Friday, July 18, 2025

Honoring Breonna Taylor (b. June 5, 1993--d. March 13, 2020)


BREONNA TAYLOR
(1993-2020)
 

https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2020/08/28/amanpour-breonna-taylor-vanity-fair-radhika-jones-ta-nehisi-coates.cnn 

https://www.cnn.com/…/amanpour-breonna-taylor-vanity-fair-r… 

Radhika Jones & Ta-Nehisi Coates pay tribute to Breonna Taylor 
 
September 2020 issue of Vanity Fair 

Amanpour On PBS: Guest interviewer

Vanity Fair's Editor-in-Chief Radhika Jones and guest editor Ta-Nehisi Coates discuss the September issue they've dedicated to the "beautiful life" of Breonna Taylor.
Source: CNN

CNN VIDEO NEWS: 
 
Vanity Fair’s September 2020 cover, painting by Amy Sherald. 

Vanity Fair's Editor-in-Chief Radhika Jones and guest editor Ta-Nehisi Coates discuss the September issue they've dedicated to the "beautiful life" of Breonna Taylor.

Breonna Taylor is on the cover of Vanity Fair’s September 2020 issue

Breonna Taylor, who was shot dead by police in her home in the US, appears on the cover of the magazine’s latest issue.

Vanity Fair editor-in-chief Radhika Jones has released the magazine’s September 2020 issue, revealing it as a tribute to Breonna Taylor, who posthumously appears on the cover. Breonna Taylor, who would have been 27 now, was shot dead by Louisville police in the US on March 13, 2020, after they used a battering ram to break into her apartment. Taylor, a Black emergency room technician who was innocent, was shot at least eight times and died at the scene.

A painting of Taylor appears on the cover of Vanity Fair, created by Amy Sherald, the celebrated African-American artist who painted the portrait of Michelle Obama for the Washington D.C. National Portrait Gallery in 2018. Sherald made sure to draw on personal details from Taylor’s life to bring the portrait to life, including studying her hair, style and gaze, plus adding a gold cross on a chain necklace and an engagement ring Taylor would never get to wear (her boyfriend was planning to propose to her before her murder). “I made this portrait for her family,” says Sherald. “I mean, of course I made it for Vanity Fair, but the whole time I was thinking about her family.” You can read more about Sherald’s process, here.

“Five months have passed since police killed Breonna Taylor in her own home, a violent crime that our September issue guest editor Ta-Nehisi Coates ascribes to a belief in Black people as a disaster, as calamity,” said the caption on Vanity Fair’s Instagram account, revealing the poignant cover. For the issue, editor-in-chief Radhika Jones handed over the editorship to award-winning author Ta-Nehisi Coates, who set the theme for the issue as “The Great Fire.” Coates explained the theme: “I don’t know how else to comprehend the jackboots bashing in Breonna Taylor’s door and spraying her home with bullets, except the belief that they were fighting some Great Fire—demonic, unnatural, inhuman.”

The accompanying cover story, written by Coates, came to life via a series of interviews with Taylor’s mum, Tamika Palmer. In the moving interview, Palmer describes the night of her daughter’s death and how Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, phoned her with the news: “Kenny calls me in the middle of the night. He says, 'Somebody kicked in the door and shot Breonna.' I am dead asleep. I don’t know what he’s talking about. I jump up. I get ready, and I rush over to her house.” You can read the full interview here.

The Vanity Fair cover comes as the online campaign known as #SayHerName continues over the lack of accountability for Taylor’s death—her killers still haven’t been charged. Outrage over her death surfaced during the George Floyd protests as it came to light that the officers who murdered Taylor had only been placed on administrative reassignment. 

Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter protests over police brutality and systemic racism in the US have reignited overnight, after a Black man identified as Jacob Blake, 29, was shot multiple times in the back by police officers in Kenosha, Wisconsin. As per a report by CNN, Blake’s three children—aged three, five and eight—were in the car when two police officers shot him multiple times as he entered the driver's side door of an SUV. Reports say the officers from the Kenosha Police Department were responding to a domestic incident nearby at the time, which Blake, who was unarmed, was reportedly trying to de-escalate. According to a family friend, who spoke with CBS News, Blake is “expected to make it.” The officers are currently being investigated.

You can read more about Vanity Fair’s September 2020 issue, here

 
Living (& Dying) while Black in the American Gulag
by Kofi Natambu

(For Trayvon Martin, 1995-2012, Oscar Grant III, 1986-2009, Tamir Rice, 2002-2014, Sandra Bland, 1987-2015, Armaud Arbrey, 1994-2020, George Floyd, 1973-2020, Breonna Taylor 1993-2020 & all the rest of us) 

Whether our relentless stalking enemies are armed or unarmed we remain trapped within their panopticon designed crosshairs no matter where we deign to go or not. We remain as always under deadly surveillance walking and breathing in the ever present carceral space(s) of department stores and supermarkets and shopping malls and subways and restaurants and libraries and elevators and sidewalks and movie theaters and bookstores and streetcorners and college campuses and on our own front steps waiting for the inevitable genocidal rewards reserved for the truly articulate black paranoid who actually is (as always) under attack especially whether he or she knows it or not (Always) unidentified human objects on the lazily metaphysical and strictly corporeal plane of our ever present terrorized existence (always) writhing like tiny hyperactive bugs in the enormous festering testtube that is (like always) the ruthlessly indifferent society that we live or rather far more accurately indeed die in 


All,

The ongoing white supremacist deluge of vicious anti-black hatred and violence in this deadly pathological society continues as always unabated with absolutely no end in sight. The unrelenting assault on Breonna Taylor like so many others continues in death as it did in her life and the lives of so many others murdered and destroyed by this despicably racist country… 

Kofi

https://www.nytimes.com/.../breonna-taylor-statue…

FROM THE PANOPTICON REVIEW ARCHIVES

(Originally posted on December 28, 2020): 

Weeks-Old Statue of Breonna Taylor Is Battered in Oakland, California

The vandalism of the ceramic sculpture of Ms. Taylor near City Hall is under investigation, the police said.

by Neil Vigdor
December 28, 2020
New York Times

PHOTO: A bust of Breonna Taylor in a plaza near Oakland City Hall was smashed in several places late last week. The artist wants to create a new statue in bronze. Credit: Shelby Knowles for The New York Times

The clay took several months for a Bay Area sculptor to shape with his hands into a likeness of Breonna Taylor, which he finished with a dark brown satin glaze.

But less than two weeks after the statue memorializing Ms. Taylor was installed in a busy downtown plaza in Oakland, Calif., its creator, Leo Carson, said he held the broken pieces of the vandalized ceramic bust in those same hands.

The sculpture was smashed in several places late last week, drawing widespread condemnation in the community and prompting a police investigation. And when Mr. Carson passed by the statue again on Tuesday, he said, it was gone.


The vandalism was regarded as another indignity to those still grappling with the killing of Ms. Taylor, a 26-year-old Black woman and emergency room technician, by police officers in Louisville, Ky., during a botched drug raid in March. Ms. Taylor’s death, along with the killing of George Floyd in late May, stoked widespread protests over police brutality and racial injustice.


A plaque with Ms. Taylor’s name and the phrase “Say Her Name” was displayed on the front of the statue that was vandalized in Latham Square plaza, which is near Oakland City Hall.

Race/Related: A deep and provocative exploration of race, identity and society with New York Times journalists.

“I built it to support the Black Lives Matter movement,” Mr. Carson said in an interview, “but that also makes it a target for racist aggression.”

The bust was missing from its pedestal near Oakland City Hall on Tuesday.

The bust was missing from its pedestal near Oakland City Hall on Tuesday. Credit...Shelby Knowles for The New York Times

A spokeswoman for the Oakland Police Department said in an email on Monday night that a police report had been filed in the matter and that the vandalism was under investigation. On Tuesday, the police did not immediately respond to questions about whether or when the sculpture had been removed.

Mr. Carson, 30, who is white, said he spent about $600 making the sculpture, which he placed in the plaza on Dec. 12. He chronicled the installation on Instagram, and one person warned at the time that it could face a backlash. “Pull that down,” the person wrote, “it’s a source of riots.”

Mr. Carson, who made trips to Home Depot and a ceramics studio while making the sculpture, said he had prepared for the possibility that the installation could be damaged.
“It was always in the back of my mind,” he said. “I just had a feeling like I had to do it anyway. It didn’t matter.”

Mayor Libby Schaaf of Oakland denounced the vandalism in a Twitter post on Monday.

“It’s a vicious attack against the light + justice sought in Breonna Taylor’s name,” Ms. Schaaf wrote. “We will keep moving forward; Oakland will not tolerate acts of hatred.”

Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, also condemned the damage to the sculpture.


“This act of vandalism disrespects Breonna’s memory, what she represents and the work of this artist,” Mr. Greenblatt said Monday on Twitter.


Mr. Carson said that the outpouring of support from the community had been heartening. By Tuesday, he had raised more than $20,000 on a GoFundMe page toward building a new sculpture from bronze. He said he planned to donate the remaining funds to Ms. Taylor’s family.


The three officers implicated in Ms. Taylor’s death avoided homicide charges in September, setting off a new round of protests across the nation. A grand jury in Louisville indicted one officer, who was fired, on three counts of wanton endangerment.


Mr. Carson said that someone on Instagram told him about the vandalism over the weekend.


“In that sense it’s not surprising," he said, “but it doesn’t reflect Oakland.”


He added that the bronze sculpture he hopes to build will be sturdier.


“It gives her a sense of wholeness again,” he said.


Jacey Fortin contributed reporting.

Anatomy of a Killing

VIDEO: 
Here’s what to know about the killing of Ms. Taylor 

by the police.

How the Police Killed Breonna Taylor
Dec. 28, 2020

Breonna Taylor’s Life Was Changing. Then the Police Came to Her Door.
Aug. 30, 2020

Fired Officer Is Indicted in Breonna Taylor Case; Protesters Wanted Stronger Charges
Sept. 23, 2020


Correction: Dec. 29, 2020

An earlier version of this article misspelled the name of Oakland’s mayor. She is Libby Schaaf, not Libby Schaff.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR:


Neil Vigdor is a breaking news reporter on the Express Desk. He previously covered Connecticut politics for the Hartford Courant. @gettinviggy • Facebook


PHOTO: A bust of Breonna Taylor in a plaza near Oakland City Hall was smashed in several places late last week. The artist wants to create a new statue in bronze. Credit: Shelby Knowles for The New York Times


FASCIST AMERICA 2025: The Scumbag-In-Chief Demands That The GOP Members of His National Cult Attack, Defame, And Steal The Government's Funding Of NPR and PBS Because the Fascist Madman in the White House Actually Thinks the Media and Especially Journalists In General Belongs To Him

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/17/us/politics/senate-vote-trump-bill-pbs-npr-foreign-aid.html 

Congress Agrees to Claw Back Foreign Aid and Public Broadcast Funds

President Trump’s request to claw back $9 billion in congressionally approved spending passed despite objections from Republicans who said it abdicated the legislative branch’s power of the purse.

Listen to this article · 7:53 minutes 
 
Representative Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, center, listening as her House committee advanced the bill to claw back funds on Thursday. Credit: Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times


by Catie Edmondson
Reporting from the Capitol
July 17, 2025
New York Times



Congress approved a White House request to claw back $9 billion for foreign aid and public broadcasting, after Republicans bowed to President Trump in an unusual surrender of congressional spending power.

The House’s 216-to-213 vote early Friday morning sent the package to Mr. Trump for his signature. Two Republicans, Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Michael R. Turner of Ohio, opposed the measure.

The Senate approved the package in a predawn 51-to-48 vote the day before, overcoming the objections of two Republicans, Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who argued that their party was ceding Congress’s constitutional control over federal funding.

The bulk of the funds targeted — about $8 billion — was for foreign assistance programs. The remaining $1.1 billion was for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which finances NPR and PBS.

The debate on the measure laid bare a simmering fight over Congress’s power of the purse. Since Mr. Trump began his second term, the White House has moved aggressively and at times unilaterally, primarily through the Department of Government Efficiency, to expand the executive branch’s control over federal spending, a power the Constitution gives to the legislative branch.

Top White House officials, led by Russell T. Vought, the budget office director, have sought to rein in the size of the federal government, including by freezing funds appropriated by Congress. It is part of a wider campaign to claim far-reaching powers over federal spending for the president.

This time, the administration went through a formal process by submitting what is known as a rescissions bill. Those measures are rare and seldom succeed, given how tightly Congress has historically guarded its power over federal spending. The last such package to be enacted was in 1999, under President Bill Clinton.

Mr. Trump wasted little time in celebrating, singling out in an all-caps social media post early Friday the cuts to “atrocious NPR and public broadcasting, where billions of dollars a year were wasted.”

“Republicans have tried doing this for 40 years, and failed….but no more,” he added. “This is big!!!”

G.O.P. leaders said the vote was a symbolic victory that underscored the Republican-held Congress’s willingness to cut federal spending they viewed as inappropriate and wasteful.

“I appreciate all the work the administration has done in identifying wasteful spending,” Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the majority leader, said in a speech ahead of the vote. “Now it’s time for the Senate to do its part to cut some of that waste out of the budget. It’s a small but important step toward fiscal sanity that we all should be able to agree is long overdue.”

A man in a dark suit walks in a hallway. A woman walks near him, holding a phone.
Senator John Thune on Wednesday. Credit:  Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

But the process left even some Republicans who ultimately voted for the bill uncomfortable. A number of senators said the administration had not provided details about what specific programs would be affected.

“If we find out that some of these programs that we’ve communicated should be out of bounds — that advisers to the president decide they are going to cut anyway,” Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who is retiring, said, “then there will be a reckoning for that.”

And even as G.O.P. senators agreed to cancel funding at the White House’s request, 10 of them signed a rare public letter to Mr. Vought demanding that he reverse a decision to withhold roughly $7 billion in congressionally approved funding to their states meant to bolster educational programs including after-school and summer programs.

“The decision to withhold this funding is contrary to President Trump’s goal of returning K-12 education to the states,” the Republicans wrote.

To win the votes of Republican senators who initially objected, G.O.P. leaders agreed to strip out a $400 million cut that Mr. Trump requested to the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, known as PEPFAR. The White House signaled it would not contest the change.

They also shielded some funding for some specific programs, including aid to Jordan and Egypt; Food for Peace, a program that provides food assistance to other countries; and some global health programs.

Another holdout, Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota, who had previously indicated that he would oppose the request because of the cuts to public broadcasting, decided to support the package. He said he had been assured by top Trump administration officials that they would steer unspent funds “to continue grants to tribal radio stations without interruption” for next year.

Ahead of the vote, the head of a network of Native radio and television stations privately appealed to Mr. Rounds to oppose the package, saying the deal he had made was unworkable.

“There is currently no clear path for redirecting these funds to tribal broadcasters without significant legislative and administrative changes,” Loris Taylor, the president of Native Public Media, wrote.

The vote incensed Democrats, who argued that Republicans were ceding Congress’s constitutional powers in the name of cutting a minuscule amount of spending, just weeks after passing their marquee tax bill that would add $4 trillion to federal deficits.

They warned that it could have dire consequences for future bipartisan negotiations to fund the government. Lawmakers are currently working to negotiate spending levels ahead of a Sept. 30 shutdown deadline.

“We have never, never before seen bipartisan investments slashed through a partisan rescissions package,” Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said. “Do not start now. Not when we are working, at this very moment, in a bipartisan way to pass our spending bills. Bipartisanship doesn’t end with any one line being crossed; it erodes. It breaks down bit by bit, until one day there is nothing left.”

The vote codified a number of executive actions the administration advanced earlier this year to gut foreign aid programs, many first undertaken by DOGE.

The effects on public media are yet to come, but the passage of the bill caused immediate alarm. Katherine Maher, the chief executive of NPR, said in a statement early Friday that the cuts represented “an unwarranted dismantling of beloved local civic institutions, and an act of Congress that disregards the public will.”

NPR and PBS will survive — only a small percentage of their funding comes from the federal government. But the cuts will force many local stations to sharply reduce their programming and operations as early as this fall. Many public broadcasters receive more than 50 percent of their budgets from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

That means the package could be a death sentence for some stations, which have survived several attempts to choke off funding over the decades. For other broadcasters, it will mean cutting back on local programming.

“We just don’t have a lot of fat to trim elsewhere,” Julie Overgaard, the executive director for South Dakota Public Broadcasting, said in an interview ahead of the vote.

“On the PBS side of things, I can’t just start cherry-picking which national programs I want and only pay for those,” she said. “So it really leaves me and many others with little choice but to look at the local programming that we self-generate.”

Benjamin Mullin and Michael Gold contributed reporting.

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: 

 

Catie Edmondson covers Congress for The Times.

A version of this article appears in print on July 18, 2025, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Senate Approves Trump’s Effort To Cancel Funds. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper 
 
 

FASCIST AMERICA 2025: The Ongoing Murder Of Breonna Taylor and The Federal Government's State Sponsored Coverup of This Endless Murder by the Fascist Trump Regime and their Deadly White Supremacist Department of Justice



Credit: Eric Lee for The New York Times
 
July 17, 2025
New York Times

None of the police officers who raided Breonna Taylor’s home used body cameras, impeding the public from a full understanding of what happened. The Times’s visual investigation team built a 3-D model of the scene and pieced together critical sequences of events to show how poor planning and shoddy police work led to a fatal outcome. 
 
 
 

VIDEO: 

“...Shortly after the department made its request public, the family’s legal team issued a statement describing Ms. Taylor’s mother, Tamika Palmer, as “heartbroken and angry.”

“The family asked for one thing: that Brett Hankison be sentenced in accordance with the law and federal guidelines,” the lawyers wrote, adding: “Recommending just one day in prison sends the unmistakable message that white officers can violate the civil rights of Black Americans with near-total impunity.”

Samantha Trepel, a former attorney with the civil rights division, urged the judge to ignore the recommendations, calling the filing “transparent, last-minute political interference.”

Mr. Hankison, who is white, was the only officer to be charged for his actions during the botched operation that prompted protests across the country. His shots did not kill Ms. Taylor, a 26-year-old Black woman who worked as an emergency room technician. Two other officers, also white, fired the fatal shots, but neither was charged.

None of the police officers who raided Breonna Taylor’s home used body cameras, impeding the public from a full understanding of what happened. The Times’s visual investigation team built a 3-D model of the scene and pieced together critical sequences of events to show how poor planning and shoddy police work led to a fatal outcome.

The killing brought national attention to “no-knock” warrants. A judge initially signed off on such a warrant for Ms. Taylor’s apartment, but officers were later instructed to announce themselves. Whether they complied remains an unresolved issue.

The chief of the Louisville Metro Police Department was fired in the wake of protests of the killing, and a report by the Justice Department two years ago found that the department had shown a pattern of discriminating against Black people.

Hundreds of lawyers and other staff members have left the civil rights division, with veterans of the office saying that they were driven out by Trump administration officials who want to aggressively pursue cases against the Ivy League, other schools and liberal cities. Lawyers in the division traditionally saw their work as protecting the constitutional rights of minority communities and marginalized people.

Shortly after Mr. Trump was sworn in for his second term, his political appointees at the Justice Department ordered an immediate halt to all new civil rights cases or investigations — and signaled that it might back out of Biden-era agreements with police departments that engaged in discrimination or violence, according to two internal memos sent to staff.

The actions, while expected, represented an abrupt about-face for a department that had for the past four years aggressively investigated high-profile instances of violence and systemic discrimination in local law enforcement and government agencies.

The first of two memos sent by Chad Mizelle, the chief of staff at the department, ordered a “litigation freeze” at the civil rights division to decide whether Trump appointees want “to initiate any new cases,” according to a screenshot of the document viewed by The New York Times.

A second memo ordered a similar freeze on department activity involving so-called consent decrees — agreements hashed out with local governments intended to address flawed police practices, or bias based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation and disabilities.

In May, Ms. Dhillon announced she was backing out of Biden-era agreements with Louisville and Minneapolis that were intended to enact policing reforms in the wake of the Taylor killing and murder of George Floyd, calling them “overbroad” and bureaucratic.

The moves were part of a larger effort, spearheaded by Ms. Dhillon and backed by senior White House officials, to prioritize enforcement of Mr. Trump’s culture war edicts, including participation of transgender women in sports, over the division’s founding purpose of fighting race-based discrimination.

In an email in April, Ms. Dhillon directed the division’s career work force to pursue the president’s agenda, outlined in executive orders and presidential memorandums, or face unspecified consequences. The revised statement encouraged investigations into antisemitism, anti-Christian bias and noncompliance with a range of Trump executive fiats.

“The zealous and faithful pursuit of this section’s mission requires the full dedication of this section’s resources, attention and energy to the priorities of the president,” she wrote..”

–Glenn Thrush, “Justice Dept. Asks for 1-Day Sentence for Ex-Officer Convicted in Breonna Taylor Raid", New York Times, July 17, 2025


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/17/us/politics/justice-department-brett-hankison-sentence-breonna-taylor.html

Justice Dept. Asks for 1-Day Sentence for Ex-Officer Convicted in Breonna Taylor Raid

The administration asked the judge in the case to sentence the former officer to essentially the brief time he had served when he was first charged, and three years of supervised release.

Listen to this article · 6:56 minutes

Learn more



Brett Hankison appearing for his federal trial last October in Louisville, Ky. Credit: Matt Stone/The Courier-Journal, via Imagn

by Glenn Thrush
Reporting from Washington
July 17, 2025
New York Times

VIDEO: 

The chief of the Justice Department’s civil rights unit has asked a federal judge to sentence a Louisville police officer convicted in the 2020 killing of Breonna Taylor to one day in prison, a stunning reversal of the unit’s longstanding efforts to address racial disparities in policing.

Last year, a federal jury in Kentucky convicted Brett Hankison, the officer, of one count of violating Ms. Taylor’s civil rights by using excessive force in discharging several shots through Ms. Taylor’s window during a drug raid that went awry.

He faces a maximum sentence of life in prison, and a judge will consider the government’s request at a sentencing scheduled for next week.

On Wednesday, Harmeet K. Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, asked the judge in the case, Rebecca Grady Jennings, to sentence Mr. Hankison to one day in prison — essentially the brief time he had served when he was charged — and three years of supervised release.


In the filing, Ms. Dhillon suggested the prosecution was excessive, arguing that the Biden Justice Department had secured a conviction against Mr. Hankison after his acquittal on state charges and the ending of his first federal trial in a mistrial.

“In this case, two federal trials were ultimately necessary to obtain a unanimous verdict of guilt,” Ms. Dhillon wrote, adding that Mr. Hankison, now a felon who was fired from his job five years ago, had already paid a substantial penalty for his actions.

“The jury’s verdict will almost certainly ensure that defendant Hankison never serves as a law enforcement officer again and will also likely ensure that he never legally possesses a firearm again,” the filing added.

Such requests are typically filed by career prosecutors who worked on the case. Wednesday’s filing was signed by Ms. Dhillon, a political appointee who is a veteran Republican Party activist with close ties to President Trump, and one of her deputies.

Shortly after the department made its request public, the family’s legal team issued a statement describing Ms. Taylor’s mother, Tamika Palmer, as “heartbroken and angry.”

“The family asked for one thing: that Brett Hankison be sentenced in accordance with the law and federal guidelines,” the lawyers wrote, adding: “Recommending just one day in prison sends the unmistakable message that white officers can violate the civil rights of Black Americans with near-total impunity.”

Samantha Trepel, a former attorney with the civil rights division, urged the judge to ignore the recommendations, calling the filing “transparent, last-minute political interference.”

Mr. Hankison, who is white, was the only officer to be charged for his actions during the botched operation that prompted protests across the country. His shots did not kill Ms. Taylor, a 26-year-old Black woman who worked as an emergency room technician. Two other officers, also white, fired the fatal shots, but neither was charged.

None of the police officers who raided Breonna Taylor’s home used body cameras, impeding the public from a full understanding of what happened. The Times’s visual investigation team built a 3-D model of the scene and pieced together critical sequences of events to show how poor planning and shoddy police work led to a fatal outcome.

The killing brought national attention to “no-knock” warrants. A judge initially signed off on such a warrant for Ms. Taylor’s apartment, but officers were later instructed to announce themselves. Whether they complied remains an unresolved issue.

The chief of the Louisville Metro Police Department was fired in the wake of protests of the killing, and a report by the Justice Department two years ago found that the department had shown a pattern of discriminating against Black people.

Hundreds of lawyers and other staff members have left the civil rights division, with veterans of the office saying that they were driven out by Trump administration officials who want to aggressively pursue cases against the Ivy League, other schools and liberal cities. Lawyers in the division traditionally saw their work as protecting the constitutional rights of minority communities and marginalized people.

Shortly after Mr. Trump was sworn in for his second term, his political appointees at the Justice Department ordered an immediate halt to all new civil rights cases or investigations — and signaled that it might back out of Biden-era agreements with police departments that engaged in discrimination or violence, according to two internal memos sent to staff.

The actions, while expected, represented an abrupt about-face for a department that had for the past four years aggressively investigated high-profile instances of violence and systemic discrimination in local law enforcement and government agencies.

The first of two memos sent by Chad Mizelle, the chief of staff at the department, ordered a “litigation freeze” at the civil rights division to decide whether Trump appointees want “to initiate any new cases,” according to a screenshot of the document viewed by The New York Times.

A second memo ordered a similar freeze on department activity involving so-called consent decrees — agreements hashed out with local governments intended to address flawed police practices, or bias based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation and disabilities.

In May, Ms. Dhillon announced she was backing out of Biden-era agreements with Louisville and Minneapolis that were intended to enact policing reforms in the wake of the Taylor killing and murder of George Floyd, calling them “overbroad” and bureaucratic.

The moves were part of a larger effort, spearheaded by Ms. Dhillon and backed by senior White House officials, to prioritize enforcement of Mr. Trump’s culture war edicts, including participation of transgender women in sports, over the division’s founding purpose of fighting race-based discrimination.

In an email in April, Ms. Dhillon directed the division’s career work force to pursue the president’s agenda, outlined in executive orders and presidential memorandums, or face unspecified consequences. The revised statement encouraged investigations into antisemitism, anti-Christian bias and noncompliance with a range of Trump executive fiats.

“The zealous and faithful pursuit of this section’s mission requires the full dedication of this section’s resources, attention and energy to the priorities of the president,” she wrote.

In a separate mission statement sent to the division’s voting rights unit, Ms. Dhillon directed department lawyers to root out voter fraud and prosecute undocumented immigrants who tried to vote in U.S. elections. Both are rare events, despite efforts by Trump Republicans, including Ms. Dhillon, to portray them as a major threat to election integrity.

Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs contributed reporting.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
 

Glenn Thrush covers the Department of Justice for The Times and has also written about gun violence, civil rights and conditions in the country’s jails and prisons.

A version of this article appears in print on July 18, 2025, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: U.S. Is Seeking Day of Prison In Taylor Raid Order Reprints | Today’s Paper


See more on: U.S. Politics, Joe Biden, Brett Hankison, Breonna Taylor



 

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

FASCIST AMERICA 2025: What Exactly Is It And What Is It Doing As We Speak? + How the Criminally Corrupt, Deeply Unhinged, and Violently Pathological Trump Regime in Collusion With Massive Corporate Institutions, Cowardly and Reactionary Citizens, and The Equally Fascist Supreme Court Is Systematically Destroying the Country With No End in Sight--PART 2

Trump’s Power & the Rule of Law (full documentary) | FRONTLINE



FRONTLINE PBS | Official

July 15, 2025 
 
 
FRONTLINE goes inside the showdown between U.S. President Donald Trump and the courts over presidential power. This journalism is made possible by viewers like you. Support your local PBS station here: https://www.pbs.org/donate​. President Donald Trump’s allies, opponents and experts talk about how he is testing the extent of his power, the legal pushback and the impact on the rule of law. “Trump’s Power & the Rule of Law” is a FRONTLINE production with Kirk Documentary Group, Ltd. The director is Michael Kirk. The producers are Michael Kirk, Mike Wiser, Vanessa Fica and Philip Bennett. The writers are Michael Kirk & Mike Wiser. The reporters are Vanessa Fica and Brooke Nelson Alexander. The editor-in-chief and executive producer of FRONTLINE is Raney Aronson-Rath. Explore additional reporting on “Trump’s Power & the Rule of Law” on our website: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/do... #Documentary #Politics #Law

VIDEO:  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28sQyweAPRs

 

https://www.anativeson.org/p/dread-and-imagination


A Native Son

Dread and Imagination

by Eddie Glaude, Jr.
July 14, 2025
A Native Son
Substack



All weekend I have been thinking about the state of the country. Of course, I do that every day. But over the last few days, with the passage of the so-called “big beautiful bill,” the images out of Texas after the flood, the battles with ICE in California, and the tears of those caught up in the massive layoffs at the State Department, I have been struggling with this feeling of dread (sententia timoris): that these people are hellbent on destroying the country as we know it and that the pain is only going to get worse.

They are doing this out of greed and hatred—often driven by an ideology that believes that government is, by definition, an intrusion on individual liberty AND a view that holds that this country must remain white. I said recently on MSNBC that we need to stop beating around the bush when it comes to what ICE is doing. This isn’t about criminals that threaten public safety. ICE’s charge is clear: it is to make America white again.

But we also need to be clearer about what these people are doing with government. In the name of efficiency and smaller government, they are shredding what’s left of the American social contract. Honestly, I do not know what they take to be our obligations to each other or their understanding of the role of government in ensuring a baseline standard of living for every American. It feels like they want to hurl us back into a state of nature and let the “survival of the fittest” determine who will live and who will die. Meanwhile, the uber rich sit back and watch it all, like a battle royal, tossing pennies to the victors.

It seems that three basic values guide their approach: a view that equates liberty with selfishness, an idea of safety that aligns with harsh policing of “radical others” and military dominance abroad, and a commitment to keeping certain white people at the top of the food chain and maintaining the illusion that other white people might join them. None of these provide a stable foundation for a robust idea of the public good.

Instead, we end up with raw power dictating the distribution of benefits and burdens. With working people barely keeping their noses above water and blaming other working people, usually Black people and people of color, for their problems. With so-called cultural issues stoking resentment. All the while these people gut mechanisms to ensure that our food is safe, defund education and public health. Leave the country vulnerable to catastrophic weather events due to climate change (a change they deny, because they are in the pockets of the fossil fuel industry). Pass tax policy that redistribute wealth upward to the richest of the rich. Allow the physical infrastructure to crumble and the cultural infrastructure to shatter into pieces.

Americans must be clear about what these people are doing and what motivates it all. If we keep treating their policies as if they are rational attempts to govern as opposed to deliberate attempts to dismantle government, we will be complicit in destroying the country.

We must also give voice to a compelling vision that counters the dystopian world these people want to create. But honestly, that becomes difficult to imagine when I see the hysteria around the candidacy of Zohran Mamdani. I could give less than a damn about his political self-description. The phrase democratic socialist confuses matters more than it clarifies. Plus, I have grown tired of fighting political battles on the terms of the 18th or 19th century. Watching Democratic party leaders line up to defeat him, let’s me know that our problem isn’t just Donald Trump’s Republican party.

What I want is a clear articulation of the values that ought to animate our way of life. Why can’t we talk about state-owned grocery stores in areas that are food deserts? Why can’t public transportation be free? What is wrong with public colleges and universities being basically free? Why can’t every child in this country, no matter their zip code or the color of their skin, be guaranteed a quality education? What is the problem with a living wage? Why is American health insurance so damn expensive and why can’t every American be guaranteed healthcare? Why are rents sky high? And housing so scarce? Why can’t we invest in the American people—all of us? Not simply those who have the means or the right skin color!

If all of this is a threat to the American way of life, we have to ask ourselves what the substance of that life is, such that we are willing to allow so much misery and suffering in our midst.

I want us to imagine a different America. To step outside of the constraints of the current political configurations and dare to be bold enough to say, with our chests, that every American deserves a living wage, a quality education, and healthcare. That these values are baseline to what it means to live in this country. And these commitments aren’t reducible to some 19th century ideology meant to scare folks and render the world in certain terms. They simply reflect basic decency and love of neighbor.

This has been my response to that feeling of dread: to let my imagination wander without the constraints of the politics of these dark days. 
 

 
AMERICA IS A FASCIST STATE

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

Opposed to anarchism, democracy, pluralism, egalitarianism, liberalism, socialism, and Marxism fascism is at the far right wing of the traditional left–right spectrum.

AMERICA IS A ROGUE STATE

A nation or state regarded as breaking international law and posing a threat to the security of other nations.

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

In Fascist America 2025 Some People Are Actually Standing Up To the Fascists and SpeakingTruth To Power No Matter What--Please Do Yourself A Favor and LISTEN TO THEM AND THEN PASS THE WORD

Who Trump's Bill Really Hurts ft. Ayanna Pressley, Nina Turner & Jamal Bryant | The Joy Reid Show



The Joy Reid Show

July 8, 2025

VIDEO: 
 
 

The Joy Reid Show

In this powerful episode of The Joy Reid Show, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, activist Nina Turner, and Pastor Jamal Bryant break down how Trump’s devastating new bill will strip healthcare, food assistance, and economic security from millions—while handing massive tax cuts to billionaires. 
 
 
Chapters: 
 
00:00 Introduction & Target Boycott Update 
05:15 Corporate Retreat from DEI Commitments 
12:30 The Medicaid Crisis Explained 
20:45 Democratic Failures & Grassroots Resistance 
30:10 Billionaire Tax Scams Exposed 
42:18 Call to Action & Closing Remarks 
 
ABOUT JOY REID: 
 
Joy-Ann Lomena Reid (AKA Joy Reid) is a best-selling American author, political journalist and TV host. She was a national correspondent for MSNBC and is best known for hosting the Emmy-nominated, NAACP Award-winning political commentary and analysis show, The ReidOut, from 2020 to 2025. Her previous anchoring credits include The Reid Report (2014–2015) and AM Joy (2016–2020).


STAY CONNECTED WITH THE SHOW: 

Website: https://www.joyannreid.com

Substack: https://substack.com/@joyannreid 
 
Facebook: / 61576759980854

Instagram: / joyreidshow

TikTok: / thejoyreidshow

Bluesky: bsky.app/profile/joyannreid.bsky.social


FOLLOW JOY ON SOCIAL: 

Facebook: / joyreidofficial 
Instagram: / joyannreid