Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Washington Post on Obama Wave Stunning Clinton's Black Supporters

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/18/AR2008021802364.html

What this exposes--for the umpteenth time--is just how much conventional/traditional black political leadership is seriously out of touch with the genuine hopes, fears, desires, and needs of the general African American population. This has been the case now for well over 50 years going back to the modern Civil Rights era that began in the mid 1950s. For example, contrary to both popular belief and the pervasive intellectual myths engendered by various forms of historical revisionism, traditional/'mainstream' black political leadership did NOT support Dr. King until AFTER he became world famous in 1963-1964. The masses of black people however had aggressively supported King and the CR movement from 1955 on. This widening gap between official black "leaders" and the "led" of course persisted and became even more obvious with the meteoric and politically prophetic rise of Malcolm X in 1964 and the subsequent 'Black Power' era began in earnest in late 1965 AFTER the passage of national Civil Rights and voting rights legislation sponsored by the Democratic Party administration of Kennedy/LBJ in 1964 and '65. Needless to say this ongoing alienation and disaffection of the masses of black people from much of their "officially sanctioned" national political leadership has only expanded and grown larger since the mid 1970s...This is the INDEPENDENT black political legacy that Obama is inheriting and currently benefitting from...

Kofi


Obama Wave Stuns Clinton's Black Supporters
By Kevin Merida
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 19, 2008; Page C01

You can see the confusion on some of their faces, hear the concern in their voices. How in the world do we deal with this?

Hillary Clinton's black supporters -- especially the most prominent ones -- hadn't expected their candidate to be in a dogfight right now. They thought Barack Obama was an election cycle or two away from being serious presidential timber. They thought Bill Clinton's presidency and the close relationships the Clintons had forged with African Americans would translate into goo-gobs of votes in '08. They were wrong.

Remember all the commentator chatter last summer: Is Barack Obama black enough?

Well, he's black enough now.

Obama has swamped Clinton among black voters in each of the 20 contests that had exit polls and large enough samples of African Americans to be meaningful. Just to put that kind of shutout in perspective, black voters represent the only demographic group that the New York senator has not carried at least once during the Democratic primary campaign. Obama now has such a lock on the loyalties of African Americans -- 84 percent of the black vote in Alabama, 87 percent in Georgia, 84 percent in Maryland, and on and on -- that the black vote is no longer contestable.

Which brings us back to the dilemma facing some of Clinton's high-profile black supporters -- those with titles and constituencies of their own. They are feeling some kind of crazy pressure. Last Friday, about 25 of them held an hour-long conference call to discuss what one described as an effort to "pester, intimidate, question our blackness" for not supporting Obama.

The catalyst for the call was a report in the New York Times that Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) was wavering in his support of Clinton. Lewis would not comment, but according to the Times, the congressman had indicated he was prepared to fully flip and back Obama and thus be more in step with his congressional district, which voted 3-to-1 for Obama on Super Tuesday. This bit of news was extremely significant, for Lewis is one of the coveted "superdelegates," those 796 elected officials and party insiders who are not bound by anything that has or will happen at the polls. They are free to choose the candidate of their liking, as unpledged delegates to the national convention. And with the nomination fight so razor-close, they are being wooed -- some say harassed -- like never before.

Lewis's office tried to put the brakes on the notion that a switch of allegiance to Obama was imminent. But too late. Some of Clinton's other black supporters decided to rally and try to blunt the fallout. Among those on the conference call were Trenton Mayor Doug Palmer, former Denver mayor Wellington Webb, and congresswomen Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas and Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio.

Palmer was among the more forceful voices, urging others on the call, as he put it yesterday, "to stand up and say why you're for Hillary Clinton in the face of adversity. We can't afford to be wishy-washy . . . Stand up. Fight. Advocate for your candidate. Don't capitulate. . . . Don't let nobody intimidate or threaten you. Just hold on."

In an interview Palmer still sounded riled about a few things he had heard about. One of them, reported by the Associated Press, was a private conversation between Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), a Clinton supporter, and Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.), one of Obama's national campaign co-chairmen. Both lawmakers are superdelegates. Jackson had asked Cleaver if he wanted to go down in history as someone who prevented an African American from occupying the White House for the first time. Separately, Jackson told the AP that supporting Clinton in districts where Obama won overwhelmingly might place those politicians at risk of a primary challenge.

It just so happens that Palmer, the first black mayor of Trenton and an 18-year incumbent, presides over a city that voted overwhelmingly for Obama. Not that he is worried, mind you. Just bothered.

"To intimate that you may face a challenge for what you believe in, I just think that's over the top," said Palmer, who was first elected in 1990 by a 300-vote margin and has been reelected fairly easily ever since. "I think my citizens pretty much understand that I am a person who stands up for what I believe in. I'm not saying that if I run again somebody won't hold that against me. That's politics."

See These YouTube Videos on Supporting Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kica8hmSdAM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2zO5d-XZWA


Check out these two videos and LISTEN to this young brother (late 20s?) BLOW...Something very important is going on here...and it's all connected to the POWER of knowledge as informed by activism and intelligently LINKED to citizenship...Stay Tuned...

Kofi

Monday, February 18, 2008

Amiri Baraka on Obama's Legislative Record

THIS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING OBAMA'S ACTUAL LEGISLATIVE RECORD IN THE SENATE. BTW: Obama is ALSO characterized in the Senate's official annual evaluation of its members as "the U.S. Senator with the most liberal voting record." This letter sent to me today by writer and activist Amiri Baraka further explains in detail precisely HOW AND WHY that is the case. By stark constrast Hillary's senatorial record PALES IN COMPARISON. Read the REAL FACTS below...

Kofi

Sent: 2/18/2008 1:42:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Subj: Governmental Experience

Let's take a closer look at who's really qualified and or who's really working for the good of all of us in the Senate. Obama or Clinton.

Records of these two candidates should be scrutinized in order to make an informed decision.

Senator Clinton, who has served only one full term - 6yrs. - and another year campaigning, has managed to author and pass into law - 20 - twenty pieces of legislation in her first six years.

These bills can be found on the website of the Library of Congress www.thomas.loc.gov, but to save you trouble, I'll post them here for you.

1. Establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site.
2. Support the goals and ideals of Better Hearing and Speech Month.
3. Recognize the Ellis Island Medal of Honor.
4. Name courthouse after Thurgood Marshall.
5. Name courthouse after James L. Watson.
6. Name post office after Jonn A. O'Shea.
7. Designate Aug. 7, 2003, as National Purple Heart Recognition Day.
8. Support the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition
Day.
9. Honor the life and legacy of Alexander Hamilton on the bicentennial
of his death.
10. Congratulate the Syracuse Univ. Orange Men's Lacrosse Team on winning the championship.
11. Congratulate the Le Moyne College Dolphins Men's Lacrosse Team on
winning the championship.
12. Establish the 225th Anniversary of the American Revolution
Commemorative Program.
13. Name post office after Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda.
14. Honor Shirley Chisholm for her service to the nation and express
condolences on her death.
15. Honor John J. Downing, Brian Fahey, and Harry Ford, firefighters who lost their lives on duty. Only five of Clinton 's bills are, more
substantive. 16. Extend period of unemployment assistance to victims of
9/11.
17. Pay for city projects in response to 9/11 18. Assist landmine
victims in other countries.
19. Assist family caregivers in accessing affordable respite care.
20. Designate part of the National Forest System in Puerto Rico as
protected in the wilderness preservation system.

There you have it, the fact's straight from the Senate Record.


Now, I would post those of Obama's, but the list is too long and substantive, so I'll mainly categorize.


During the first - 8 - eight years of his elected service he sponsored over 820 bills. He introduced:

233 regarding healthcare reform,
125 on poverty and public assistance,
112 crime fighting bills,
97 economic bills,
60 human rights and anti-discrimination bills,
21 ethics reform bills,
15 gun control,
6 veterans affairs and many others.

His first year in the U.S. Senate, he authored 152 bills and
co-sponsored another 427. These inculded **the Coburn-Obama Government
Transparency Act of 2006 - became law, **The Lugar-Obama Nuclear
Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act, -
became law, **The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, passed the
Senate, **The 2007 Government Ethics Bill, - became law, **The
Protection Against Excessive Executive Compensation Bill, In committee,
and many more.

In all, since entering the U.S. Senate, Senator Obama has written 890 bills and co-sponsored another 1096.
An impressive record, for someone who supposedly has no record
according to some who would prefer that this comparison not be made
public.

He's not just a talker.

He's a doer.

Records of these two candidates should be scrutinized in order to make
an informed decision.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

L.A. Times on Latinos and Obama

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-obama17feb17,0,3776094.story

Please juxtapose this article in today's L.A. Times to others I've sent today. Very interesting indeed...

Kofi


Hola, Obama

Latinos may have had their doubts about his candidacy. But he deserves a second look.
February 17, 2008

'Yes, we can."

The chant made famous by Sen. Barack Obama's presidential bid captures the senator's infectious optimism and movement candidacy. It also neatly translates into Spanish as "Si, se puede." That slogan, as any politically conscious Angeleno realizes, is the rallying call of this region's labor movement and its largely Latino leadership. And yet, despite Obama's surging national popularity and rhetorical identification with Latino political strength, many Latinos continue to harbor doubts about his candidacy. As this race enters its final stretch, Latinos owe Obama a second look.

Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton differ on few issues and generally agree on the matters of principal concern to Latinos. Both support comprehensive immigration reform; indeed, Obama promises to press that cause even more aggressively than Clinton. Both support significant revamping of the nation's healthcare system. Both favor economic, tax and job programs that would help poorer Americans, many of Latin American descent.

One of their relatively few policy differences places Obama in allegiance with many Latino leaders -- and Clinton on the other side. She opposes the issuance of driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, while Obama favors licensing those drivers. In part, his reasons are practical -- unlicensed drivers are more likely to flee the scene of an accident -- but the result puts him closer to what might be described as a predominantly "Latino" position on this issue than Clinton.

Nevertheless, Latino voters have given Clinton overwhelming support in some contests, notably California, where they favored her over Obama by roughly 30%, contributing significantly to her victory here. Partly, this may be because Latino voting power in this country owes much to Bill Clinton, who as president tapped several prominent Latinos -- Bill Richardson, Federico Pena, Henry Cisneros -- for positions of influence. Also, Latino voters traditionally have valued experience over soaring rhetoric. And some Latinos -- like some Anglos -- sadly have shown distaste for African American candidates, a reserve exacerbated by tensions between blacks and Latinos in many American cities. That last factor -- prejudice -- is rarely addressed directly, but it stalks this campaign.

The combination of history, loyalty and bigotry has hurt Obama, but there are signs that it may be ebbing. La Opinion endorsed Obama and specifically praised his "inclusive message of hope." The Service Employees International Union, with its huge Latino membership, on Friday backed his candidacy, and a number of prominent Latino officials have joined his campaign in recent months. Those endorsements have been trickling in and appear to be registering with voters. Obama lost California and other heavily Latino states on Super Tuesday. But he held his own among Latinos in Virginia, and his support is unmistakably broadening.

We in Los Angeles occupy the glorious center of Mexican American life. Our polyglot culture -- its language and institutions, politics, parades and street life -- is being shaped daily by the rub of black and white, Asian and Latino. Our mayor was elected by an inspiring cross-cultural coalition. It is, as we well know, a uniquely American joy to be immersed in the fast currents of cultural change.

Now the nation has the chance to experience a bit of the excitement that we enjoy in Los Angeles. It can set aside its prejudices and predispositions and join in support of a new kind of candidate. Texas, with its large Latino population, goes to the polls on March 4. Latino voters there and across the country should give Obama a chance. His victory could be theirs as well.

Si, se puede.

The Moving Train: Black Superdelegates

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/black_superdelegates_rethinkin.html

Yep, as usual "chickens are coming home to roost" alright...Let's hope enough of these mercenary black politicians in the Clinton machine's hip pocket come to their senses soon enough to find out "what time it is." Many of them are currently stuck in some ideological No Mans Land where they childishly indulge themselves and actually pretend to be NEUTRAL. Ha & Double Ha! THAT'S A LAUGH! How politically delusional can one be? Ain't no "NEUTRAL" in this fight folks...As the radical historian and activist Howard Zinn always says: "You can't be neutral on a moving train..." AND THESE JOKERS ARE GETTING READY TO FIND OUT THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH OF THOSE WORDS VERY SOON...Much sooner than they think in fact...

Meanwhile: THE TRAIN IS MOVING AT SUPERSONIC SPEED...

Kofi

Black superdelegates: Rethinking Obama, Clinton

by Mike Dorning

The outpouring of support for Barack Obama's presidential candidacy in African-American communities is shifting the political calculus for superdelegates with large black constituencies and causing some of them to reconsider promises of support for Hillary Clinton.

Rep. David Scott (D-Ga.), who represents a predominantly black suburban Atlanta constituency, announced late in the week that he was shifting his support from Clinton to Obama, citing an overwhelming vote for Obama in his congressional district. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), who also endorsed Clinton, was quoted Friday in The New York Times saying he would vote for Obama at the nominating convention, though neither Lewis nor his spokeswoman responded to inquiries about his comments and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution quoted an aide describing the report as "inaccurate."

They and many other black elected officials are experiencing firsthand a powerful movement toward Obama, reflected not only in lopsided votes for him but also a surge in African-American turnout.

In South Carolina, Georgia and Virginia, Obama attracted more than 80 percent of the African-American vote, exit polls showed. Turnout among black voters was up 89 percent in Georgia and more than doubled in South Carolina and Virginia.

Confronted with that political reality at the same moment that Obama has seized the momentum in the campaign for the nomination, more black members of Congress are having second thoughts about endorsements of Clinton, said Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.), an African-American who is lobbying fellow House members on behalf of the Illinois senator.

See the rest of the report in today's Tribune

(And see what Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) had to say about this matter on National Public Radio:

"You know, a lot of things can change after the primary. I don’t know why people keep dealing with that. Next week, something might jump out that’s serious and even that will cause some of the people to rethink how they cast their votes on February the 5th. We already have people who are superdelegates who are now rethinking their commitments that they made two and three months ago because the circumstances have changed.'')

See more here in the Swamp:

More from today's Tribune:

"I do know several who are struggling with the issue and are re-evaluating the landscape, re-evaluating the circumstances under which they were supporting Sen. Clinton," said Butterfield, who switched his support from home-state candidate John Edwards to Obama in early January, well before Edwards quit the race.

So far, the movement among black party and elected officials has been small. In addition to Scott and Lewis, Christine Samuels, an African-American politician from New Jersey, also announced Thursday that she would switch her support from Clinton to Obama.

But it is a visible fracture of support for Clinton among a segment of superdelegates that is especially sensitive to arguments from the Obama campaign that party officials should follow the will of their constituents when they cast their votes as superdelegates.

Despite the huge margins of support that Obama has consistently won among African-American voters, black party and elected officials have been much more divided on the presidential nomination. On the eve of the Iowa caucuses, the 43-member Congressional Black Caucus was about evenly divided among those who made public endorsements between Obama and Clinton, and even now 15 African-American members of Congress are announced as Clinton supporters.

Politicians are traditionally reluctant to reverse public endorsements; it devalues their word in future dealings. But a break with a politician's base also can be perilous, and allies of Obama are reminding colleagues of that.

Clinton spokesman Mo Elleithee argued that such tactics amounted to a political threat.

"We believe that superdelegates ought to vote for the person they think would make the best president. It's disappointing that the Obama campaign would engage in threats and tactics like these. It doesn't sound very much like the politics of hope," Elleithee said.

Tribune reporters John McCormick and Rick Pearson contributed to this report.

What follows is a transcript from NPR's News and Notes, courtesy of NPR:

FARAI CHIDEYA: From NPR News, this is News and Notes. I’m Farai Chideya. Many political pundits thought that the presidential primaries would be over effectively by this point, that the rush by many states to hold their contests early would decide the nominees quickly. That hasn’t turned out to be the case.

In fact, for the Democratic Party, there’s been the exact opposite effect: The race has tightened over time and the people who may have the most influence are the late-voting states and the superdelegates. Hundreds of Democratic elected officials and party leaders hold superdelegate status, among them, the members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina is the majority whip in the U.S. House of Representatives. He hasn’t stated a preference for either candidate. He joins us now. Representative Clyburn, welcome.

REPRESENTATIVE JAMES CLYBURN (D-SC): Thank you so much for having me.

MS. CHIDEYA: So your state, South Carolina, was pivotal in the race, and it’s Democratic primary was called informally by some folks the black primary because black voters made up more than 40 percent of the Democratic electorate. So this was a moment also when comments by former President Bill Clinton helped to activate the issue of race directly in the campaign. And Barack Obama won your state. You have remained studiously neutral. Where are you today?

REP. CLYBURN: I still remain studiously neutral. I think that the historical significance of so-called superdelegates, these are unpledged delegates – is very, very important for us to maintain. We are in place in order to either extend the wishes of the voters or to try to make corrections if they need to be made.

MS. CHIDEYA: Contributor Donna Brazile who is also a long-time Democratic party insider ran the presidential campaign of former Vice President Al Gore has said she will just up and leave the Democratic Party if the superdelegates are used to broker a convention and that it’s not the committed delegates who have come as a part of the voting process who get to make the decision. How do you react to that – someone who is so passionate about the Democratic Party but is absolutely against the superdelegates deciding?

REP. CLYBURN: She’s in a big club, a club that I think would be overflowing at the meetings if that were to happen. I don’t think anything like that will come close to happening. Here is the deal: we all know, the Democrats, we have what we call proportional voting. So if we have votes in these primaries that are proportional and then you get to the end of the process and you’re still not at the magic number of 2025, which would be 50 percent plus one, what do you do? Well, that’s when the superdelegates step in. They step in to extend the voter’s will, not to reverse it.

MS. CHIDEYA: But even if someone has that magic number, the superdelegates could throw it the other way.

REP. CLYBURN: No, that’s not what I said. I said, they will not reverse it. I’m saying the superdelegates will step in to extend the will of the people. But you cannot –

MS. CHIDEYA: But it could happen mathematically but you’re saying you don’t think it will happen?

REP. CLYBURN: No, that’s not what we are. We are here to do for the Democratic Party what United States congresspeople ought to do.

MS. CHIDEYA: Congressman, let me ask you just on a personal level, former President Bill Clinton is calling people, Senator Clinton is calling people, Senator Obama is calling people. Have any of those individuals called you recently and asked for your support as a superdelegate?

REP. CLYBURN: I don’t think I’ve talked to President Clinton – yes, we did talk a week after the South Carolina primary. I have not talked to him since then. I have not talked to Senator Clinton since the primary. I’m trying to think – I may have talked to Obama. I’ve talked to all of their people, but I’ve not talked with them personally.

MS. CHIDEYA: Give me an example of something that one of the candidates has said – and you don’t have to say which one – one of the candidates’ proxies or supporters has said to try to swing you one way or the other?

REP. CLYBURN: Oh, they remind me of what the voters did in my congressional district and wanting to know whether or not I’m ready to reflect the will of my congressional district to further Obama’s interests, and there’s some people who want to know that to see whether or not I’ve got enough guts to vote the other way. And I can tell you, I do have enough guts to vote the other way if I thought that was in the necessary – that was in the interest of nationalizing our party. And I think that’s what my voters would want me to do.

You know, a lot of things can change after the primary. I don’t know why people keep dealing with that. Next week, something might jump out that’s serious and even that will cause some of the people to rethink how they cast their votes on February the 5th. We already have people who are superdelegates who are now rethinking their commitments that they made two and three months ago because the circumstances have changed.

MS. CHIDEYA: Speaking of which, Representative John Lewis of Georgia endorsed Senator Clinton. And recently, the New York Times said he had moved his support to Senator Obama. He is saying that that is not what he said. But they quoted him saying something is happening in America. And people are prepared and ready to make that great leap. He’s again saying he is not casting his superdelegate vote for Senator Obama, but he is reassessing the situation. Does that show the huge amount of pressure that’s particularly on members of the Congressional Black Caucus who have been split in their endorsements?

REP. CLYBURN: Well, yes, that’s true. Congressman David Scott who represents the congressional district adjacent to John’s has flat-out switched. He’s made it very clear: He is switching to reflect the will of his voters. I think Obama got 80 percent in his district. I read that two other superdelegates have said they’re moving to the uncommitted column who had previously committed to Senator Clinton, and another one has since switched. Remember, a lot of these people made their commitments 10 months ago, even a year ago when everybody was getting ready for a coronation. They now see that there’s not going to be a coronation. So everybody are adjusting in order to reflect what their current emotions are.

MS. CHIDEYA: Do you think this whole issue of who gets to decide could tear the party apart as opposed to uniting it?

REP. CLYBURN: It could just as soon unite it too; yes, it could. This is a very, very unusual election year. And nobody could have anticipated any of what has happened.

MS. CHIDEYA: Well, Congressman, we thank you so much for your time.

REP. CLYBURN: Well, thank you so much for having me.


Posted by Mark Silva on February 16, 2008 2:05 PM

SF Chronicle on the Latino Vote

Click here for a very interesting and informative article in today's SF Chronicle

BTW: The middle of the article not only talks openly about the Latino vote in this election and its actual relationship to the African American voting bloc in the U.S. but also makes the open admission that I've been making since Day One in these daily missives that it was the heavy national Latino vote of 43% for the Bushwhacker in 2004 that constituted the REAL margin of victory for the Republican's presidential victory (and NOT--as have been relentlessly and ERRONEOUSLY asserted by far too many people who you would think know better --the fault of Ralph Nader)...

As far as I recall this is the FIRST TIME EVER that a major American newspaper has ADMITTED the fact that the Latino vote (and the 45% endorsement of the Bushwhacker by Asian American voters in 2004) is what actually led to Kerry and the Democrats being defeated in the last election. I also hope that this article's analysis of the Texas primary is on the mark and that the black voting bloc and (possibly) YOUNGER LATINO VOTERS can make the difference there for Obama (having said that however I gotta admit that I'm not yet personally fully convinced that Obama will triumph in Texas by pulling off a much larger percentage of the Latino vote there than he has anywhere else--California and New York alone gave Clinton 75% of their votes.

If there was ever a classic example of that deadly flaw in American politics of a voting bloc that CONSISTENTLY votes AGAINST its own self interest in presidential elections it's the Latinos--very sad to say. Let's truly hope THEY WAKE UP IN TIME to realize that NEITHER Obama NOR the national black community is their political enemy--unlike the majority of Republican white voters AND many white Democrats as well (as quiet as it's kept). As the beautiful (and politically savvy) Mexican American actress Eva Longoria said in an interview in 2005 "My people have to realize who our REAL FRIENDS AND ENEMIES ARE in politics and stop voting for people who mean us nothing but harm." AMEN Eva!


Speaking of Eva who's widely considered by many to be one of the most beautiful women in the world check this out (from Wikipedia): Eva Longoria Parker was born Eva Jacqueline Longoria in Corpus Christi, Texas, the daughter of Mexican-American Catholic parents, Enrique Longoria, Jr. (born in Rachal, Brooks County, Texas) and Ella Eva Mireles (married in Falfurrias, Brooks County, Texas). Her ancestry traces to Southern Mexican immigrants who immigrated to the United States. She has three older sisters: Elizabeth Judina, Emily Jeannette, and Esmeralda Josephina. The family lived and worked on farmland that had been handed down to them from past generations, but they often had very little money; Enrique and Ella struggled for many years to give their children a decent upbringing.

Eva showed viewers an introspect into the hardship she faced in her formative years growing up poor on The Oprah Winfrey Show in 2006; she took cameras on location to the family farm, and showed how spartan they were still living. Longoria admitted that things looked slightly better for them financially, only when she made it in show business. In an interview with Dateline's Stone Phillips, Longoria also revealed the snubbing she received from her siblings. She said "I grew up as the ugly duckling. They used to call me 'la prieta fea,' which means 'the ugly dark one.'"
That's right folks: RACISM NEVER SLEEPS... NOTE: Ironically In 2007 Ms. Longoria married her boyfriend Tony Parker--a black man born and raised in Paris, France who is a famous guard on the world champion NBA basketball team San Antonio Spurs...

Saturday, February 16, 2008

SEIU Endorses Obama

Click here for a Mother Jones Article on the SEIU endorsement.

This is a VERY important Union endorsement of Obama by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), one of the most progressive and politically active unions in this country. Spread the word...