http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/18/opinion/18dowd.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
All,
Dowd hits the nail squarely on its head with this editorial. Not only is everything she says here 100% accurate but she properly calls out our increasingly gutless wunderkind of a President in doing so. I've never seen any so-called "liberal reform" politician who was more afraid of simply standing on principle or upholding a firm independent political and/or moral position while facing even a modicum of ideological opposition or public pressure than Obama. It's as if ANY time rightwing demagogues choose to openly mock, attack, and dismiss this President's avowed or assumed position on ANYTHING (which of course takes place ALL THE TIME) Obama immediately blinks, waffles, backs down, equivocates, or surrenders without even the HINT of a fight. Which is precisely why the right continues to openly bully him. I'm sorry to have to say this but it's very clear to me at this point that what Barack absolutely lacks in large measure is courage, conviction, and independence. He seems motivated primarily by an adolescent ego and a desperate yearning for the rank "approval" or "bipartisan cooperation" of people who actually couldn't care less if he lived or died. If the President can't or won't honorably defend in openly aggressive, upfront, and decisive terms the human and constitutional rights of citizens to practice either religious or personal/sexual freedom in this country what good is it for him to assert that he "believes in" constitutional law and civil rights? The protection of people's human and civil rights is not an ACADEMIC EXERCISE OR ABSTRACT THEORY Mr. President. What's wrong with you brother?
What's making the present overall political and economic reality far worse is the equally stark and ugly fact that we of the American Left and progressives generally have done an absolutely abysmal and pathetic job of holding this President and his administration fully accountable for its ineptitude, irresponsibility, denial, and cluelessness when it comes to almost every single major issue facing this country. Even more importantly we have collectively failed in a major way to organize, educate, and MOBILIZE American citizens to openly demand and fight for clear cut political, economic, cultural, and ideological ALTERNATIVES to the pervasive madness, corruption and infantilism that characterizes U.S. politics today. If we were doing a much better and far more mature job ourselves then it's clear that even this President and his opportunist administration could be held to a far higher standard and actually begin to fight for genuine reform and real substantive change in this society. Until such time as these facts become an integral and dynamic part of our politics in both practical and theoretical terms the clinically psychotic far righwing led by the Republicans and the Tea Party will continue to dominate both public discourse and grassroots political movement in this country...Stay tuned...
Kofi
Our Mosque Madness
By MAUREEN DOWD
August 17, 2010
New York Times
WASHINGTON
Maybe, for Barack Obama, it depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.
When the president skittered back from his grandiose declaration at an iftar celebration at the White House Friday that Muslims enjoy freedom of religion in America and have the right to build a mosque and community center in Lower Manhattan, he offered a Clintonesque parsing.
“I was not commenting, and I will not comment, on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there,” he said the morning after he commented on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there. “I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding. That’s what our country is about.”
Let me be perfectly clear, Mr. Perfectly Unclear President: You cannot take such a stand on a matter of first principle and then take it back the next morning when, lo and behold, Harry Reid goes craven and the Republicans attack. What is so frightening about Fox News?
Some critics have said the ultimate victory for Osama and the 9/11 hijackers would be to allow a mosque to be built near ground zero.
Actually, the ultimate victory for Osama and the 9/11 hijackers is the moral timidity that would ban a mosque from that neighborhood.
Our enemies struck at our heart, but did they also warp our identity?
The war against the terrorists is not a war against Islam. In fact, you can’t have an effective war against the terrorists if it is a war on Islam.
George W. Bush understood this. And it is odd to see Barack Obama less clear about this matter than his predecessor. It’s time for W. to weigh in.
This — along with immigration reform and AIDS in Africa — was one of his points of light. As the man who twice went to war in the Muslim world, he has something of an obligation to add his anti-Islamophobia to this mosque madness. W. needs to get his bullhorn back out.
Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are both hyper-articulate former law professors. But Clinton never presented himself as a moral guide to the country. So when he weaseled around, or triangulated on some issues, it was part of his ultra-fallible persona — and consistent with his identity as a New Democrat looking for a Third Way.
But Obama presents himself as a paragon of high principle. So when he flops around on things like “don’t ask, don’t tell” or shrinks back from one of his deepest beliefs about the freedom of religion anywhere and everywhere in America, it’s not pretty. Even worse, this is the man who staked his historical reputation on a new and friendlier engagement with the Muslim world. The man who extended his hand to Tehran has withdrawn his hand from Park Place.
Paranoid about looking weak, Obama allowed himself to be weakened by perfectly predictable Republican hysteria. Which brings us to Newt Gingrich.
Gingrich fancies himself an intellectual, a historian, a deep thinker — the opposite number, you might say, of Sarah Palin.
Yet here is Gingrich attempting to out-Palin Palin on Fox News: “Nazis don’t have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust Museum in Washington.” There is no more demagogic analogy than that.
Have any of the screaming critics noticed that there already are two mosques in the same neighborhood — one four blocks away and one 12 blocks away.
Should they be dismantled? And what about the louche liquor stores and strip clubs in the periphery of the sacred ground?
By now you have to be willfully blind not to know that the imam in charge of the project, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is the moderate Muslim we have allegedly been yearning for.
So look where we are. The progressive Democrat in the White House, the first president of the United States with Muslim roots, has been morally trumped by Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, two moderate Republicans who have spoken bravely and lucidly about not demonizing and defaming an entire religion in the name of fighting its radicals.
Criticizing his fellow Republicans, Governor Christie said that while he understood the pain and sorrow of family members who lost loved ones on 9/11, “we cannot paint all of Islam with that brush.”
He charged the president with trying to turn the issue into a political football. But that is not quite right. It already was a political football and the president fumbled it.
All,
Dowd hits the nail squarely on its head with this editorial. Not only is everything she says here 100% accurate but she properly calls out our increasingly gutless wunderkind of a President in doing so. I've never seen any so-called "liberal reform" politician who was more afraid of simply standing on principle or upholding a firm independent political and/or moral position while facing even a modicum of ideological opposition or public pressure than Obama. It's as if ANY time rightwing demagogues choose to openly mock, attack, and dismiss this President's avowed or assumed position on ANYTHING (which of course takes place ALL THE TIME) Obama immediately blinks, waffles, backs down, equivocates, or surrenders without even the HINT of a fight. Which is precisely why the right continues to openly bully him. I'm sorry to have to say this but it's very clear to me at this point that what Barack absolutely lacks in large measure is courage, conviction, and independence. He seems motivated primarily by an adolescent ego and a desperate yearning for the rank "approval" or "bipartisan cooperation" of people who actually couldn't care less if he lived or died. If the President can't or won't honorably defend in openly aggressive, upfront, and decisive terms the human and constitutional rights of citizens to practice either religious or personal/sexual freedom in this country what good is it for him to assert that he "believes in" constitutional law and civil rights? The protection of people's human and civil rights is not an ACADEMIC EXERCISE OR ABSTRACT THEORY Mr. President. What's wrong with you brother?
What's making the present overall political and economic reality far worse is the equally stark and ugly fact that we of the American Left and progressives generally have done an absolutely abysmal and pathetic job of holding this President and his administration fully accountable for its ineptitude, irresponsibility, denial, and cluelessness when it comes to almost every single major issue facing this country. Even more importantly we have collectively failed in a major way to organize, educate, and MOBILIZE American citizens to openly demand and fight for clear cut political, economic, cultural, and ideological ALTERNATIVES to the pervasive madness, corruption and infantilism that characterizes U.S. politics today. If we were doing a much better and far more mature job ourselves then it's clear that even this President and his opportunist administration could be held to a far higher standard and actually begin to fight for genuine reform and real substantive change in this society. Until such time as these facts become an integral and dynamic part of our politics in both practical and theoretical terms the clinically psychotic far righwing led by the Republicans and the Tea Party will continue to dominate both public discourse and grassroots political movement in this country...Stay tuned...
Kofi
Our Mosque Madness
By MAUREEN DOWD
August 17, 2010
New York Times
WASHINGTON
Maybe, for Barack Obama, it depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.
When the president skittered back from his grandiose declaration at an iftar celebration at the White House Friday that Muslims enjoy freedom of religion in America and have the right to build a mosque and community center in Lower Manhattan, he offered a Clintonesque parsing.
“I was not commenting, and I will not comment, on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there,” he said the morning after he commented on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there. “I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding. That’s what our country is about.”
Let me be perfectly clear, Mr. Perfectly Unclear President: You cannot take such a stand on a matter of first principle and then take it back the next morning when, lo and behold, Harry Reid goes craven and the Republicans attack. What is so frightening about Fox News?
Some critics have said the ultimate victory for Osama and the 9/11 hijackers would be to allow a mosque to be built near ground zero.
Actually, the ultimate victory for Osama and the 9/11 hijackers is the moral timidity that would ban a mosque from that neighborhood.
Our enemies struck at our heart, but did they also warp our identity?
The war against the terrorists is not a war against Islam. In fact, you can’t have an effective war against the terrorists if it is a war on Islam.
George W. Bush understood this. And it is odd to see Barack Obama less clear about this matter than his predecessor. It’s time for W. to weigh in.
This — along with immigration reform and AIDS in Africa — was one of his points of light. As the man who twice went to war in the Muslim world, he has something of an obligation to add his anti-Islamophobia to this mosque madness. W. needs to get his bullhorn back out.
Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are both hyper-articulate former law professors. But Clinton never presented himself as a moral guide to the country. So when he weaseled around, or triangulated on some issues, it was part of his ultra-fallible persona — and consistent with his identity as a New Democrat looking for a Third Way.
But Obama presents himself as a paragon of high principle. So when he flops around on things like “don’t ask, don’t tell” or shrinks back from one of his deepest beliefs about the freedom of religion anywhere and everywhere in America, it’s not pretty. Even worse, this is the man who staked his historical reputation on a new and friendlier engagement with the Muslim world. The man who extended his hand to Tehran has withdrawn his hand from Park Place.
Paranoid about looking weak, Obama allowed himself to be weakened by perfectly predictable Republican hysteria. Which brings us to Newt Gingrich.
Gingrich fancies himself an intellectual, a historian, a deep thinker — the opposite number, you might say, of Sarah Palin.
Yet here is Gingrich attempting to out-Palin Palin on Fox News: “Nazis don’t have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust Museum in Washington.” There is no more demagogic analogy than that.
Have any of the screaming critics noticed that there already are two mosques in the same neighborhood — one four blocks away and one 12 blocks away.
Should they be dismantled? And what about the louche liquor stores and strip clubs in the periphery of the sacred ground?
By now you have to be willfully blind not to know that the imam in charge of the project, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is the moderate Muslim we have allegedly been yearning for.
So look where we are. The progressive Democrat in the White House, the first president of the United States with Muslim roots, has been morally trumped by Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, two moderate Republicans who have spoken bravely and lucidly about not demonizing and defaming an entire religion in the name of fighting its radicals.
Criticizing his fellow Republicans, Governor Christie said that while he understood the pain and sorrow of family members who lost loved ones on 9/11, “we cannot paint all of Islam with that brush.”
He charged the president with trying to turn the issue into a political football. But that is not quite right. It already was a political football and the president fumbled it.
