governed by state law. That’s how it has worked since America’s founding. But the Republican-led U.S. Senate wants to change that to keep businesses from getting sued when people contract COVID-19.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats have generally opposed immunity. Pelosi recently said that she doesn’t support McConnell’s proposal but thinks “there is a balance that can be struck.” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, said legal immunity would allow corporations to “expose their workers to COVID without repercussions.”
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Billy Corriher is a senior researcher with Facing South who specializes in judicial selection, voting rights and the courts in North Carolina.
PHOTO:Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell removes his face mask as he leads fellow Republican senators into a news conference in the Mike Mansfield Room at the U.S. Capitol on December 1, 2020, in Washington, D.C. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images
As COVID Spikes, the GOP Pushes Bans on Suing Negligent Businesses









NOTE:  This post can also now be found here at the Panopticon Review On Facebook page.

Wednesday, December 2, 2020

The Destructiveness of Trump's Equity Gag Order and What Biden Must Do Now: African American Policy Forum hosted and moderated by Kimberle Crenshaw: December 2, 2020

https://www.facebook.com/TheAfricanAmericanPolicyForum

Greetings Friends:

Imagine a world in which a deadly virus disproportionately kills people of color, yet efforts to address documented race disparities in health care are banned...

A world in which medical practitioners and researchers are no longer permitted to learn about the implicit biases that contribute to these deadly outcomes...

A world in which the history of housing segregation and its current role in grounding massive wealth disparities cannot be acknowledged as structural racism...

A world in which colleges and universities that have produced some of the very tools that are used to identify patterns of race and gender inequality suddenly agree that such tools cannot be used in their own institutions...

A world in which hate speech is protected but anti-racist ideas are banned and deemed un-American...

A world in which the very capacity to name social injustice is taken away and replaced by a whitewashed vision of American history as the only story that can be legitimately and safely told...

If this sounds like a nightmare, then I urge you to wake up to our current reality.

Join me tonight, December 2nd, at 8 PM EDT (5 PM PDT) to learn about this grave threat to our civil rights and civil liberties from leading thinkers and activists on the frontlines of fighting back: Carol Anderson, Rachel Godsil, Laura Gomez, Charles Lawrence, Janai Nelson, and Lisa Rice. The episode, titled “#TruthBeTold: The Destructiveness of Trump's Equity Gag Order & What Biden Must Do Now,” will elevate Trump’s ongoing effort to snuff out the racial reckoning that has changed the national conversation about race, and how his Executive Order uploads an alt-right fringe view into national policy. The ban rehearses past efforts to suppress liberation by gagging and punishing those who promote equitable practices throughout our society.

This authoritarian suppression will continue to cast a shadow over our future until it is rescinded and its damages are repaired. That won’t happen unless we understand the threat and organize to meet it.

If we can’t be heard, we can’t make change. And that’s the point of the Gag Order. Everyone who cares about fairness and equity has to show up and show out.

You can read more about the panelists, and RSVP, here.

In solidarity,

Kimberlé Crenshaw

Please follow AAPF on Instagram (@AAPolicyForum), Twitter (@AAPolicyForum), and Facebook for more updates. You can also follow our E.D. Kimberlé Crenshaw @sandylocks on Twitter, and @kimberlecrenshaw on Instagram.

 #TruthBeTold:  

The Destructiveness of Trump's Equity Gag Order and What Biden Must Do Now

December 2, 2020
Streamed live 6 hours ago

African American Policy Forum
AAPF
Hosted and moderated by Kimberle Crenshaw

If you are interested in supporting more programming like this, please support the African American Policy Forum at: www.aapf.org/donate.

How did President Trump take a fringe ideology and put it at the center of federal policymaking? How has Trump’s mainstreaming of alt-right ideas and tactics impeded critical work being done to advance the causes of racial justice and gender equity? What must President-elect Biden do to fight back against the right’s censorship of social justice? All of these questions and more will be discussed on this week’s episode of #UnderTheBlacklight.

This episode of #UnderTheBlacklight will focus on our recently-released #TruthBeTold Report. This timely report examines the Equity Gag Order promulgated by the Trump administration that prohibits federal agencies and federal contractors from conducting diversity trainings and equity programming that touch on topics such as intersectionality, structural racism, and implicit bias.

On this episode, AAPF Executive Director Kimberlé Crenshaw will be joined by Carol Anderson, Rachel Godsil, Laura Gomez, Charles Lawrence, Janai Nelson, and Lisa Rice will discuss not only the impact of the Equity Gag Order but also explore the historical antecedents of the current white supremacist backlash, the contemporary resistance to it, and its crucial implications for our future.

VIDEO:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6esQs3F-Wg0&feature=youtu.be
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6esQs3F-Wg0" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>








NOTE:  This post can also now be found here at the Panopticon Review On Facebook page.

All,

WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF BEING COMPLETELY FUCKED OVER BY A DEADLY COMBINATION OF COWARDLY DEMOCRATIC "CENTRISTS" AND RUTHLESSLY DEMAGOGIC REPUBLICAN RIGHTWINGERS BANDING TOGETHER TO GIVE US MERE CRUMBS AND A VICIOUS SUSTAINED ASSAULT ON OUR VERY HUMANITY

BEWARE.

BECAUSE THE WORST IS YET TO COME AND AT THIS RATE IT WILL BE HERE VERY SOON. IF THE PANDEMIC DOESN'T KILL US CONGRESS WILL

EITHER WAY IT'S MASS MURDER BY THE GOVERNMENT AND THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR IT...

IF COLLECTIVELY WE DON'T DEMAND MUCH MORE OF WHAT WE NEED AND DESERVE WE WILL GET NOTHING IN RETURN BUT THESE CRIMINALLY RICH ASSHOLES'S CONTEMPT AND VIOLENT INDIFFERENCE.

DON'T SIMPLY LAMENT YOUR SO-CALLED "FATE"

FIGHT BACK!!!

Kofi

https://www.nytimes.com/…/…/politics/pardon-white-house.html

A bipartisan group of centrist senators announced yesterday morning that they were working on a $908 billion compromise stimulus bill, but within a few hours Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, said he was working up his own substantially smaller proposal with Republican leaders in the White House and the House. Since May, McConnell has refused to allow a Senate vote on the $3 trillion stimulus bill passed by the Democratically controlled House.

The compromise framework, spearheaded by Senators Joe Manchin and Susan Collins, would restore federal unemployment benefits that lapsed over the summer, but at $300 a week instead of $600. It would also provide $160 billion for state, local and tribal governments.

Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, defended his decision to cut short lending programs set up under stimulus legislation passed this year, a move Democrats have said will sabotage the economy under Biden. Mnuchin said yesterday that the economy had “regained 58 percent of the lost jobs” and was recovering more quickly than expected.

https://www.nytimes.com/…/econo…/biden-economy-stimulus.html

Biden and His Economic Team Urge Quick Action on Stimulus as Risks Mount

The president-elect introduced key nominees in Delaware, while lawmakers exchanged new proposals with prospects for a deal still dim.

by Jim Tankersley, Alan Rappeport, Jeanna Smialek, Emily Cochrane and Luke Broadwater
December 1, 2020
New York Times

PHOTO: President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. acknowledged that any stimulus agreement would necessarily fall far short of the trillions of dollars that Democratic leaders have insisted on for months.Credit...Kriston Jae Bethel for The New York Times

WASHINGTON — President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. on Tuesday introduced the economic team he will rely on to help rebuild the U.S. economy at a perilous moment, with coronavirus cases soaring, the Federal Reserve chair warning of challenging months ahead and lawmakers in Congress still struggling to reach agreement on a rescue package.

Mr. Biden, speaking in Delaware, called on Congress to pass a substantial relief package to help keep businesses, households and local governments afloat while his Treasury secretary nominee, Janet L. Yellen, called the damage done so far “an American tragedy” that could lead to long-term devastation if not quickly corrected.

“Right now, the full Congress should come together and pass a robust package for relief to address these urgent needs,” Mr. Biden said.

But he acknowledged that any stimulus agreement would necessarily fall far short of the trillions of dollars that Democratic leaders have insisted on for months, saying that “any package passed in a lame-duck session is lucky to be at best just a start.”

Mr. Biden’s nominees made it clear that they were thinking expansively about how to revive the U.S. economy and looking beyond just restoring lost jobs and livelihoods to finding ways to widen economic wealth, broaden opportunities and repair safety net programs.

“This is a moment of urgency and opportunity unlike anything we’ve faced in modern times,” said Cecilia Rouse, Mr. Biden’s nominee to lead the Council of Economic Advisers. “The urgency of ending a devastating crisis. And the opportunity to build a better economy in its wake — an economy that works for everyone, brings fulfilling job opportunities and leaves no one to fall through the cracks.”

But those goals, which were at the center of Mr. Biden’s campaign, are likely to run into obstacles in Congress, where Republicans, who spent the past four years on a spending spree, have resurrected their concerns about the federal deficit. They have cited it as a reason to forgo the kind of large stimulus package that Mr. Biden and other top Democrats have said is needed.

The political divisions were on display Tuesday, as a bipartisan group of centrist senators announced in the morning that they were working on a $908 billion compromise stimulus package. By the afternoon, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, announced that he had been discussing his own proposal with Trump administration officials and Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the minority leader.

That package would be hundreds of billions of dollars smaller than the bipartisan plan — and thus a nonstarter with Democrats. But Mr. McConnell seemed to suggest that President Trump would not sign a more expansive bill, reminding Republicans in a private conference call and reporters during a news conference that a presidential signature is needed.

The continued likelihood of congressional gridlock before Inauguration Day threatens to saddle Mr. Biden’s economic team with dim prospects come Jan. 21, when it will confront an economy that has seen a slowdown in hiring growth, manufacturing activity and other key measures in recent weeks. Millions of Americans are set to lose unemployment assistance at year’s end. Others could face eviction and foreclosure as government moratoriums expire.

“The pace of improvement has moderated,” the Fed chair, Jerome H. Powell, told the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday, saying the rise in virus cases was “concerning and could prove challenging in the next few months.”

“The risk of overdoing it is less than the risk of underdoing it,” Mr. Powell said.

Administration officials have shown little sign of worry about recent economic developments, insisting the recovery is on track while Mr. Trump continues his legal quest to overturn his re-election defeat at the polls.
ImageTreasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and the Fed chair, Jerome H. Powell appeared before the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and the Fed chair, Jerome H. Powell appeared before the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday.Credit...Al Drago for The New York Times

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, appearing alongside Mr. Powell, downplayed the broader risks facing the economy and blamed economic shutdowns in some states for slowing progress. While he called for targeted relief for sectors that have been hit hardest by the pandemic, like restaurants and airlines, he said the economy had recovered faster than many had expected and that the economy had “regained 58 percent of the lost jobs.”

RELATED: Paul Krugman: A deeper look at what’s on the mind of Paul Krugman, a world-class economist and opinion columnist.

He defended his decision to end several of the Fed’s emergency lending programs on Dec. 31. He has also requested that the central bank return the Treasury funds supporting those programs. Democrats said the moves amounted to economic sabotage.

“Either you’re purposefully trying to stop President-elect Biden and Janet Yellen from getting to work for the people we all serve, or you’re so delusional that you think because the stock market is back up, everything is fine,” said Senator Sherrod Brown, Democrat of Ohio. “Either way, it’s malpractice.”

Mr. Powell, who told lawmakers that the Fed would have preferred to keep those lending programs going while acknowledging that it was Mr. Mnuchin’s place to decide, painted a more dire picture of the economic outlook. He pointed to continued uncertainty around the speed of a vaccine rollout, the reality that millions remain out of work and the fact that small businesses could fail in the winter months.

“We do have a long way to go,” Mr. Powell said. “We’ll use our tools until the danger is well and truly past, and it may require help from other parts of government as well, including Congress.”

Republicans insist that the economy is recovering and that the United States does not need to borrow more money for another big relief package, while Democrats insist that a large jolt of stimulus is necessary and that now is not the time to worry about deficits.,

“There’s a reason states and localities have to have a balanced budget but we’re allowed to have a deficit to deal with crises and emergencies as we have in the past,” Mr. Biden said. “We have to keep vital public services running, have to give aid to local and state governments to make sure they can have law enforcement officers, firefighters and educators as we did in 2009.”

After months of deadlock on Capitol Hill, a bipartisan group of senators tried to move things forward with the $908 billion compromise stimulus proposal, funded in part by repurposing the money that Mr. Mnuchin clawed back from the Fed lending programs.

The proposal, spearheaded by two centrists — Senators Joe Manchin, Democrat of West Virginia, and Susan Collins, Republican of Maine — and a handful of senators from both parties, has not been publicly endorsed by either Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California or Mr. McConnell.

Intended as a stopgap measure to last until March, it would restore federal unemployment benefits that lapsed over the summer, but at half the rate, providing $300 a week for 18 weeks, and does not include another round of checks for every American. The measure would provide $160 billion to help state, local and tribal governments facing fiscal ruin — a fraction of what Democrats had sought. Also included was $288 billion to help small businesses, restaurants and theaters, and a short-term federal liability shield from coronavirus-related lawsuits.

In contrast, the framework circulated on Capitol Hill by top Republicans does not include funds for state and local governments and curtails a short restoration of federal unemployment benefits even further.

“The advantage of our compromise bill is it has bipartisan, bicameral support,” Ms. Collins said. “I want a bill that can become law.”

The bipartisan plan is an attempt to find a middle ground between the dueling stimulus proposals that Democrats and Republicans have haggled over for months. Its cost is less than half of what Democratic leaders had pushed for in the weeks leading up to the election but nearly double the latest proposal from Republican leaders.

PHOTO: A bipartisan group of senators on Tuesday unveiled a $908 billion compromise stimulus proposal on Capitol Hill.Credit...Saul Loeb/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

It includes most of the main ingredients that Mr. Biden and Democratic leaders have called critical for a deal, a possible sign that it could form a basis for a compromise that Mr. Biden could get behind.

Asked about the plan by reporters after his event with his economic team, Mr. Biden replied: “I just heard about it. I’ll take a look at it when I get back.”

The fresh attempt at a bipartisan compromise came as Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Mnuchin held their first phone discussion since late October, when they had a flurry of pre-election conversations that failed to culminate in a deal. Ms. Pelosi said she and Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, had sent a new proposal of their own to Republican leaders on Monday.

John Lettieri, the president of the Economic Innovation Group think tank in Washington, which has pushed for more small-business aid, said the bipartisan plan “seems close to being the sweet spot” for a possible compromise — if one is possible.

Some Senate Republicans on Tuesday reiterated opposition to any deal that sends money to support state and local government budgets, with Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana challenging Mr. Powell at the hearing about whether states are really in such bad straits and suggesting the money would be used to shore up shaky pension funds.

“I’ve always said, I think it’s an area that’s worth looking,” Mr. Powell said, noting that states are among the largest employers in the economy and that they provide critical services.

Mr. Biden’s appointees all sounded an urgent tone as the incoming administration faces the prospect of a double-dip recession.

His nominees, all of whom must win Senate confirmation, talked about the pain of the pandemic recession, noting that it was falling hardest on traditionally marginalized Americans and widening the divide between the rich and the poor.

Ms. Yellen, a former Fed chair and an academic labor economist, said she had gone into economics “because I was concerned about the toll of unemployment on people, families and communities.” She warned that inaction in the face of the current economic crisis “will produce a self-reinforcing downturn causing yet more devastation.”

Nicholas Fandos contributed reporting.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

Jim Tankersley covers economic and tax policy. Over more than a decade covering politics and economics in Washington, he has written extensively about the stagnation of the American middle class and the decline of economic opportunity. @jimtankersley

Alan Rappeport is an economic policy reporter, based in Washington. He covers the Treasury Department and writes about taxes, trade and fiscal matters in the era of President Trump. He previously worked for The Financial Times and The Economist. @arappeport

Jeanna Smialek writes about the Federal Reserve and the economy. She previously covered economics at Bloomberg News, where she also wrote feature stories for Businessweek magazine. @jeannasmialek

Emily Cochrane is a reporter in the Washington bureau, covering Congress. She was raised in Miami and graduated from the University of Florida. @ESCochrane

Luke Broadwater covers Congress. He was the lead reporter on a series of investigative articles at the Baltimore Sun that won a Pulitzer Prize and a George Polk Award in 2020. @lukebroadwater

A version of this article appears in print on Dec. 2, 2020, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Biden Urges a ‘Robust’ Stimulus as Risks Mount. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper

PHOTO: President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. acknowledged that any stimulus agreement would necessarily fall far short of the trillions of dollars that Democratic leaders have insisted on for months.Credit...Kriston Jae Bethel for The New York Times

nytimes.com
 
NOTE:  This post can also now be found here at the Panopticon Review On Facebook page.







#DemocracyNow

Barbara Ransby & David Sirota Warn of Close Links Between Biden’s Cabinet Picks & Corporate Power

Democracy Now!
November 25, 2020

President-elect Joe Biden declared “America is back” this week as he revealed some of the people who will staff his administration in key national security posts, vowing to roll back Donald Trump’s “America First” foreign policy and embrace multilateralism. Among his picks are longtime adviser Tony Blinken for secretary of state, diplomatic veteran Linda Thomas-Greenfield as ambassador to the United Nations, and former Secretary of State John Kerry for a new Cabinet post as climate czar. Historian, author and activist Barbara Ransby says Biden’s picks so far mostly come from the centrist establishment of the Democratic Party and lack progressive voices. “We need people who have compassion, who have accountability to the most vulnerable, who pledge to defend the planet, people who have a clear understanding and commitment to fighting white supremacy and police violence,” says Ransby. We also speak with investigative journalist David Sirota, who says Biden’s picks represent “an attempt to restore the old Washington.” Sirota served as an adviser and speechwriter for Senator Bernie Sanders during his presidential campaign.

#DemocracyNow

Democracy Now! is an independent global news hour that airs on nearly 1,400 TV and radio stations Monday through Friday. Watch our livestream 8-9AM ET:
https://democracynow.org

VIDEO:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Try8lyMEhGw<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Try8lyMEhGw" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>