What are we to make of the Biden administration’s call for an additional $14 billion
in assistance for Israel and simultaneous call for humanitarian aid for
Gazans? Defensive weapons for Israel’s Iron Dome system would make
sense, but in practice, is the idea that we will help pay for
humanitarians to mop up the blood caused in part by our weapons?
What are we to tell Dr. Iyad Abu Karsh, a Gaza physician who lost his wife and son
in a bombing and then had to treat his injured 2-year-old daughter? He
didn’t even have time to care for his niece or sister, for he had to
deal with the bodies of his loved ones.
“I have no time to talk now,” he told a Times colleague, his voice trembling over the phone. “I want to go bury them.”
In
his speech on Thursday, Biden called for America to stand firmly behind
Ukraine and Israel, two nations attacked by forces aiming to destroy
them. Fair enough. But suppose Ukraine responded to Russian war crimes
by laying siege to a Russian city, bombing it into dust and cutting off
water and electricity while killing thousands and obliging doctors to
operate on patients without anesthetic.
I doubt we Americans would shrug and say: Well, Putin started it. Too bad about those Russian children, but they should have chosen somewhere else to be born.
Here
in Israel, because the Hamas attacks were so brutal and fit into a
history of pogroms and Holocaust, they led to a resolve to wipe out
Hamas even if this means a large human toll. “Gaza will become a place
where no human being can exist,” declared
Giora Eiland, a former head of the Israeli National Security Council.
“There is no other option for ensuring the security of the State of
Israel.”
I think that view reflects a
practical and moral miscalculation. While I would love to see the end of
Hamas, it’s not feasible to eliminate radicalism in Gaza, and a ground
invasion is more likely to feed extremism than to squelch it — at an
unbearable cost in civilian lives.
I
particularly want to challenge the suggestion, more implicit than
explicit, that Gazan lives matter less because many Palestinians
sympathize with Hamas. People do not lose their right to life because
they have odious views, and in any case, almost half of Gazans are
children. Those kids in Gaza, infants included, are among the more than
two million people enduring a siege and collective punishment.
Israel
has suffered a horrifying terrorist attack and deserves the world’s
sympathy and support, but it should not get a blank check to slaughter
civilians or to deprive them of food, water and medicine. Bravo to Biden
for trying to negotiate some humanitarian access to Gaza, but the
challenge will be not just getting aid into Gaza but also distributing
it to where it’s needed.
A prolonged
ground invasion seems to me a particularly risky course, likely to kill
large numbers of Israeli soldiers, hostages and especially Gazan
civilians. We are better than that, and Israel is better than that.
Leveling cities is what the Syrian government did in Aleppo or Russia
did in Grozny; it should not be an American-backed undertaking by Israel
in Gaza.
The best answer to this test
is to try even in the face of provocation to cling to our values. That
means that despite our biases, we try to uphold all lives as having
equal value. If your ethics see some children as invaluable and others
as disposable, that’s not moral clarity but moral myopia. We must not
kill Gazan children to try to protect Israeli children.